|
<br /> <' 3~
<br /> ) Ji.
<br /> e
<br /> S/
<br /> -~ ~- -. .--- - - -- - -- -
<br /> I DE~END~NT ON THE ~DDITIONAL UNITS or'INCOME PURCHASED 'BY YOUR EM~LOYEES~ AGAI N; itll S
<br /> SHOULD BE OF A VERY SMALL AMOUNT. INASMUCH AS THE POLICE OF~ICE~'S OFFIREM~N~~ ~ATE
<br /> WILL BE DECREASED IF THESE TWO A~ENDMENTS A.E ADOPTED, AND THE EMPLOYER~S ~U.~tNT
<br /> SERVICE tONTRIBUTION WILL BE CORRESPONDINGLY.DECRtASED, It I~ THE BtLlt~ OFTHi~'
<br /> DEPARTMtNT THAi BOTH AMENDMENTS COULD BE ADOPTED WITH NO OVER-ALl IN~REASE TO THE
<br /> I SUBDIVISION DURING THE NEXT 4-YEAR PERIOD, AND THE BENEFITS TO THE EMPLOYEES QUITE
<br /> OBVIOUSLY WILL BE MOST BENEFrCIAL.
<br /> I
<br /> ,I ALTHOUGH THE LAW ONLY REQUIRES THAT A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY ADOPT THESE
<br /> I AMENDMENTS, ~E ASK FOR Y8UR COOPERATION IN NOTIFYING US WHETHER THE AMtNDME~TS'A~E
<br /> ADOPTE6,OR WHET~ER THE~ ARE ~EJECTED. IN ORDER THAT WE MAY PROPERLY R~EPARE FOR T~E
<br /> ADMI,NI~TRATION or THE .SYSTEM AFTER JA~UARY I, WE WOULD ,APPREClATE T~IS IN~UIRY B~INGY
<br /> PROPOSED TO THEjDMjNISTRATlVE BODY (COUNTY COURT ,OR CITY COUNCIL, ETC.) AT THE NEXT,
<br /> REGULAR MEETING OF THAT BODY AND THAT WE BE FURNISHED IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER WITH,A~
<br /> I CERTIFIED COpy OF THAT PORTION OF THE MINUTES WHEREIN THESE AMENDMENTS WERE DISCUSSED
<br /> 'I AND WHEREIN ACTION ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS VAS TAKEN.
<br /> 0'
<br /> e ., '.
<br /> IF WE CAN HELP YOU WITH ANY FURTHER I NFORMAlI ON, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO,CALL"ON
<br /> US. "
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. KOPPE, SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE,
<br /> THAT THIS COMMUNI_ATION BE REFE~RED
<br /> TO THE PuBLIC SAFETY AND FINANCE COMMITTEES. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I 15 COMMUNICATION FROM SANITARY DRIVER'S ASSOCIATION - RE: INCREASE IN RESIDENTIAL CHARGES
<br /> IN CONNECTION WITH REFUSE HAULING WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS~FOLLOWS:
<br /> "PLEASE CONSIDER TH I S AN APP,LI CATION OF THE SANI T,ARY ~NGI NEERS FOR AN '.I NCREASE
<br /> IN THEIR RESIDENTIAL CHARGES IN CONNECTION WITH REFUSE HAULING.
<br /> THE LAST CHANGE, AUTHORIZED BY CITY ORDINANCE No. 9799, .BECAME ErFECT'lVE AI:'RI,L' I.S,T,I
<br /> 1951. THE PRICE THEN ESTABLISHED WAS $1.05 PER CAN AND WE ARE NOW ASKING FOR A 20;
<br /> INCREASE, MAKING THE RATE $1.25 PER CAN.
<br /> ,WE WILL APPRECIATE YOUR CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THIS MATTER AT ~N EARLY DATE,
<br /> AND WILL BE GLAD TO FURNISH YOU WITH ANY INFORMAT~ON YOU MAY DESIRE TO NEGOTIATE T"~S~
<br /> CLAIM.~ ",
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. KOPPE, SECONDED BY MR. OwEN, THAT THIS COMMUNICATION BE REFERRED TO
<br /> THE PUBLIC WORKS AND HEALTH AND RECR&ATION COMMITTEES. MOTION CARRIED..
