Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~7~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />E. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE PROGRAM AS OUTLINED WAS TO BE A COMMUNITY EfrORT, <br />NOT DESIGNED SPEClrlCALLY fOR A LIMITED NUMBER or MERCHANTS IN THE AREA, BUT <br />.rOR ALL ORG'ANIZATioNS~ GROUPS AND CiTIZENS or THE CITY.' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />F. THE POINT WAS MADE THAT WHILEITHIS WAS BEING DONE ON' AN EXPERIMENTAL BASIS, <br />THE EFrECT or IT MAY LEAD TO CLOSURE AT SOME rUTURE DATE AND BEFORE SUCH COM- <br />P~ETECLOSURE IS MADE' A GREAT DEAL OF' STUDY AND THOUGHT WOULO'HAVE TO GO INTO <br />~HE CONSEQUENCE OF SUCH ACT10N. <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />G. THE- POINfWAS'MA~E THAT If WILLAMETTE STREET WERE CLOSED FO~ A~ INDEr)NITE <br />PERIOD IT MI GHT LEAD'TO THE BUI LDI NG UP or OTHER CENTERS or SHOPP'I NG AWAY <br />rROM THE CITY CORE, ALTHOUGH IN RErUTATION IT'WAS POINTED OUT THAT EUGENE DOES <br />NOT HAVE surrlCIENT POPULATION TO SUPPORT OTHER THAN' A CORE AREA. <br /> <br />1h.; . <br /> <br />H. <br /> <br />T~ERE WASiSOME EXPRESSION or OPINION THAT If THE EXPERIMENT or CLOS1NG <br />METTE STREET WERE:SUCCESSfUL, THEN THE OUTSIDE PERIMETER STREET~ MIGHT <br />WIDENED'TO ALLOW AMORE CONVENIENT TRAffIC flOW AROUND THE CORE AREA. <br />THOUGHT THAT SUCH WIDENING OF,THE PERIMETERiSTREETS COULD BE DONE MUCH <br />ECONOMICALLY 'THAN THE WIDENING Of WILLAMETTE STREET. <br /> <br />WILLA- <br />BE <br />t TWAS <br />'MORE <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />FOLLOWING THE 'DISCUSSION IT'WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. BRIGGS THAT THE <br />COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THE CLOSING OF WILLAMETTE STREET fROM'7TH TO 11TH AVENUErOR A TEN <br />DAY PER 100 STARTI NG, APPROXI MATEL Y MARCH 21', 1957 ON AN: EXPER I MENTAL BASI S. MR. EDMUNDS <br />VOTE NO." " j <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR~ WATSON SECONDED BY MR~ SHEARER THAT THE REPORT' or THE COMMITTEE Of THE <br />WHOLE BE SEGREGATED AND THAT ITEM II BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED: ~ . <br /> <br />I T WAS' MOVED' BY MR; EDMUNDS SECONDED BY MR; SHI SLER THAT THE REPORT or ,THE COMMI TTEE ON THE <br />CLOSURE OF W,LLAMETTE STREET BE REJECTED. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED ON VOICE VOTE. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT A RESOLUTION BE DRAWN INSTRUCTING THE, <br />PLANNING COMMISSIOf\! TO MAKE A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE FEASIBILITY or THE CLOSING or,WILLAMETTE <br />STREET AT SOME FUTURE DATE 'AND WHAT MIGHT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY, SUCH A CLOSURE AND TO REPORT BACK TO <br />THE COUNCIL. