|
<br />rs36
<br /> e'
<br /> .
<br /> I
<br /> THE COMMITTEE WAS INFORMED BY THE CITY MANAGER THAT HE HAD CONTACTED MR. AND MRS. I
<br /> SO LB ERG, THE OWNERS OF THE LOT NORTH OF 18TH, AND THEY DECLINED TO GIVE UP THE THREE
<br /> FEET IN QUESTION BUT WOULD IF NECESSARY GIVE THIS THREE FOOT STRIP WITH PAYMENT OF I
<br /> $500 DAMAGES. THEY WOULD ALSO BE WILLING TO SELL THEIR LOT TO THE CITY FOR $3,500. I
<br /> THE MATTER WAS DISCUSSED AND IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE THAT MR. I
<br /> I
<br /> CARROLL AND MR. DAHL BE APPROACHED WITH THE PROPOSAL THAT THE PARKING STRIP ADJACENT I
<br /> 18TH AVENUE CITY I'
<br /> TO THEIR PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BE CUT BACK THREE FEET AND THE II
<br /> INSTALL, AT CITY.EXPENSE, A CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY. II
<br /> IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THA.T IF THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTABLE TO MR. CARROLL AND MR. II
<br /> DAHL THAT THE CITY PROCEED WITH THE VACATION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF 18TH AVENUE WEST.
<br /> I
<br /> 5. PETITION OF JOHN W. ROBERTS, AND A. A. WILLIS, FOR A VARIANCE AT 1222 WEST 7TH
<br /> AVENUE - THE PROPERTY AT 1222 WEST 7TH. AVENUE WAS INSPECTED BY THE COMMI TTEE. THE I,
<br /> REQUEST I S FOR A VARIANCE OF THIS PROPERTY FROM THE PRESENT CLASSIFICATION OF C-I TO II
<br /> C-3, CENTRAL BUSINESS. 'I
<br /> ,
<br />I IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CbMMI THE THAT THIS REQUEST FOR f.>. VARI ANCE BE I e
<br /> I
<br /> DENIED. THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS A.N I NSI DE LOT IMPROVED BY A RESIDENCE BUILDING Ii
<br /> AND SURROUNDED BY OTHER RESIDENTIAL BUI LDINGS OF GOOD QUALITY.
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> 6. REZONING OF LOT 6, BLOCK 2, CAMPBELL'S FIRST ADDITION TO EUGENE, SOUTHEAST CORNER 'I
<br />I OF 6TH AVENUE WEST AND POLK STREET - THIS LOT AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY WAS VIEWED BY
<br /> THE COMMI TTEE AND THE PRESENT ZONING OF THESE PROPERTIES WAS CONSIDERED. I,
<br /> "
<br /> THE REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY, A CITY OWNED LOT, FROM C-I, LIMITED COMMERCIAL TO !I I
<br /> II
<br /> C-3, CENTRAL BUSINESS, WAS INITIATED BY. THE CITY COUNCIL AND TRANSMI TTED TO THE PLANNING I,
<br /> COMMISSION BY A RESOLUTION ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1953. THE REQUEST WAS CONSIDERED I
<br /> BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS OCTOBER 6TH MEETING AND A PERMANENT REPORT WAS SUB-
<br /> MITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT ITS OCTOBER 12TH MEETING APPROVING THE CHANGE FROM C-I, II
<br /> LIMITED COMMERCIAL TO C-3P, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, IN LI EU OF C-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
<br /> COUNCIL BILL 1627 EFFECTING THE REZONING FROM C-I TO C-3fP' WAS GIVEN FIRST READING ON :1
<br /> OCTOBER 12TH AND THE HEARING WAS CONTINUED. THE BILL WAS GIVEN SECOND READING ON I:
<br /> Ii
<br /> NOVEMBER 9TH I[
<br /> AND THE HEARING WAS FURTHER CONTINUED. Ii
<br /> I
<br /> IT COMMI TTEE THAT LOT 6, BLOCK CAMPBELL'S FIRST I
<br /> IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE 2, Ii
<br /> ADDI TION, BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH AVENUE WEST AND POLK, AND LOT I , BLOCK 5, I'
<br /> I'
<br /> OF THE SAME ADDITION BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH AVENUE AND POLK, BOTH BE ZONED "
<br /> il
<br /> FROM C-I, LIMITED COMMERCIAL TO C-3P, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. II ..
