|
<br />18.t..~
<br />,...~
<br />e
<br />
<br />- !: - '- ,- '.
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I !i
<br />, "WE SHOULD LIKE TO HAVE PERMISSION TO INSTALL.A RADIO TRANSMITTER F'OR OUij ROAD
<br />!: DEPARTMENT I N YOUR RADIO BUI LDI NG ON SKI NNER IS.BUTTE. WE WI LL NEED TO HAVE ACCESS
<br />" TO THIS EQUIPMENT TWENTy-rOUR HOURS A DAY WHEN NECESSARY.
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />IT IS HOPED THIS PERMISSION CAN BE,GRANTED, AND WE SHOULD APPRECIATE CONfiRMATION
<br />AS SOON AS CAN BE MADE."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY MR. OwEN THAT THE REQUEST BE APPROVED
<br />AND THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO WRITE A LETTER GRANTING SUCH PER~ISSION. MOTION
<br />CARRIED.
<br />" '. I
<br />22 COMMUNICATION F'ROM ACTING AIRPORT MANAGER - RE: MAHLON SWEET AIRPORT RESTAURANT BUILD-
<br />ING WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />I "I. MR. EASTON OF' THE STROUT REALTY COMPANY, 101 I WEST 6TH AVENUE, T~LEPHONE
<br />I, 5-0041-5, HAS ASKED ME TO DETERMI NE WHAT CHARGES THE CI TY WOULD MAKE TO RELEASE THE
<br />e RESTAURANT BUILDING AT MAHLON SWEET AIRPORT fROM OUR CONTROL SO THAT THE BUILDING
<br />COULD BE REMOVED F'ROM THE AIRPORT SITE.
<br />I'
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />
<br />:1 2. THE BUI LDI NG WAS BUI L T ON THE SI TE UNDER A 'LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CI TY Of
<br />:; EUGENE AND MR. K. J. MURRIE IN SEPTEMBER, 1947 AT WHICH TIME MR. MURRIE LEASED A
<br />100 X 100 F'OOT SECTION CONTAI~ING 10,000 SQUARE rEET AND IN ESSENCE AGREED TO THE
<br />F'OLLOWING: I
<br />
<br />I A. To PROV(DE A RESTAURANT BUI LDrNG. r
<br />B. To CONTINUOUSLY THEREAfTER CONDUCT AND OPERATE A REaTAURANT.
<br />c. To PAY TO THE CITY AS RENTAL rOR THE PREMISES 2~ PER SQUARE rOOT PER YEAR,
<br />. PAYABLE SEMI-ANNUALLY, ANQ
<br />i
<br />D. To PAY AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 5% or THE GROSS RECEIPTS OF' THE RESTAURANT AS
<br />: ADDITIONAL RENTAL.
<br />Ii
<br />;1 3. As NEAR AS I CAN DETERMINE, THERE HAVE BEEN NO PAYMENTS MADE ON THE TWO CENT PER
<br />SQUARE rOOT LAND AREA LEASE NOR ON THE 5% OCCUPATIONAL TAX SINCE APPROXIMATELY OCTOBER
<br />or 1949. IN ADDiTION, THE BUILDING HAS NOT BEEN USED SINCE OCTOBER 1949 EXCEPT fOR A
<br />.' PER 100 OF' ABOUT F'I VE MONTHS I N THE SUMMER or 1952 WHEN EARL SN,YDERHAD AN OPERATOR ON
<br />, THE SITE UNDER SOME AGREEMENT UNKNOWN TO ME. As A CONSEQUENCE, THE LAND USE RENTAL
<br />IS NOW AT A MINIMUM OF' F'OUR YEARS AND NIN~ MONTHS DELINQUENT.
<br />
<br />4. MR. EASTON Of THE STROUT REALTY COMPANY DESIRES TO SELL THIS BUILDING AND REMOVE
<br />" IT fROM THE SITE TO ANOTHER SITE, WHICH I UNDERSTAND WOULD ,BE AT ,APPROXIMATELY 6TH.
<br />' AND BLAIR IN THE CITY OF' EUGENE. HE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE F'INAL ARRANGEMENTS If SUCH
<br />ARRANGEM~NTS ARE POSSIBLE F'OR SUCH SALE BY APPROXIMATELY SEPTEMBER 1ST.
<br />
<br />5. IN MY BELIEF', THE CITY COULD REQUIRE THAT THE BUILDING BE LEfT ON THE PR~MISES
<br />AT THE AIRPORT F'OR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE BASIC'LEASE AGREEMENT OR THE SUPPLEMENTAL
<br />AGREEMENT, ESPECIALLY AS SET fORTH IN THE BASIC AGREEMENT ON PAGE fOUR. SPECIF'ICALLY,
<br />i,
<br />., THAT THEY HAVE NOT MAINTAINED A RESTAURANT, MADE THE LAND USE PAYMENTS SET F'ORTH IN
<br />I I, THE BASI C LEASE, NOR BY REASON THAT THE BUI LDI NGHAS NOT BEE,N OPEN, MADE ANY PAYMENTS
<br />I' ON THE 5% OCCUPATIONAL TAX. IT WOULO, HOWEVER, APPEAR, THAT THE CI TY MI GHT BE ABLE TO
<br />!: RECAPTURE SOME PORTION OF' THE RENTALS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ,PAl D. F'ROM THE PRESENT
<br />I OWNER Of THE BUILDING INASMUCH AS HE HAS A CONSIDERABLE EQUITY IN THE BUILDING AND
<br />i: DESIRES TO REALIZE SOME CASH fROM MIS INVESTED VALUE, 1T BEING MY UNDERSTANDING THAT
<br />! HE ACQUIR~D THE BUILDING BY REASON THAT HE WAS A CO-S1~NER ON A $4,000.00 NOTE WHICH
<br />': WAS EXECUTED BY HIM AND MR. MURRIE, AND WHICH MR. MURRIE DID NOT PAY, AN,D HE WAS RE-
<br />:: QUI REO TO PAY. COPI ES OF' THE BASI C AGREEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT ARE ATTACHED."
<br />e '
<br />i: IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY DR. CRUMBAKER THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE
<br />REF'ERRED TO THE AIRPORT COMMITTEE AND THE CITY ATTORNEY fOR RECOMMENDATI.ONS. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />23 COMMUNICATION ~RO~ THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF' ARCHITECTS, SOUTHWESTERN OREGON CHAPTER _
<br />RE: CIVIC PLANNING PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS F'OLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"DUE TO RAPID DEVELOPMENT Of THE CIVI~ PLANNING PROJEtT UND~RTAKEN BY A GROUP Of
<br />LANE COUNTY ARCHITECTS, IT SEEMS ,PROPER THAT A MORE CLOSELY INTEGRATED EF'fORT SHOULD BE
<br />ARRANGED BETWEEN CITY AND COUNTY AT THIS TIME.
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />i To F'ACILITAT'E MORE SPECIF'lC PLANNING WE WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND THAT A THREE MAN
<br />" COUNCIL COMMI TTEE'BEAPPOI NTED TO WORK WI TH THE LANE COUNTY COMMI SSI.ONERS AND THE
<br />ARCHITECTS.
<br />
<br />I SOME or THE PROBLEMS A.MT I C I PA TE 0 .AR E AS rOLL OWS :
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I ~
<br />
|