|
<br /> 217 "'llIlll
<br /> e
<br /> 6/23/58
<br /> ~---:,-:-::--==-=:-=,,:,,,,-:-..:::-=~___~_-=-=:..:n~~_ __---==._...::=-=-~_:_:._----~__:_~ __~~__~_-:-:~_~__ ~"":" _ _ ___ _ -:;---_. - -'--- - ~- .-.. ~- ~ ~ .~ ~ . - -. - ~-- - "--.
<br /> ..
<br /> - ---------- ---------- - --.- ~ --- ---- ~ -, ~ ~ ~ I
<br /> - -----"- ---. --~- - ------ .-_. -- .'- - ~ ~
<br /> 1 STREET AND VIEWED THE PROPERTJ OWNED. ~Y.MR. EU~ENE~ LACEY ON WHICH HE
<br /> I S REQUEST I NG A 10 ' fRONT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK. THE ASSISTANT CITY ,
<br /> MANAGER EXPLAINED THAT MR~ LACEY HAD PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED A 15' SETBACK I
<br /> IN ERROR. ~ THE COMMITTEE NOTED THAT THE 10 ' SETBACK CONfORMED WITH OTHER !
<br /> HOUSES IN THE BLOCK AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE ACTION Of THE BOARD Of I
<br /> \,
<br /> ApPEALS TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BE UPHELD. "
<br /> I
<br /> 11 I
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 6 (A) Of THE I
<br /> I,
<br /> 'I REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. ~MOTION CARRIED. !I
<br /> Ii
<br /> II (B) REQUEST. BY WALTER K..McCORKLE fOR VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT CARPORT 2' fROM
<br /> S I.DE PROPERTY LI NE AT 975 WEST 18TH AVENUE - THE COMMJTTEE DROVE TO 975 ,
<br /> 1.., WEST 18TH AVENUE AND OBSERVED THE PARTIALLY COMPLETED CARPORT WHICH MR.
<br /> .,
<br /> Ii WALTER K. MCCORKLE HAD ERECTED WITHOUT A PERMIT. IT WAS EXPALINED THAT !
<br /> \1 THIS STRUCTURE IS IN VIOLATION Of THE ZONING:ORDINANCE, AND THE COMMITTEE "
<br /> e I, II
<br /> I: RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD. Of ApPEALS ACTION DENYJNG THE VARIANCE BE UPHELD. :1
<br /> \,~
<br /> ij
<br /> IT WAS MOVED. BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN~THAT ITEM 6 (B) Of,THE.
<br /> REPORT Of THE.COMMITTEE. OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. !I
<br /> .
<br /> I . !
<br /> ,
<br /> I Ii (C) REQUEST BY J. P.O'NEIL fOR PERMISSION TO DIVIDE PROPERTY 80'XI60' INTO I,
<br /> I THREE LOTS 53-1/3'X80' EACH, LOCATED AT 19TH AVENUE AND COLUMBIA STREET - 1
<br /> Ii !
<br /> THE COMMITTEE DROVE TO 19TH AVENUE AND COLUMBIA STREET AND, VIEWED THREE !
<br /> HOUSES WHICH ARE PRESENTLY ON A LOT 80'XI60', WHICH LOT MR. O'NEIL IS RE- Ii
<br /> ,I I
<br /> I: QUESTING TO DIVIDE INTO THREE LOTS Of EQUAL SIZE, EACH BEING 53-1/3'X80'. ,
<br /> I' I
<br /> IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THIS REQUEST HAD BEEN SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY AND HAD \
<br /> ,I ~i
<br /> !1 BEEN DENIED BY tHE COUNCIL SINCE'THE DIVISION WOULD MAKE EACH LOT LESS
<br /> THAN 6000 SQUARE fEET AS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING REGULATIONS. IT WAS ALSO ,
<br /> I I
<br /> II EXPLAINED THAT THESE HOUSES WERE IN EXISTENCE PRIOR TO THE TIME THE ZONING ',I
<br /> II 11
<br /> Ii REGULATIONS WERE PUT INTO EffECT. THE BOARD Of ApPEALS RECOMMENDED AP-
<br /> \; PROVAL Of THE DIVISION Of THE PROPERTY, AND THE COMMITTEE BY A 3-2 VOTE
<br /> RECOMMENDED THAT THE ACTION Of THE BOARD Of. ApPEAL a BE SUSTAINED ALLOWING I,
<br /> "
<br /> I' MR. O'NEIL TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. "
<br /> I! II
<br /> :i
<br /> . I,
<br /> II II
<br /> ,I IT WAS MO!ilED BY MR. HARTMAN~ SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT .ITEM 6 ~c) Of THE
<br /> Ii
<br /> II REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION DEFEATED 4-3d
<br /> ,'I
<br /> ,I
<br /> I IT WAS MO,VED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. SHISLER THAT RECONSIDERATION~ BE I
<br /> ,
<br /> , I
<br /> I GIVEN MR. O'NEIL'S REQUEST TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. MOTION. DE- I
<br /> , fEATED 5-2.
