|
<br />~71
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />13
<br />
<br />f!.. REPORT or THE €OMMI TTEE Of' THE ""HOLE MEETI NG HELD MAY" 4,1956 ..; RE:. CONSI DERATi ON OF'
<br />P~O~OSED'AIR POLLU~ION ORDINANCE; COMMUNICATION FROM FRANK I. KrN~~Y RE~ARDING THE S!ATE BA~eROFT
<br />LAW; AND SALE OF PROPERTY IN PARK-AI~E SUBDIVISION WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />,"PRESENT:COUNCILMEN BQOTH, GOl?LOVE, SHEARER, OwEN; AND HARTMAN; CITY MANAGER;
<br />C~TY ATTORNEY; CITY RECO~DERJ MR. CLARENCE UREY; AND MR. ~DAN WYANT OF THE EUGENE REGISTER- I'
<br />GUARD.
<br />
<br />~. C6NSI~ER~TION or PROPOSED AIR POLLUTfON ORDINANCE - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT SOME ilME
<br />PREVIOUS TO THE MEETING, A SUGGESTEDORDrNANCE HAD BEEN GIVEN TO THE COMMITTEE FOR STUDY
<br />AND THAT SINCE THAt TIME CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS HAD BEEN MADE BY THE OREGON STATE AIR
<br />POLLUTION AUTHORITY, 'WHICH BASrCALLYGAVE DEF"lNITIONS 'TO THE SUBJECT OF.' THE CONTRDL or AIR
<br />POLLUTION.
<br />
<br />IN THE REVISED ORDINANCE WHICH WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE THE STANDARDS, AS SET
<br />UP, ARE BASEDON'MINIMUM S~ANDARDS. UN~E~'THIS ORDINANCE, IF' PRO~ERLY EHFORCE6 ~ITHIN
<br />THE CITY LIMITS, AfR POLLUTION 'COULD BEHELD 'TO A MINIMOM AND AIR POLLtiTI6N COMING FROM
<br />AREAS OUTSI DE THE CITY' I NTO THE CI TY C<fULD BE CONTROLLED 'BY THt OREGON ,STATE AI R 'POLLUTION
<br />AUTHORITY. j'
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />IT WAS FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS AMONG THE FIRST IN THE STATE OF THIS
<br />VARIETY AND' COULDPo1'ENTIALLY REQUIRE. SOME REVISION OR MOI>tf'ICATION AFTER E'XPERIENCE "HAD
<br />BEEN GAINED, BUT THAT BASICALLY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THE O~~INANCE IS EFFE~TIVE, N~T OVERLY
<br />EXCESSIVE, AND ENFORCEABLE.
<br />
<br />., .
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />AFTER FURTHER D:I SCUSSI ON I TWAS 'MOVED BY MR. OWEN, SEOONDED BY MR. BOOTH, THAT THE
<br />COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE AND THATA'iHEARING BE HELD ON THE SUBJECT
<br />OF TH IS ORD I NANCE. MOTLON CARR I ED. I -
<br />
<br />2. COMMUNICATI~N FROM FRANK I. KLNNEY REGARDING ~HE STATE BANCROFT LAW - IT WAS EXPLAINED
<br />THAT MR. FRANK I. KINNEY HAD APPEARED BEFORE THE, COUNCIL AND PRESENTED A LETTER T~ THE
<br />COUNCIL REQUESTING A REVIEW OF THE PROVISIONS or THE STATE BANCROET ACT AND THE ACTION OF
<br />if HE OREGON STATE TAX ,COMMI ssi ON IN ESTABLI SHI NG A RATI 0 F'OR LANE COUNTY OF FORTYP-ER CENT
<br />OF' TRUE VALUE WITH REFERENCE T~REAL PROPERTY, WHEN THE ~ANE COUNTY ASSESSOR HA. INDICATED
<br />;THE ACTUAL RATIO IS TWENTY-FI VE PER 'CENT OF TRUE VALUE. MR. KI NNEY .1 NDI CATED I N HI S
<br />COMMUNICATION THAT THIS WAS CAUSING A HARDSHIP WHERE STREETS, SEWERS, OR OTHER LOCAL
<br />IMPROVEMENTS ~ENT pAST VACANT ~ROPERTY 'lN ~HAT HE COULD NOT ~OND SUCH PROPERTY UNDER ~~E
<br />RATIO SET UP BY THE STATE TA~ COM~ISSIO~~ -
<br />
<br />THE CITY ATTORNEY I"D1CATED THA~, ArTE~~ONSULTATION,~HE DID NOT BELIEVE THE CITY
<br />COULD USE'THE RATIO'ESTABLISHED BY THE LOCAL ASSESSOR BUT THAT UNDER THE LAW THE CITY MUST
<br />USE THE RATIO ESTABLI SHED BY THE STATE TAX COMMI S'SI ON AS SET FORTH I N THE STATUTES.
