|
<br />~1~
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />AND THE DEPARTMENT J'iAS COMPLETED, THE STANDARD FI R.S,T AID COURSE UNDER THE 01 R,ECTI ON OF
<br />MR. W. H. PAI~E, SAF'ETY I NSP~CTOR' FOR THE STATE I.NDUSTRI AL ACCI DENT COMMI SSI ON. T,HE
<br />DRILL TIME rOR THE MONTH AMOU~TE~ ~o 95 HOURS.
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />ACCORDIN~ TO THE POLICE REPORT, A COpy OF W~ICH IS ON YOUR DESK, THE SEMI-ANNUAL
<br />REGIONAL POLICE TR~INING 'SCHOOL WAS C~MPLETED IN ~ARCH. THIS SCHOQLCOVEREP A PERIOD
<br />or SEVEN WEEKS AND UTILIZED INSTRUCTO~S FROM SEVE,RAL DIFFERENT AGENCIES, INCLUDING
<br />THE FBI, EUGENE, PORTLAND" MEDrORD AND SALEM POLI,CE' DEPARTMENTS.. UND,ER GENERAL CRI MI-
<br />'NAL ACT! V ITY, OUR CASE LOAD fOR MARCH WAS ONLY SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN ,THAT FOR FEBRUARY
<br />, WH I CH I S ACCOUNTED FOR BY. THE ,LONGER MONTH, AS WE HAD ONLY 236 CASES REPORTED I N MARCH
<br />COMPARED TO 229 .1 N FEBRUAR.Y. OF THE CASES, TEN W,ERE BURGLAR I ES:,: ,TWELVE GRAND LARCEN-
<br />I ES, 74 PETTY ~ARCENY. WEMAD,E 71 ARRESTS FOR OF.FENSES I NVOLVI NG DRUNKENESS, 01 SORDERLY ,
<br />CONDUCT AND VAGRANCY, AS COMPARED TO 66 SUCH ARRE.STS rOR THE, PRECEDI NG MONTH, THERE
<br />BEING AN AVERAGE or ONLY 34 PRISONERS IN MARCH CQMPARED T~ 44 'IN FEBRUARY. A TOTAL .OF
<br />236 BOOK-INS WERE MADE, 104 FOR THE 'COUNTY AND '13,2 FOR THE CITY. THE JAIL KI,T~HEN
<br />SERVED A TOTAL OF 36p9 MEALS 'AT AN ,AVERAGE COST Of 13. 9tJ PER MEAL. VE,HI CLES, OF THE
<br />DEPARTMENT COVERED 37,,930 .MILES IN MARCH. THE MU.NICIPAL COURT PROCESSED 1085 CASES
<br />DURING THE MONTH, WITH I~ blSMI~SALS RESULTING. JHE JUVENILE TRAFrlC ~RAINING OFFI-
<br />CER GAVE INSTRUCTIONS TO 1390 ELEMENTARY' STUDENT~ DURING THE MONTH.
<br />
<br />THE ENGINEERI'NG, DE~PARTMENT COMPLETED THE FIE.LD 'WORK ON 10 PAVING, AND 5 SEWER PROJECTS;
<br />PREPARED BID OPENI NGS FOR 3 STORM SEWERS" 2 SANIT.ARY SEWERS, I ALLE,Y 'AND J .STREET PAVI NG
<br />PROJECT; COMPLETED THE F-IELD WORK FORJEFF'ERSON S.TREET RELOCATI'ON BET)/EEN27T.H AND ~9TH .
<br />AVENUES; AND PREPARED RIGHTS-Or-WAY DESCRIPTION O.N THE AMAZON CHANNEL PROJE.CT FROM OLIVE
<br />STREET TO 32ND AVENUE. THE MAI'NTENANCE DEPARTMEN,T' GRADED 17 MI LE,S 'OF GRAVELED STREElS A;ND
<br />ALLEYS, USED 201 yARDS GRAVEL; 181, TONS' OF' PREMI X., PUT IN 2,46 FEE'T OFCULVER.T PI PE,' CLEANED
<br />OUT 3 MI LES OF 01 T(:HES, COMPLETED NEW BUI LDI NG AT. SHOP USI NG 36,300 LBS. PRE.MI X AND 6
<br />YARDS GRAVEL, CONSTRUCTED 4 NEW CATCH BASI NS, AND. A CULVERT AT 26T,H AN.D RI VERVI EW USING
<br />36 FEET OF 54- CU,-VERT, PI PE AND 57 YARDS OF GRAVE,L'. ALSO THI S DEPARTMENT SWEPT 823 CURB
<br />MILES, fLUSHED'634 MILES"HAND SWEPT ~LLEYS, HAUL~D 404 yARDS or,~~REET SWE~PINGS AND
<br />CLEANED CATCH BASINS, SEWERS ANp CULVER~S IN VARIPUS rARTS or THE,CI~Y, FE~L 3 TRE~S
<br />AND RESPONDED TO II ~EWER CALLS.
<br />
<br />OUR LIBRARIAN REPORTS THAT MARC~ 19~7 WAS OU~ -SECOND RECORD BREAKING ~ONTH OF
<br />THIS YEAR FOR THE LARGEST, TOTAL CI,RCULA:TION AND T,HE HIGHEST AVERAGE DAILY, CIRCULATION."