<br /> Ii
<br /> II :1
<br /> Ii ij
<br /> 1 1\ 7. PAVING OF ALLEY BETWEEN 11TH A'4D 12TH AVENUES fROM HIGH STREET TO' THE EAST -
<br /> r THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED TO THE COMMITTEE THAT THE PAVING Of THE /,
<br /> 'I ~j
<br /> Ii ALLEY BETWEEN I I TH AND 12TH AVENUES fROM HIGH STREET TO THE EASTHAD BEEN PETI-
<br /> TIONED BY APPROXIMATELY 50% OF THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS, HAD BEE:N APRROVED
<br /> I: BY THE COUNCIL AND BIDS HAD BEEN CALLED. ~ BIDS SUBMITTED fOR THE PRO~ECT WERE :1
<br /> ,I
<br /> 11 HIGHER THAN ANTICIPATED AND IT WAS THE COUNCIL'S DECISION TO AGAIN CONTACT THE , ,
<br /> AFFECTED PROPE:RTY OWNERS .BEFORE: PROCEED I NG. WITH. THE PAV I NG. THE QITY ENGINEER :!
<br /> 1\ REPORTED THAT THE LATEST POLL INDI,CATED 50%. AGAINST THE .P'AVING, 23.5% IN fAVOR... II
<br /> " ,i
<br /> p Of THE. PAVING AND 26.5%iGAVE,NO RESPONSE. THE COMM IlTEE RECOMMENDED THAT TH I S 11
<br /> I:
<br /> e I: PROJECT ~E DROPPED. il
<br /> i: '. ~
<br /> , i\
<br /> Ii
<br /> Ii IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 7 Of THE REPORT OF
<br /> II THE COMM I TTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. . MOT I ON .CARR I ED. I
<br /> II I,
<br /> ,
<br /> Ii !
<br /> CONS I DERAT '.ON Of, B" OS OPENED 'JUNE 1
<br /> !I 8. 19 , 1958 fO:R VAR taUS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - ~ I
<br /> THE COMMITTEE ~STUDIED A TABULAHON, OF"::BIDS RECEIVE'D AND OPENED ON JUNE 19., 1958
<br /> ::1 '1
<br /> I,
<br /> II ON THREE STREET PAVING PROJECTS, ONE SANITARY SEWER PROJE~T AND TWO STORM SEWER 1/
<br /> Ii PROJECTS AND RECOMMENDEDTHA,T THE~ CONTRACTS BE A.WARDED TO_ .THE LOW BIDDER ON EACH :j
<br /> I,
<br /> I! PROJECT AND THAT THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BEP.REPARED AND SIGNED BY. T.HE PROPER !i
<br /> CITY OfFICIALS.", \1
<br /> ; ~
<br /> II I
<br /> No ACTION WAS TAKEN ON ITEM 8 Of THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE Of THE'WHOLE AS. ;1
<br /> I' CONTRACTS WERE AWARDED WHEN BID OPENING CONSIDERED EARLIER IN THE MEETING. "
<br /> "
<br /> I I; .1
<br /> I' II
<br /> , i IT WAS MOVED .BY MR.. MOLHO:LM SECONDED BY MR'. MCGAFfE,y THAT THE MATTER Of .JEFFERSO N STREET OPEN I NG .j
<br /> ,d "
<br /> , BE REFERRED TO THE PUBL I C WORKS COMM,I TTEE. MOT I ON CARR I ED.: il
<br /> I
<br /> , ii
<br /> ,
<br /> I '1
<br /> , ti
<br /> I
<br /> I I ~ I
<br /> II
<br /> , :\
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> e u ,I
<br /> I )1
<br /> !' !I
<br /> II :1
<br /> :1 "
<br /> ;'j ;1
<br /> I :!...il
<br />
|