|
<br /> ~ ,..'\\~), I"'" ~
<br /> Z-'D
<br /> ~)
<br /> e
<br /> 11 -- -
<br /> I
<br /> I i
<br /> I REVISION IN SITE fOR SOUTH SIDE FIRE STATION - IT WAS EXPLAINED TO THE COMMITTEE
<br /> I I .
<br /> I' BY THE CITY MANAGER AND FIRE CHIEf THAT SOME DiffiCULTY HAD BEEN ENCOUNTERED BY THE
<br /> I
<br /> II ADMINISTRATION IN THE NEGOTIATION fOR PURCHASE Of THE LOTS ON THE NORTH SIDE Of 31ST
<br /> "
<br /> II AVENUE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED fOR PURCHASE BY THE COUNCIL. THE DiffiCULTY, IT WAS
<br /> II EXPLAINED,i IS THAT THE OWNERS ARE UNABLE TO GIVE_EVIDENCE Of SUffiCIENT TITLE TO THE
<br /> I
<br /> II LOTS AND THEREfORE THE SALE CANNOT BE CONSUMMATED.
<br /> Ii
<br /> II
<br /> " IT WAS THEREfORE THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE PUBLIC SAfETY COMMITTEE BY THE CITY
<br /> Ii
<br /> I' MANAGER THAT THE COMMITTEE APPROVE THE PURCHASE -Of SITE No. I , THE 60' X 158' LOT ON THE
<br /> ,I
<br /> II WEST SIDE Of WI~LAMETTE STREET AT 30TH AVENUE, PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED, fOR $1,800.00. IT
<br /> "
<br /> Ii ,WAS,THE COMMENT Of THE FIRE CHIEf THAT THE LOT WILL ACCOMMODATE THE fiRE STATION AS PLANNED
<br /> I,
<br /> il PROVIDED A WAIVER Of THE TWELVE fOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK TO NINE fEET IS GRANTED.
<br /> I'
<br /> II
<br /> 'I IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION Of THE COMMITTEE THAT THE ,COUNCIL APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> " PURCHASE Of SITE No. I ON,WI,LLAMETTE STREET AT 30TH AVENUE FOR $1,800.00.
<br /> I'
<br /> I
<br /> " .
<br /> e 'I 2. POLICY fOR LifE INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR RETIRED EMPLOYES - IT WAS EXPLAINED BY THE I
<br /> I: I
<br /> " CITY MANAGER THAT NO FORMAL POLICY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED REGARDING LifE INSURANCE COVERAGE
<br /> " I
<br /> :1 fOR RETIRED CITY EMPLOYES ALTHOUGH ,THE CITY HAS BEEN MAKING CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARD PREMIUMS
<br /> II
<br /> "
<br /> " fOR TWO RETIRED EMPLOYES PENDING THE ESTABLISHMENT Of A PERMANENT POLICY.
<br /> !i
<br /> ,I THE PRESENT GROUP PROGRAM fOR LifE INSURANCE, IT WAS EXPLAINED, BUILDS UP A PAID UP
<br /> :1
<br /> "
<br /> I' INSURANCE POLICy AT RETIREMENT AGE WHEREAS THE PREVIOUS TERM INSURAMCE DID NOT. THE OLD
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> I, PLAN ALLOWED EMPLOYES TO CARRY A GREATER AMOUNT Of INSURANCE DURING THE TERM Of EMPLOYMENT
<br /> I !I
<br /> II THAN THE PAID UP PLAN. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE PROBLEM IS. THAT THOSE APPROACHING
<br /> I:
<br /> II RETIREMENT AGE, WHO HAVE BEEN INSURED fOR A CONSIDERABLE PERIOD UNDER THE TERM PLAN,
<br /> "
<br /> :: WI~L HAVE A VERY SMALL AMOUNT Of PAID-UP INSURANCE AT RETIREMENT AGE UNDER THE NEW PLAN.
<br /> d
<br /> Ii THE THOUGHT IS THAT THE COUNCIL MIGHT WANT TO CONSIQER CONTINUING A ~ERTAIN AMOUNT Of
<br /> I' INSURANCE AfTER RETIREMENT fOR PRESENT EMPLOYES WHOSE TERM OF EMPLOYMENT UNTIL RETIREMENT
<br /> 11
<br /> ,I IS NOT SUffiCIENT TO BUILD UP A REASONABLE AMOUNT Of PAID-UP INSUijANCE.
<br /> 'I
<br /> II
<br /> "
<br /> I' A PLAN TO GUARANTEE ALL PRESENT EMPLOYES OVER 40 YEARS OF AGE WITH PAID UP INSURANCE
<br /> ,I
<br /> :1 AT RETIREMENT EQUAL TO ONE-HALf THE AMOUNT Of
<br /> " INSURANCE IN FORCE AT TIME Of RETIREMENT
<br /> 'I
<br /> :' LESS THE AMOUNT Of ,PAID UP INSURANCE TO THEIR CREDIT WAS DISCUSSED.