<br /> [I
<br /> 7. REQUEST OF IRAC. HART AND ELVIS NIPPER, 752-760 JEFFERSON STREET FOR REZONING I'
<br /> 'I
<br /> FROM R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO C-R, COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL - THE' CHANGE OF II
<br /> ZONING WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS NOVEMBER THIRD MEETING AND A [I
<br /> HEARING WAS HELD BY THE COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 9TH. THE MATTER WAS REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC
<br /> WORKS COMMI TTEE OF THE COUNCIL AT THE NOVEMBER 9TH MEETING. I:
<br /> d
<br /> THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THESE TWO PROPERTIES AT 752 AND 760 JEFFERSO~ STREET AND II
<br /> ...,
<br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THE PETI,TIONERS BE INFORMED THAT THE COUNCIL DOES NOT fAVOR THE RE- II
<br /> ZONING OF THESE PROPERTIES BUT WOULD CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR A SPECIFIC Ii I
<br /> . 'I
<br /> USE. IT ALSO RECOMMENDS THA T THE' HEARING ON THIS REQUEST BE CONTINUED.
<br /> I,
<br /> REQUEST BON MARCHE STORE - THE COMMI TTEE WAS I'
<br /> B. OF THE FOR AN EASEMENT PROVIDED WITH II
<br /> DETAILS OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ENGINEER AND GAVE IT CONSIDERA- .,
<br /> IT I'
<br /> TION. IS THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE REQUEST BE APPROVED AND THAT A FORMAL EASEMENT Ii
<br /> BE PREPARED TO CONTAIN A CLAUSE TO HOLD THE Cl TY HARMLESS fROM ANYTHING WHICH MIGHT I:
<br /> RESULT FROM THE USE OF THE LA.ND SO GRANTED. "
<br /> II
<br /> IT IS RECOMMENDED ALSO THAT THIS DOCUMENT INCLUDE A PROVISION FOR ACCEPTANCE BY il e
<br /> THE PETITIONER AND ALSO A PROVISION THA.T THE PETITIONER RESTORE THE ALLEY SURFACING 'I
<br /> AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS MAINTENANCE UNTIL THE FILL HAS COMPLETELY SETTLED. :1
<br /> i:
<br /> ,:
<br /> 9. CONSENT TO ANNEXATION FILED BY ALVIN D. A.ND HELMI CHARLES, 2356 FLORAL HILL DRIVE - Ii
<br /> THE RESOLUTION SETTING A HEARING F-OR THIS ANNEXATION WAS REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS Ii
<br /> COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 9TH MEETING OF THE COUNCIL. I.
<br /> AT THE I'
<br /> ,I
<br /> "
<br /> .,
<br /> THE COMMI TTEE VIEWED THIS PROPERTY AND NOTED ITS LOCATION WiTH RESPECT TO THE "
<br /> 'I
<br /> PRESENT CITY LIMITS. THIS LOT EXTENDS OUT FROM THE CITY LIMITS TO FLORAL HILL DRIVE I.
<br /> I:
<br /> AND IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY ONLY ON THE WEST END OF THE LOT. I,
<br /> ,.
<br /> Ii
<br /> IT \ 5 THE R~COMMENDATION OF THE COMMI TTEE THAT THIS REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION BE I
<br /> "
<br /> CHARLES COUNCIL WOULD CONSIDER I,
<br /> DENI ED, BUT THAT MR. BE NOTIFI ED THAT THE A. REQUEST "
<br /> FOR ANNEXATION IF IT WOULD INCLUDE ALSO THE AREA TO THE NORTH OF MR. CHARLES' LOT TO Ii
<br /> "
<br /> THE CITY LIMITS. " II
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, Ii
<br /> SECONDED BY SIEGENTHALER THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS ,.
<br /> COMMITTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> I
<br /> ,!
<br /> II
<br /> I,
<br /> ,;
<br /> I'
<br /> ,I
<br /> Ii e
<br /> :!
<br /> ii
<br />~ I'
<br /> I:
<br />
|