<br /> .. :
<br /> 16 COMMUNICATION FROMl-PERCY W. BROWN AND COMPANY - RE:. ,EXAMINATION OF RECORDS OF THEiClry OF
<br /> EUGENE FOR QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1955 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> ''WE I:!AVE COMPLETED THE INTERIM EXAMINATION or, THE ~ECORDS Of' THE CITY Of' E-UGENEF9~
<br /> THE QUARTER ENDING ~EPTEMBER 30, 1955. ''f . ,
<br /> SOME OF THE AUDITING PROCEDURES ORDINARILY REQUIRED FOR THE E~PRESSIONOF AN :r ;'
<br /> I OPINION HAVE N.T~BEEN PERFORMED, AND NO FORMAL"OPINION IS EXPRESSE[) AT THIS TIME,.' ( ,
<br /> I HOWEiVER, TO THE EXTENT Of' THE AUDIT WORK P~RFORMED, WE FIND THE BOOKS IN GOOD ORDER
<br /> i
<br /> I AND ALL CASH PROPERLY ACCOUNTED FOR. THE ENTIRE AUDIT WORK WILL BE COMPLETED FOR THE
<br /> ANNUAL REPORT AT JUNE 30, 1956."
<br /> IT WA~ MOVED BY MR. GODLOVE, SECONDED BY MR. KOPPE THAT THIS <=OMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED
<br /> AND PLACED ON riLE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> COMMUNICATION FROM C~iRLES O. ' .
<br /> - 17 PORTER, .ATTORNEY - RE: ENDORSEMENT OF THE FIREMENS'
<br /> PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> "ON fRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4TH THE ~OUNCIL.MET WITH ME AND,SEVERAL ~EPRESENTATIVES O~,
<br /> EUGENE fiREMEN TO DISCUSS FURTHER WHETHER OR NOT THE COUNCIL .WOULD ENDORSE THE FIREMEN'S
<br /> PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT GIVING THEM A 56 HOUR WEEK AND WHETHER OR NOT THE COUNCIL
<br /> WOULD AGREE TO CALL A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR THAT CHARTER AMENDMENT.
<br /> , . )
<br /> AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF JOHN PENNINGTON, THE CITY ATTORNEY, NO DECISIONW~S~ADE
<br /> AT THAT. TIME ON EITHER QUESTION AND WE WER~ ASKED TO PRESENT TO THE COUNCI.L AN ACTUAL
<br /> CHARTER AMENDMENT AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.
<br /> -'" ,. . , I I
<br /> I HAVE ON NUMEROUS, OCCASIONS TALKED TO MR. FI NLAYSON ABOUT ARRANGING THI S MEE.TING
<br /> BUT, BECAUSE OF THE HEAVY SCHEDULE OF COUNC I L MEM~ERS I T HAS NQT BE,EN POSSI BLE FOR TH~
<br /> COUNCIL TO MEET WITH US.
<br /> I ,BECAUSE THE FIR~~EN WANTTO?O~TAIN T~E NECESSARY NUM~ER-OF SI~~ATURES ON THE
<br /> I NI TI ATI VE .:PETI TI ON AS ~OON AS POSSI BL,E, I TIS THE I:R ~NTENTION TO.HAVE THE PET!TION$
<br /> PRINTED AND CIRCULATED WITHOUT FURTHER DELAy. . r.- . "
<br /> THE FI.REMEN ARE,HOWE~ER, ASKING THA~ THE COUNCIL VOTE ON THE .ABOVE-MENTIONED
<br /> MATTERS A~D MAKE KNOWN',ITSDECISION AS .SOON ~S POS'IBLE~' " " , I'
<br /> " ' " ' I
<br /> e
<br /> .....
<br />
|