|
<br /> 279 ~
<br /> e
<br /> 8/25/58
<br /> ---- ----- - _.--_.-------- --~_.~ .-----~-._----- --- --~ -~-- - ~----_._-------~ ------_._-----~-----_.~-~_._------- -~ ~----~-----------
<br /> -~~.- -......~~ -~._~ ";...-~~- ~--~ ._---,--.,.~--- ._~--- ----. -- ~~- -- -~- - -~ ---- ~--~---~_._._-_.-
<br /> .o~--~~~-~l-~- -- - - -.. - . - -~- ~- - -- - -. ---- - - ---- - - -- - -.-= ~~'"''''''
<br /> ~--_._~----- ..~_. ~--~.- - -~--
<br /> I I,
<br /> I: 5. REQUEST BY COUNCILMAN:McGAFFEY CONCERNING THE KEEPING OPEN OF SWIMMING POOLS
<br /> 11 DURING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER - THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS & RECREATION r
<br /> GAVE HIS REPORT SHOWING THE -COSTS INVOLVED IN KEEPING THE CITY SWIMMING POOLS [
<br /> I, OPEN DURING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER. HE EXPLAINED THAT PRESENT PLANS ARE TO 'I
<br /> I; KEEP AT LEAST ONE POOL OPEN THROUGH SEPTEMBER 7 AND, IF THE CURRENT BUDGET
<br /> 1, \.,
<br /> (; WilL AllOW,- TO KEEP BOTH POOLS dPEN THR6UGH SEPTEM~ER 7: STUDIES HAVE' SHOWN II
<br /> THAT IT IS.NOT ECONOMICAL TO OPERATE THE CITY SWIMMING'POOLS AFTER SCHOOL
<br /> I; STARTS UNLESS THE SCHOOL DISTRICT USES THE POOLS AS PART OF THEIR EDUC~ONAL II
<br /> I,
<br /> I' PROGRAM. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS & RECREATION HAD DISCUSSED SUCH A PLAN i\
<br /> jl WITH MEMBERS OF SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 STAfF AND THERE
<br /> I; IS A POSSIBILITY A PLAN 1\
<br /> WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE C,Ty'AND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR CONSIDERATION IN THE I
<br /> II 1959-60 BUDGET. HIS REPORT SHOWS THAT IT WOULD COST APPROXIMATELY $3957.80 1.l t'
<br /> )-1..
<br /> I' TO KEEP THE POOLS OPEN DURING THE MONT~ OF SEPTEMBER. SINCE THESE FUNDS /fl'
<br /> Ii . ,
<br /> ARE NOT CURRENTLY BUDGETED,THE 'COMMITTEE'TOOK NO ACTION. ,
<br /> II I
<br /> ,I I
<br /> e Ii 6. DISCUSSION OF BUS SERVICE WITH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - A REPRESENTATIVE OF'
<br /> , "
<br /> I, THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMED THE COMMITTEE t
<br /> 11 THAT THEY HAD MET AND DISCUSSED THE CURRENT BUS SITUATION. 11' IS THEIR I
<br /> !
<br /> II OPINION THAT BUS TRANSPORTATION IS NECESSARY EVEN THOUGH IT SHOULD BE NECES- I
<br /> I'
<br /> \1 SARY FOR THE CITY TO SU~SIDIZE'THE Bus COMPANY IN ORDER TO KEEP BtiSSES RUN- I
<br /> I,
<br /> II NING. THE CITY MANAGER' POINTED OUT THAT THE CHARTER'OF THE CITY'OF 'EUGENE r
<br /> I II
<br /> !I PROHIBITS THE ENGAGING IN BUS OPERATIONS IN ANY MANNE~, FINANCIAL OR OTRuR-
<br /> I WISE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT OF THE CHAMBER Of COMMERCE
<br /> Ii EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE. H
<br /> I: ii
<br /> .
<br /> II I'
<br /> I~ 7. REQUEST fOR FRANCHISE BY CASCADE TRANSIT LINES - THE CITY MANAGER INFORMED !
<br /> ;1 THE COMMITTEE THAT HE HAD A LETTER FROM CASCADE TRANSIT LINES REQUESTING
<br /> I'! A FRANCHISE TO OPERATE PASSENGER BUSSES OVER THE STREETS OF THE CITY OF j'
<br /> II EUGENE. THE ATTORNEY FOR CITY TRANSIT LINES INFORMED THE COMMITTEE THAT II
<br /> I A PETITION IS NOW IN FEDERAL COURT WHICH PLACES ALL OF THE PROPERTY AND I,
<br /> ., iJ
<br /> :1 EQUIPMENT OF THE CITY TRANSIT LINES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT. "1
<br /> iil
<br /> I, HE STATED THAT IN HIS Opi'NI~~ THE:CASCADE TRANSIT LINES COULD NOT NEGO-
<br /> I I
<br /> , I',
<br /> ,I TIATE AT THIS TIME FOR A FRANCHISE SINCE THE EQUIPMENT WHICH THEY INTENDED ,
<br /> I: TO OPERATE IS BEING LEASED FROM CITY TRANSIT LINES AND THIS'EQUIPMENT IS I
<br /> H
<br /> l\ NOW UNDERJURISDI~TI~N OF THE COURT~ HE'STATED THAT IN HIS OPINION'THE
<br /> i! OLD ~RANCHISE WHICH THE CITY TRANSIT LINES HAD'WITH'THECITY OF EUGENE' IS I
<br /> I: Ii
<br /> I', STILL IN EFFECT, AND IT IS THE DUTY OF THE CITY COUNCil TO PROTECT THIS I
<br /> I FRANCHISE BY PROHIBITING ACTIONS OF COMPETITORS. 'THE CITY MANAGER INFORMED I
<br /> , II
<br /> ,
<br /> I~ THE COMMITTEE THAT THE CITY TRANSIT LINES HAD NOTIFIED THE CITY THEIR SER-
<br /> ! VICES HAD TERMINATED AND THAT THE CITY IS PROCEEDING'UNDER'THE ASSUMPTION
<br /> :! '1
<br /> \ THAT NO FRANCHISE EXISTS; THEREFORE, ANY BUS~ES CAN O~ERATE IN THE CITY OF Ii
<br /> I! EUGENE AT THE PRESENT TIME. THE QUESTION OF INSURANCE COVERAGE ON BUSSES II
<br /> NOW OPERATING AROSE, AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE INSURANCE COMPANY WHICH ' !!
<br /> I' ~ORMERLY HAD INSURANCE ON CITY TRANSIT LINES:EQUIPMENT 'BE CONTACTED TO SEE
<br /> Ii. ,'I
<br /> IF COVERAGE I S STILL I N EFFECT. THE'Bbs COMMITTEE WHICH HAD BEEN APPOINTED-~ II
<br /> J I,
<br /> I: BY THE MAYOR REPORTED THAT THEY WERE LED TO BELIEVE THAT CITY TRANSIT LINES II
<br /> I ARE NO LONGER IN EXISTENCE, THAT A NEW COMPANY WOULD OPERATE THE BUSSES
<br /> I,
<br /> jI AND WOULD NEGOTIATE WITH THE-CITY FOR A FRANCHISE AFTER LEGAL COMPLICATIONS !i!
<br /> Ii HAD BEEN RESOLVED. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST FORAA FRAN- 11
<br /> II CHISE BY THE CASCADE TRANSIT LINES BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE." !!
<br /> II
<br /> /: 'T WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT 'TEMS J AND 2 Of THE REPORT OF THE [I
<br /> Ii COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CAR~IED, COUNCILMAN'LINDEE~ VOTING NAY. i
<br /> n
<br /> I' I
<br /> ,I
<br /> ti IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT 'TEM 3 or THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE
<br /> e I: I
<br /> OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED. 11
<br /> II
<br /> I Il
<br /> Ii IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN~THAT ITEM 4{A) OF THE REPORT OF THE'COM-
<br /> 'I
<br /> It MITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED,'COUNCILMEN HARTMAN AND EDMUNDS:'VOTING NAY:
<br /> I I
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> r IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT OF THE COM-
<br /> " 'MITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOT I ON CARR I ED'. 1
<br /> ,I II
<br /> I: , REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS I
<br /> ,
<br /> il
<br /> II I
<br /> I ,I A REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS MEETING HELD AUGUST 13, 195B - RE: VARIOUS REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES I
<br /> I
<br /> I' WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:' ~
<br /> ,I
<br /> Ij
<br /> !,I "THE BoARD OF ApPEALS HELD A REGULAR MEETING AT THECITY HAll, ,I
<br /> i:!
<br /> I
<br /> I AUGUST 13, 1958. MEMBERS PRESENT WERE MR. MORRIS, 'MR. MOYER AND MR~HEN- ij
<br /> I
<br /> I ' i DERSHOTT. MR. BALZHIS~R AND MR. CULBERTSON WERE ABSENT. ,'. I
<br /> I
<br /> Ii I. MR. J. P. O'NEIL, P~O.BOX 84B, REQUESTS PERMISSION TO' D"~I~E A LOT II
<br /> 1'1
<br /> I.! BO'XI60', lOCATED AT 19TH AVENUE AND COLUMBIA'STREET,'INTO THREE I
<br /> !!
<br /> I EQUAL SIZE'lOTS, 53-I/~'XBO'., MR.-HENDERSHOTT MADE A MOTION'AND i
<br /> I IT WAS SECONDED By"MR".MOYER'THAT THE'REQUEST'BE'GRANTED'.
<br /> ! " ,
<br /> I 2. MR. W. H. SHIELDS COMPANY, 252 TAYLOR STREET, REQUESTS A VARIANCE IN
<br /> I
<br /> ,1 HEIGHT TO CONSTRUCT A FENCE 8'6" TO 'THE READ AND NORTH OF THE JOHNSON'
<br /> e Ii
<br /> I; I
<br /> (~ I
<br /> Ii 1.1
<br /> I: 1,
<br /> I; l\
<br /> i' ~
<br /> r:
<br />
|