Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />519 <br />e <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~:i <br />ff <br />I' <br />I!.' ,I T, 15 :'f,HE ~ECOMMENDATI ON oL:THE,; PUBL IIC .WORKS COMMI TTEE_' THA T-THEC I:n ACCEP.T THESE <br />il REQUESTS FOR ANNEXATIONS AND THAT A REFUND OF THE SEWER'SE~VICECHARGE ~E,MADE TO THOSE <br />ii PEOPLE WHO HAVE PAID FOR THE YEAR BEGI NNt~NG JULY 1,1955 AS SOON AS THE PROPERTY BECOMES <br />Ii A PART OF THE CI TY. . - ,,, <br />" <br />I! I <br />I; . .. <br />" 3. PETITION fOR.ANNEX~TION Of~A PROPERlY SOUTH Qr 26TH AVENUE EXTE~otNG ABOUT 110 FEET <br />SOUTH-Of~6TH AND EXTENDING ,fROM JACKSON STREET TO TYlER:STREETTQ T~E,CtTY ,Of EUGENE _ <br />THIS 15 A REQUEST BY MRS. GERTRUDE D~LE IN [HE fORM Of A,QQNSENT 1:0 ANNEXATI;ON SINCE SHE <br />OWNS 100 PER CENT Of THE PROPERTY INVOLVED. THIS PETITION WAS DISCUSSED IN CONNECTION <br />WI1H ~HE oDEVE.LO~MENT Of ..THAT AREA ,AN,D THE SEWER .AND STREET ,1,M~~q~EMENTS:TO GO I.N THE; AREA <br />AND IT u~ THE ,RECOMMENDATION oFniE' PU,~L,'tWbRKS'COMMITTEE, 'tI:lAT:Tl1E COuNC':!'; ','ACCEPT THIS <br />AI~EA .FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CI TX.'''' . <br />~. - l <br />. . ,J . <br />,4. ISIDE,WALK ON DONALD STREET FROM 34TH',P'LACE TO 35TH AVENUE,-.TI-tE C.OMMI,TTEE ,VISITED, THIS <br />AREA AGA I N ,TO MAKE ;;PAR TICULA~ ;,NOTE OF ,THE RES I D,ENl:l ALDEVE LOPME NT ,ALONG TH IS 'ONE BLOCK. <br />I TWAS EXPLAI NED BY MR. MARTIN, ONE OF, THE RES I DENTS I N THIS BLOCK, THAT -iTHE LOCATION OF A <br />SIDEWALK SET IN THE NORMAL DISTANCE FROM THE CURB WOULD WORK A REAL HARDSHIP ~N ~HEPROPER- <br />_ TI ES THAT HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED SI NCE THE I R LAWNS AND CONCRETE WORK HAVE BEEN I NSTALLED AT <br />· A GRADE,CONSIDER~BLY UNDER::.;T'HE GRADE O,FTHE.SIDEW,ALK. LT'WAS POINGED OUT TH'AT' I'.F ,THE. <br />I' SIDEWALK LOCATION IS ESTABLISHED SET IN FROM THE ~URB:IT' WOULD I.NVOLVE MAJOR AND EXPENSIV,E, <br />~ RECONSTRUCTION WI~HOUT ANY CORRESPONDING IMPROV~~ENT TO THE PROPERTY. . I <br /> <br />Ii - - , . ~ , n I I <br /> <br />I: I TIS THE RECOMMENDATI ON OF THE PuBLI C WORKS COMMI TTEE, AfTER fULL CONSIDERAn.ON':OF <br />I <br />i: THE PROBLEM, THAT A CURB SIDEWALK ALSO BE AUTHORIZED fOR THIS BLOCK WITH THE PROVISION TI'IAT <br />Ii: WHEN, THE.SI DEWA,LK IS '.NSTALLED' THAT. THE' COS,T OF RELOCA~'-NG ANY 'POLES OR ,HYDRANTS,BE <br />, I NCLUQED IN .THE 'COST OF THE' PROJEC,T,AND.ASSESSE'D' 'TO .THE' PR,OPERTY ,'OWNERS~. ': ' <br />" <br />- . ., <br />5. RE'QUEST OF' THE RED CR,OS5,-LANE' COUNTY' CHAP.TER, FOR PURCHASE OF A BUILOING"Sf'TEA'f. 14lH <br />AVENUE AND CHAMBE.RS STREET-THE R,EQ,UESTOF THE RED' CROSS WAS AGAI N 01 SCUSSED BY THE," <br />COMMITTEE. IT IS THE FEELING OF THE COMMITTEE THAT THE COUNCIL HAS COMMITTED ITSELF TO <br />T,HE NEED,S~OF'5HE SCHOOL DI'STRICT' FOR SCHOOL SITE'S'I,N T.HI'S ,AREA AND' THAT IT I'S DIFF.ICULT <br />TO GIVE APOSITlV,E' ANSWER ,ON :THE :USE 'Of". THIS: PROPERTY 'UNT-IL IT IS' DEF,INI,TE.LY KNOWN EXACTL;Y <br />'WHATAREA' IS NEEDED BY".THE SCHOO'l DISTRICT AND HOW IT'WILL BE USED.' <br />: _ _ .,,: i : -. : .. -. . .: - - <br />IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTE~ THAT THE MATTER BE RETAINED IN COMMITTEE <br />FOR F:URTHER STUDY A:ND UNTIL :tHE MATTER. HAS BEEN _Cl:EARED ;W.