Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~8e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />"r- <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MENTS fOR THE CONSTRUCTION Of THE AMAZON CHANNEL BY CONCRETE LINER fROM THE <br />fAIRGROUNDSfTO CHARNELTON STREET AND THAT IT WAS NECESSARY THAT THE CITY GIVE <br />AN EASEMENT:TO THE fEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO COVER THE CONSTRUCTION Of THE AMAZON <br />CHANNEL THROUGH THE ABOVE AREA. <br /> <br />. \, . <br />IT WAS RE~O~MENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OfFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE <br />NECESSARY DOCUME~TS.~RANTING AN EASEMENT 10 THE fEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE CON- <br />STRUCTION or THE AMAZON CHANNEL BY CONCRETE LINER FROM THE fAIRGROUNDS TO <br />CHARNELTON'STREET. ' <br /> <br />2. DIScusilON'ON THE ~IDTH 6f GARfiELD STREET BETWEEN 6TH AND 7TH AVENUES - IT WAS <br />EXPLAINED THAT THERE WERE VARIOUS WIDTHS WHICH COULD BE USED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF GARFI.ELD,STREET BETWEEN 6TH AVENUE AND 7TH AVENUE WEST. THESE WIDTHS ~ERE 42 <br />fEET, 44 FEET OR 48 FEET. 'THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT SINCE GARfiELD STREET <br />WAS CONSTRUCTED TO A WiDTH OF 48 FEET BETWEEN 7TH AND 11TH AVENUES, THIS WIDTH <br />OF 48 FEET BE EXTENDED FROM 6TH TO 7TH AVENUE. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />IMPROVEMENT OF 6TH AVENUE WEST, BEING THE HIGHWAY 99 NORTHBOUND - THE CITY MANAGER!' <br />EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD CONTACTED THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER WITH REFERENCE' <br />TO THE POSSI-BLE I MPROVEMENT Of 6TH AVENUE FROM THE END OF THE EXI STl NG CURBS AND <br />GUTTERS:WHICH WOULD BE :BETWEEN ALMADEN AND.PIERCE STREETS. VARIOUS WIDTHS COULD <br />,,'", - -.' <br />BE USED IN THIS INSTANCE FOR THE POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTIO~OF THE StREET, BUT THE <br />RECOMMiNdATION cif T~E ~IGHWAY ENGI'NEER WAS TO BE NOT LESS THAN.44 FEET If ~HE <br />CITY WERE PLANNING FOR FUTURE TWO-WAY ARTERIAL TRAFfiC. IT WAS FURTHER EXPLAINED <br />THAT A WIDTH OF 44 FEET WOULD MAKE IT CONSIDERABLY EASIER TO USE THE EXISTING <br />HIGHWAY SURFACING AND REQUIRE THAT A STREET BE BUILT ONLY BETWEEN THE EXISTING <br />'HIGHWAY SURFACING AND THE PROPOSED CURB LINE. : <br /> <br />. " <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />:- \.' ~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS RE~OMMENDED THAT. THE CI TY fOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATI ONS OF THEENGI ~EER AND <br />THAT TH~ iMPROVEM~NT OF' 6TH AVENUE WEST BE TO A WIDTH OF 'NOT LESS THAN 44 'fEET. <br /> <br />, .- <br />4. REPORT ON fiRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS - THE CITY MANAGER PRESENTED A REPORT TO <br />THE COMMITTE;E IN WHICH THE fiRE CHIEf H~D SET FORTH A NUMBER OF IMPROVEMENTS WHICH <br />WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PLACE THE CITY IN A LOWER FIRE INSURANCE GRADING GROUP. THE <br />fiRE CHIEF COMMENTED ON THE VARIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH WERE PRESENTED to THE <br />COMMITTEE IN'WRITING.. DURING THE COURSE OF THE PRESENTATION MEMBE*S OF THE COM- <br />MITTEE MADE INQUIRY AS TO SOME PARTICULAR QUESTIONS, AND FOLLOWING THE PRESENTA- <br />tiON IT wAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SA~ETY COMMITTEE <br />FOR