|
<br />'14'
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I. COM~UNICATION FROM MESSRS. SHORTAN~: BAX~~~;R~G~RDING ~~OTES~Ot THE.~itiAL ~~NiFIT
<br />~~SES~~~NT O~ TH~ O~~NING OF GARFIELD STREET FROM 7TH TO 11TH AVENUtS ~ MESSR~.BAXiER
<br />AND SHO~T WERE ~RE~ENT~AT THE COM~ITfEE MtETING A~D PRESENTED T6TH~CO~~ITTEE fHt~~ -
<br />6~~ECi~ONiRE~~~~i~G T~E ~.SE~SMiNTOF: BE~t~iT~ AGAjN~~-T~t~~~~O~E.iv~o~'i~i:o~t~I~~'
<br />or GARtIELD' STREE~. BE,tWEEN 7nl AND 11TH' AVENUES.' I T w~S EXPLAi NED~O,n:tE' C6MM'IT~E'E~T""A"t
<br />MR. SHORT HAD FilED SUIT AGAINST THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON HIS PROPERTV;WHICH: AMOUNTED-'.
<br />TO $~~7~60. MR. BAXTER ALSO INDICATED THAT ~t DID NOT BELIEVE THAT HE WOULD BE BENErlTTED
<br />BY THE ~MOUNT OF'HIS ASSEsskENT, WHICH WAS $541~25.
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />, I
<br />
<br />~ :,' - . -
<br />
<br />THE COMMI TTEE.DI SCUSSED; WI TH MR'. BAXTER THE REDUCTION OF H'I S ASSESSMENT: f'~OM $541.25
<br />TO $270.00 AND LIKEWISE DISCUSSED WITH MR. SHORT THE REDUCTION or HIS ASSESS~ENT FROM
<br />$227.60'TO $1l0.00...uMR~.BAXTER'INDiCATED THAT'WHILE HE.DID NOT BELiEvE:' THE ru:ouc'ED:'
<br />ASSESSMENT WAS EXACTLY PROPE~; THAT HE.WOULD AGREE TO.PAY THE $270.00SPEClrIED'I~ THE
<br />COUNcrL APPROVED THE ACTION OF THE COMMITTEE.
<br />
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />
<br />WITH REFERENCE TO MR. SHORT'S ASSESS~ENT, THE COMMITTtE~D MR. SH6RT WE~E"U~ABLE TO
<br />ARRIVE AT A rlGURE WHICH WAS MUTUALLY AGREEABLE. IT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION 'OF THE
<br />COMMITTEE: THAT MR. ,BAXTER!S ASSESSMENT, WHICH WAS ASSESSED TO HIM AS A.BENEFIT-r6R'TH~
<br />6~ENING OF GARFIELD ,STREET ,eETwEtN'7TH AND 11TH AVENUES, BE REDUCED FROW THE AMOUNT SHOWN
<br />ON THE VIEWER'S~REPORT,OF $541.25 TO $270.00.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />2. SALE or PROPERTY TO MCCRACKEN BROTHERS MOTOR fREIGHT - THE CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED TO
<br />THE COMMITTEE ,THAT 'MCCRACKEN BROTHERS MOTOR FREIGHT DESIRED TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY
<br />B~RDERING THE PROPOSED ~E.T 7TH AVENUE EXTENSION WHICH WOuLD BE A TRIANGbLAR PIECE OF
<br />~ROPERTY AT THE NORTHWESTERLY END OF THE PROPERTY WHICH THE CITY or E~GENEWILl-ACQtiIRE
<br />FROM THE STATE OF OREGON WHEN GARFIELD STREET IS CONSTRUCTED, LESS 'A PORTION FROM THE
<br />NORTHERLY SIDE WHICH WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR RIGHT or WAY FOR ,THE PROPOSED WEST 7TH AVENUE
<br />EXTENSION. ' ,
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />A SALE PRICE FOR. THIS PROPERTY, BASED ON THE TOTAL COST TO THE CITY or EUGENE'rOR-THE
<br />OPENING ,or GARFIELD ,STREET, WOULD BE.15455 CENTS'PER SQUARE FOOT, OR rOR THE TOTAL AREA
<br />OF 37.770 SQUARE FEET WHICH INCLUDES THE PROPERTY NECESSARY rOR THE WEST 7TH AVENUE
<br />EXTENSION,'THE COST ,wouLD BE $5,837.35. ,IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT NO ACTUAL: SELLING
<br />PRICE COULD BE DETERMINED EXCEPT ON A SQUARE FOOT BASIS AT THIS TIME~ AND.UNTIL SUCH TIME
<br />AS THE CITY COULD DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF SQUARE FEET WHICH WOULD BE NEEDED FOR THE STREET
<br />RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE PROPOSED WEST 7TH AVENUE EXTENSION.
