Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the bill to Support. <br /> The motion passed, 2:1; Mr. Papd no. <br /> <br />SB 0653 <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the bill to Support. <br /> <br />Ms. Brooks indicated the bill, which would direct the DEQ to establish a testing program for the Willamette <br />River and its tributaries, was likely dead. <br /> <br />Mr. Duckett noted that he and Mr. Ruffler had approached the bill from different points of view. The Parks <br />and Open Space Division supported the priority given the Willamette River and the fact lottery dollars <br />would be redirected to Willamette Greenway acquisitions. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruffler said the intent of the bill was good, but it did not indicate any additional State resources would <br />be allocated and DEQ would have to reallocate its existing resources, and the agency was already fiscally <br />strained. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 2:1; Mr. Papd no. <br /> <br />SB 1006 <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Pap6 about the staff recommendation to oppose the bill, which would <br />require contracting agencies to document the determination of lowest responsible bidder on a form submitted <br />to the Bureau of Labor and Industries, Ms. Pomes said there was nothing in the bill about how the <br />information that would be gathered would be used. There was already a process in place that required the <br />City to document that it awarded bids to the lowest bidder. Ms. Bettman suggested the bill was an attempt <br />to create a statewide data base and allow someone to determine if local agencies were complying with the <br />law. She believed given the minimal amount of work, the bill should be supported. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the bill to Support. <br /> The motion passed, 2:1; Mr. Pap6 voting no. <br /> <br />Priority 3 Bills' <br /> <br />HB 2100 <br /> <br />The committee considered HB 2100, which would establish regional land use commissions. The staff <br />recommended opposition to the bill. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the priority of the bill to Priority <br /> 2. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />HB 2268 <br /> <br />Mr. Lidz noted that the bill, which would modify the rules governing appraisal exchanges in condemnation <br />actions, had been slightly amended by a word change. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations April 7, 2005 Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />