|
<br />~~ A,~ .,' ~
<br />uvl
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />-- ------ --~-_. - --------,
<br />-~--._-------- - .-._-_.~
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />cr IT W~S' EXPLAINED BY,THE CITY MANAGER ~HA~~THE COUN~IL DID NOT ACCEP~ tHI~ PETITiON
<br />IN OCTOBER F'OR THE REASON THAT IT DID NOT INCLUDE THE ENTIRE TRACT OWNEO'Sy:MR., LEACH,
<br />BUT MERELY THE NORTH PART OF' IT. IT WAS ALSO EXPLAINED THAT THE SITUATioN HAS NOW
<br />CHANGED WITH REGARD'~TO THE OWNERSHIP AND THAT THE TRACT IN QUESTION IS'OWNED NOW ENTIRELY
<br />BY M~,. EDMAN AND MR. ALLENBAUGH. THEY ARE I N THE PROCESS OF' DEVELOPI NG THEI R L'ANO" AND
<br />DESIRE THAT IT BE' ANNEXED IN ORDER THAT THEY MAY RECEIVE CITY SERVICES. THE'TRACTIN
<br />QUESTION I S A PI ECE OF' .LANDJUST SOUTH OF' 23RD AVENUE 'AND BETWEENAR:rHUR STREET AND'
<br />GARF'IELD STREET BEING APPROXIMATELY' 300 F'EET BY 120 F'EET.
<br />
<br />IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION or THE COMMITTEE THAT THE PETITION'OF' MESSRS. EDMAN AND
<br />ALLENBAUGH BE 'ACCEPTED AND THAT THE PROCEDURE BE STARTED TO ANNEX THIS AREA UNDER THE
<br />100% CONSENJ' RULE..
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />4. PETITION F'OR ANNEXATION OF' AN AREA SOUTH OF' 23RD AVENUE AND WEST OF' CHAMBERS STREET.
<br />THE AREA CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY, 155 ACRES. THEPETlT,ION WAS S"'GNED'BY ELEVEN VOTERS
<br />LIVING IN,:THE AREA OUT OF' A POTENTIAL OF' PERHAPS 27 OR,28 RESIDING-'IN THE AREA. IT 'WAS
<br />EXPLAINED TO,THE COMMITTEE THAT A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION INDICATES"THAT ONLY TWO
<br />VOTERS:ARE DEF'IN1TELY OPPOSED, SIX VOTERS ARE UNDECIDED ON THE ISSUE~ AND THAT THt'
<br />BALANCE ARE POTENTIAL VOTERS, aUT NOT REG~STERED AT THE PRESENT~ IT WAS ~OTED BY 'THE
<br />COMMITTEE THAT THIS PROPOSED ANNEXATION INCLUDES ALSO THE EDMAN, ALLENBAUGH TRACT ALSO
<br />~EING PROPOSED UNDER,:rHE 100% CONSENT RULE.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />IT IS THE F'EELING OF' THE COMMITTEE THAT THIS IS A DESIRABLE ANNEXATION, AND IT IS
<br />THE RECOMMENDATION OF' THE COM~ITTEE 'THAT THE COUNCIL AP~ROVE THIS PETI'TIONF'OR ANNEXA-
<br />TION or, THIS,AREA,LESS THE EDMAN-ALLENBAUGH PROPERTY AND THAT THE COONC(L AUTHORIZE AN"
<br />ANNEXATION ELECTION COVERING THIS PROPOSAL.
<br />
<br />5. - PETITION F'OR' ANNEXATION OF' A 13,ACRE TRACT, RUNNING ACROSS '2ND AVENUE WEST AND
<br />BETWEEN G,RANT STREET, AND AN 'EXTENSI ON,OF' CHAMBERS STREET'.
<br />
<br />IT WAS EXPLAINED TO THE COMMITTEE THAT THIS IS A SMALL AREA WHICH IS COMPLETELY
<br />SURROUNDED BY LAND THAT IS NOW WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND THAT EVERY EF'rORT SHOUlD BE
<br />MADE TO BRING THIS ARmA WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF' THE CITY.
<br />
<br />.'
<br />
<br />, I T IS J:HE ,RECOMMENDATION OF' THE PUBLI'C WORKS COMMI TTEE THAT AN EF'F'ORT BE MADE TO
<br />SECURE THE CONSENT OF', 100% or THE, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP -TO THIS ANNEXATION AND THAT Ir. THIS
<br />CANNOT. BE '~CCOMPl;1 SHED, THAT THE ~CI:TY ORDER,:AN ANNEXATl ON ,ELECTl ON WI THI N THE AREA BASED
<br />ON THE, PETl T ION NOW BEF'ORE 'THE' COUNC I L.
