|
<br />~~~
<br />'1' ({J Q;
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />4. PAVING Of 29TH PLACE BETWEEN PEARL AND HrGH SrrREETS- THE COMMITTEE AGAIN CONSIDERED
<br />THE PAVING Of 29.TH' PLACE fROM. PEARL, TO. HI.GH STREET W.HICH ORIGINALLY, HAD BEEN ,PETI-
<br />TI~NED fOR PAVJNG.~O A'WIDTH Of, 18 fEET~ IT WAS EXPLAINED, THAT THE PROPERTY HOLDERS
<br />WERE AGREEABLE TO; THE PAVI NG TO A WIDTH Of 27 fEET fOR A PORT,ION Of THE STREET.' AfTER
<br />SOME DISCUSSION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE WIDENING Of THE STREET fROM 18 fEET TO
<br />27 HET' FORA STUB PAV,EMENT A,S OUTLI NED' BY, THE CI TY ENGI NEER, SUBJE,CT TO THE APPROVAL
<br />OF THE ~FFECTED PROPERTY HOLDERS.
<br />
<br />5. DISCUSSION CONCERN,ING THE PAVING Of 24TH'PLACE FROM W'LLAMETTE TO OLIVE STREET - THE
<br />COMMITTEE AGAIN CONSIDERED THE PAVING OF 24TH PLACE FROM W'LLAMETTE TO OL'VESTREET.
<br />BASED ON THE LATES,T TABULATI ON 42.6~ OF THE PEOPLE POLLED fAVORED PAVI NG, 47.21%
<br />OPPOSED PAV I NG AND' NO REPORT WAS RECE I VED fROM 10.12%. I T WAS NOTED lIiHAT THE STREET
<br />AS IT CURRENTLY,EX~STS, IS BADLY DETERIORATED AND IS ,IMPOSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN. THE COM-
<br />MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITION fOR THE PAVING Of 24TH PLACE fROM WILLAMETTE TO
<br />OLIVE STREET BE HELD IN COMMITTEE.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />6. COMMUNICATION fROM JOHN L~ BRANDT, 2630 AGATE STREET, REQUESTING VACATION Of A POR-
<br />TION Of REED STREET LYI NG WEST Of LOT 6, BLOCK 5, AGATE PLAT - MR., BRANDT,'S COMMUNI-
<br />CATION, WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE AND AN ATTACHeD MAP WAS SHOWN TO THE COMMITTEE. THE
<br />COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE PROPRIETY Of VACATING SUCH AN AREA, AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE
<br />REQUEST BE DENIED.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />7. REQUEST fOR REZONING MADE BY HAROLD L. PARMENTER ON PROPERTY BETWEEN Moss AND VILLARD
<br />STREETS ON THE SOUTH SIDE Of GARDEN AVENUE.- THE COMMITTEE AND IN~ERESTED CITIZENS,
<br />fROM THE GARDEN AVENUE SECTION DISCUSSED THE REQUEST MADE BY MR. PARMENTER fOR A
<br />CHANGE IN ZONING fROM R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO C-I LIMITED COMMERCIAL D,IS.,
<br />TRICT WHICH WAS RECOMMENDED fOR APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE RESIDENTS
<br />Of THE AREA I ND,I CATED THEY WERE GREATLY CONCERNED OVER THE POSSI BI LI TY THAT THE PRO-"
<br />BERTY RECOMME,NDED FOR REZONING MIGHT BE USED, fOR PURPOSES' WHICH WOULD BE INJURIOUS
<br />TO RESIDENTIAL VALUES IN THE AREA., AfTER SOME'CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION BETWEEN THE
<br />COMMITT(E AND REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE AREA, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THJS MATTER BE
<br />RETURNED TO THE fULL PLANNING COMMISSION fOR fURTHER STUDY.
<br />
<br />8. REQUEST BY MR. FRED L. MILLER, 1381 LAWRENCE STREET, fOR CHANGE IN'ZONE.fROM R~I
<br />SINGLE FAMILY TO R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - N CONSIDERING MR. MILLER'S RE-
<br />QUEST THE; PLANNING COMMI'SS,I ON' RECOMMENDED THAT'THE, BALANCE Of' THE. BLOCK BETWEEN' 13TH
<br />AND 14TH AVENUES EXCEPT FOR THE COMMERCIAL ZONING BE REZONED To:R;.3 MULTIPLE FAMILY
<br />RESIDENTIAL. THE COMMITTEE HAD VIEWED THE PROPERTY AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE RECOM-
<br />MENDATI.ON' OF THE PLANNI NG. COMMI SSI ON" BE ACCEPTED. 1
<br />
<br />'{ .
