Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 181 """'IIIl <br /> e <br /> II i <br /> II I <br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY DR. CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC i <br /> WORKS COMMITTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED.' I <br /> . I <br /> . 'REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMI SSI ONS I <br /> I <br /> . , <br /> I <br /> 8 A REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS - RE: REQUESTS OF ST. MARY'S EPISCOPAL.CHURCH AND I <br /> , <br /> " MARTIN BROS. SIGN COMPANY FOR BON MARCHE WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: I <br /> I, I <br /> II <br /> " I <br /> l' , <br /> "THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD A REGULAR MEETING AT THE CITY HALL, AUGUST 6, 1954, I <br /> TO CONsfDER THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS FOR VARIANCE FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING i <br /> ORDINANCE.AND SIGN ORDINANCE. MEMBERS PRESENT WERE MR. LUVAAS, MR. BALZHISER, MR. I <br /> MORRIS, AND MR. GILLILAN. . , <br /> I . REQUEST OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE OF ST. MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH AT 13TH AND I <br /> PEARL STREETS FOR A WAIVER OF THE OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS I <br /> IN CONNECTION WITH <br /> I, <br /> " THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SUNDAY SCHOOL UNIT TO THE SOUTH OF THE EXISTING CHURCH. <br /> " <br /> e THE BOARD TOOK NO ACTION ON THIS MATTER ON THE PREMISE THE ORDINANCE DID NOT , <br /> I <br /> GIVE THEM JURISDICTION TO WAIVE SAID REQUIREMENTS. THIS PROPERTY IS I N THE C-3P i <br /> " ZONE. <br /> Ii : i <br /> I <br /> " MARTIN BROS. SIGN COMPANY REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE SIGN <br /> 2. I <br /> I <br /> CODE AS PERTAINS TO THE HEIGHT OF SIGN ABOVE SIDEWALK IN RELATION TO THE. SIZE OF , <br /> SI GN. . . . , I <br /> I <br /> I . <br /> THIS SIGN IS FOR THE BON MARCHE BUilDING AND Will BE HUNG ON THE BROADWAY FRONT , <br /> OF THE BUILDING. IT Will EXTEND FROM THE TOP OF A MARQUEE TO THE TOP OF THE BUILDING <br /> APPROXIMATELY 36 FEET. IT WILL BE NINE FEET WIDE EXTENDING FROM THE BUILDING FACE <br /> TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE MARQUEE. THE ORDINANCE WOULD REQUIRE A SIGN OF THIS SIZE <br /> TO BE AT LEAST 20 FEET ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. <br /> THE BOARD tOOK COGNIZANCE OF THE FACT THAT THE-MARQUEE HAS PROVIDED. SUFFICIENT <br /> CLEARANCE ABOVE THE WALK (NINE FEET) AND A SIGN ERECTED ABOVE 4T WOULD NOT BE A <br /> HINDRANCE TO ANY TRAFFIC AND FURTHER ~HE BUILDING OCCUPIES THE QUARTER BLOCK AND <br /> THE SIGN'WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH ANY OTHER SIGN. THEREFORE, REQUEST WAS GRANTED. <br /> I . <br /> r~ I THERE BE I NG NO FURTHER 'EiuSi NESS,MEETI NG WAS ADJOURNED." <br /> .' I. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY ~R. CRUMBAKER, SECONDED. BY MR.~BoOTH THAT THE: REPORT OF THE BOARD OF <br /> ApPEALS BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> 9 A REPORT FROM THE PLANNING' COMMISSION - RE: REZONING OF 18TH AND WILLAMETTE AND 18TH <br /> AND FRIENDLY, REFERRED to THEPLANNIN~ COMM1SSION ON JULY 26TH'WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS <br /> FOLLOWS: -.. <br /> "REZONING <br /> DR. C. W. DAVIS, ET AL - THE WEST SIDE OF WILLAMETTE STREET FROM ONE LOT NORTH <br /> I OF 18TH AVENUE SOUTH TO 19TH AVENUE. <br /> REQUESTED CHANGE FROM R-3 TO CR <br /> . <br /> , THI SMATTER, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 6, 1954 WAS REFERRED <br /> BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIO.N B'Y THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 26,.1954, WITH THE <br /> SUGGESTION THAT THE CHANGE OF ZONE BE CONSIDERED FOR E I TH.ER C-3 OR C-3P. THIS <br /> WAS IN RESPONSE TO THE ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY THE PETITIONERS WHEN THE COUNCIL <br /> . STAtED THAT WILLAMETTt F~OM 17TH TO 19TH WILL BE WIDENED IN 1955. <br /> e <br /> I: MRS. LEONARD E~PLAINED THAT SHE WAS OPPOSED TO' COMMERCIAL ZONING IN 1948 <br /> ,I <br /> II WHEN PROPERTY TO THE NO~TH OF HER WAS ZONED COMMERCIAL, BUT WITH THE INCREASE <br /> " <br /> IN TRAFFIC AN~ THE RESULTANT N01SE, ~HEY NOW WISH TODISPOS~ OF THE PROPE~TY. <br /> MR. DILLON ALSO SPOKE BRIEFLY ON ~HE ~UBJECT. . <br /> ALL P'RESENT AGREED TO ACC'EPT THE C-R ZONE CLASSIFICATION WITH THE UNDER- <br /> S~ANDING THAT IF THE USE DEMAND MAKES IT APPEAR THAT A C-3 CLASSIFICATION IS <br /> MORE DESIRABLE THEY MAY APPLY AT A FUTURE DATE FOR RECLASSIFICATION. <br /> " <br /> I' DR. DAVIS AROSE TO REQUEST THE PLANNING COMMISSIO~ ~O REPORT BACK TO THE <br /> I: CITY COUNCIL THAT A CR ZONE IS NOW DESIRABLE AND ACCEPTABLE. <br /> " <br /> I <br /> . . - <br /> THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO THE' COUNCIL THAT ~HE AREA BE ZONED <br /> CR BECAUSE:- . . <br /> I . <br /> . <br /> I' <br /> 'i . . <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <t.: . . <br /> . . . <br /> . . <br /> . . <br /> . ,- . <br /> e <br /> I' <br /> I <br /> I, ~ <br /> I' <br />