Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> r- 50 <br /> e <br /> I <br /> 12/9/57 <br /> =..::~ _ ~__..__ .___~ ~__._ _ ___ _~~=;:;-~~~.:.-=,.-:=-::-~._~:.:-:::----=-=-"::=---:---:-~~_ r_~~_~__._ ___ -_ ___._~_ --~-~- ~ ~ - - --- - ---. ------~------~~--- . ~. - <br /> -- - - - - -- - ~ -,,~ --- - ~ <br /> ,- -+ -- - ~ - ; . ......" --- -- -- --. - - - - - - . - -+ - ~ -- ". .. -, ~_...--._--- .- <br /> ,,-- ---"_.- ...._~..._, - ...---- <br /> REPORTS OF COMMITTEES I <br /> 1 A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 26, 1957 - RE: PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE - <br /> ApPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF RE1'AIL MALT BEVERAGE CLASS A (RMBA) LICENSE, DUTCH MILL, OPERATED BY MR. <br /> I AND MRS. JOSEPH M. STICKLEY; !)UBL I C WORKS. COMMI TTEE -. KEED. REQUEST FOR LEASE OR EASEMENT TO ERECT A <br /> I <br /> I TV ANTENNA ON SPENCERS BUTTE; WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I IIPRESENT: MAYOR MCGINTY; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, HARTMAN, EDMUNDS, LAURIS, LINDEEN AND I <br /> I <br /> j MOLHOLM; CITY MANAGER; ASSISJANT CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; PARKS & I <br /> I I <br /> I RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT; CHIEF OF POLICE; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; I <br /> I <br /> I MESSRS. STICKLEY, SAHLSTROM, CURREY, BURRIS, JACOBS, RUTH, HARPER, .KITTS, I <br /> IRONS, PENNISTON,BRENNE, .McDoNALD, MILLER, SKELTON, AND OTHER INTERESTED I <br /> II CITIZENS; DON BONHAM, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; WENDY RAY, KUGN. I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I I PUBLI C SAFETY COMM ITTEE <br /> I I. ApPLICATION FOR FiE"NEWAL OF RETAIL MALT BEVERAGE CLASS' A fRMBA) LICENSE, DUTCH I <br /> I MILL, OPERATED BY MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH M. STICKLEY - THE CITY MANAGER READ A <br /> I e <br /> DETAILED'REPORT fROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE CONCERNING ACTIVITIES AT THE DUmCH <br /> I MILL TAVERN WHICH HAD <br /> II INFLUENCED THE DECISION.OFTHE CHIEF OF POLICE TO REFUSE <br /> APPROVAL OF THE F1ENEWAL OF THE 1958 LI CENSE. THE REPORT. CONTAINED STATISTICS <br /> WHICH SHOWED THE DUT~H MILL TAVERN AND ITS IMMEDIATE VICINITY HAD BEEN THE <br /> ,! <br /> I SCENE OF MANY MORE ARRESTS FOR DRUNKENESS, DISORDERLY CONDUCT AND OTHER VIOLA- <br /> I . . I <br /> i TIONS THAN HAD SIMILAR ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE CITY. ..THE CITY. MANAGER EXPLAINED <br /> I THAT ACTION Of THE COUNCIL WAS NOT FINAL AND'THAT LICENSES COULD. BE ISSUED OR I <br /> i REFUSED ONLY BY THE OREGON LIQ~OR CONTROL COMMISSION. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I THE ATTORNEY FOR MR. STICKLEY STATED.THAT WHILE HE REALIZED THAT TRANSGRESSIONS I <br /> I HAD OCCURRED IN THE PAST, STEPS HAD BEEN TAKEN TO CORRECT THEM, AND IF THE I <br /> I LICENSE IS APPROVED THE TAVERN WOULD BE OPERATED TO CONFORM WITH REGULATIONS. <br /> I HE CALLED ON SEVERAL PERSONS WHO TESTIFIED.THEY HAD KNOWN:MR. AND MRS. STICKLEY <br /> 1 <br /> Ii FOR MANY YEARS AND TO.THE BEST OF;THEIR.KNOWLEDGE.