Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,., <br />271 <br />e <br /> <br />8/ II/58 <br />__ __ ____ _. _.._ 6- _ __ __ __~___ _ .____ --__ __ ---...- -- ---- <br />-~ --'- - .... ~ - - --" - - .+- - . . - - - - - -- - . - - -- - -- - . <br /> <br />-.--- .--::.....--::-----...::,;--=-~'"""" ---- - -.- - --- --- -. I- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I 4. R'VERVIEW ANNEXATION - THE CITY MANAGER INFORMED THE COMMITTEE THAT AN AREA ADJA- <br />I CENT TO THE CITY LIMITS IN THE RIVERVIEW AREA IS REQUESTING ANNEXATION BY 100% . <br />~ CONSENT. THE MINUTES 'Of ' THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 5, 1958 INDI- , <br />~ CATE THAT ALTHOUGH ALL SIX PARCELS OF PROPERTY~ THE OWNERS OF WHICH ARE REQUEST- . <br />t ING ANNEXATION, ARE CONTIGUOUS, ONE PARCEL OF PROPERTY, WHOSE OWNER REFUSES TO' \1 <br />~ JOIN BY CONSENT, CREATES A GAP IN THE WEST SIDE OF R'VERVIEW STREET. IT IS THE 'I <br />~ RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT TO PROPERLY SQUARE OFF THE AREA f <br />I: TO THE PRESENT CITY LIMITS, IT WOULD BE. DESIRABLE TO ADD FOUR PROPERTIES TO ~! <br />~. THOSt WISHING TO COME INTO THE CITY BY CONSENT. THE COMMITTEE VIEWED MAPS OF ~ <br />~ THE AREA IN QUESTION AND RECOMMENDED THAT AN ELECTION IN THE AREA BE HELD. ~ <br />~ ~ <br />~ IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 4 OF THE REPORT OF THE !I~ <br />!: COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.' i <br />11 i <br />~ 5. REZONING OF PROPERTY AT 15TH AVENUE AND fAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD REQUESTED BY VERNON I <br />o SCOTT - THE COMMITTEE DROVE TO AND VIEWED THE AREA ON BOTH SIDES OF 15TH AVENUE I <br />e 1\ EAST OF fA I RMOUNT BOULEVARD WH I CH HAD BEEN REQUESTED FOR REZON I NG FROM R-, TO 1:1 <br />o R-4 MULTIPLE fAMILY RESIDENTIAL BY VERNON SCOTT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S I <br />f PERMANENT REPORT OF AUGUST 5, 1958 WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE IN WHICH IT WAS I <br />l~ - <br />~ BROUGHT OUT THAT THE SEWER CAPACITY OF THE AREA WAS DESIGNED FOR SINGLE FAMILY ~ <br />, DWELLINGS AND THAT IT WAS FELT THAT REZONING OF THE AREA AS REQUESTED WOULD BE ~ <br />!' SPOT ZONING AND WHICH WOULD BENEFIT ONLY ONE PROPERTY OWNER. THE COMMITTEE 'I <br />! RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S. ACTION TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR RE- ~. <br />In ZONING BE UPHELD. MR. LINDEEN VOTED NAY. P <br />f ~ <br /> <br />, l~ IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 5 OF THE REPORT OF THE II.,' <br />.~ COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. 'I: <br />I i, <br />:: 6. SIDEWALKS ON COLUMBIA STREET BETWEEN 22ND AND-27TH AVENUES - THE COMMITTEE VISITED [I <br />~ THE AREA BETWEEN 22ND AND 27TH AVENUES ON COLUMBIA STREET AND NOTED THAT WHILE ~ <br />I, SIDEWALKS ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET FOR APPROXIMATELY 175% OF THE DISTANCE :1 <br />r THERE ARE GAPS ON BOTH S)DES OF THE STREET WHERE NO SIDEWALKS EXIST. THE CITY ~ <br />I MANAGER STATED THAT THE HEAVY TRAFF I C FROM LAURELWOOD GOLF COURSE DOWN COL UMB I A [I <br />, Ii <br />: STREET CREAT~S A MENACING CONDITION FOR PEDESTRIANS WHO ARE FORCED TO WALK ON ~ <br />! THE STREET WHERE NO SIDEWALKS EXIST. AfTER VIEWING A MAP OF THE AREA SHOWING II <br />i THE PLACES WHERE SIDEWALKS ARE NOT IN EXISTENCE, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT 1,'1 <br />Iii SIDEWALKS BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF COLUMBIA STREET FROM 22ND TO 27TH AVE- j <br />I,' NUE { EXCEPT WHERE SIDEWALKS ARE. ALREADY CONSTRUCTED AND THAT THE NECESSARY t_,1 <br />~ ORDINANCE INITIATING THE PROJECT BE PASSED. l <br />I' I <br />;}~ IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 6 OF THE REPORT OF THE f1i <br />Ii COMM I TTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTl ON CARR I ED. I <br />~ ' 'j-, <br />II : <br />I',,: 7. HENDERSON ANNEXATION - THE CITY MANAGER INFORMED THE COMMITTEE THAT A SIZEABLE ~ <br />I AREA IN THE GLENWOOD DISTRICT IS REQUESTING ANNEXATION AND THAT IT WOULD PRO- i <br />~ BABLY NECESSITATE AN ELECTION IN THE AREA. No ACTION WAS TAKEN BY THE COMMITTEE. I <br />I: :' <br /> <br />I I': 8. ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE AT 165 WEST 5TH AVENUE - THE fiRE MARSHAL INFORMED THE l,' <br />i' COMMITTEE THAT SINCE A RECENT FIRE AT 165 WEST 5TH AVENUE IN AN OLD DWELLING II' <br />, I WHICH HAD RESULTED IN THE LOSS OF TWO LrVES, THE OWNERS OF THE BUILDING HAD I' <br />ij NOT REPAIRED THE STRUCTURE EVEN THOUGH INSURANCE HAD BEEN COLLECTED FOR FIRE ~ <br />~ DAMAGE. THE fIRE MARSHAL STATED THAT HE HAD SENT LETTERS TO THE OWNERS, 1 <br />p II <br />~ CLARENCE AND NELLIE HYDE, AND TO THE OPERATOR OF A ROOMING AND APARTMENT HOUSE I <br />I: IN THE BUILDING, MRS. HAZEL CRUZAN. HE FURTHER STATED THAT HE HAD CONTACTED 1 <br />I: THE PARTIES IN PERSON SEVERAL TIMES BUT THAT NO ACTION TO REPAIR THE DAMAGE I <br />_ 'I HAD BEEN FORTHCOM I NG. THE COMM I TTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE fl RE MARSHAL'S RE- ;, <br />~ ! PORT RECOMMENDING ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE PROCEEDINGS BE INSTITUTED ON THE PRO- ; <br />1 PERTY AT 165 AND '65-1/2 WEST 5TH AVENUE BE APPROVED. r <br />, <br />! l <br />~ 9. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SURVEY AT INTERSECTIONS OF AGATE STREET WITH 13TH, 18TH AND 19TH ~ <br />J AVENUES - THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER GAVE A DETAILED REPORT ON THE INTERSECTIONS OF ~ <br />~ AGATE STREET WITH 13TH, 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES IN WHICH HE INDICATED THAT HE ~ <br />o HAD MADE TRAFFIC COUNTS AT ALL THREE INTERSECTIONS. IT IS HIS OPINION THAT ~ <br />~ THE TRAFFIC SITUATION AT THESE THREE INTERSECTIONS DOES NOT JUSTIFY A CHANGE ~ <br />I: TO TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THIS TIME. HE DID RECOMMEND THAT THE PRESENT CURB Ii <br />1 RADIUS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF IBTH AVENUE AND AGATE STREET BE CUT BACK ! <br />~ TO FLOW INTO THE NORTH CURB LINE OF 18TH AVENUE, AND THAT THE STOP SIGNS ~ <br />II STOPPING NORTH/SOUTH TRAFFIC ON AGATE STREET AT 19TH AVENUE BE REMOVED. THE ~ <br />J COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT OF THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER BE ADOPTED AND : <br />~ THAT ANOTHER STUDY BE MADE AFTER SCHOOL BEGINS AT THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND : <br />I I,,',! THE UN I VERS I TY OF OREGON TH I S FALL. j! <br />11 ,I <br />~ 10. TERMINATION OF SIGNAL AT BROADWAY AND MILL STREET - THE CITY MANAGER INFORMED J <br />II THE COMMITTEE THAT THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT BROADWAY AND MILL STREET WHICH WAS !! <br />t ORIGINALLY INSTALLED AS A PUSHBUTTON SIGNAL FOR PEDESTRIANS HAD BEEN TORN OUT [ <br />LI <br />~ BY A TRUCK CARRYING ROAD EQUIPMENT NOT HAVING ENOUGH CLEARANCE. THE TRAFFIC I <br />1 ENGINEER'S REPORT INDICATED THAT 11,500 VEHICLES USE THIS ROUTE INA 24-HOUR I <br />I PERIOD OF TIME. HE STATED_THAT AN AVERAGE OF ONLY 16 PEDESTRIANS USE THE f <br />1 CROSSING DURING THE SAME PERIOD OF TIME. HE FURTHER STATED THAT HE HAD CON- ; <br /> <br />- '",l '.'1, <br />~ 11 ' <br />1 ' <br />I · <br />',I :,1 <br />~ I <br />~ ~ <br />