09/14/1953 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~74', e REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS j I 9 A THE BOARD OF ApPEALS - RE: REQUEST OF ROBERT R. FERENS WAS RE PORT OF SUBMI TTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: I I "THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD A MEETING SEPTEMBER 6, 1953 AT THE CITY HALL TO I CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING REQUEST YOR SETBACK: VARI A.NCE. I MR.' ROBERT' R. FER'ENS OWNS PRO'PERTY 'ON WOODLAND AVE NUE BETWEEN SPRING DRIVE AND V ANN E 'S S S T R'EE T.'... TH'I S 'PROPERTY I S 'ON THE NORTH. SLOPE AND HAS A STEEP SLOPE FROM FRONT I TO REAR OF Lor' WHICH WOULD CAUSE MR. FERENS SOME HARDSHIP TO CONSTRUCT HIS CARPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT OF 20-FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. THEREFORE, I HE' HA,S REQUESTED A WAI VER OF 10 FOOT OF SA,I D SETBACK REQUIREMENT. THE BOARD IN DISCUSSING THIS REQUEST, AGREED THAT IT WOULD BE D 1 F.F I C U L T TO MOVE THE CARPORT ANOTHER TE N FELT NORTH AND CAUSE CONS I DE R'ABL.E EXPENSE IN ADDITIONAL RETAIN- I I NG WALLS. I THE BOARD . Ii e THEREFORE GRANTED T H I'S ,R E QUE S T SUB J E C T TO LE,TTERS OF APPROVAL FROM THE TWO ADJOINING ~ROPERTY OWNERS. II THERE BEING NO ~URTHER BUSI NESS, MEETING WAS ADJOUR'NED. " Ii IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS BE I ADOPTED. MOT I O'N CARR I ED. I , .. II I 10 A REPORT OF THE RLANNING COMMISSIDN ~ RE: RECOMMENDATION OF CITY COUNCIL; REQUEST FOR VARIANCE AT 20TH' 'AND WI LLAMETTE WAS SUBMI TTED ,AND READ AS FOLLOWS: II '~A$ A PERMANENT REPORT, PURSUANT TO THE RESOLUTION OF THE:' COMMON COUNC I L OF THE II CITY OF EUGENE, DIRECTING THE CI TY PLANNING COMMISSION TO PREPARE A REPORT UPON CERTAIN II REQUEST'S 'FOR RECLASSIFICATION O~ ZONING WITHIN THE CITY, THE CITY PLANNING CO~MISSION HEREBY ;ADOPTS AS ITS PERMANENT REPORT, THE FOLLOWING: I THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION I I OF ZONI NG OF PROPERTY '1 N THE CITY BE DENIED: i II 1 RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL I i LOTS 3, 4, :5, BLOCK 8 ELLSWORTH I'ST ADDI TI ON II ..' II BLOCK 7,' ELLSWORTH 1ST ADDI:TION ,I BLOCKS ,2 AND 3 ELLSWORTH'2ND ADDITiON I BLOCK 2 PE'ARL ADD I T ION I EAST 1/2 BLOCK 5 PEARL -ADD I TI ON 1 LOTS I THRU 5 BLOCK 2 TESHNER'S ADDITION I BEING THE WEST SIDE OF HIGH STREET FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SECOND LOT SOUTH OF 13TH 1 1 I' AVENUE .TO MIDWAY BETWEEN 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES. II I; I REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO CR-COMMERCIAL II RESIDENTIAL : AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDEDlffiHAT A CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE 1/2 BLOCK Ii WIDE BE CREATED:AND ESTABLISHED AROUND THE AREA THAT,THE PLANNING COMMISSION PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED TO BE ZONED C-3P, WHICH AREA IS DESCRIBED AS: THE AREA BOUNDED ON THE NORTH I BY THE PRESENT C-3 ZONE (SOUTH OF 13TH AVE) ON THE SOUTH BY 15TH AVE; ON THE EAST BY A I LINE MIDWAY BETWEEN PEARL AND HIGH STREETS, AS FOLLOWS:- I I' e BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST'CORNER OF' LOT 3 BLOCK 8 ELLSWORTH 1ST ADDITION (TH~ Ii II NORTH LINE OF THIRD LOT SOUTH OF 13TH AVE ON WEST SIDE OF HIGH STREET); RUNNING II THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF HIGH STREET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT /i 2 BLOCK 2 ELLSWORTH'S 2ND ADDITION; THENCE WEST ALONG LOT LINES AS PLATTED TO Ii THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9 BLOCK I SNODGRASS ADDITION; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE '1 I' .1 EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY TO THE SOUTH Ll NE OF 15TH AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE II SOUTH LINE OF 15TH AVENUE TO THE ~AST LINE OF THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY BETWEEN PE A R L II AND HIGH STREETS; TH E NC E NORTI:i' ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEY TO THE NORTHWEST I "CORNER OF LOT 3 BLOCK 8 ELLSWORTH 1ST ADDITION; THENCE EAST TO PLACE OF BEGINNING I I EXCEPT FOR ALLEYS AND STREETS INCLUDED IN SAID DESCRIPTION; II BEING FROM THE NORTH LINE OF THE THIRD LOT SOUTH OF 13TH AVENUE TO 15TH AVENUE ON ii THE WEST SIDE OF HIGH STREET AND THE FIRST TWO LOTS SOUTH OF 15TH AVENUE FROM HIGH II STREET TO ALLEY MIDWAY BETWEEN OAK AND WILLAMETTE STREETS. 1 II AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE ,I I PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A DENTAL CLINIC BE DENIED:- I ~ I II i .1 :1 e :( I 'I I ~' I II j