|
<br />52~
<br />e
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />~ - - - -- -- -
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />. r ~I--
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN SECONDED BY MR. LINOEEN THAT THE(COMMITTEE REPORT'BE
<br />ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />" C
<br />4.. ONSIDERATlON OF' THE ADDITION OF' AN ~GRICULTURAL' ZONE TO THt:.ZONING ORDINANCE,-
<br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE WHICH
<br />WOULD ADD AN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. THE COMMITTEE INDICATED'THAT THEY DID NOT '
<br />BELIEVE THEYWERE'READY TO:ACT ON~THE MATTER'AT THIS TIME, ~ND IT WAS RECOMM~NDED
<br />THAT THE ITEM BE HELD IN COMMIT~EE.AND~THAT THE.HEARING SCHEDULED F'OR TH~ COUNCIL I
<br />MEETING ON JULY 22, 1957 BE CONTINUED.!' .. . I
<br />. . ,
<br />
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN. THAT THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE ADOPTED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED. ,
<br />
<br />" '
<br />5. ApPLICATION F'OR CLASS "A" DISPENSERS LICENSE SUBMITTED BY DEWEY HILLGREN, DEWEY'S
<br />SIP. 'N SNACK, 1601 WEST 11TH AVENUE - THE-~EQUESTED APPLICAT~ON WAS CONSIDERED BY
<br />THE COMMITTEE. IT WAS POINTED. OUT THAT THE AREA WAS CURRENTLY OPERA~ED.AS A
<br />. DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT AND THAT IT-WAS PATRONI~ED.BY STUDENTS AND THOSE UNDER LEGAL ,A
<br />AGE. THE COMMITTEE EXPRESSED SOME-CONCERN; ABOUT THE ADDITION OF' THE SALE OF' : ·
<br />ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT A BUSINESS PLACE WHOSE PATRONAGE INCLUDED STUDENTS, AND IT
<br />WAS" RECOMMENDED THAT. THE REQUEST BE pENIED.~ .
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. LINDEEN SECONDED BY MR. SHISLER THAT THE REPORT OF' THE COMMITTEE BE
<br />01 SAPPROVED AND THAT THE LI CENSE BE GRANTED. MOTl ON CARRI ED. ,- --
<br />
<br />"!). CONSI DERATI ON OF' BIDS FOR' THE' PAVI NG OF' PARKI NG LOTS, WALKS AND OTHER AREA'S ~ROUND I
<br />THE AMAZON SWIMMING POPL :--THE.PARKS &.RECREATION SUPERINTENDEN'T EXPLAINED-THE PLANS
<br />A'ND SpECIF'ICATlONSON WHICH THE- BIDDERS, MADE THEIR- BIDS AND FUR:THER INDICATED THAT '
<br />THREE'- BIDS WERE RECEI VED -- ONE"FROM" MR. C.. M. KEMP F'OR $9575.85, ANOTHER. FROM I NTER-
<br />CITY S~ND& GRAVEL,COMPANY FOR.-$15,168.00AND A T-HIRD F'ROM JOHN -STEINMULLER, JR.,
<br />F'OR $18,592.00. '.'MR.'C. M. Kn1P WAS' PRESENT AND'INDIC-ATEI1 HE DID NOT'BELIEVE THERE
<br />WA~ ANYTHING WRONG WITH HIS BID AND THAT HE WA~ SATISF'I~D WITH THE PRICE HE HAD
<br />BID. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE LOW BID BY MR. C. M. KEMP IN THE LUMP SUM
<br />OF' $9575.85 aE ACCEPTED~ .-
<br />
<br />7. DISCUSSt'ON REGARDING BIDS ON AUTOMOTIVE STREET SWEEPER - IT WAS INDICATED THAT F'OUR
<br />BIDS HAD- BEEN - RECEI VED F'OR THE PURCHASE OF' AN. AUTOMOTI VE' STREET SWEEPER - ONE F'ROM ,
<br />NELSON EQUI PMENT COM'PANY BI 001 !'l~' ON- AN ELGI N, STREET KI NG AT $11,300.00, ON[ FROM '
<br />FEENAUGHTY MACHINERY COMPANY BIODING'ON AWA'YNE MODEL 2-550 AT A DISCOUNT PRICE ~F' - I
<br />$11,418.00, ONE-F'ROM'THE COLUMBI.A EQUIPMENT COMPANY BIDDING.ONAN Au!>nN-WESTERN.
<br />MODEL 60 AT A DISCOUNT PRICE OF' $11,630.p4, ALL OF' WHICH ABOVE WERE 4 CUBIC Y~RD
<br />'C~PACITY. A F'U~THER. Blb7WAS ENTERED.BY CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENTCOMPANY2BIDDING ON .