STUDY. " <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />REQUEST BY SCHOOL DISTRICT #504-C fORn RE PROTECTION CONTRACT 'ONTHE NORTH EUGENE <br />HIGH SCHOOL - IT ,WAS EXPLAINED THAT A REQUEST HAD BEEN RE;CEIVED fROM S~HOOL DIS- <br />TRICT #504-C FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR THE NORTH EUGENE HIGH SCHOOL WHICH IS LOCATED <br />ADJACE~T TO/OUTSIDk OF THE ~'VER ROAD fl*E PROTECTION DISTRICT. DURING ~HE DIS- <br />CUSSION IT WAS POINTED out THAT THE COUNCIL HAS ENACTED A RESOLUTION 'SETTING 'FORTH <br />A RATE ~F 6 MILL$ ON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY, OR A MINIMUM Of $150 <br />PER YE~R, AS THE RATE WHICH wOULD BE CHARGED FOR FIRE PROTECTION. fOLLOWING SOME <br />DISCUS~ION iN WHICH IT WAS RECOGNIZED THAT THE PEOPLE Of THE CITY HAVE A VERY <br />GREAT INTEREST IN THE 'BUILDINGS OWNED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, IT WAS RECOMMENDED <br />THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONTRACT FOR FIRE PROTECTION Of THE NORTH EUGENE HIGH <br />SCHOOL BASED ON 6 MI LLS OF THE SCHOOL 's V~LUATI ON AS I T, WOULD BE VALUED FOR -TAX <br />PURPOSES." - . <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />" <br />IT WAS MOVEO'SY MR~ WATSON SECONDED BY MR. EDMONDS THAT THE REPORT OF 'THE .COMMITTEE Of THE <br />WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I TWAS McivED' BY -MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE WIDTH OF 6TH AVENUE WEST, BE I,NG <br />HI GHWAY 99 NORTHBOUND, fROMTH~ END OF THE EXI STt NG CURBS AND GUTTERS WHI CH ARE BETwEEN' ALMADEN" <br />AND PIERCE STREETS 'BE SET AT 48 FEET. MOTtON CARRIED. ,.' ~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. -.i:f ': <br /> <br />:;;: <br />4 A REPORT OF THE HEALTH & RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON fEBRUARY 20, 1957 - RE: ~XCHANGE\: <br />Of PROPER~Y WITHCfNTU~Y fUND "FOR PARK PURPOSES; SAtE O~ EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY ~ORPARK PUR~O~ES; ~ <br />PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR PONY RI DE AT SKI NNERS BUTTE -PARK; AND 01 SCUSSI ON OF PROPOSAL fOR URBAN'RE- <br />NEWAL AND HOUSING CODE WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"PRESENT: MAYOR McGINTY; COUNCILMEN HARTMAN, LAURIS, LINDEEN; CITY MANAGER; CITY <br />ATTORNEY; PARKS & RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT; CITY RE~ORDER;,PLANNING <br />,CONSULTANT; MRS.'WHITE; MRS. CLARK; MRS. BALDINGER; MR. BURBEE;MR. WINDSOR; <br />DAN W~ANT,EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD~ <br /> <br />I. EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WiTH CENTU~Y fUND FOR PARK PURPOSES - THE PARKS & RECREATION <br />SUPERINTENDENT EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY or EUGENE HAD CERTAIN LOTS ADJOINING THE <br />PROPOSED LOCATION or PEARL STREET BETWEEN 22ND _AVENUE EAST AND 25TH AVENUE E~ST <br />WHICH, WHEN PEARL STRE~T'IS CONSTRUCTED"wiLL NOT,BE CONTIGUOUS TO THE AMAZON <br />PARK PROPERTY BUT WOULD BE ON THE wEST SIDE or PEARL STREET AND FOR THIS REASON <br />WOULD HAVE SMALL VALUE rOR PARK PURPOSES. <br /> <br />. -.,1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. . /j <br />IN ACCORDANCE WITH PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN BY THE COUNC,L, AN ESTIMATE OF THE <br />POTE~TiAL1~ALUE 6F THESE LOTS HAD BEEN MADE, INCL~DING THE PROPOSED COSTS OF <br />STREET ASSESSMENTS WHICH WOULD BE ASSESSABLE TO THESE LOTS. ON THE BASIS OF THE <br /> <br />e, <br /> <br />~ <br />