|
<br />~"'l"'>"..~
<br />L'. , ", > ;
<br />:1" { ::;;
<br />e
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />- ---~-- ---..-- --------._-- -- ------ -- ------~-- - -- - -_.~ .,.-- --------------- ----- ---~_.- . - - --- ---- - - - --------- -- - ------- -'- ----- ---_. - . ..-------- -- -.---- --- - ---------.' - .----
<br />_. . ~. __ -0 ..- - . " ~ _ _ _ ~ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _. .. _ _. _ _ . _ _. __ _ . _ _. .
<br />
<br />--c_c~r~- _~_~~---"'c --~~----- ,- -----~"---- - -~-~'- .,_,~_____,--,__cc,___~'~_c_ --~,-'-,'- -- _.c ,~~_~,---____u~__ _~~-____"_ __' ___u_ '":_-_~_---'__ ~_C_'=_:'~___
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />3. -" REQUEST,' OF' 'MR:~GEORGE TODD REGARDI NG STREET I MPROVEMENT I N ACORN PARK ADDI TI ON-'- ' I
<br />MR.' TODD EXp~~rNED ':TO'THE COM'MI 1:TEE 'THAT THE SOUTHER~ PART 'OF' -'ACORN P-ARK STREET,' WHI CH . ,
<br />I S ,A C:OUNTY ROAD AND ,OUTSIDE - THE CITY OF' EUGENE', I S BE liNG I MPROVED BY, THE COUNTY' BY ..
<br />GRADING'ANDSURirAClNG Wi'TH 1TWO INC-HES'OF' ASPHALTi'c CONCRETE. THrS, HE EXPL-AINE'O, ',S
<br />BE:i NG 'DONE-BY THE, COUNTY' AHDTHE COST ISTO BE: BORNE EQUALLY BY --THE COUNTY AND THE
<br />PROPERTY OWNER. A PORTION OF':THIS STREET _:r1THAVENUE TO THE SOUTHTS-NOWWITHIN
<br />THE C~~Y LIMITS. MR. TODD INTENDS TO IMPROVE THIS LATTER PIECE OF' THE STREET IN THE
<br />\ ' ,
<br />SAME' MANNER EXCEPTTHA:T T.HE ;COUNTY Wn:L NOT 'SHARE I NTHECOST. HI S REQUEST: IS, rOR PER- !
<br />Mi ~S'I ON' to I MPROV:E .THI S cS,TREET WI TH TH IS SPEC IF" CA nON AND F'OR :THE CYTY TO SH,(RE' IN THE
<br />COST OF' THE STREET ONLY TO THE EXTENT OF' THE WIOT.H OF' THE RIGHT OF' WAY CROSSTNG,THE
<br />AMAZON AND THE WIDTH OF' ONE INTERSECTION.
<br />
<br />, .. . .. \'
<br />
<br />THE COMMI TTEE DESI RES MORE. I,NF'ORMATION ON TH.! S 'REQUEST ANDTH~REF'ORE RECOM~ENDS If
<br />THAT THE MATTER BE RETAINED IN THE COMMITTEE F'OR F'URTHER STUDY. ,j ~
<br />
<br />4~ REQUEST OF' GRANT B. BEESON F'OR PURCHASE OF' TWO CITY OWNED LOTS - THE COMMITTEE
<br />,,' CONSI ~ERED -THE c!tEQUES:r OF' MR.- BEESON WHO D.ESI RED TO PURCHASE 'tWO LO,TS O.WNED 'BY THE CI:TY.
<br />THESE LOTS ARE TWO LOTS OF' THE MARTI N TRACT WHI CH WER.E PURCHASED. BY THE CI TY 'OF' EUGENE, e
<br />F'OR PARK PURPOSES.
<br />
<br />'--IT WAS-T~E 'DECI51:0N :;F'''OtE -PUBLICWO';KS COMMITTEE, AF'TE.R OISCUSSIONOF THE MATTER, 11.1,
<br />THAT THIS PROPERTY COULD NOT,BE DISPOSED OF' F'OR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES, AND THEREFORE
<br />R,~COMME.ND,S T.O THE, CO~U~CI L THATTHI S MA,TTER.' BELAI D ON, THE TABLE.' AND THAT: NO 'ACTION BE II
<br />TAKEN. ", ~ ,- I I
<br />
<br />5~ PErl:TION: F'OR A,NANNEXA.TI ON OF'. AN AREA BETWEEN 28TH AND 30TH AVENUES, AND GENERALLY i
<br />BETWE-EN LAWRENCE cAND:MADISON STREETS-' THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THIS. PETITION ,TO ANNEX-
<br />THI S AREA AND F'ROM, THE .1 NFO.RMATI ON :PRES~NTED TO. THE: COMMI TTEE', 'CAME .TO THECONClUSI ON
<br />THAT TH~ftUMBE~: OF PERSONSF'AVORINa THE ~NNEXAT10N WAS JUST ,SLJGHTLY MORE THAN THE
<br />NUMBER, O~ PERS~NS,WHO OPPOSED 'IT~ ~
<br />,;~' . , -. il
<br />"",l' I TIS THE RECOMMENDATI ON OF' THE COMMI TTEE THAT THI S REQUEST BE RETAI NED I N THE II
<br />" COMMI TTEE' F'OR FURTHER' STUDY. :AND CONS_I DERATION. " - - I)
<br />
<br />,'6. . 'PROPOSAL' F'OR, I NSTALLAT~I ON OF A ~ANI TARY SEWER ON 'JACKSON STREET A'ND'THE WEST' LINE i
<br />OF' ELLENDALE ADDITION FROM 24TH AVENUE TO BETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH AVENUE~ - AF'T~R LOOKING II
<br />THIS AREA OVER AND CONSIDERING THIS PROPOSAL, THE COMMITTEE GIVES ITS APPROVAL TO THIS I .='
<br />PROJECT AND R.ECOMMENDS TO THE COUNC I L 'THAT' '-T BE ,(PPROVED :F'OR TNCLUSI-ONI N THE CURRENT I .
<br />PROGRAM." -
<br />
<br />11 'WAS MOVED BY MR.--KO.PPE,' SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE THAT THE~REPORT OF' THE PUBLIC WORKS I
<br />COMMI TTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTI ON.CARR'I ED. , ,
<br />
<br />9A REPORT OF' THE PUBLIC WORK~' COMMI TT.EE MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1955 "" RE: ' REQUEST F'OR I
<br />VAR lANCE, E-MERALO BAPT'I STCHURCH;: COMMUNI CATION F'ROM EDV~RD r. JUDK'INS; I MPROV,EMENT OF' 18TH I
<br />AVENU,E F'ROMALDER'TO UNI V'ERSI TYSTREETS; WI'DENI NG AND RECONSTRUCTI'NG 18TH AVENUE FROM rERR.Y I
<br />TO PATiTERSON STREETS; PURCHASE OF' ,PUBLI C WORKS' EQUI PMENT;: REQUEST F'OR EXCHANGE OF. PROPERTY !
<br />BY CARL. ARNEBER_<U STORM SE'(ERS, ""OR 24TH: AVENUE AND ON VANBUREN STREET; SANLTARY SEVERS IN I[
<br />SUNNY HOLLOW AREA WAS SUBMI TT:tD ^NDREAD AS F'OlLOWS: j, I
<br />
<br />"PRE,SENT:: 'MAYOR: JOHNSON; -COUNCI LMEN KOPPE ,AND BOOT'H; CI TY MANAGER;: CI TY' ENG:I:NEER; il'!
<br />CI'TY ATTORNEYl",AN~' T_H~ CI Tr ~ECORDER.' ALS,~ PRESENT AT ,THE MEETI NG WER.E ME.SSRS. HI TCHENS, II
<br />I ~ND N~EDHAM, REPRESENTING THE EMERALD BAPTIST CHURCH, MR. CHANEY, AND MR. JUDKINS.,-
<br />
<br />iT~E' I TEMS OF', BUSI NE~S~ :01 SCUSSEDBY THE_ COMNI TTEE I NCLUDED- THE F'OLL:GWJ NG: il
<br />, , ' -, c , II
<br />I . PETI TI ON FOR A VA;R I ~t.!.C_E,-, E!'4ERA,LD BAPTIST CHURCH, NORTHEAST CORNER OF' I O~TH AVENUE; AND II .
