Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 49'-Q~ <br /> _.Ll <br /> e <br /> I, <br /> I' <br /> I <br /> I II AFTER FULL DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS, IT W"S THE CONSENSUS OF OPINION <br /> ,I <br /> I rH"T SOME TYPE OF OVERHE"D STRUCTURE TO TAKE THE RIVER ROAD TR"FFIC OVER THE RAILROAD <br /> I: <br /> " AT W"SHINGTON AND JEFFERSON STREETS WOULD BE <br /> 'I THE SOLUTION. <br /> , I <br /> " <br /> " IT IS THEREFORE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE THAT THE CITY REQUEST THE <br /> 'I <br /> ST" TE HIGHWAY COMMISSION TO TAKE OVER 1ST AVENUE FROM RAILRO"D BOULEV"RD TO WASHINGTON <br /> ~ il STREET AND WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON STREETS TO 7TH AVENUE"S " SECONDARY HIGHW"Y AND <br /> 11"\ 'I THAT THE CITY REQUEST THE ST"TE HIGHW"Y COMMISSION TO UNDERT"KE DET"ILED STUDIES OF <br /> '''''-' (E"SIBILITY "NO COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING O~ERHf"D CROSSING STRUCTURES ON W"SHINGTON "NO <br /> 00 <br /> <r: JEFFERSON STREETS FOR TWO L"NES OF TRAFFIC WITH TR"FFIC IN ONE DIRECTION "NO ON TWO <br /> "- AL TERN"TE PROPOSALS "S FOLLOWS: <br /> c:t II <br /> I: I . A FOUR LANE STRUCTURE I N THE CENTER OF' THE BLOCK BETWEEN W"SHINGTON <br /> i "NO JEFFERSON STREETS FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC. <br /> ! , I <br /> !' , 2. A TWO LANE ON EITHER WASHINGTON OR JEFFERSON STREET FOR <br /> STRUCTURE TWO <br /> I <br /> WIlY TR"FFIC WITH ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF', WAY ON THE "LTERNATE S TR E E T <br /> e 'I FOR CONSTRUCTION OF " FUTURE OVERHE"D 'I F NEEDED. <br /> "NO TH"T THE CITY AGREE TO SHARE TH~ COSTS OF SUCH SURVEY WITH THE SUTE HIGHW"Y <br /> COMMISSION ON "N EQUAL B"SIS. " <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMB"KER, SECONDED BY GODLOVE TH"T THE REPORT OF THE COMMI TTEE BE <br /> ADOPTED. <br /> I IT W"S MOVED BY SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY CONE THAT THE MOTION TO ADOPT THE REPORT BE <br /> "MENDED TO ADOPT THE REPORT WITH THE INCLUSION OF A RECOMMENDATION TH"T THE STATE HIGHWAY <br /> 'I COMMI,SSION ALSO TAKE OVER 1ST AVENUE FROM WASHINGTON STREET E"ST AND SOUTH OF SKINNER'S <br /> , BUTTE AND ON TO 4TH AVENUE WHERE IT CONNECTS WITH THE FERRY STREET OVERP"SS APPRO"CH("S " <br /> SECOND"RY HIGHWAY. MOTION C"RRIED. <br /> I J I <br /> I THE ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED WAS THEN VOTED'UPON AND APPROV"L W"S GIVEN UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> ! <br /> 7 A REPORT OF THE PUBLIC S"FETY COMMITTEE - RE: ApPLICATION OF SANIT"RY ENGINEERS FOR <br /> ,: INCREASE IN G"RBAGE RATES; ORDINANCE REGULATING HEIGHT OF SMOKE STAC'KS AND CHIMNEYS WAS I <br /> I SUBMITTED "NO READ "S fOLLOWS: I <br /> I <br /> "PRESENT: M"YOR JOHNSON; COUNCILMEN CRUMBAKER, KOPPE, SIEGENTHALER, WATSON; CI TV ! <br /> ;.. MANAGER; CITY ENGINEER "NO CITY RECORDER. <br /> i <br /> 'i I. ApPLIC"TION OF S"NITARY ENGINEERS FOR INCRE"SE IN G"RB"GE RATES. !THIS REQUEST <br /> WAS AGAIN CONSIDERED "ND THE WHOLE OPERATION OF THE GARBAGE HAULERS WAS REVIEWED IN <br /> THE LIGHT OF THE NUMBER OF COMPANIES OPERATING, THE NUMBER OF TRUCKS AND THE GENERAL <br /> EFFICIENCY OF THE OPERATION. IN THE DISCUSSION, IT WAS FELT TH"T THE COMMI THE NEEDS <br /> MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION FROM THE COMPANIES NOW LICENSED 'SUCH AS A CURRENT STATEMENT <br /> OF PROFIT AND LOSS, STATEMENT OF NUMBER OF DAYS AND HOURS WORKED EACH WEEK, E TC. IN <br /> OROER ,TO GIVE INTELLIGENT CONSIDERATION TO THE REQUEST. <br /> I C I TV BE <br /> I IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMM I TTEE THAT THE FURNISHED WITH SUCH <br /> 1 IT COMMI TTEE <br /> " ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS FOR FURTHER STUDY. IS ALSO A RECOMMENDATION OF THE <br /> THAT THE COUNCIL UNDERTAKE A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE FEASIBILITY OF THE CI TV TAKING <br /> OVER THE G"RBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL BUSINESS WITHIN THE CITY. <br /> i 2. ORDINANCE REGULATING HEIG~T fF SMOKE STACKS AND CHIMNEYS. THE COMMI TTEE STUDIED <br /> 'I <br /> A PROPOSED ORDINANCE "MENDING THE ORDINANCE #1589 WHI CH REGULATES THE HEIGHT OF SMOKE <br /> STACKS AND CHIMNEYS wlmHIN THE CITY. THE EARLY ORDINANCE PROVIDED THAT SMOKE STACKS OR <br /> CHIMNEYS MUST BE AT LEAST 15 FEET ABOVE THE TpP ROINT OF ANY AND EVERY BUILDING WITHIN <br /> e A RADIUS OF 50 FEET. THIS HAS BEEN INTERPRETED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO APPLY <br /> :i ONLY TO BUSINESSES AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND APARTMENT HOUSES BUT AS STATED I N THE <br /> ! ORDINANCE IT WOULD TECHNICALLY APPLY TO RESIDENCES. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD <br /> LIMIT SUCH REGULATIONS TO BUSINESS ANO COMMERCI"L BUILDINGS ANO "PARTMENT HOUSES. <br /> IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE T HiA T r H E PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE <br /> :1 #1589 BE APPROVED. <br /> " I COMMI TTEE <br /> 3. STUDY OF" LICENSE F"EE SCHEDULE. IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE THAT THE <br /> STUDY OF THIS MATTER BE DEFERRED TO A FUTURE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE. " <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY CO~E THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC SAn TV <br /> COMMI TTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> :i <br /> 8 A REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE - RE: KINNEH-ADAMS DEED; LEONARD-YATES SEWER <br /> I PETI,TION; V,. C. CHASE REQUEST; VACATION OF 18TH AVENUE WEST; PROPOSAL TO PURCHASE 6TH AND <br /> , I <br /> POCK; SEWER' ON AGATE STREET, FROM'26TH TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS; LAUREL HILL DRIVE ANNEXATI ON; <br /> 'I POLK STREET BETWEEN 6TH AVENUE I AND 7TH AVENUE <br /> I SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF" TO ALLEY BETWEEN 6TH <br /> I <br /> I. WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS F"OLLOWS: <br /> 'e <br /> ~ <br /> --- ~ <br />