|
<br />~g
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />4. 01 SCUSSI ON REGARDI NG POSSI BLE SETTLEMENT OF C,ONDEMNATION ON JUDKI NS PROPERTY FOR
<br />STREET PURPOSES -THE CITY ATTORNEY INDICATED THAT HE HAD BEEN NEGOTIATING,WITH
<br />THE PROPERTY HOLDER FOR SETTLEMENT OF THE, CONDEMNATION IN WHICH, THE:CITY PROPOSES
<br />TO ACQUIRE A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY TOC~NNECT AUGUSTA SJREET AND: LAUREL HILL DR1VE
<br />AND I NDI CATED HE BELl EVED I TWAS POSSI BLE TO SETTLE THE CONDEMNATI ON SUI T OUT OF
<br />COURT. ,THE COMMITJEE RECOMMENDtD JHAT HE BE GIVEN. AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE,A
<br />SETTLEMENT." , '
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE REPORT OF TI:lE .PUBLIC WORKS COM-
<br />MITTEE BE ADOPTED EXCEPT FOR ITEM #2. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />-J
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT ITEM #2 BE FOR PAVING AND INSTALLA-
<br />TION OF SIDEWALKS o'N (I TY VI EW STREET FROM 1,8TH AVENUE TO, 22ND, AVENUE EXCLUS I VE OF ,II (I' FEE]' AD';'
<br />JACENT TO AND: SOUTH ,OF ,18TH AVENUE. MOTl ,ON C'ARR I EO.,
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR., B~'GGS THAT CJTY V,EW ST~EET BE PAVED FRDM 22ND
<br />AVENUE TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS AS FOUND ON THE WEST SIDE QFCITY VIEW STREET, SUBJECT TO. APPROVAL
<br />OF 50.% DF THE PRo.PERTY OWNERS TO BE AFFECTED BY THE ASSES$M,ENT. ,M,O,T, ON CARRI ED.
<br />
<br />, '
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. BRIGGS SECDNDED BY MR. WATSON THAT THE REPDRT OF THE CDMMITTEE DF THE
<br />WHOLE BE ACCEpTED. ,t-10T'ION FARRIED W,ITH:MRS.-LAURIS A,N,o M~. L.INDEEN VPT!NG NA,Y.'
<br />
<br />.. '
<br />A REPORT OF THE C,OMMITTEE MEETING HELD APRIL 5, 1957- RE:"PUBLIC WORI:<S COMMITTEE'';' STATEMENT
<br />FROM MR. SIONEY SAKS FOR REPAIRING PARKING STRIP DN PEARL,STREET; POSTCARDPDL~ DN 1HE,PAVING OF
<br />JACKSON STREET FRO.M BROADWAY TO IDTH AVENUE; PUBLI C SAFETY COt:-tMI TTEE - CONSI DERATI DN DF' BIDS ON
<br />F'I RE HOSE; HEALTH & RECREATI DN COMMITTEE. - CDNSID,ERATION DF,THE. ~OST AND METHOD9F F INANC I NG COM-
<br />PLETt ON OF T.HE AMAZON PARK SWIMMI NG PO,OLjCOMMI TlEE OF THE WHOLE - PROPOSED CONNECTIj)N OF JEFFER-
<br />SON AND WASHINGTON STR~ETS TO KREATZ RDAD AND 29TH AVENUE, DISCUSSION ON THE WILLA~ENZ1E AND RIVER
<br />ROAD ANNEXATI ON AREAS; WAS SUBMI TTED AND READ AS FDLLOWS::
<br />
<br />"PRESENT: ,MAYOR, MCGI'NTY; CDUNCI LMEN WATSON" SHEARER, HARTMAN, SHI SLER, LAUR IS, BR I GGS
<br />'AND LINDEEN; CITY MANAGER; CITY'RECORDER; CITY ENGINEER; CITY ATTORNEY;
<br />PLANNING CONSULTANT; PARKS & RECREATION SUPERINTENDENTJ ADMINISTRATIVE
<br />ASSISTANT; FRED BRENNE, EUGENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-
<br />GUARD; AND A NUMBER OF CITIZENS FROM THE RIVERRDAD AND WILLAKENZIE AREAS AND
<br />THEIR COUNSEL.
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
<br />I. STATEMENT: FROM MR. SIDNEY SAKS 'FDR R,EPAI RI NG PARKI NG STRI P: DN PEARL STREET -- A BI LL
<br />FOR REf'A I R OF. THE PARK,I NG AREA ADJACENT TO MR. S,AKS,' H,OME ON PEARL STREET WAS 'PRE-
<br />SENTED TO. THE COMMITTEE. I TWAS EXPLA I NED THAT' MR. SAKS I NCURRED THE EXP,ENSE BY
<br />R~ASON OF HAVING HI~ED SDME WORK DONE ON T~E PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF HISRESJDENCE.
<br />THE TOTAL BI LL FOR THI S WORK AMOUNTED TO $40..0.0. AND THE WDRK' WAS PERFDRMED ,BEFDRE
<br />THE STREET WAS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY AND WHILE IN THE CONTRACTDR'S RESPONSIBILITY.