<br /> " I
<br /> " ,
<br /> ,
<br /> . I: As A RESULT Of fURTHER CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION, THE FINANCE AND PUBLIC SAfETY
<br /> " COMMITTEES RECOMMEND THE'ADOPTION Of THE fOLLOWING POLICY: I
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> I'
<br /> ii THAT THE CITY AGREE TO GUARANTEE CERTAIN LifE INSURANCE COVERAGE AT RETIREMENT
<br /> Ii TO RETIRED CITY EMPLOYES AND EMPLOYES THAT WERE fULL TIME CITY EMPLOYES AS Of
<br /> !: ,SEPTEMBER I, 1954 AND COVERED.UNDER THE GROUP INSURANCE PROGRAM PRIOR TO
<br /> ,
<br /> 'I DECEMBER 31, 1954. .
<br /> I,
<br /> ;i
<br /> II . , SUCH GUARANTEE Of CONTINUED- LTFEINSURANCE AfTER RETIREMENT,WOULD'EQUAL ONE-HILf
<br /> Ii
<br /> ii THE AMOUNT Of,THE INSURANCE IN-fORCE AT THE TIME Of RETlREMENT, NOT TO EXCEED
<br /> " $1,500.00. UNDER THIS PLAN THE GUARANTEED AMOUNT WOULD BE MADE UP OF THE PAID-UP I
<br /> " I
<br /> I: INSURANCE ACCUMULATED BY THE EMPLOYEE ,AT,RETIREMENT PLUS AN AMOUNT Of INSURANCE
<br /> I :! PROVIDED BY THE CITY TO EQUAL-TOTAL GUARANTEED. THE PREMIUM ON THE PORTION Of
<br /> " THE 'INSURANCE OVER AND ABOVE THE AMOUNT Of, THE PAID-UP INSU~ANCE WOULD BE AT THE
<br /> I'
<br /> II EXPENSE Of THE C1TY.
<br /> "
<br /> I:
<br /> II
<br /> !I FOR THE PURPOSE Of THE GUARANTEE,
<br /> I THE RETIREMENT AGE fOR EMPLOYES, OTHER THAN
<br /> II
<br /> " POLICE AND FIRE, IS 65 YEARS-OR OVER. FOR POLICE AND FIRE EMPLOYES THE RETIR~MENT
<br /> II
<br /> :1 AGE IS 60 OR OVER.
<br /> II FOR THE EMPLOYES WHO ELECT TO RETIRE AT A TIME WITHIN fiVE YEARS PRIOR TO THE RETIRE-
<br /> e I,
<br /> " MENT AGES INDICATED ABOVE, THE CITY MAKES THE SAME ,GUARANTEE LESS THE, AMOUNT OF PAID
<br /> I
<br /> 'I UP,IIIISURANCE THE EMPLOYEE ~OULD HAVE PURCHASED BETWEEN THE EARLIER RETIREMENT AGE
<br /> I AND THE NORMAL RETIREMEIIIT AGE. "
<br /> :'
<br /> "
<br /> II I TEM No. Of THE REPORT WAS ORDERED SEGREGATED AND REFERRED BACK TO THE PUBLI C SAFETY
<br /> I' I
<br /> I' COMMITTEE. I
<br /> ;:
<br /> " .... , ' ,
<br /> II IT WAS MOVED BY MR. BOOTH, SECONDED BY MR. SIEGENTHALER THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT
<br /> "
<br /> il Of THE FINANCE AND PUBLIC SAfETY COMMITTEES BE ADOPTED. ROLLCALL VOTE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> Ii ~
<br /> 10 Ii A REPORT OF THE . PUBtl C WORKS COMMI nEE MEET! NG HELD ON OCTOBER' 8, 1954 - RE: REQUEST Of
<br /> I' AMAZON WATER 'CONTROL DISTRICT; OUTSIDE SEWER CONNECTIONSj AND ANNEXATION Of CITY VIEW STREET
<br /> Ii LOTS WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS:
<br /> "
<br /> : ' ,
<br /> ,
<br /> i "PRESENT: MAYOR JOHNSON; COUNCILMEN CRUMBAKER, KOPPE, AND SIEGENTHALER; CITY
<br /> I
<br /> I MANAGER; CI TV ENGINEER;. CI TV RECORDER.~ ALSO PRESENT WERE MR. W. C~ MORROW AND MR. H. H.
<br /> , BARTELS REPRESENTING THE AMAZON WATER CONTROL DISTRICT. MR. JAQUES Of-THE REGISTER-
<br /> I
<br /> II GUARD ALSO ATTENDED THE MEETING. THE COMMITTEE MADE A fiELD TRIP OUT OVER THE WEST IITH-
<br /> RR AREA fOR THE PURPOSE Of INSPECTING THE DRAINAGE Of THE AREA, NpTING THE DRAINAGE
<br /> Ii PROBLEMS WHICH STILL EXIST.AND fOR A BACK-GROUND fOR CONSIDERING A REQUEST Of THE
<br /> I
<br /> I AMAZON WATER CONTROL DISTRICT. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE CONSIDERED AT THE MEETING HELD
<br /> I AI'iTERTHE TRIP. ~
<br /> i' I . REQUEST Of AMAZON WATER CONTROL DISTRICT - THE LETTER Of SEPTEMBER 27, 1954 FROM
<br /> e Ii THE AMAZON WATER CONTROL DISTRICT REQUESTING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN EXTRA DRAINAGE
<br /> ii .....
<br />
|