|
<br />~....
<br /> 40
<br /> e
<br /> 1//25/57
<br />-:-:.-:-~"7.'""-----::-:--;~_~-':--:- ~~- ~ -=:---=--' -=--:--"':-:-:--:----:-_--::--::---::---:-:--:::"_+ --::;--:---:--~- --=~,---:-;-_::_--:--:-::::-_____:__-:---:-~~-_:_~_=_~-~__ -- .- .- ~~. -.-.- - ~ " ._ _... 2 ..- ~ _ _ _ -- - ,- -- -..- -..-- --, --' --
<br /> ..- .. .. . .. . ~ - '. -. - -- .... "' -- - . -- -- --. . - -- ' . - - -- . ,- .- . - -- -- K _ __ _ .__ - . .. _ __ _ _. L' ___._
<br /> I - -- --- -.. - - .- --- - ___________,__ ___ --00-.
<br /> DISCOVERED, THAT THE ERROR HAD BEEN MADE AN,D HE HAS REQUESTED TI1AT THE <; I1:Y ,Of I
<br /> EUGENE EXECUTE 'A BARGAIN AND SALE DEED TO CORRECT THE ERRORS PREVIOUSLy~ADE.
<br /> ; IN THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSION I T WAS PO I NTED OUT THAT THE LOT "WH I CHREMA I NS.I S
<br /> I A SALABLE LOTj AND fOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION THE COMMITTEE .RECOMMENDED THE
<br /> 1 PROPE~ CITY OfFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE .NECESSARy DEED TO THE PRO-
<br /> PERTY.
<br /> .1
<br /> I €OMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ,
<br />I j I. DISCUSSION REGARDING.~HE REZONING OF THE WEST $IDE OF WILLAMETTE STREET BE~WEEN' I
<br /> i 18TH AND 19TH:AvENUES ~ IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT ORIGINALLY,A REQUEST WAS PRESENTED
<br /> I
<br /> I TO THE PLANNING COMMisSION FOR THE REZONING:OF TWO LOTS IMMEDIATELY SOUTH Of 18TH
<br /> 1 AVENUE ,ON THE WEST SIDE Of WILLAMETTE .STREET TO BE REZONED FROM CR TO C-3P, .AND
<br /> I IN THE DISCUSSION OF THE REZONlfIlG Of THESE LOT~ WHICH WAS CONDUCTED BY THE PLAN-
<br /> I NING COMMISSION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ITSELF SUGGESTED THAT THE REMAINDER Of
<br /> I I
<br /> THE PROPERTY BETWEEN 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES ON THE WEST:SIDE Of WILLA METTE STREET
<br /> SHOULD BE REZONED.TO C-3P. THE ~ECOMMENDE6 RE~pNING' BY' ~~E PLANNIN~' COM~~~SION'
<br /> , AT THIS PARTI~ULAR i"ME WAS'.NOT POSSiBLE'SINer'THE:, Wi-tO~E,OF'THE'PRoP~RTY LOCATED
<br /> ! e
<br /> I BETWEEN 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES HAD NOT'BEENADVE'RTI$ED fOR'HEA~ING,ANQIT WAS
<br /> I SUBSEQ~ENTLY,~ECOMME:NDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT THE'REiON~NG BE DENIED.
<br /> FOLLOWING A DISCUSSION Of.THE VA~IOUS ACTIONS AND ~EFERRALS THAT H~VE BEEN MADE
<br /> BY BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL ON THIS SUBJECT, IT WAS RECOM-
<br /> I MENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION IN DENYING THIS REZONING BE S~STAINED.
<br /> I .. ..
