06/14/1954 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

111 ""'IIIl e - -- --- -- -- - ~ -- ---- -~------ -----,- ~--_. ----- --~ -- --- ---- -. - ---- -. - - --- . ~ - ~ -. -. -. . - - --- ---- -_.-- -- __ - ____. _..c- 0__ _ _ _ .. _...__ __ ___ __. . _ _ - -- -- r- -,-,-- -- -~_. ----- - - - --------- . - ----------- - --- I 2. REQUEST or C. J. YOUNGQUIST, 1567 ORCHARD STREET rOR SUBDIVISION:or LOT'- THE I ! I COMMITTEE REVIEWED MR. YOUNGQUIST'S REQUEST AND INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AT 1567 ORCHARD STREET. IT IS THE rEELING or THE COMMITTEE THAT A 40 rOOT LOT IS NOT ADE~ QI:lATE rOR A CI TY BUI LDI NG LOT REGARDLE-SS OF' THE rACT THAT PRESENT USE COULD BE C0N- rAINED ON A 40 rOOT LOT. THE COMMITTEE BELIEVES THAT THE STAN6ARD CITY LOT SHOUL~' ~E I! 60 rEET I N WI DTH, AND BELIEVES THAT IT WOULD BE UNWISE TO CREATE A LOT or LESS THAN I' i' 50 rEET I N WI DTH. IT IS THERErORE THE RECOMMENDATION or THE COMMITTEE THAT THIS 100 rOOT LOT BE ~UBDIVIOED INTO TWO LOTS -- EACH WITH A rRONTAGE or 50 rEET. 3. REQUEST OF' THE BEST PIE COMPANY - RE: VARIANCE rOR LAND USE AT 16TH AND II CHARN~LTON STREET - THE REQUEST or THE BEST PIE COMPANY WAS CONSIDERED BY THE COMMITTEE , il ArTER INSPECTING THE SITE OF' THE BUILDING WHICH IS LOCATED I,N THE ALLEY BE~WEEN 16TH I: I AND 17TH AND BETWEEN CHARNELTON AND OLIVE STREETS. THE REQUEST IS rOR A VARIANCE TO I' USE THE BUILDING rORMERLY OCCUPIED BY THE EULANE BAKERY rOR USE AS A BAKERY SHOP rOR ! , " THE PURPOSE or BAKING PIES. , IT WAS NOTED BY THE COMMITTEE THAT T~IS AREA IS ZONED AS A SINGLE rAMILY AREA e AND THAT THE BUILDING WAS ~ORMERLY USED AS A BAKERY UNDER A NON-CONrORMING USE. FURTHER THAT THE BUILDING HAS NOT BEEN USED rOR A PERIOD or ONE YEAR OR MORE. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE CITY HAD RECEIVED SOME COMPLAINTS IN THE PAST UNDER THE OPERATION Ii BY THE ,EULANE BAKERY. THESE COMPLAINTS INVOLVED NOISE AND CONrUSION IN THE RESIDENTIAL " , DISTRICT CAUSED BY LOADING AND UNLOADING EITHER DURING LATE HOURS OR EARLY HOURS IN THE MORNING. IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION or THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE THAT THIS APPLICATION rOR I A ,VARIANCE BE DENIED. !: 4. ' TRUNK SEWER PROGRAM rOR THE YEAR 1954-55 - A 'pROPOSED TRUNK SEWER PROGRAM rOR THE " :i YEAR 1954-55 TO BE rlNANCED OUT or CITY rUNDS WAS OUTLINED BY THE CITY MANAGER AND'THE , i: CITY ENGINEER. THE PROJECTS PROPOSED TO BE UNDERTAKEN ARE ESTIMATED TO COST $255,635.00. I' " A DESCRIPTI9N or THESE PROJECTS PLUS THE ESTIMATED COST or EACH IS AS rOLLOWS: :' , A. SOUTH WILLAMETTE SYSTEM INCLUDING HILYARD STREET TRUNK FROM 32ND AVE. SOUTH $ 21,7Iq.OO B. SOUTH HILYARD STREET BETWEE~ WEST AMAZON DR. ., AND HILYARD ST. rROM 35TH AVE. TO DILLARD RD. 980.00 C. SOUTH HILYARD STREET EAST AMAZON DRIVE TO DILLARD - WESR AMAZON TO SPRAGUE 12,760.00 D. RIVERVIEW TRUNK SEWER W/PUMPING AT Moss STREET 20 I , 525.00 E. FIVE STORM SEWERS - ,( I )!3ETWEEN 32ND AND 35TH rROM AMAZON TO UNI VERSI TY 12,605..00 (2) BETWEEN LAWRENCE & WASHINGTON rROM AMAZON TO 16TH 2,675.00 (3) BETWEEN 25TH AND 26TH AVE. rROM ONYX TO EMERALD 700.00 (4) 23RD AVENYE BETWEEN CLEVELAND AND CITY ~IEW 680.00 I I I (5 ) 18TH rROM CHARNEL TON TO WASHINGTON 2,000.00 TOTAL $ 255,635.00 ArTER A COMPLETE DISCUSSION or THESE PRO~ECTS, AND A STUDY or THE MAPS, APPROVAL Of THE COMMITTEE WAS GIVEN TO THE PROGRAM. IT IS THERErORE THE RECOMMENDATION or THE COMMITTEE THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE TRUNK SEWER PROGRAM rOR THE CITY Of EUGENE rOR THE YEAR 1954-55." e .1 :1 IT WAS MOVED BY KOPPE, SECONDED BY OWEN THAT I TEMS No. I AND No. 2 BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. IT,WAS MOVED BY KOPPE, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT I TEM No. 3 BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. :1 IT WAS MOVED BY KOPPE, SECONDED BY SIEGENTHALER THAT ITEM No. 4 BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. 9 COUNCILMAN SIEGENTHALER RAISED THE ISSUE AGAIN CONCERNING THE REMOVAL or THE LIGHTS AT WASHINGTON PARK RECREATION AREA AND STATED THAT HE BELIEVED IT SHOULD BE DISCUSSED AGAIN BY 11 THE COMMITTEE. I: ;1 IT WAS MOVED BY SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE SUBJECT BE AGAIN RErERRED TO THE HEALTH AND RECREATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. i I 10 A REPORT or THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO RE-STUDY THE COUNCIL'S ASSESSMENT POLICY ON ARTERIAL STREETS, HELD ON JUNE 3RD WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS rOLLOWS: e ! , I I I , ~