Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pap6 moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 2, Neutral. The motion died for <br /> lack of a second. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 suggested a higher priority for HB 2768, which would allow persons with a concealed hand gun <br />license to buy a firearm without undergoing a criminal history record check. Mr. Cushman did not object to <br />changing the priority but did not see the bill as going anywhere. He was unsure how much movement such <br />bills would have in the current legislature. Mr. Pap6 was not opposed to retaining the current priority and <br />suggested the bill be monitored. Ms. Brooks indicated staff would return with the bill if it gained traction. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 determined from Ms. Muir that HB 3135, related to energy facility siting, did not specify the type <br />of energy facility in question. Ms. Walston concurred. She said that the bill was intended to give local <br />governments an opportunity to comment on energy facility siting. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 1, <br /> Support. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Priority 3 Bills <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman opposed SB 2418, related to the requirements for forming a special district, as she perceived it <br />would diminish the authority of the boundary commission. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the priority of the bill to Priority <br /> 2, Oppose. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested the status of liB 2544, related to the appellate rule of proceedings before the Land <br />Use Board of Appeals, be changed to Support with amendments given that the bill gave legal counsel more <br />time to respond to issues. Staff had no objection. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pap~, moved to change the status of the HB 2544 to Sup- <br /> port with amendments. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor about the staff position on the HB 2586, related to increased <br />penalties for right-of-way offenses, bill, Ms. Hammitt explained that Judge Wayne Allen was opposed to the <br />fact that the bill called for suspension and a minimum suspension period, which removed judicial discretion. <br />He supported an amendment allowing for that discretion. The committee made no changes to the staff <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor wanted to change the status of liB 2603, related to business registry fees, to Priority 2. <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Pap~ about the progress the bill was making, Ms. Brooks indicated no <br />hearings had been held on the bill. Ms. Bettman suggested the committee retain the existing status given the <br />lack of progress. There was general concurrence. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ asked if HB 2619, related to the designation of rural development zones for economic develop- <br />ment, was sponsored by Governor Ted Kulongoski. Ms. Brooks indicated the bill was sponsored by the <br />Oregonians in Action. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested a higher priority be assigned to the bill. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations March 31, 2005 Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />