Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />'Ii <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />IT WAS ANNOUNCED BY MAYOR JOHNSON THAT HE HAD INVITED THE MEMBERS Of THE EUGENE POLICE <br />DEPARTMENT PISTOL TEAM TO PRESENT THEMSELVES AND THEIR TROPHIES WON IN'A RECENT STATE-WIDE <br />COMPETITION AT THE MEETING. THE fiVE. MEMBERS: LT. DONALD CLARK; DETECTIVE EDWARD ,BUNCH; <br />DETECTI VE RI CHARD NELSON; DETECTI VE RAYMOND JOHNSON A,ND PATROLMAN WAYNE WOOD CAME fORWARD <br />AND WERE INTRODUCED AND CONGRATULATED BY THE MAYOR. ~HE MAYOR COMMENDED THEM ON THEIR <br />ACHIEVEMENT AS INDIVIDUALS AND AS A TEM FOR THEIR PROFICIENCY IN MARKSMANSHIP AND FOR <br />THE.! R ESPR I T DE CORPS. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBA~ER, SECONDED BY SIEGENTHALER THAT ALL HEARINGS SET FOR THE <br />MEETING BE CONTINUED UNTIL APRIL 26TH AT 7:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />AT THIS POINT OF THE MEETING, COUNCILMAN CRUMBAKER, PRESIDENT GF THE COUNCIL, REQUESTED <br />THE FLOOR'TO MAKE A STATEMENT IN BEHALF OF THE COUNCIL. HIS STATEMENT WAS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"I RISE 'TO A QUESTION OF PRIVILEGE AfFECTING THIS COUNCIL AS A WHOLE. I REFER <br />TO THE CAMPAIGN Of FALSEHOOD AND MIS-STATEMENT CARRIED GN IN THE EDITORIAL COLUMNS <br />OF THE EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD. SEVERAL MONTHS AGO MR. TUGMAN MADE A HEATED STATEMENT <br />TO THE COUNCIL OVER ZONING' BEING CONSIDERED FOR THE SOUTH WILLAMETTE AREA, AND END- <br />ING WITH WHAT APPEARED TO BE AN ULTIMATUM OR THREAT. MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL INTER- <br />PRETED HIS ATTITUDE TO BE 'PASS THE ORDINANCES AS I DEMAND, OR ELSE.' THE CHARACTER <br />OF THE CAMPAIGN CARRIED OUT TO DATE IN THE EDITORIAL COLUMNS Of THE GUARD fiTS INTO <br />THIS PICTURE. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />No ONE CAN CHALLENGE THE RIGHT Of MR. TUGMAN TO CRITICIZE THE COUNCIL AS SHARPLY <br />AS HE LIKES, IF HE WILL STICK TO THE TRUTH, SO THAT THE ISSUE CAN BE BETWEEN HIS JUDG- <br />MENT AND THAT OF THE COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL ADMIRES THE fREE HAND ALLOWED TO THE EDITOR <br />IN WRITING (DITORIALS. THE USE Of EDITORIAL COLUMNS fOR PERSONAL VENDETTA IS AN ABUSE <br />Of THE FREE PRESS, AND A BETRAYAL Of READERS WHO HAVE A RIGHT TO BELIEVE THAT EDITORIALS <br />ARE BASED ON HONEST CONVICTION AND NOT ON PERSONAL GRUDGES, OR PERSONAL ANIMOSITY. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT APPEARS THAT THE fOLLOWING FALSEHOODS OR HALF-TRUTHS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO <br />DISCREDIT THE COUNCIL AND DESTROY PUBLIC CONfiDENCE IN THE COUNCIL'S ACTS. <br /> <br />I. HE- HAS CHARGED THE COUNCIL WITH CONDUCTING SECRET COUNCIL MEETINGS, <br />IMPLYING THAT CROOKED DECISIONS ARE MADE AGAINST THE PUBLIC. HE KNOWS THIS TO BE <br />FALSE IN TOTO. <br /> <br />~.' <br /> <br />2. HE CHARGES THAT THE COUNCIL