<br />THE COMMI TTEE, RECOMMENDED THAT THE ABOVE BI l.L. BER.EJECTED AN.D, THAT' A COM,MUNI CATI 0'"
<br />BE ADDRE,SSED TO MR. SA KS EXPLA IN:I NG THA,T THEMA T:TER' WAS BETWEEN HIM,' AND TH,E CPN-
<br />TRACTOR, THAT THE C.. TY HAD NO AUTHORI TY TO. PAY,FDR SUCH 'WDRK AND THAT THE S:TREET
<br />HAD"NOT BEEN ACCEPTED WHEN HE HAD ENGAGED A PRIVATE PERSDN TO. MAKE REPAIRS T9 HIS
<br />PROPERTY.
<br />
<br />2. PDSTCARD POLL ON 'THE PAVING ,OF )ACKSDN,~TREET FRDM,BROADWAY TO IOT-H, AVENUE - -IT
<br />'WAS,EXPLAI~E.D :THAT :THE: CPMMI TTEE HAD PREVI OUSL Y 'REQUESTED A POLL TO. BE TAK~N CDN:';
<br />CERNI NG 'foHE PAVI NG OF JACKSON STREET FROM BROADWAY TO. IDni AVENUE AND THAT AS OF
<br />THI'S nME,BASED .o.N ANSWERS RECE I,VED, 62.58" DF _THE PRDP,ERry HOLD,ERS W,ERf:IN., '
<br />FAVOR .oFPAVI NG, 13.25% WERE OpPOSED TO. PAVI NG' AND ,NO. ,RE~PRTWAS, RECEI VED FROM
<br />24.1,6%. 'ON THE BASI S qF' THE POLL THE COMMI TTEE ,RECOMMENDED THAT THE STREET, BE
<br />PAVED AND THAT THE ~ECESSARY ORDtNANCES INITIA~ING THE PAVING PROJECT B~ PASSED.
<br />
<br />7
<br />
<br />PUBLIC ,SAFETY COMMITTEE
<br />I. CDNSIDERATIDN OF BIDS DN FIRE HDSE - IT WAS ~XPL~INED THAT THE CITY DF EUGENE "AD
<br />RECENTLY REQUESTED BIDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF 10.0.0. FEET OF 2-1/2r F'IRE HOSE AND 50.0.
<br />FE.ET,DF 1-1/2" f,IRE HOSE AND THA-T THE BIDS H,AD BEEN OPENED AND TABU,LATED AND. TI:lE
<br />CHIEF OF THE'FIRE, DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN REQUESTED TO EXAMINE THE VARIOUS SAMPLES AND
<br />MAKE' A RECOMMENDATI ON A$ TO WHICH HOSE SHOULD BE PURCHASED. I T: WAS EXPLAI NED' THAT
<br />THE LOW BIDDER HADNDT WOVEN THE HDSEWHI CH HE PROPOSED TO SELL TO THE .CI TY AND
<br />fDR THISREASDN IT WAS FELT ,THAT HIS BID SHOULD NOT BE CONS,IDERED. IT WAS LIKEWISE
<br />EXPLAINED THAT DTH.E'R CITIES HAD EXPERIENCED 01 F'F'ICULTY WITH. SOME DF' T.HE HOSE: IN THE
<br />BRANDS WHICH HAD BEEN 'BID UPON, AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY PURCHASE THE
<br />FIRE HOSE fROM MUNNELL. & SHERRILL, INC., EUG.ENE, WHO BID ON "PURITAN BRAND" HDSE
<br />AT A PURCHASE PRICE DF $1.69 PER FODT FOR 2-1/2" HOSE AND $1.21 PER fOOT FOR 1-1/2"
<br />HOSE. THEI'R BIDIND,ICATES A 2% DI.SCDUNT FOR PAYMENT BY THE IDTH OF THE MONTH fDL-
<br />LDWI NG DELI VERY, D,ELI VERY TO BE AT THE CI TY HALL -I N EUGENE WI THIN 3D TO 45 DAYS
<br />FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF DRDER.
<br />
<br />8
<br />
<br />HEAL TH & RECREATION COMMI TTEE'
<br />I. CONSiDERATION DF THE CDST AND METHOD Df fINANCI~G COMPLETION OF THE AMAZON ,PARK
<br />SWI MMI NG POOL - I TWAS EXPLAI NED THAT THE APPROXI MATE' SUM Of' $,33,0.0.0. WDULD BE
<br />NECESSARY, TO. PI.ACE THE AMAZON PARK SWI MMI NG PODL IN, READ,I NE,SS, FOR SW.I MM) NG OUR I NG
<br />THE CDMING SUMMER SEASDN. OF THI.S SUM $15',0.0.0. IS AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CAPITAl.
<br />EXPENSE BUDGET Of THE PARKS DEPARTMENT, AND THE REMAINING $18,0.0.0. WOULD HAVE TO BE
<br />SECURED F'RDM DTHER SOURCES. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT $13,000 COULD BE TAKEN ~ROM THE
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />I'
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|