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />9. REQUEST BY MR. ARTHUR'R. QUACKENBUSH FOR VARIANCE TO USE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
<br />SOUTHWEST CORNER OF:WALNUT'AND,GARDENAvENUESFOR A PARKING LOT -, THE'COMMITTEE AND,
<br />RESIDENTS OF THE GARDEN AVENUE AREA DISCUSSED THIS REQUEST fOR REZONING AND AGAIN
<br />THE RESIDENTS EXPRESSED CONSIDERABLE CONCERN AS TO WHAT SUCH A REZONING MIGHT DO 10
<br />PROPERTY VALUES IN THE AREA. THE COMMITTEE HAD VISITED THE SITE AND RECOMMENDED
<br />THAT THE REPORT Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WHJCH IS THAT THE: REQUEST BE DENIED,
<br />BE ACCEPTED AND THAT THE VARIANCE BE GRANTED. 1 \ '
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />10. REQUEST BY JOE F.MITCHEt.L FOR VARIANCE FROM R-I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO ALLOW
<br />A DUPLEX ON PROPERTY'LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF' 24TH' PLACE 1 BETWEEN McMILLAN STREET
<br />AND THE ALLEY'EAST-~IT WAS JNDICATED THAT THE STRUCTURE'LOCATED ON THEI PROPERTY WAS
<br />UNDER'CONSTRUCTION 1N MAY 1948 WHEN'THE AREA ANNEXED TO ,THE C1TY AN~ AT THAT,T1ME
<br />WAS PLANNED AS A DUPLEX; HOWEVER, IT WAS, NOT UNTIL THIS YEAR THAT THE STRUCTURE WAS
<br />COMPLETED AS A'DUPLEX AND THE PLUMBING, WIRING AND fURTHER IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN
<br />STOPPED BY THE:BuILDING I~SPECTOR SINCE THE BUILDING DOES NOT CONF'ORM' TO THE ZONING
<br />~OR THE AREA, AND F'URTHER SINCE ANY PRIVILEGES CARRYING OVER F'ROM ANNEXATION HAD ~
<br />EX,PIRED. 'THE COMMITTEE IN VIEWING THE, AREA OBSERVE,D .THE:BUILDING NOW APPEARS AS A.
<br />DUPLEX F'ROM. THE EXTERIOR' AND THE PLANNI NG COMMI SSI ON HAD;; RECOMMENDED 'THAT THE:
<br />VARIANCE BE GRANTED SO THAT A PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED TO COMPLETE; THE EXISTING STRUCTURE.
<br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED CONCURRENCE IN THE RECOMMENDATION Of THE PLANNING COM-
<br />MISSION fOR A VARIANCE TO, BE GRANTED.
<br />
<br />\ ,
<br />
<br />\.\
<br />
<br />i I:
<br />
<br />5
<br />
<br />COMMI TTEE' Off THE: WHOLE, , ' ii, r "
<br />I. CONS1DERATIONOf REQUEST Of EDGEWOOD ESTATES fOR REIMBURSEMENT OF' THE COST Of A
<br />STORM SEWER LOCATED 'I~ THE EDGEWOOD ESTATES. SUBDIVISION - JHE COMMITTEE. ENGAGED IN
<br />A DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROPRIETY Of MAK'NG PAYMENT FOR A STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTED
<br />BY EDGEWOOD ESTATES UNDER CITY SUPERVISION UPON WHICH NO BIDS HAD BEEN CALLED. THE
<br />BACKGROUND OF' THE REQUEST WAS EXPLAI NED AND CONSI DERABLE 01 SCUSSI ON, WAS .HAD ON THE .
<br />SUBJECT.: DURING THE' PROCESS OF':'DI'SCUSSION'THE C'TyATTORNEY INDICATED THAT-HE'WOU.LD
<br />PASS NO OP,INION AS"TO WHAT'LIAB',L,TY ',THE 'MEMBERS, OF' THE,COUNCIL;MIGHT.HAVE' IN'THE
<br />EVENT THAT' PAYMENT WAS MADE AND fURTHER EXPLINED THAT THE QUESTION COULD ONLY BE
<br />ANSWERED BY MEANS, Of DECLARATORY' JUDGMENT S.UO'. THE CITY ATTORNEY, F"URTHER I NO I CATED
<br />THAT lN'HIS OPIN10N'THERE WERE THREE BASIC THINGS THE COUNCIL WOULD HAVE TO CONSIDER
<br />(A) A DETERMINATION OfP.OLICY T,O B,E FOLLOWED IN THIS .SITUATlON, (B) A DETERMINATION
<br />OF THE AMOUNT' OF' MONEY WHI CH' MI GHT. BE PAl D' fOR THE STORM SEWER, AND ,(e) A' DETERMI NA-
<br />TION AS' TO'WHETHER'A LEGAL BASIS F'OR PAYMENT COULD BE'FOUND ,BY THE; REPRESENTATIVE'S
<br />ATT,ORNEYS BY MEANS"OF" A DECLARATORY, -J,UDGMENT SUI n: ',' , .,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />1 ;
<br />
<br />! '\ : f
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />....1
<br />
|