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED ON VOICE VOTE. <br /> <br />5 A REPORT OF THE MEETING BET~EEN THE COUNCIL AND ~HE'EUGENE W~TER & ELECTRIC BOARD HELD <br />FEBRUARY 4, 1957 - RE: CONTINUATION OF PAYMENTS TO THE CITY IN LIEU or'TAXES WAS' SUBMITTED AND <br />READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"PRESENT: " COUNC I LMEN WATS'ONj SHEARER, HARTMAN, SHI SLER, EDMUNDS' AND LI NDEEN; CITY <br />MANAGER; CITY ATTORNEY; CITY RECORDER; ADMINiSTRATivE ASSISTANT; MESSRS. <br />TROMLITZ, SMITH,.HOAGlUN, SILVA, McNUTT, BOALS, DEPUTY DIRECTORS TAYLOR <br />AND PATTERSON, CONTROLLER KiNG or THE EUGeNE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD; AND <br />TOM JACQUES OF THE EUGENE R~GISTER-GUARD. <br /> <br />I <br />{, <br /> <br />THE 'MEETI NG WAS' HELD WI TH THE'EUGEtE WATER & ELECTRI C BOARD FOR THE PURPOSE OF 01 SCUSSI NG <br />THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTlNUiNG'THE 6% TAX LEVIED ON THE UTILITY'S GROSS 'ELECTRIC PAYMENTS <br />WHICH AS or NEXT JUNE 30 WILL HAVE BEEN IN EXISTENCE rOR A' PERIOD Of 2-1'/2 YEARS. <br /> <br />THERE WAS GENERAL DISCUSSION BETWEEN MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL AND MEMBERS OF THE <br />EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES or BOTH'UNITS CONCERN- <br />ING THE PROPRIETY O~ SUCH TAXATION. <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS EXPLAINE~ THAT THE COMMON COUNCIL HAD ~ RESOLUTION PREPARED'REQUESTING <br />CONTINUATION orTHE'6% TAX BUT THAT THIS RESOLUTION HAD NOT BEEN PASSED AS or THE <br />DATE OF THIS MEETING. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THE RESOLUTION-BE PASSED'AND REFERRED <br />TO THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD fOR THEIR ACTION. No ~ORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN <br />BY EITHER BODY DORING THE MEETING." <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE REPORT or THE MEETING BETWEEN THE <br />COUNCIL AND THE' EUGENE~WATER:& ELECTRIC BOARD BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE. MOTION tARRIED. <br />(, <br />6 A REPORT O~ THE PUBLIC WOR~S AND PUBLIC'SAfETY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 7, 1957 - RE: <br />REQUEST fROM RESIDENTS or THE AREA fOR SEWER LINE AT THE REAR OF PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE Of <br />EMERALD STREET rROM APPROXIMATELY 28TH AVENUE TO 29TH AVENUE; PETITION rOR THE PAVING or McMILLAN <br />STREET fROM 26TH AVENUE TO ~7TH AVENUE; REQUEST rOR CORRECTING DEED ON PROPERTY ADJACENT TO <br />COLUMBIA STREET BETWEEN 23RD AND 24TH AVENUES; AND REQUEST FOR SEWER IN AREA SOUTH or 40TH AVENUE <br />AND EAST 'Of WILLAMETTE STREET WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"PRESENT: MAYOR McGiNTY; 'COUNCiLMEN WATSON, SHEARER, HARTMAN, SHISLER, EDMUNDS, LAURIS <br />AND LINDEEN; CITY MANAGER; CITY ENGINEER; CITY ATTORNEY; CITY RECORDER; AD- <br />MINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; AND MILES McKAY. <br /> <br />I. REQUEST rROM RESIDENTS or THE AREA rOR SEWER LINE AT' THE ~EAR Of PROPE~TY ON THE <br />EAST SIDE or EMERALD STREET ~ROM APPROXIMATELY 28TH AWENUE TO 29TH AVENUE'- THE <br />COMMITTEE OBSERVED THE AREA WHERE RESIDENTS HAD REQUESTE~ THAT A SEWER LINE BE <br />INSTALLED. THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION or SUCH A SEWER LINE WAS POINTED OUT BY THE <br />CITY ENGINEER, AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT IN CERTAIN CASES.RIGHT-Or-WAY WOULD HAVE <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ <br />