<br />I' 2. DISCUSSION.REGARDINGB,IDS ON fiRE HOSE - T,",E'F'IRE' CHIEf 'E~Pi..AINE:[) T~AT' BIDS':HAD I
<br /> BEEN RECEIVED fOR THE:PURCHASE OF fiRE HOSE AND THAT~NLY ONE.B~DDER HAD, ,IN HIS
<br />II OPINION, MET THE SPECIfiCATIONS OF THE CITY OF EUGENE AND THIS BIDDER:QUOTED THE
<br /> HIGHEST PRICE Of THE 81DS PRESENTED AT THIS PARTICULAR OPENING. THIS HOSE, IN
<br /> , THE'OPINION OF THE FIRE CHIEF, IS THE BEST PRODUCT AT THE LOWEST PRICE, AND HE
<br /> I RECOM~ENDED THAT THE C!TY PURCH4SE PURITAN. BRAND FIRE HOSE AT $1 .69'PER FOOT.
<br /> I
<br /> i fROM MUNNEI+L &, SHERR I LL, I file., EUGENE: '.'Ti-t'ERE: WAS' A . GE'NERAL' 0 i SCl,jSS'1 oN' BY, REPRE- I
<br /> SENTATIVES OF,THE COMMITTEE PRESENT.WITH RESPECT~TQTHE ~ROPRIETY OF AQVERTISING
<br /> I ' '
<br /> i fOR BIDS FOR SMALL AMOUNTS Of fiRE HOSE AND THE PROPER PROCEDURES W~ICH SHOULD
<br /> I BE FOLLOWED BOTH AT THIS TIME AND IN THE FUTURE. IT WAS INDICATED BY THE FIRE
<br /> I CHIEf. THAT THERE WOUDD BE NO PROBLEM ON THE PART of THE FIRE DEPARTMENT J~STIFY-
<br /> 1 ING THE PURCHASE OF THE PARTICULAR HOSE WHICH HAS BEEN RECOMMEfIlDED EVEN,THOUG~
<br /> I SUCH HOSE IS NOT BID AT THE LOWEST COST. FOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION IT WAS RE-
<br /> I COMME~DED THAT THE,RECOMMENDATl6N' OF THE fIRE C~IEF CONCERNING THE PU~CHASE OF.
<br /> PURITAN BRAND FIRE HOSE AT $1.69 PER fOOT BE APPROVED.
<br /> j 3. REQUEST fOR SHORT TIME PARKING ZONE:ON THE WEST SI.DE OF TAYLOR STREET ,SOUTH Of
<br /> ,
<br /> I 6TH AVENUE - THE TRAFFIC ENGI~EER INDIC~TED THAT A S~RVEY IN THE VICI~ITY OF , , ,
<br /> I THE POSTOFFICE LOCATED AT 6TH AVENUE AND TAYLOR STREET HAD BEEN MADE AND IT WAS
<br /> I NOTED THAT THERE ARE A: NUMBER Of ALL DAY PARKE~$ USING SPACES IN,TH!S,AREA
<br /> WHICH LEAvES INA~EQUATE SPACE F~PATRONS Of,T~E POSTOFFICE TO PARK IMMEDIAT~LY
<br /> i . ..'
<br /> ! ADJACENT TO THE,POSTOffICE,.AND,T~AT.A NUMBER OF ,S~CH PATRON$ ~RE DOUBI,.~ PARK-
<br /> ING OR PARKING IN CURB,CUTS WHILE,THEV,TRANSACTBUSINESS ~ITH THE,POSTOfFICE.
<br /> I T6REMEDY THE,SITUATION IT ~ASRECOMMENDED THAT A -,. .,
<br /> i 12 MINUTE PARKING ZONE BE IN-
<br /> I STALLED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAYLOR STREET BEGINNING AT A POINT 25 FEET SOUTH I
<br /> I OF THE SOUTH CURB LINE Of 6TH AVENUE AND C6NTINUING SOUTH FOR A'DISTANCE Of
<br /> I
<br /> I 44 FEET. THIS SHORT TIME ZONE WILL ALLOW TWO ADDITrlONAL SHORT TIME SPACES fOR
<br /> . .. . . .' ". '. . . .., I
<br /> PEOPLE DESIRING TO USE THE POSTAL fACILITIES AND WI~L UNDOUBTEDLY ALLEVIATE .