BETRAYS PUBLIC CONFIDENCE BY NOT RUBBER STAMPING <br />ALL RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISS~ON. HIS PURPOSE IS TO PIT THE PLANNING <br />COMMISSION AGAINST THE COUNCIL. THE REAL CONFLICT IS BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND MR. <br />TUGMAN OVER WHOSE CONSCIENCE SHALL GOVERN COUNCIL ACTION. <br /> <br />3.' HE, DELIBERATELY SPREAD FALSEHOODS OVER THE CHARACTER Of ZONING PROVIDED FOR <br />THE SO-CALLED MILL RACE AREA. THE GREAT OUTCRY WAS THE PRODUCT OF THESE FALSE STATE- <br />MENTS. <br /> <br />4. HE DRAGGED THE RESTORATION OF THE MILL RACE INTO THE MESS, IN ORDER TO <br />AROUSE THE D,ISTRUST Of THOSE INTERESTED IN THAT DEVELOPMENT. HE KNEW THE EXTENT <br />OF THE UNTRUTHS INVOLVED IN HIS STATEMENT. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />CASUAL INQUiRY TO DATE INDICATES THAT THE SIGNATURES Of MANY PERKSONS ON THE <br />REFERENDUM PETITIONS INDICATE BELIEF THAT THE TUGMAN FALSIFICATIONS AND MIS-STATEMENTS <br />ARE IN FACT TRUE, AND THAT REFERENDUM POWERS WERE NECESSARY TO REBUKE THE COUNCIL AND <br />STRIKE DOWN WRONGfUL ACTS. <br /> <br />UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES IT APPEARS THAT THE COUNCIL SHOULD NOT FURTHER CONDUCT <br />THE CITY'S BUSINESS UNTIL IT SHALL HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO MAKE A COMPLETE STATEMENT Of <br />fACTS, EXPOSING THE HOAX PERPETRATED BY THE EDITORIAL ATTACK. IT IS HOPED THAT A <br />GROUP Of DISINTERESTED CITIZENS MAY BE PERSUADED TO MAKE AN EXAMINATION AND OffER <br />THEIR JUDGMENT ON THE MERI~S Of THE CONTROVERSY~ <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />I MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL ADJOURN UNTIL APRIL 26TH, AND THAT A COMMITTEE OF THE <br />COUNCIL BE APPOINTED TO FORMULATE A STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE COUNCIL." <br /> <br />THE MOTION TO ADJOURN WAS SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN OWEN. <br /> <br />THIS ACTION WAS FOLLOWED BY STATEMENTS fROM INDIDUAL COUNCILMEN SUPPORTING THE <br />STATEMENT MADE BY DR. CRUMBAKER fOR THE COUNCIL. COUNCILMAN OWEN SPOKE FIRST, FOLLOWED <br />BY SIEGENTHALER AND KOPPE. MAYOR JOHNSON THEN SPOKE BRIEFLY IN ANSWER TO THE CHARGE ON <br />SECRET COUNCIL MEETINGS.' HE STATED THAT DURING THE NINE YEARS HE HAS BEEN'ASSOCIATED <br />WITH EITHER COUNCIL WORK OR AS MAYOR THERE HAS NEVER, TO HIS KNOWLEDGE, BEEN A SECRET <br />COUNCIL MEETING. HE STATED FURTHER THAT ALL COUNCIL MEETINGS AND COUNCIL COMMITTEE <br />MEETINGS WERE OPEN AT ALL TIMES IF PERSONS DESIRED TO ATTEND THEM. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />COUNCI LMAN BOOTH THEN SPOKE SUPPORTI NG THE STATEMENT FOLLOWED BY GODLOVE, CONE AND <br />WATSON. COUNCILMAN WATSON COMMENTED THAT THE COUNCIL SHOULD GUARD AGAINST'BEC~MING TOO <br />EMOTIONAL ON THE SUBJECT BUT AGREED THAT THERE WAS A BASIS FOR THE OBJECTION AS STATED. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~ <br />