<br />
<br />6. ANNEXATION OF' THE BETHEL AREA. THE SUBJECT OF' ANOTHER ANNEXATION FOR 'A PORTION 'OF'
<br />THE BETHEL AREA PROPOSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS CONSIDERED AND DISCUSSED BY THE
<br />COMMITTEE. THE COMMITTEE INDICATED THAT IT wAs RELUCTANT, IN T~E ABSENCE OF' A F'URTHER
<br />REQUEST F'ROM THE RES I DENTS ,OF' THE 'AREA,' TO RECOMMEND ANOTHER -ELECTION I NTHE 'BETHEL':
<br />DISTRICT AT THIS TIME. THE COMMITTEE'1:HEREF'ORE'REF'ERS THI:S~MATTERBACK TO THE COUNCIL
<br />WITHOUT A SPECIF'IC RECOMMENDATION."
<br />
<br />I T WAS MOVED BY' MR ..KOPPE, SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE THAT THE -RE PORT OF' -',THE PUBLt C WORKS
<br />COMMI TTEE BE AD,OPTED." MOTION CARRI ED. , (
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />A MR.' AMBROSE'SPOKE"I N BEHALF' or HI MSELF' AND OTHERS PRESENT ,RE.GARDJ:NG THE PROPOSED BETHEL
<br />ANNEXIiTION. ,:THE'Y 'F'AVORED AN A'NNEXATl ON OF' 'THE GI LBERT 'HOMES AREAA'ND DESI RED, AN EARLY -'E'LEC-
<br />TION~ MR. CLAIR :MltLER AND MR. A. BERNTZEN~or THE BETHEL WATER DI'STRICT -WEREALloH~ARD ON
<br />THIS SUBJECT; THEY DESLRED,TO STUDY THE SUBJECT MORE THOROUGH(Y ALONG WITH A COMMITTE[ or
<br />THE COUNCIL T~WORK OU~~SOMETHING:~HA~ WOULD.~E REASONABlE TO THE CITY, THE A~EA, AND THE
<br />WATER DISTRICT.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF' THE JUDICIARy"FI-NANCE, AIRPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMlT,TEE MEETING MELDON
<br />FEBRUARY 18, 1955 - RE: TV ANTENNA FRANCHISE; OF'FER F'ROM SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.4; AND THE
<br />WI DTH OF' GARF.'l ELD STREET PAVI NG WAS SUBMI TTEDAND READ 'AS F'OLLOWS:,
<br />
<br />,ttPRESENT: COUNC'I LMEN KOPPE, HARTMAN, OwEN AND SHl'SLERj ~CI Ty."MANAGER;, CITY ENGI NEER;
<br />ACTING AIRPORT MANAGER; DIRECTOR OF' PARKS & RECREATION; AND CITY RECORDER.
<br />
<br />FOUR COMBI NED -COUNC'I L COMMI TTEES 'MET ,ON FRIDAY, FEBRUARY, '18TH,' TO DI SCUSS VARIOUS
<br />~ATTERS." THREE RECOMMENDA'TI ONS ARE MADE AS A 'RESULT or THESE DI.SCUSSIONS. '
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I . TV -,AN'TENNA FRANCHI SE - A, DRAF',TOr:" A PROPOSED "FRANCH I SE WITH ABAR' RAG 10- TV TO PERMIT
<br />USE or:STRE'ETS AND "ALLEYS OF' THE,CI'TY F'OR' A TELEVISION ANTENNA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WAS
<br />REV IEWEDAND .'01 SCUSSED ,BY,THE COMMI TTEE.-. THE COMMI TYEE GENERAL'LY APPROVES THE ORDI NANCE
<br />AS WRITTEN, BUT IS CONCERNED THAT(,ADEQUATE-PROVISION. BE MADE'~F'OR 'REMOVAl'OF',WIRES AND
<br />EQUIPMENT IN THE VENT OF' TERMINATION OF' THE F'RANCHISE. IT WAS AfSO MENTIONED IN THE
<br />CISCUSSION THAT THEPRovrSI ON rORRES,TO.RATI ON OF' ANY STREET AND ALLEY CUTS SHOULD BE
<br />CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINANCES ANO PRACTICES 0F' THE CITY.
<br />
<br />IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF' THE COMMITTEE THAT THE ORDINANCE BE AMENDED TO CONF'ORM
<br />TO THE ~BOVE' AND, 'nfAT THE: 'oRbl NANCE, AS AMENDED, BE'PASSED:
<br />
<br />, 1 ~~ - "
<br />
<br />.,'
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />......
<br />
|