Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 14 <br /> <br /> REPORT ID: CELEG3 LEGISLATIVE TRACKING PAGE: 3 <br /> BILLS AND RESPONSE DETAIL RL <br /> DATB'U~ <br /> TIME: 5:1 <br /> PM <br /> <br /> BILLS SENT DUE DATE SUBJECT PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />TITLE ELIMINATES OFFSET FROM STATE SCHOOL FUND GRANT FOR PROPERTY <br /> TAXES OF SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT ARE IMPOSED ON NEW CONSTRUCTION OR <br /> OTHER EXCEPTIONS TO GENERAL RULE DETERMINING ASSESSED VALUE OF <br /> PROPERTY. ELIMINATES OFFSET FOR TWO TAX YEARS FOLLOWING <br /> DETERMINATION OF ASSESSED VALUE UNDER EXCEPTIONS. <br /> SPECIFIES THAT TAXES IMPOSED BY SCHOOL DISTRICT ON EXCEPTION <br /> VALUE BE DISTRIBUTED TO SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTEAD OF URBAN RENEWAL <br /> DISTRICT IF EXCEPTION VALUE ALSO CONSTITUTES INCREMENT VALUE IN <br /> URBAN RENEWAL AREA OF CERTAIN URBAN RENEWAL PLANS. <br /> REQUIRES THAT MONEYS DISTRIBUTED TO SCHOOL DISTRICT UNDER ACT <br /> BE USED FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS. <br /> APPLIES TO TAX AND FISCAL YEARS BEGINNING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, <br /> 2007. <br /> REFERS ACT TO PEOPLE FOR THEIR APPROVAL OR REJECTION AT SPECIAL <br /> ELECTION HELD ON SAME DATE AS NEXT PRIMARY ELECTION. <br /> <br /> POL <br /> CONTACT RESPONDENT DEPARTMENT UPDATED PRIORITY POLICY RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br /> LARRY SUE <br /> CS-FMS 3/15/2005 PRI 3 YES III.B.2 OPPOSE <br /> HILL CUTSOGEORGE <br /> <br /> COMMENTS: THIS BILL WOULD REDUCE REVENUES IN THE DOWNTOWN URBAN <br /> RENEWAL DISTRICT AND WOULD REDUCE REVENUES IN THE <br /> RIVERFRONT DISTRICT IF THE PLAN IS EVER SUBSTANTIALLY <br /> AMENDED IN THE FUTURE. COUNCIL POLICY OPPOSES REDUCTION <br /> IN URBAN RENEWAL REVENUE. <br /> <br /> PATTY PATTY <br /> CS-FMS 3/15/2005 PRI 3 YES VII.A NEUTRAL <br /> BOYLE BOYLE <br /> <br /> COMMENTS: THE IGR COMMITTEE HAS ESTABLISHED POLICIES THAT IN THIS <br /> CASE CONFLICT. <br /> <br /> HB <br /> 3/16/2005 3/30/2005 URBAN RENEWAL PRI 1 NEUTRAL <br /> 3056 <br />RELATING RELATING TO URBAN RENEWAL; CREATING NEW PROVISIONS; AND AMENDING ORS <br />CLAUSE 457 . 105 . <br /> <br /> TITLE REQUIRES APPROVAL OF URBAN RENEWAL PLAN BY EACH CITY OR COUNTY <br /> WITH TAX REVENUES THAT WILL BE REDUCED UPON ADOPTION OF URBAN <br /> RENEWAL PLAN. <br /> APPLIES TO URBAN RENEWAL PLANS ADOPTED OR SUBSTANTIALLY AMENDED <br /> ON OR AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE OF ACT. <br /> <br /> POL <br /> CONTACT RESPONDENT DEPARTMENT UPDATED PRIORITY POLICY NuMRECOMMENDATION <br /> <br /> LARRY LARRY <br /> CS-FMS 4/8/2005 PRI 1 YES III.B.2 OPPOSE <br /> HILL HILL <br /> <br /> COMMENTS: I AGREE WITH SUE CUTSOGEORGE. THIS WOULD GIVE A COUNTY <br /> VETO POWER OVER URBAN RENEWAL PLANS THAT ARE WHOLLY <br /> WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF A CITY. <br /> <br />http ://ceonline/celeg/reports/BillsDetail.asp 4/29/2005 <br /> <br /> <br />