|
<br />'11R"~
<br />(;:- .:'\ .'1
<br />1 11 ,
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />7.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
<br />I. DISCUSSION OF" COUNCIL BILL No. 4165 RE'G'ARDINGASSESSMENT TO MT. 'CALVARY CEMETERY
<br />F'OR SEWER LI NE '- By REASON of"' A PROTEST WI TH REGARD TO'THE ASSESSMENT OF'; MT .CALVARV
<br />CEMETERY F'OR A SEWE-R L'I NE I NSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE I'R 'PROPERTY, THE' CITY AT'TORI'KY
<br />WAS REQUEST~D TO RENDER AN OPINION AS TO WHETHER SUCH LIEN COULD PROPERLY BE
<br />ASS'ESSED TO A' CEMETERY DISTRICT OPERATI NGUNDER THE STATE LAW. ' "
<br />
<br />THE CITY 'ATTORNEY IN AN OPINION DATED MAY 13, 1957 INDICATED THAT THE OREGON LAW
<br />STATES ~HAT BURIAL LOTS SOLD fOR THE PURPOSE OF' INTERME~T SHALL NOT BE SUBJEGTTO
<br />L'I EN AND F'URTHER I,NDICATED THAT I T APPEARED' THI S SECTION WOULD BE BROAD ENOOGH TO
<br />INCLUDE LIENS' FOR L'OCAL ASSESSMENT. THE OPINION' F'URTHER STATES T-HAT IN THIS SITUA-
<br />~ION THE'~NTIR~'COST' OF" THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COULD BE ASSESSED AGAINST TH~-PRO-
<br />PERTYHOL'DERS BENErt TED, OR THATPORTI ON ASSESS'ABLE TO THE CEMETERY COULD SEPAl 0
<br />BY THE' CI TY..
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />AF'~ER SOME DI~CUSSION WITH RESPECT TO THIS SITUATION, IT WA~ RECOMMENDED THAT~HE
<br />ASSESSMENT: ToMT. CALVARY CEMETERY BE MADE IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY SHOULD: BE
<br />USED F'OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE, THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO REASSESSMENT. TO OTHER BENEF' HED
<br />PROPERTIES, AND THAT THE PROPER CITY OF'F'ICIALS BE INSTRUCTED NOT TO INCLUDE THE
<br />ASSESSMENT TO MT. CALVARY CEMETERY IN ANY F'ORECLOSURE SUIT.
<br />
<br />1 '
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />2. 01 S'CUSSI ON REGARDI NG THE PAVe NG OF' 24TH PLACE rROM WI LLAMETTE TO OLl VE' STREET",- IT
<br />~AS REPORTED THAT . MAJO~ITY OF' THE RESIDENT~ or 24TH PLACE F'ROM WI LlAMETTE TO OLIVE
<br />STREET ~E~E TAVORABLE TO PAVING 24TH PLACE IF' A CONTRACT PURCHA~E~ WHO ~AD si~~ED
<br />THt' PET'Hi"ON WAS' TO BE LOOKED UPON AS A' PROPER SIGNER or SUCH A PETITION'WHEN/THE
<br />OWNER or RE:CO~D "AD COMMUNICATED WITH THE CITY MANAGER'S 'OfrtCE IN OPPOSITION TO
<br />SU'CH' A P'AVING PROJECT.' IN THE EVENT THAT THE SIGNATURE OF' THE OWNER or RECORD IS
<br />USED; THEN THERE' IS"NOT A MAJORITV IN F'AVOR OF' THE P'AVING.
<br />
<br />MR. ANDERSON, A RESIDENT OF' THE AREA, APPEARED BEF'ORE THE COMMITTEE AND INDICATED
<br />THE STREET IS IN EXTREMELY POOR ~ONDITION AND WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY BE I MPA_SABlE: THIS
<br />NEXT WINTER.