<br />MOBILE SWEEPER MODEL 2~MSWITH A 3,CUBIC YARD CAPAC~TY AT $10,954.00, AND AN ALTER- i
<br />NATE BID WAS RECEIVE.D. FROM f."EENAUGHTY MACHINERY COMPANY BIDDING ON A..W,AYNE:MoDEL I
<br />2-450 WITH A 3. CUBIC YARD CAPACITY AT A DISCOUNT PRICE OF $11,088.00. THE DIRECTOR
<br />- Of PUB~IC WORKS INDICATED THOSE BiDDING ON A 4 CUB~C YARD CAPACITY.SWEEPER:WERE CON-
<br />SIDERED TO BE ON COMPARABLE PIECES OF' EQUIPMENT. :
<br />. r
<br />
<br />MR. HALE OF' COLUMBIA EQUI PM~NT COMPANY APPEARED BEFORE !HE COMMI TTEE AND I NDI CATED j I
<br />HIS CO~PANY BELIEVED-THE AUSTIN-WESTERN SWEEPER. TO BE A SAF'ER.MACHINE TO OPERATE
<br />SINCE.THE HOPPER WAS LOCATED BEHIND THE DRIVER AND. THE DRIVER'S VISIBILITY WAS
<br />PRESUMED TO BE GREATER DUE TO THE HOPPER LOCATION. HE ALSO INDICATED HIS F'IRM :
<br />WOU~D BE WILLING, TO PLACE THE AUSTIN-WESTERN SWEEPER IN. THE CITY OF' EUGENE F'OR A
<br />PERIOD OF THIRTY DAYS FRO OPERATION AT NO COST TO THE CiTY, AND THIS STATEMENT
<br />WAS F'URTHER VERIF'IED BY A TELEGRAM F'ROM THE COMPANY'S PORTLAND'OFF"ICE-WHICH WAS
<br />'READ TO' THE COMMITTEE.'. MR. HALE ALSO iNDICATED THAT HE IS A:LOCAL RESt DENT ~ND
<br />WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO' THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT'F'OR ANY'ASSISTANCE NECESSARY : ...
<br />IN OPERATION, PART-REPLACEMENT, ETC., ON THE AUSTIN-WESTERN SWEEPER. ,.
<br />
<br />~... - .... .~-.- . 1
<br />
<br />AFTER SOME 01 SCUSSI ON THE COMMI TTEE RECOMM~NDED THAT THE AUSTI N-WESTERN SWEEPER
<br />BE'GIVEN A THIRTY DAY TRIAL WITH THE' PURCHASE~ORDER TO BE SUBJECT TO CANCELLA-
<br />TION AT THE END OF THE TRIAL, PERIOD. ..
<br />
<br />8. CONSIDERATION' OF' BIDS ON VARIOUS PUB~IC WORKS PRO-JECTS - IT.WAS EXPLAINED TH~T
<br />BIDS HAD BEEN RECEIVED ON THREE STREET PAVING PROJECTS, ONE INT~RSECTION P~VING
<br />PROJECT, ONE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT AND TWO STORM SEWER PROJECTS, AND THAT THESE
<br />BIDS WERE COMPARABLE-TO OTHER BIDS 'REC~IVED THIS YEAR. . IT WAS RECOMMENDED T~AT THE
<br />VARIOUS BIDS TAKEN AT THE BID OPENING, ON: JULY 19, 1957 BE AWARDED TO THE LOW BID- I
<br />DERS ON EACH PROJECT." I
<br />
<br />I .., - ...A .... \J
<br />i
<br />No ACTI ON WAS TAKEN ON THE ABOVE THREE I TEMS AS CONTRAC-TS WERE. AWARDED ON THE BIDS
<br />EARLIER IN THE MEETING.' . ! .-
<br />
<br />"9. CONSID~RATlON OF' AN ~MENDMENT TO ORDINANCE #11002- REGARDING PHOTOGRAPHERS' L1- I
<br />CENSES - ~T WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE C~RRENT PHOTOGRAPHY LICE~SING ORDINANCE RE-
<br />QUIRED AMONG OTHER THINGS THAT A PHOTOGRAPHER WHO WISHED TO OPE~ATE WITHIN THE I
<br />, ,
<br />CITY SHOULD F'ILE AN APPLICATION WITH A BOND AND THAT NO LICENSE COULD BE ISSUED .
<br />UNDER THE ORDINANCE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF. A THIRTY DAY PERIOD, THIS PERIOD
<br />ORIGtN~LLY DESIGNED FOR PURPOSES OF HAVING. TIME TO INVESTIGATE THE,APPLICANT~S
<br />BACKGROUND. IT WAS LIKE~ISE EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY HAD BEEN PRESENTED WITH A r
<br />SITUATION IN WHICH IT WAS DOUBTF'UL THAT. THE ~XISTING ORDINANCE WOULD APPLY AND 4IP
<br />
<br />I
<br />~ I:
<br />
|