Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r4~f <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />THE 'CI TV LI MITS HAD 'A DRAI'NAGE DI TCH RUNNI,NG THROUGH' I T AND rN .HER BEL I EF ,THE 'SEWER <br />WOULD BE QF NO USE TO HER. . THE COMMITTEE .DROVE TO THE A~EA AND LOOKED OVER THIS <br />PARTICULAR SITUATION AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE ASSESSMENT STAND AS WAS MADE BY THE <br />ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. <br /> <br />'1 <br /> <br />HEALTH & RECREATION COMMITTEE <br />I. DISCUSSION ON COUNTY OFFER TO GIVE fERRY STREET BRfDGE PARK 'TO CITY - AT THE COUNCIL <br />MEETING OF MARCH II, 1957 A LETTER FROM THE LANE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPART- <br />MENT wAs 'READ I~WHICH A PARK AREA ON THE NORTH SID~ OF TH~ WI~LAMETTE RIVER LOCATED <br />IMMEDI'ATEL.:Y EAST OF -THE NORTH 'APPROAcH laTHE fERRY STREET BRIDGE 'WAS OFFERED TO THE <br />CITY Of' EUGENE' AT NO"COST.' . SI'NCE 'RECE'-PT OF' THIS LETTER"IT HAs BEEN DETERMINt'D 'THAT <br />THE COUNTY HAS ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION <br />TO GI VE THE STATE PR lOR CONSI OERATI ON ON ,ANY COUNTY PROPERTY CURRENTLY OWNED t"N . : <br />THIS AREA AND FOR THAT'REASO~ THE OFFER MADE By'THE LANE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION' <br />DEPARTMENT WAS WI THDRAWN. THE COMMI TTEE"RECOMMENDED THAT THE MATTER 'BE TABLED. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />COMMrTTEE or -THE WHOLE . . --. -. <br />I. DISCUSSION REGARDING STREET NAME 'SIGNS -THE CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED TO'THE ~COMMITTEE' <br />THAT-THE SUM OF '$10,000 HAD BEEN SET UP IN'THE 1956-57 BUDGET,FOR THE fNSTALLATION <br />or STREET NAME 'SI GNS. IT'-S 'PRESUMED THAtTl-lI 5' PROJECT WI LL EXTEND OVER AT (EAST' <br />FOUR YEARS AND WILL COST'APPROXfMATELY $10,000 I'N EACH YEM BEFORE THE CITY IS <br />COMPLETELY SIGNED. THE ENGiNEERl'NG DEPARTMENT INDICATED THAT THERE ARE APP~OXI- <br />MATEL y900 INTERSECTIONS' IN THE"'CfTY AND THAT WI TH THE '1IIlSTALJ:,ATI ON OF STREET NAME <br />SIGNS ON TVlO CORNERS OF EACH INTERSECTJ'ON,1800 UNIT SIGNS WOULD BE NECESSARY,TO <br />COMPLETELY SIGN THE CITY. <br /> <br />THE 'COMMITTEE VIEWED ,SIGNS 'OF VARIOUS TYPES iNCLUDING SCOTCHLITE, BAKED ENAMEL AND <br />PORCELAIN ENAMEL SIGNS. 'THEEST{MATED MATERIA~ COST FOR SUCH SIGNS VARIED FROM <br />$6~90 PER'UNIT'TO $I'I;60'PER ~NIT~, THE RECOMMENDED SIGN WAS INDJCATEDAS 'A TYPE B <br />SCOTCHLITE AT A ~NITCOst OF '$6~90,AND 'THIS SI'~NWAS 'ACTUALLY O~SERVED'BY THE COM- <br />MITTEE AND WAS FOUND TO BE LEGIBLE IN,DAYLIGHT LIGHTING AS WELL AS HIGHLY REFLECTIVE <br />FOR NIGHT LIGHTING AND IN THE OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE WAS THE BEST SIGN OBTAINABLE <br />BASED:ON'THOSE TYPES OF' SIGNS SHOWN TO'THE COMMI'TTEE.' 'I'T WAS 'EXPLAINED THAT THE P.ER <br />UNIT'COST OF $6.90 rNCLUDED MATERIAL FOR THE,sfGN ONLY AND' DID NOT INCLUDE LABOR FOR <br />MANUFACTURE OF' THE SIGN, INSTALLATION OF THE SIGN NOR ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST. THE <br />COMMITTEt' REtOMMEIIlDE~ ACCEPTANCE' OF:THE'ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR 'TYPE B'SCOTCH- <br />LITESf~NS.AT'A~'APPROXIMATE cost OF $6.90 'PER 'UNIT~ <br /> <br />2. Dlst~ssro~ REGARDING'POTENTIA' ANNEXATioN l'lIl THE 'WILLAKENtlE 'fIR~ PRO~ECTION DISTRICT - <br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD AMONG THE COMMITTEE WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNEXATION OF A POR- <br />TION OF THE WILLAKENZIE fiRE PROTEcTION.DISTRICT. No FORMAL RECOMMENDATION WAS MADE." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR~,WATSON SECONDED By'MRS~ LAURIS THAT' THE, REPORT OF THE 'PUBLIC WORKS COM- <br />MITTEE AND OF THE HEALTH & RECREATION COMMITTEE BE ADOPTED~: 'MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE <br />WHOLE BE ADOPTED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN 'PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATtONS' <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />A PETITION FOR'REZONING TH~ NORTHEAST CORNER OF'32ND AVENUE AND WILLAMETTE STREET FROM RA, <br />OUTER RESIDENTIAL DISTRltT, TO C-2, 'NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBMITTED BY FLOYD D.STAPP <br />AND HELD OVER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION ON NOVEMBER 13, 1956, BY REQUEST'WA~ BROUGHT ON FOR RE- <br />CONSI DERATI ON. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN'SECONDED By'MR. SHEARER THAT THE PETITION BE REFERRED TO THE <br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />A CONSENT TO ANNEXATION WAS SUBMITTED BY CARL AND RUTH E. &STROM FOR THE NORTH 116 FEET OF <br />LOT 5,'BLOCK 2, OF ARCADIA PARK. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. WATSON THAT THE CONSENT TO ANNEXATION BE RE- <br />FERRED TO THE'PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I I <br /> <br />A PETITION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF UNIVERSITY STREET FROM 23RD TO 25TH AVENUE WAS SUBMITTED <br />WITH SIGNATURES OF OWNERS REPRESENTlNG'46.53%'OF THE TOTAL,F'RONT'f'OOTAGE OF'THEPROPERTlES TO BE <br />ASSESSEO. ,,'d'.' <br /> <br />I TWAS' MOVED BY' MR. 'SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. WATSON THAT' THE PETI TI ON BE REFERRED TO THE <br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />'A PETITION FOR'THE I~PROVEMENT OF CHARN~LTON STREET FROM 25TH TO 26TH AVENUE WAS SUBMITTED <br />WITH SIGNATURES OF OWNERS REPRESENTING 40.41% OF iHE TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE OF THE PROPERTIES TO BE <br />ASSESSED. ' . <br /> <br />I T WAS MOVED By'MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER lH'AT THE: PETI TI ON BE REFERRED TO THE <br />PUBLIC WORKS COM~ITTEE. MOTI~N CARRIED. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />A PETITION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF CITY VIEW STREET FROM 18TH TO 22ND AVENUE WAS SUBMITTED <br />WITH SIGNATURES OF OWNERS REPRESENTING 53~42% OF THE TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE OF THE PROPERTiES TO BE <br />ASSESSED, SAI D' IMPROVEMENT C'ONSI'STI NG OF' PA,n NG AN'O SIDEWALK. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br />! <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />,: <br />I' <br />I: <br />Ii <br />, <br />\; <br />f <br />Ii <br />I <br />" <br />I <br />j <br />I <br />I' <br />" <br />Ii <br />I' <br />Ii <br />': <br />I. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />--- <br />