~HEY OPERATED THEIR PLACE OF I <br /> BUSINESS IN A MANNER THAT REFLECTED CREDIT.TOTHEM AND THE TAVERN BUSINESS. ! <br /> 11 SEVERAL BUSINESSMEN IN THE VICI'NITY.OF THE DUTCH MILL TAVERN STATED THAT CONDI- <br /> I I <br /> I TIONS WERE SUCH THAT.THEIR CUSTOMERS REFUSED TO WALK INTO THEIR PLACES OF I <br /> I BUSINESS AND THAT MANY INCIDENTS HAD OCCURRED WHICH HAD NOT BEEN REPORTED TO <br /> 1 THE P.OLICE. THE POLICE CHIEF EXPLAINED.THAT MR. STICKLEY HAD BEEN.WARNED I <br /> 1 SEVERAL TIMES THAT HIS METHOD OF OPERATION.MAS NOT IN LINE WITH ACCEPTED PRO-. <br /> CEDURE. ONE MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE EXPRESSED THE OPINION THAT HE FELT THE I <br /> j BUSINESSMEN HAD PROTESTED THE TKVERN~S OPERAT10N ONLY AS A LAST RESORT. I <br /> I . .. .. . <br /> AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICATION <br /> I BE RE.JECTED. <br /> I <br /> I I . ~_.' <br /> 2 .1 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE <br /> I. .KEED REQUEST fOR LEASE OR EASEMENT TO ERECT A TV.ANTENNA ON SPENCERS BUTTE - <br /> I ALL PARTIES CONCERNED AGREED THAT AT PRESENT THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT INFOR- <br /> 1 .. MATION AVAILABLE TO INTELLIGENTLY NEGOTIATE, AND ACTION WAS POSTPONED UNTIL I <br /> I THE ATTORNEY fOR KEED WOULD BE ABLE TO .PRESENT A DEFINITE PROPOSAL.II <br /> I <br /> , <br /> 1 IT WAS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN SECONDED BY MR. LINDEEN THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE <br /> 1 AND OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. I <br /> I <br /> I A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 29, 1957 - RE: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE - DIs- <br /> CUSSION REGARDING REZONING OF THE WEST SIDE OF W,LLAMETTE STREET BETWEEN 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES; RE- <br /> QUEST FOR SIGN VARIANCE, JERRylS TV SHOP, 2782 FRIENDLY STREET; REQUEST TO REMOVE CENTER PARKING STRIP <br /> , e <br /> II ON VILLARD STREET BETWEEN FRANKLIN BOULEVARD AND 14TH.AvENUE;REQUEST FOR PAVING ASSESSMENT SEGREGA- <br /> TION BY EUGENE FARMERS COOP AND WESTWARDHoHoMES, INC.; PUBLIC WORKS AND HEALTH AND RECREATION COM- I <br /> 11 MITTEES - CONSIDERATION OF A FlEQUEST.BYRADIO STATION KEED FOR LEASE OF AREA ON SPENCERS BUTTE FOR <br /> TELEVISION ANTENNA; COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - ApPOINTMENT.OF BUDGET COMMITTEE MEMBERS; DISCUSSION RE- <br /> I GARDING NIGHT TAXI SERVICE BETWEEN SPRINGfIELD AND EUGENE;.DISCUSSION REGARDING TRADING OF PROPERTY <br /> FOR FIRE STATION SITE; WAS SUBMIT~ED AND READ..AS FOLLOWS:: <br /> I I <br /> ! "PRESENT: COUNCILMEN SHEARER, SHISLER, .EDMUNDS, LAURIS, BRIGGS, LINDEEN AND:MoLHOLM; <br /> I CITY MANACiER; CITY ATTORNEY; CITY RECORDER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLlC.WORKS; <br /> CITY ENGINEER; FIRE CHIEF; PARKS & RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT; TRAFFIC <br /> ENGINEER; PLANNING CONSULTANT; REPRESENTATIVES OF TERMINAL.TAXI COMPANY <br /> I AND SPRINGFIELD TAXI; 21 MEMBERS:OF THE DEMOLAY WHO WERE PARTICIPATING IN <br /> I '~. GOVERNMENT DAY; DON.BoNHAM, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD. <br /> i <br /> 3 i PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE <br /> j I. DISCUSSION REGAR[)iNG REZONING OF THE WEST SIDE.OfWILLAMETTE STREET BETWEEN 18TH I <br /> 1 AND 19TH AVE~UES - THE COMMITTEE AGAIN CONSIDERED THE MATTER OF REZONING AN AREA <br /> 'I LOCATED ON THt WEST SIDE OF W,LLAMETTE STREET BETWEEN: 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES. THE I <br /> I PROPOSAL FOR ~EZONING WAS THAT THE AREA BE REMOVED FROM THE CR ZONE AND PLACED <br /> IN A C-3P ZONE. SOME REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMMITTEE INDICATED THEY BELIEVE I <br /> I THAT THE.CR CLASSIFICATION IS ADEQUATE FOR THIS AREA AT THIS TIME AND THAT A RE- I <br /> j ZONING TO C-3P 15 NOT NEEDEDIN~HIS AREA SINCE THERE.ARE PROPERTIES MUCH CLOSER I <br /> I TO THE MAIN BUSINESS DISTRICT OF THE CI~Y THAT WILL LOGICALLY DEVELOP BEFORE I <br /> THIS AREA. OTHEH REPRESENTATIVES Of THE.COMMITTEE: INDICATED THAT THEY BELIEVE I <br /> I -- <br /> 1 <br /> J I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> , <br /> ;, <br /> ., <br />