<br />
<br />.
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARE,RTHAT THE REPORT or THE CITY MANAGER BE
<br />RE~EIVED AND PLACED ON,rILE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />.
<br />REPORTS, 'or COMMI TTEES
<br />,
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MARCH 29, 1957 - RE: PUBLIC WORKS, COMMITTEE - PETITION
<br />FOR PAVING OF ALLEY BETWEEN 5TH AND 6TH AVENUES FROM WASHINGTON TO JEFFERSON STREET, PETITION rOR I
<br />I'
<br />PAYING AND SIDEWALKS CI;rY V,IEW STREETFR9M .8TH TO 22Np AVENUE, PETITION rOR PAVING CHARNELTON, [i
<br />STREET rROM 25TH TO 26TH AVENUE, PETITION FOR PAVING Of UNIVERSITY STREET rROM 23RD TO 25TH AVE-
<br />NUT, REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION OF THE NORTH 116 FEET, LOT 5, BLOCK 2, ARCADIA PARK, SUBMITTED BY I'
<br />CARL AND RUTH E. EKSTROM; COMMI TTEE OF THE WHOLE - REQUEST rOR REZONI NG or PROPERTY. AT SOUTHEAST I:
<br />CORNER or 32ND AVENUE AND WILLAMETTE STREET SUBMITTED BY FLOYD AND MARY STAPP, REQUEST BY HAZEN L. I
<br />AND DOROTHY H. OLSEN FO~ VACATION' or A. PORT! ON. or THE ?TREET RI GHT-OF"WAY ADJACENT TO Lo] 8, I'
<br />BLOCK 5, HENDRI CKS AMENDED ADDi TI ON BEl NG LOCATED AT 18TH AND LI NCOLN, 01 SCUSSI ONRGGARDI NG .THE I
<br />!
<br />WILLAKENZIE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ANNEXATION AREA, DISCUSSION REGARDING PPSSIBLE SETTLEMENT OF I:.
<br />CONDEMNATION ON JUDKINS PROPERTY FOR STREET PURPOSES; WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />
<br />).
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I'
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />[
<br />I;
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />i'
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />\:
<br />II
<br />"
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />"PRESENT:
<br />
<br />COUNCILMEN WATSON, HARTMAN, SHISLER, LAURIS, BRIGGS AND LINDE'EN; CITY MANAGER;
<br />CITY ENGINEER; CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; PLAN-
<br />NING CONSULTANT; MESSRS. OLSEN, SNYDER AND LUVAASj DAN WVA~T, EUGENE REGISTER-
<br />GUARD.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
<br />I. PET! TI ON rOR PAVI NG OF ALLEY BETWEEN 5TH AND 6tH AVENUES rROM W~SHI NGTON. TO JEFFERSON-
<br />A PETITION CONTAINING SIGNATURES or OWNERS or 67.49% or THE TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE or
<br />THE PROPERTIES TO BE ASSESSED WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. TH~ COM~ITTEE DROVE
<br />... .
<br />OVER THE ALLEY IN QUESTION AND;NOTED THAT IT APPEARED TO BE A:HI~H USE A~LEYAND IN
<br />NEED OF REPAIR. IT WAS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT THE ALLEY BE PAVED AND THE NECES-
<br />SARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE PAVING BE PASSED.
<br />
<br />2.
<br />
<br />PETITION FOR PAVING AND SIDEWALKS ON CITY VIEW STREET FROM 18TH TO 22ND AVENUE - A
<br />PETITION CONTAINING S!GNATURES or OWNERSoor 53.42% OF THE TOTAL fRONT rOOTAGE OF
<br />T~E PROPERTY fo BE ASSESSED ~AS PRESENTED TO'THE COMMITTEE~ -THE COMMITTEE VISITED
<br />THE AREA AND DROVE OVER THE STREET, AND IT WAS POINTED Our THAT THE LOr AT THE, SOUT~-
<br />WEST CORNER or 18TH AVENUE AND CITY VIEW STREET IS NOT INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS. THE
<br />COMMITTEE INDICATED THEY THOUGHT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
<br />18TH AVENUE AND CITY VIEW STREET SHOULD BE CONTACTED TO DETERMINE IF HE WOULD PAY
<br />THEPROPORTIONATE,COST rOR PAVING IF THE STREET WERE IMPROVED. IT WAS RECOMMENDED
<br />THAT CITY VIEW STREET BE PAVED AND SIDEWALKS INSTALLED rRO~ t8JH AVENUE TO THt SOUT~
<br />CITY LIMITS AS FOUND ON THE WEST SIDE or CITY VIEW STREET EXCLUSIVE OF THE 116 rOOT
<br />PIECE IMMEDIATELY SOUTH, or 18TH AVENUE UNLESS T~E PROPERTY HOLDER WHOSE PROP~RTY IS
<br />NOT INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WILL AGREE TO PAY THE PROPORTIONATE COST OF,THE STREET
<br />IMPROVEMENT.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|