<br />PATTERSON STREET - THE COMMITTEE REVIEWED THIS REQUEST OF' THE EMERALD BAPTIST CHURCH I ~
<br />WI TH MR., CHANEY ,AND THE. REPRESENT. AnVE,S' OF'_ THE B~PT.l_ST CHURCH' 1_ N ,THE LI~H!' OF' MR. CHANEY'S I!
<br />OBJECTI ONT~ THE VAR'I ANCE:. ~. CHANEY_'S OBJECTION 'WAS BASED' M.AI:NlY ON THE' LENGTH, OF THE !
<br />SET JJACK ON THE_ NORTH' SI DE or-THE PROPERTY. THE SET BACK WHI CH WAS BE I NG PROPOSED,: .NAMEL Y ;1
<br />20 FEE! INCLUDING THE "IOTH'OF' :THE--ALLEY, HE CLAIMED, WAS INSUF'FICIENT TO SAFEGUARD THE 1'1
<br />VAlUEOF'HIS PROPERTY.,As--.,~A RESULT OF' .:THE DISCUSSIONS;, IT APPEARED-THAT MR.CH'ANEY WOULD I
<br />BEWI_LLING'TO.WI'THDRAW HIS.:OB,JECTI'ON IF A 24 'F'OOT:'SET BACK ,WAS ESTABLISHED,'AND ,IF' THE .
<br />HEIGHT or THE BUILDING.WOULD: BE-,LIMI'TED TO 20: F'EET AT THE EAVES.-,
<br />
<br />-- I T: I STHERECOMMENDA~I .ON .OF', THE COMMI TTEETHAT A V.AR I-ANtE BE GRANTED BASED UPON A 11'
<br />-24 rOOT SETBACK, I NCLUDI NG THE ALLEY-, WI TH THE, BU I LDI NG NOT TO EXCEED: 20 F'EETI N HE I GHT i
<br />AT'THE EAVES, PROVIDED IT MEETS VITH THE APPROVAL OF 100 PER CENT OF' THE OWNERS or THE II
<br />, 'A~~TTI NG ,PRC?~E_R,T~;,:~~c.~pr F'C?~":. TH_E. BUS] _NESS P,ROP~R..TY TO THE ,E_~ST~"- _" II
<br />
<br />2:., COMMUNI CATI ONSF'ROM MR. EDWARD r". JUDKINS - THE COMMUNI CA.TI ONS. FRO':" MR. JUDKINS WERE:I I'
<br />READ T~ THE COMMITTEE ~ND' THE SITUATION WAS EXPLAINED FURTHER BY MR. JUDKINS, WHO WAS i'
<br />PRESENT AT THE ME'ETI NG.' HE' STATED: THAT HE WAS MAl NLY CONC-UNED ABOUT TH'E ASSESSMENTS' TO II11
<br />BE PLACED A,GAINST HI~ PROPERT'!' IN THE ASSES~MENT or THE RIVERVIEW AVENUE SEWER SYSTEM. HE ,
<br />CLAIMED'THAT HE WAS ASSUREO'IMMUNITY ,.ROM ASSESSMENT F'OR A PORTION OF' HIS PROPERTY AT THE I
<br />TIME THAT'HE GAVE EASEMENTS~rOR THE TRUNK SEWER INSTALLATION. THIS-IMMUNITY, HE UNDERSTOOD,
<br />WAS TO CONTI NUE UNTI v THE PRO-PUTY WAS SOLD OR DEVELOPED. A POLl CY AD'OPTEO BY".'!,HE COUNCI L i
<br />
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />
<br />r ·
<br />~ ,I,
<br />
|