<br />
<br />ArTER SOME DISCUSSION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT MR. M. D. DELESS BE CONTACTED
<br />F'OR PRoor, OF',' CONTRACT ON, THE PURCHASE Of T'HE LAND, AND I f SUCH A LAND SALES' CON';"
<br />TRACT EXISTS IT WAS F'URTHER RECOMMENDED THAT THE STR~ET BE PAVED., /, j'
<br />
<br />3. DISCUSSION ON VARIOUS BIDS RECEIVED F'OR S'TR'EET PAVING - A aiD fOR .THE PAVING OF' (A)
<br />ADAMS STREET F'ROM1'26TH TO' 28TH AVENUE, (.B) ,CI:;rv VI EW' STREET F'ROM 18TH TO. 22ND, AVE-
<br />NUE, (C) POLK STREET F'ROM 18TH TO 24TH AVENUE, TAYLOR STREET F'ROM POLK STREET TO
<br />POLKPSTREET,20TH AVENUE F'ROM TYLER,TO'POLK.STREET,,22ND AVENUE F'ROM TYLER'TO POLK
<br />STREET AND (D) 18TH AVENUE WEST F'ROM PIERCE TO CITY VIEW. STREET WAS CONSIDERED BY
<br />THE COMMITTEE. T. C WILDISH WAS THE LOW BIDDER ON SUCH PROJECTS, AND IT WAS RE-
<br />COMMENDED THAT' THE LOWBI DAS ENTERED BY 1..., C.' WI LDI SH, BE ACCEPTED,. ' ,
<br />
<br />l . ~ '1
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />4. CONSIDERATION OF' BIDS ON PEARL STREET TRUNK SEWER F'ROM 6TH TO 28TH AVENUE - IT WAS
<br />EXPLAINED THAT BIDS HAD BEEN RECEIVED fOR THE PEARL' STREET TRUNK SEWER PROJECT AND
<br />THAT THREE SEPARATE F'IRMS OF'FERED BIDS F'OR CONSIDERATION. OF' THESE THREE F'IRMS ONE
<br />D1D NOT HAVE'THE PROPER' PREQUALIF'ICATION QUESTIONNAIRE ON F'ILE' AND ONE OF'F'ERED:THE
<br />PREQUALIF'lCATrON,QUESTlONNAIRE'ONE DAY PRIOR TO THE DATE Of'THE'BIDOPENING:AND IT'
<br />WAS RULED THAT THIS BID COULD NOT BE RECEIVED F'OR THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. THIS
<br />L.EF'T ONE RE'MAINING PROPE'RLY PREQUALIF'lEO BH)DER'WHO SPEClrtCALLY REQUESTED THAT HIS,
<br />BID BE OPENED AND CONSIDERATION GIVEN FOR THE AWARDING OF' THE ABOVE PROJECT. AFTERI
<br />SOME DISCUSSION IN WHICH THE ASSISTANT CrTY ENGINEER INDICATED THAT THIS BID WAS
<br />CONSIDERABLY BEtOW THE ENGI NEERI NG ESTI MATE, I T, WAS 'RECOMMENDED THAT THE BID' f'OR
<br />'THE PEARL' SlREET TRUNK SEWER LINE- BE AwARDED TO: T..C. WILDISH ON AiBID OF' $275,'068.20'
<br />AS BID ON PROPOSAL No. I. -
<br />\
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />8
<br />
<br />COMMITTEE: or THE WHOLE ;', "
<br />I. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED MEETING OF' THE COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION - THE-
<br />COMMITTEE GAVE SOME THOUGHT TO THE PROPOSED MEETING BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND THE
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION AND AF'TER SOME DISCUSS10N RECOMMENDED THAT TH~ MEETING BE HELD
<br />WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT 4:00 PM, fRIDAY, MAY 31, 1957, fOLLOWING/THE'AD-'
<br />JOURNED MEETING OF' THE COUNCIL CALLED rOR THAT DATE.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I"
<br />2. D. SCUSSI ON REGARDI NG NEGOTl ATI ON OF' MI LLRACE AGREEMENT WI TH UNI VERS,' TY OF' OREGON,-
<br />IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT A LETTER HAD BEEN RECEIVED F'ROM THE BUSINESS MANAGER OF' THE
<br />UNIVERSI TY OF' OREGON' IN WHI'CH THE UNI VERSI Ty INDICATED THE,Y' WERE AGREEABLE' TOJ THE
<br />CITY',S LIMITING THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST OF" THE MILLRACE OTHER ,THAN BRIDGE,'
<br />MAINTENANCE TO $2500 PER YEAR PROVIDING SUCH LIMITATION IS BASED ON CURRENT: PRICE
<br />LEVELS AND WOULD BE ADJUSTED ON THE BASIS OF ANY CHANGES IN rUTURE PRICE LEVELS.
<br />I TWAS: LI KEWI SEll NDI CATED THAT THE ,UNI VERSI TY WOULD ACCEP:ri A' CONTRACT THAT,WOULD
<br />RUN NOT MORE THAN TEN YEARS TO BE R,ENEWED EACH YEAR THEREAFTER Ir MUTUALLY AGREEABLE.
<br />
<br />'_T wAs SUGGEST,ED THAT T.HE' NEGOTIATIONS ON THI S 'BASI-SBE CONTI NUED., No F'ORMALlACTI ON
<br />WAS, TAKEN.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />_. 1, ~ .'. I , ., . l' J . ~
<br />
<br />3. REQUES,T:'f';OR 'AUTHOR I ZATi'ONTO _SELL ALL'THE CITY OWNED; L.OTS EAST Of THE WESTMORELAND
<br />PARK LOCATED AT THE OLD AIRPARK AND F'OR CONSIDERATION AS TO WHETHER TIME PAYMENT
<br />WOULD BE' 'ALLOWED - THE COMMl'T,TEEDrSCUSSED THI S SUBJECT AND RECOMMENDED THE CI TY
<br />MANAGER BEE.MPOWERED TO SET UP ALL CI TY OWNED LOTS F'OR SALE WHI CH WERE LOCATE,'D EAST'
<br />
<br />. I
<br />
<br />, ~ ' ~ 'I ., ~, ,",;
<br />
<br />;~
<br />.41
<br />
|