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE INDICATED THE ONLY RECOMM~NDATION THEY COULD MAKE IS THAT THE STATUTES
<br />OF THE STATE OF' OREGON BE rOLLOWED.
<br />
<br />3. PARK-AIRE SUBDIVISION - IT WAS EXPL"AINED THAT IT WILL SOON BE NECESSARY TO START
<br />SELLING PORTIONS OF THE PARK-AIRE SUBDIVISION, liHICH THE CITY HAS RECENTLY PLA'TTED, IN"',
<br />ORDER TO ACQUIRE FUNDS TO CARRY OUT THE WORK TO BE DONE AT MAHCON SWEET AIRPORT AND THAT
<br />BEFORE THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY CAN BE SOL~ THt PLANNING COMMISSION W)LL FIRST HAVE TO
<br />DETERMINE THE DEED RESTRICTIONS WHICH WOULD BE PLACED ON THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BUT THAT
<br />IT WAS POSSIBLE, AT THt.STlMf:, THAT THE BUSINESS LOT-AT THE NORTHEAST-'CORNER"OF' IBTH' AVENUE
<br />AND CHAMBERS" STREET', BEl NG LOT 3, COULD BE ADVERT I SED AND SOLD BI\' 81 D.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-:
<br />
<br />ArTER SOME DISCUSSION ON THE SUBJECT OF DEED RESTRICTIONS AND THE METHOD
<br />WELL AS WHICH-O~ THE LOTS ZONED ~O~ COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MIGHT BE 'SOLD, IT'WAS'
<br />THAT LOT 3, BE,I NG THE. LOT AT THE NORTHEAST CORN'ER OF: THE I NTERSECTI ON AT I BTH
<br />CHAMBERS STREET, BE PUT UP FOR SALE ON A.BID BASIS WITH THE COUNCIL TO RETAIN
<br />TO REJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS ON SUCH PROPERTY."
<br />
<br />OF SALE AS
<br />"'I"" '
<br />RECOMMENDED
<br />AVENUE AND
<br />THE AUTHORITY
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />'"
<br />
<br />, -I T, WAS' MOVED BY MR. OwEN" SECONDED BY MR.. GODLOVE, THAT THE REPORT OF THE. COMMi TTEE OF THE
<br />WHOLE BE ADOPTED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE. MESSRS. BOOTH AND KOPPE
<br />ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />14 A REPORT OF THE Bus COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1956 - RE:' ELIMINATI6N OF N1GHT SERVICE
<br />WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"PRESENT: MAYOR' JOHNSON; MESSRS. C. L. KELLY, C. F~ SHEARER, A. C. MCCHESNEY,
<br />WILLIAM RUSSELL, WARREN KORSTAD; CITYMANAGERj AND THE CITY RECORDER.
<br />
<br />THE Bus COMMITTEE MET TO CONSIDER THE MATT~R OF THE CITY TRANSIT LINES ELIMINATING
<br />NIGHT SERVICE WHfCH WAS REF'ERRED TO THEM BY THE COMMON COUNCIL. MR. C. L. KELLY INDICATED
<br />THA~ HE HAD GIVEN ADD1TIONAl THOUGHT ,TO THE.PROBLEM AND HAD, IN, CONNECTION ~IT" A BUSINESS
<br />TRIP, REVI~WED THIS.MATTER WI.TH OFFICIALS OF' THE DALLAS, TEXAS,'Bus_'COMP~NYWHICHHAVE A
<br />WELL OPERATED SYSTEM.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />-
<br />
|