~ TH SCHOOL;';OI S?RI CT; 'NUMBER FOUR. <br />, . <br />'t - ~- o.~ <br />. 6. PERMANENT_ REPORT ,O~ ,~HE PLANNING COMMISSION, ,~ATED JULY 5, 195~. _ " I <br /> <br />A. ' SCHOOL. 01 STRI C,T#4, ,OLD FR"NCES;WILLARD SUE -, THE COMMI TTEE 0.1 S.CUS.SED 'THlf ' <br />REZO'NI N,G' R,E~UEST AND ',I S I N,A:GREEMENT W.ITHlHE PLANNI NG COMMI 5S.! ON THAT .TH IS 'ENiT;' ,RE <br />B,LOCK ,BpUNDED_BY 1'3TH, 14'TH, OLil VE ANOCH,ARNE,L TON STREETS SHOULD BE REZONED F:ROMi <br />. PR AND R,:,,2 0,1 STRI,CTS TO C-3P; COM!-1ERC IA,L' DI,STR.I CT.' THE, COMMJ T:TE.E,' 'THEREFORE MAKES, <br />THI S RECOMMENDATION. i --. <br /> <br />',B. HOWARD STENSHOE" ,1397. Lr NCOLN STREET - THE PUBLI C WORKS', C.OMMI TTEE, 01 SCUSSEDj THI S <br />REQUE~T: I N SOME DETAJL AND 'IS OF THE '9PI NI ON THA'TTHEREZONI'NG Of; ~TH'I S.:SLOCK BETWEEN <br />13TH A~D 'I ~TH AND BETWEE,N' CHAR:NEL,TONAND Lt NC~LN STREETS IS NOT.,WARRANTED,. AT,THI 5 <br />1 TI ME. THE REQUEST' WAS THAT THE BLOCK' BE REZONED F,ROM R....2 01 5,TR'I C~T TO C;"'3P .COMMERCI AL <br />DISTRICT. IT IS THE fEELING or THE COMMITTEE THAT THE REZONING Of THIS BLOCK TO <br />, COMMERCI AL USE,WOULD BE, PREMA TURE. ~I T,: IS, ,THEREF9Rr THE REC.O~t.'1~ND'ATI ON: THi\T THE. , <br />M REQUE'S,T FOR REZONI NG O.F, THI S BLOCK, BE DENI ED.;, , . , <br /> <br />.. . .1." "" <br />C. '.'ERNST-POPPE"AND2IJRESIDENTS IN AR'EA- niIS-PETi"TI;6N'I.S r,OR 'REZONING O'F AN,AREA <br />ON BOTH SIDES O'F PO'RTLAND STREET BETWEEN, 24TH AND 25TH: AVENUEsr'ROM 24TH AVENUE, TO THE <br />ALLEY. THE PETITION IS FO'R CHANGE OF'ZONE FROM R-I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-2 <br />.. Two F A,MI.L Y RESIDENTI AL D)cST~ I CT. '-THE .COMMI TTEEDESIRES.' 'MO~E STUD'Y, O!,; T-tfl Sj, REQUEST <br />- AND THEREfORE RECOMMENDS THAT ,THE' HEARl NG, BE CONTI NUED TO' AUGUST,"S 'AND THAT' I~T 'BE <br />CONTINUED IN THE.COMMITTEE'FO'R ~URTHER STUDY. " <br /> <br />~i D.' C. F. HUSER, EDGEWOOD'; EST.ATES - 1 TWAS PO.I NnD DUT TO. THE' CO~MI T.T,~E" THAT THI S <br />il REQUEST COVERS:, THE AREA I N THE NEW EDGEWO'OD ESTATES SOU.TH O'F '40TH AVENUE THAT, IS <br />;: BE I NG SE T ASJ DE rOR A COMMERC I AL SHOPP lNG' DEVELOPME NT.-- THE ~RE AO WAS: POI NT.ED: 'OUT, IN <br />'I <br />I: THE PLAT OF EOGEWOOD ESTAns AND THE PROPOSED LAND USE IN THI S PARTI CULAR PLOT WAS, <br />:i ': 01 SCUSSED WIJ'H ,THE' COMML,TTEE: BY MR. HUSER '5,' REPRES~ENTATlVE. "I T, 1 S mHE RECOMMENOA- <br />!i TION OF THE PUBLI C WORKS' COMMI TTEE THAT THE' AREA, IN QUESTION BE REZONED FROM RA TO' <br />:; C-3P COMMERCIAL DISTRICT." -" ,i, , <br />, ,. <br />Ii <br />.- ii E).c, FRANK R.8RAILSFORD,' IS38--GARDEN, AV"ENUE-' THIS REQUEST. IS rO'R A ~E~ONING DF'THE <br />?" i: PRO'PERTY LO'CATEDAT 1232 Moss STREET FROM R-I TO M-I liMITED ,I NOUSTRI Al DISTRICT,. <br />- ~ IT IS THE UNDERSTA~DING OF THE COMMITTEE THAT THIS PROPERTY IS TO BE USED IN THE <br />, ., EXPANSION OF"FbRD's DRIVE IN RESTAURANT. It IS THE RECOMMENDATjON','O'F THE CDMMITTEE <br />...1 ;'! THAT THIS C,HANGE IN CLASSIFICATlON'FROM'R;;.r To'M-1 liMiTED J'NDUSTRiAl.ON 'THI5PROPERTV <br />" BE APPROVED~ <br />Ii ........ ..' , . , , . ) <br />"" jl .... , - , <br />I <br />" <br />Ir <br />!' " ' - - ' <br />II . t. <br /> <br />I' ,.. ' <br />. - <br />,I <br />i,i <br />e Ii <br />I. <br />,. <br /> <br />I! <br />i ! ...... <br />