<br />I ' ' I
<br /> A, NUMBER OF ,THE C'OUBLE PARK I NG (5 I TUAT IONS, OR CURB, CUT, PARKI NG, S I TI,IAT IONS WH I CH I
<br /> EXIST IN THE AREA. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE RECOMMENDATION Of, THE.TRAFfJC
<br /> I
<br />1 ENGINEER BE APPROVED.
<br /> ,
<br />I
<br />f
<br />I 4. ,0. 5CU55 10NRE~ARt' I'NG .5TOP 5 I GN5. AT 23RD AVENUE, AND ALDER STREET - THE TRA.-.-, C
<br />1 -
<br />) ENGINEER E~PLAINED THAT 23RD.AvENUE HAS BEEN USED,AS'A~ ART~RIAL fOR,A NUMBER ,\ . ..
<br /> OF YEARS AND THAT 24TH AVENUE,IS NOW OPEN AND DESIGNATED AS AN ARTERIAL AN~ ' , ,
<br />I THAT THE, CONTINUED USE Of 23RD AVENUE AS AN ARTERIAL SHOULD BE DISCOURAGED. IT
<br />I WAS SUGGESTED BY THE,TRAFFIC ENGINEER .THAT STOP SIGNS BE INSTAI,.LED STOPp'ING
<br />I TRAFfiC ON 23RD A.VENUE AT ITS INTERSE€TION WITH ALDER STREET. IT WAS,NOT.FELT
<br />I 'THAT:THIS WOULD INCREASE TRAf.-,C fLOW ON ALDER STREET SINCE ALDER STREET, TRAffiC
<br />! IS STOPPED AT 22ND AND 24TH AVENUES. . THE COMMITTEE DISCuSSED T~E:PROPOSAL TO
<br />I INSTALL A STOP SIGN ON 23RD AVENUE WHICH WOULD. STOP EA$T AND WEST BOUND TRAfFIC
<br /> AT ALDER STREET AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRAfFIC ENGINEER
<br />I BE APPROVED.
<br />I
<br />I LIMIT~D PARKING ON, CHARNEL TON: STREET .AND 4TH AVENUE - THE TRAFfiC ENGINEER EX-
<br />I 5.
<br />I PLAINED THAT CHARNELTON STREET fROM, 4TH TO 5TH AVENUE
<br />I IS ,NOW, LIMITED TO ONE
<br />i HOUR PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE Of THE STREET AND TWO HOUR PARKING ON THE EAST
<br />1
<br />i SIDE Of THE STREET. IT WAS FURTHER INDICATED THAT THE DifFERENCES IN TIME . ,
<br /> " '
<br />I MAKE IT DIFfICULT TO PROPERLV POLICE THE AREA AND A~SO MAKE IT SOMEWHAT.. CON- I
<br />I FUSING TO MOTORISTS. Bus I,NESS HOUSES, IN, THE ARE'A, WERE C'ONTA<;:TED, AS TO THE I R
<br />I
<br />I . ' . -
<br />I THOUGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE CHANGING Of,THE ONE HOUR LIMITED PARKING ON THE
<br />f WEST SIDE OF THE STREET TO TWO HOUR LIMITED ~ARKING, AND IN AI,.L RE~ORTED,CASES IT
<br />I WAS fELT BY. SUCH BUSINESS: HOUSES THAT THIS WOULD. BE A.GOOD PLAN. I
<br />\
<br />!
<br />I ALSO, 4TH AVENUE FROM LINCOLN TO CHARNELTON STREET PARKING.HAS BECOME A.PROBLEM I
<br />\
<br /> SINCE THERE IS UNLIMITED PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF,T~E STREET:AND SINCE THE
<br />I AREA LIES BETWEeN A TWO HOUR ZONE ON LINCOLN STREET AND A ONE HOUR ZONE ON
<br />I e
<br />It II
<br />~'
<br />\'
<br />
|