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE .TOOK NO FORMAL ACTION ON THIS SUBJECT:
<br />
<br />3. PETITION rOR PAVING THE ALLEY BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH AVENUES FROM CHARNELTON TO LINCOLN
<br />STREETS - ,THE COMMI'TTE~ VIEWED THIS .AREA AND; ON1H~ BA~15 OF THt PET~TION ON riLE,"
<br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE ALLEY BE PAVED.
<br />
<br />4. PETITI ON FOR 'PAVI NG ARTHUR STREET rROM 23RD AVENUE TO BETWEEN 23RD AND 24TH AVENUES -
<br />THE COMMITTEE:V.EWED THIS AREA~ND .ECOMMENDEDTHAT T~I~.E'H~LDtip-~NTIL 23RD AVEN~E
<br />GOULD BE PAVED BETWEEN ARTHUR AND CLEVELAND 'STREETS. THE BASIC CONSIDERATION HERE WAS
<br />THE rACT ~HAT ONLY SOME 76.09 'FEET'OF ARTHUR STREET WOULD BE PAVED.
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />5. PETITION FORPAIVING -TYLER STREET FROM 18TH ,TO'24TH AVENUES - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THIS
<br />AREA AND ON :THE BASI S or THEPETI nON ON FI LE, RECOMMENDED' THAT .THE' :StREET BE 'PAVED AND
<br />THAT THE COMMERCE I NVESTMENT COMPANY BE REQUI RED TO FURNI SH' A BOND GUARANTE"E I NG PAYMENT or
<br />THE STREET ASSESSMENT ON PROPERTIES WHICH THEY OWN.
<br />
<br />6. 'PAV.I NG VAN,BuREN-,STREETFROM 22ND' TO 24TH AVENUES ,- THE COMM'I.TTEE V.I EWED -THI S 'AR&A
<br />AND, ON THE BASIS 'OF THE PETITION ON FILE, RECOMMENDED THAT THE STREET BE PAVED AND THAT
<br />COMMERCE "NVESTMENT. COMPANY BE REQUI,RED TO FURNI SH A BOND GUA'RANT-EE I NG PAYMENT . OF' THE
<br />STREET ASSESSMENT ON PROP.ERTI ES WHI;CH THEY OWN.,
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />7. PAVING ADAMS .ST~EET FROM 22ND TO 24TH AVENUES - T~E COMMITTEE ~IEWED THIS AREA AND,
<br />ON THE BASIS or THE PETITIO~ ON ~ILE, REC~MMENDE~ THAT~lHE STREE~ BE PAVE~ AND THAT THE
<br />COMMERCE INVESTMENT' :COMPANY BE REQU I RED TO rURNI SH A BOND GUARANTEE ING PAYMENT or THE
<br />STREET AS5ESSMENT ON ,PROPERTIES WHICH THEY OWN.
<br />
<br />8. PETITION FOR SANITARY SEWE-R BET-WEEN LAWRENCE AND LI NCOlN STREE'TS F'ROM 25TH TO 29TH:
<br />, AVENUES ,AND ON 28T.HAVENUE rROM LI NCOLNTO LAWRENCE ST.REETS,'-AND ,ON 27TH PLACE rROM
<br />LINCOLN TO LAWRENCE STREETS - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA AND ON THE BASI'S or niE
<br />PETITION ON riLE, RECOMMENDED THAT THE SEWER BE 'NSTALLED.
<br />
<br />. ;
<br />
<br /> Ii
<br /> II
<br />-: r
<br /> I
<br /> I: I
<br /> I
<br />
<br />,9. PAVI'NG or 39TH, AVENUE; 'FROM HI LYARD STREET TO THE EAST 51 DE Of" PATTERSON ST'REET -
<br />THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THIS AREA' AND, ON THE BASI~ or THE PETITION ON FICE, RECOMMENDED
<br />THAT THE PAVING OF THIS STREET BE' APPROVED.
<br />
<br />10. SANITARY SEWER ON 18TH AVENUE FROM OAK STREET TO THE ALLEy BETWEEN OAK AND PEARL
<br />STREE,TS AND ON OUSTREET FROM 17TH TO IBTH AVENUES - TH.E CITY MANAGER I:NDICATED THAT
<br />SAFEWAY STORES; 'NCORPORATED, HAD"':,REQUESTED' THAT: THE C I 'TY APPROVE' THE' 'I NSTALLA:TI ON OF'
<br />THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SEWER LINE. ,THE COMMI~TEE REtOMMENDED THAT THI~ ~EWERBE INSTALLED.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />....
<br />
<br />-
<br />
|