Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,)0~ <br />4J'd1 <br />e <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_._~-_. "--- --- _.._----~ <br />. ... --- -- -._-~_._--- - -:---.,--_.:--.-;-----.._--=-----;:--'.~-----:._-----. ---~------- --_._----_._-----~--~- <br /> <br />- . -- -~ . -.- -'.. -- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I- NUMBER I WAS'APPROVED 'AS'IT"STANDS.' ~TWAS ExpLAINEOBY MR,.'WENDT T~AT,TE~PORARILY, <br />THAT IS, FOR THE NINETY DAYS, 1HERE WOULD BE NO'CHANGE WHATSOEVER IN SPRINGFIELD. <br /> <br />NUMBER 2 WAS.' CHANGED' TO' READ: . " <br /> <br />THAT THE FARE CHANGE RECITED IN No. I BE GRANTEO,FOR A TRIAL PERIOD OF NINETY (90) <br />DAYS DURING WHICH TIME THE CITY TRANSIT LINES WILL KEEP THE CITY MANAGER OF EUGENE <br />INFORMED AS TO THE EFFECT OF THE EXPERIMENT ON INCREASED REVENUE SUFFICIENT TO <br />C'OVER THE OCfT-OF-POCKET COSTS,' FOR TH IS', SERV ICE. <br />. I . " <br /> <br />IF THE FARES INCREASE DOES NOT COVER THE OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS, THE COMPANY IS TO <br />WORICOUt-'AND SUBM'iT 'to'THE COUNCIL'A PROPOSAL F'OR'A MORE LI'MITEO"SERVICE, THAT' <br />WILL PRODUCE SUCH OUT-OF-POCKEt COSTS FOR THE' LiMITEO SERVICE.' <br /> <br />IT is ALSO tHE RECOMMENDAtIoN' OF' THE COMMiTTEE THAT THE FRANCHISE ORDINANCE ON THE <br />CITY'TRANSIT LINES OPERATION BE AMENDED TO PROVIDE THAT IN THE EviNT iHAT THE COMPANY <br />~ SHOULD DECIDE AT ANY TIME TO CLOSE OUT ITS OPERATION IN EUGENE THAT IT BE REQUIRED TO <br />,., GIVE i20 DAYS NOTICE. IT IS THE' UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMMITTEE THAT SUCH AN' AMENDMENT <br />IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY." . <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE THAT THE ~EPORT OF THE Bus <br />COMMITTEE BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE~ MciflON CARRIED. <br />- ...- , " <br /> <br />1 AFTER DISCUSSION OF THE 'BUS COMMITTEE'S REPORT; IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SIEGENTHALER, <br />SEC()NOED BY MR'. GODLOVE THAT THE 'CI TY MANAGER'S" OFF I cE: PREPARE' AN AMENDMENT TO THE BUS <br />I ~R~NtHISE TO PROVIDE 'FOR AN INCREASE'OF FARES'~SPROPOSEb fOR A '120 DAY TRIAL PERIOD WIT~ <br />PRovisION THAT THE :BUS C6MPA~~!MAKE A SHowfN~ AT THE END OF'"90 DAYS OF' THE RESULTS OF' THE <br />CHANGE. MOTION CARRIED. <br />.... . . . <br /> <br />" , ., REPORTS GF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ' <br /> <br />I I A REPORT OF THE 'BOARD OF' ApPEALS MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER '8, 1954"- RE: REQUESTS OF <br />YMCA AND YWCA' AND MR. PAUVLAHERT'f WAS"SUBMI TTED AND READ AS F'OLLOWS: <br /> <br />"THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD ,A REGULAR MEETIN~ AT THE C~TYHALL DECEMBER 8, i954 TO <br />;:;;;;' CONSIDER THE fOLLOWING REQUESTS FOR SETBACK:VARIANCES. MEMBERS PRESENT 'WERE ,MR. LUVAAS, <br />.' MR. GILLILAN, MR. MORRIS AND MR. BALZHISER. