Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 115~ <br /> e <br /> - - .- -------- - - - - ------ -- - - - ~--- <br /> --._-- - ------- ~ ~, ----- - -- ----- --~- - -- - --._------ - <br /> I: -------..--- ----- <br /> 11 <br /> :, <br /> I " <br /> IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION or THE COMMITTEE THAT THE JOB or PAVING THE ALLEY <br /> BETWEEN PEARL STREET AND HIGH STREET rROM 6TH AVENUE TO THE ALLEY BETWEEN 6TH AND <br /> 7TH AVENUE BE AWARDED TO THE LOW BIDDER, FRED STUBBERT AT $1,133.04 rOR A COST or <br /> I, $3.70 PER rRONT rOOT. <br /> I <br /> , <br /> I: IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION or THE COMMITTEE <br /> THAT THE BIDS ON THE ALLEY BETWEEN <br /> 22ND AND 23RD rROM ALDER TO KINCAID STREET AND THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE or . <br /> 23RD AVENUE BE REJECTED NOT rOR THE REASON THAT THE BIDS ARE UNSATlsrACTORY, BUT <br /> BECAUSE THE SITUATION HAS CHANGED. <br /> I' <br /> II FURTHER RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG EAST 23RD AVENUE BE <br /> :' I <br /> NOTlrlED THAT THE SIDEWALK PROJECT WILL BE DErERRED UNTIL 1955, BUT AT THAT TIME , <br /> I <br /> IT WILL BE INSTALLED TO THE PROPER GRADE, AND NOT TO THE EXISTING GRADE. i <br /> ! <br /> 2. C.B. 1715 - REZONING BOTH SIDES or 6TH AND 7TH AVENUE BETWEEN TYLER & TAYLOR ! <br /> STREET ~ THE SUBJECT or THIS REZONING WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE MEMBERS or THE PLANNING I <br /> e COMMISSION IN DETAIL. As A RESULT or THE DISCUSSION IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION or THE I <br /> COMMITTEE THAT COUNCIL BILL 1715 BE GIVEN 2ND READING AND THAT A HEARING BE ADVERTISED I <br /> !I rOR JUNE 28TH AT WHICH TIME THE COUNCIL BILL BE CONSIDERED rOR rlNAL PASSAGE. tt <br /> i <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY KOPPE, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE REPORT or THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE <br /> BE ADOPTED. .MOTION CARRI ED. <br /> , <br /> , <br /> I 15 A REPORT Of THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE HELD ON JUNE 14TH - RE: BETHEL WAS SUBMITTED <br /> AND READ AS fOLLOWS: <br /> ': <br /> " <br /> , "PRESENT: ACTING MAYOR CRUMBAKER; COUNCILMEN BOOTH, GODLOVE, KOPPE, SIEGENTHALER, <br /> " <br /> !: WATSON, CONE AND OWEN; CITY MANAGER; CITY ENGINEER; CITY RECORDER; MR. ELDON JOHNSON, <br /> 'I <br /> PRESIDENT Of THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, AND MEMBERS FOSTER, BURRIS, HAMLIN AND <br /> HOWARD BUfORD. MR. JAQUES or THE REGISTER-GUARD ALSO ATTENDED THE MEETING; AND RAY <br /> BOALS AND NORMAN JOHNSON Of THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD. , <br /> I <br /> , I <br /> " <br /> IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROPOSAL AT ITS MEETING ON JUNE 9TH, THE PUBLIC WORKS , <br /> COMMITTEE MET ON JUNE 14TH fOR THE PURPOSE Of CONSIDERING A REQUEST BEING PREPARED I <br /> fOR ANNEXATION or AN AREA OUT WEST 11TH AVENUE AND TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ACTION <br /> . Of BETHEL RESIDENTS TO rORM A SEPARATE INCORPORATED CITY. THE COMMI TlEE, OTHER <br /> . <br /> MEMBERS or THE COUNCIL AND fOUR MEMBERS Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MR. BUfORD, <br /> AND MR. BOALS AND NORMAN JOHNSON or THE EUGENE WATER BOARD MADE A fAMILIARIZATION <br /> ': TOUR Of THE AREAS IN QUESTION AND ASSEMBLED AT A NOON LUNCHEON TO DISCUSS THE SUBJECT <br /> :, <br /> IN MOR~ DETAIL AND IN THE LIGHT or OTHER INfORMATION THE COMMITTEE HAD IN ITS <br /> 'I POSSESSION. <br /> THE COMMITTEE REVIEWED ITS fiELD TRIP INrORMALLY AT THE LUNCHEON AND ALSO CON- <br /> SIDERED INfORMATION fURNISHED BY THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ENGINEER WITH RESPECT i <br /> I <br /> TO THE TWO AREAS. THE MEETI'NG WAS THEN ADJOURNED TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT THE CITY <br /> HALL. THE SAME PERSONS WERE IN ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING WITH ~HE EXCEPTION Of MRS. <br /> BURRIS AND MEMBERS or THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD. MR. BUEHLER, ONE Of THE <br /> I RESIDENTS Of THE BETHEL AREA ATTENDED A PART or THIS MEETING. <br /> AfTER A RE-STATEMENT Of THE PROBLEM BY ACTING MAYOR CRUMBAKER, INDIVIDUAL <br /> I, REACTIONS WERE HEARD fROM MEMBERS Of THE COMMI!TEE, OTHER COUNCILMEN PRESENT AND <br /> " MEMBERS or THE PLANNING COMMISSION. <br /> II <br /> " I <br /> . <br /> THE GROUP WAS IN AGREEMENT WITH ~ S~ATEMENT THAT IT WOULD NOT BE fOR ~H~ BEST i <br /> 1 INTERESTS Of THE CITY, THE BETHEL AREA AND THE REST or THE METROPOLITAN AREA fOR' I <br /> j: <br /> I, BETHEL RESIDENTS TO INCORPORATE AS A SEPARATE CITY AND ALTHOUGH IT POSES SOME SERIOUS <br /> e I, <br /> PROBLEMS TO EUGENE THAT THE SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEMS, IMMEDIATE AND LONG RANGE, Of <br /> WEST 11TH AREA AND THE BETHEL AREAS WOULD BEST BE rOUND IN EffECTING AN ANNEXATION <br /> TO THE CITY Of EUGENE. SOME or THE MAIN ARGUMENTS fAVORING THE STATEMENT WERE: <br /> A. A SINGLE GOVERNMENT fOR THE PHYSICAL COMMUNITY WOULD BE MORE ErrlCIENT AND <br /> ECONOMICAL. i <br /> I <br /> B. THE DRAINAGE PATTERN Of THE WHOLE AREA AND ITS fRINGES DICTATES THE NECESSITY I <br /> THAT THE AREA BE SERVED BY ONE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT. <br /> FINANCING Of PUBLIC WORKS rOR ~RE AREA WOULD BE LESS DlfrlCULT AND LESS COSTLY. 1 <br /> C. I <br /> I <br /> D. .THE CURRENT INVESTMENTS Of THE CITY Of EUGENE IN ITS SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, i <br /> I <br /> THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD IN ITS rACILITIES AND THE fUTURE PLANS Of I <br /> BOTH CONTEMPLATE SERVICE TO THE BETHEL AREA AND OTHER AREAS THROUGH THE BETHEL ! <br /> i <br /> AREA. I <br /> I ! <br /> 1 <br /> " <br /> e Ii <br /> I' <br /> ~ <br />