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />I. ARCHITECTS HAMLIN AND ',MARTI N REPRESENTING"THE"LANE Y.M.C.A. AND Y.W.C.A. PRESENTED <br />A REQUEST F'OR A WAIVER OF F'RONTAGE SETBACKS TO ACCOMMODATE FAcILITIES'WITHINTHE PROPOSED <br />STRUCTURE. . <br /> <br />THI S'PROPERT'f I S LOCATED ON PATTERSON STREET F;ROM '20TH TO 22ND AVENUE AND IS <br />DESIGNATED PUBLIC LAND AND OWNED BY SCHOOL ()ISTRICt #4 i'N TURN LEASED'rO THE Y.'M.C.A. <br />BOARD. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE TO THE EF'fECT THAT SETBACKS F'OR PUBLIC LAND MAINTAIN <br />THE SETBACKS I'N THE DISTRICT I'N ~HICH IT IS LOtATED. : THIS PROPERTY IS ADJOINING iHE <br />SINGLE fAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE AND IS SUBJECT TO THE 15 FOOT FRONTAGE SETBACK. <br /> <br />1 THE RE'QUEST IS FOR A WA I VER OF THREE r'EET Of THE fiFTEEN ALLOWI NG FOR A 12 FOOT <br />~ETaACK ~ROM PAtTtRSO~ STREEf. ALSO FORWAI~ER OF 12 FEEf OF THE ~EQUIRED SETBACK FOR <br />THE COVERED ENTRANCE AND ARCADE WHiCH ~il'LL BE THREE FEET fROM niE FR'ONT PROPERTY L1'NE. <br />THE COVERED ENTRANCE IS 36 FEET LONG AND ONLY THIS PORTION WILL BE LESS THAN THE 12 FEET. <br /> <br />. .. a . <br /> <br />THE BOARD CONSIDERED THIS A REASONABLE REQUEST SINCE IT IS A PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT AND <br />NO RESIDENTIAL US'E WILL. EVER 'BE AFrECTeD BY' THIS DEVELOPMENT, GRANTED THE REQUEST WITH <br />~ THE PROV I SO THAT A LEl'TER' FROM THE' SC'HOOLDI'STR I CT' BE SECURED STATI NG THEY HAVE NO <br />,., OBJECTION TO THIS WAIVER Of SETBACKS. <br />. . '. . <br /> <br />2. REQUEST FROM MR. PAUL LAFFERTY OF' R. E. LAFFERTY AND SONS WHO OWN A WHOLES'ALE <br />WAREHOUSE AT 340 WASHINGTON STREET AND EXTENDING TO WITHIN 30 FEET or JEFFERSON STREET. <br />THEY WI SH 'T'O' "ADD 'A 0'0 1'T1'O'NAL "WAR'EHOUS'E SPACE' TO TH'E E'AST ''END OF THE- BUI'LDI N'G AND EXTEND I NG <br />TO THE JEFFERSON STREET PROP&RTi LI~E. THIS wduL6 ~IVE THEM'COM~(ETE UTI~IZATION OF THEIR <br />PROPERTY AND ADD 4800 SQUARE fEET OF WAREHOUSING TO THE PRESENT BUILDING. <br />. . . or <br /> <br />., T.HEIR'REQUES,T-' IS fOR A WAIVE'R, OF THE REQUIRED" SETBACK FROM JEffERSON STREtT WHICH IS <br />FIXED AT 40 FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE Of JEFFERSON AND FIGURES SEVEN FEET fROM THE PROPERTY; <br />JEFFERSON STREE,T, BEING DES'IGN'ATED FOR WIDENING TO AN 80 fo'OT THOROUGHFARE. THIS PROPERTY <br />IS ALSO INVOLVED IN THE AREA OF A PLANNED OVERHEAD CROSSING. ' <br /> <br />MR. LAFfgRTYFEELS THAT' THIS~EQUIREMENT IS GOING TO BE DETRIMENTAL io THt'6EVELOP- <br />MENT AND fULL USE Of HIS PROPERTY WHEREIN HE WILL LOSE 840 SQUARE FEET or WAREHOUSE SPACE. <br /> <br />I . <br />THE BOARD fELT THAT THE PETl-TION fOR' A VAR I "'NCE 'BE, ALLOWED I F NO 'SER I OUS INTERFERENCE <br />IS INVOLVED WITH THE FUTURE PLANNING OF' THE TRAFF'IC PLAN; BUT NOT HAVING SUFF'ICIENT FACTS <br />AND I NFORM'ATI ON ON THEPLANNI NG F'OR ,THE AREA, THE BOARD MADE NO' DE'CI SI ON AND REfERRED <br />THE MATTER TO THE COUNCIL FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF THI~ REQUEST. " <br /> <br />THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS MEETING WAS ADJOURNED." <br /> <br />‘. <br /> <br />..... <br />