<br />~288
<br />e
<br />
<br />9/8/58
<br />_ __ .,-____--~~-.~---- ~_ ____ _____ ___ _ _____ _. ______ _"__ ._._ u __. ___ __ __ __ _. _ .- _._ -~- - -----~ --_. "--~ -- -- ---~ -------------;-- ---" - - - -------- - - ----- -+----- ----- ~~- ----------,-....,.--..----
<br />._. _._~_~W'_.___. ._ .." .____ _ ~__ _ ."._._ __ _ _. _ _ ~ _. ..' _. '_ . . , . " '. .--. n,
<br />-- - - - - - ~ - -
<br />- "-,. - - . - .- ... ...... - . -- -.. .- ---.' .~ ._--..
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />. BY THE ENPLOYEES, AND AS A PART or THE CONTRACT THEPATNENT or WHICH HAD 'BEEN 1
<br />II TAKEN OVER BY THE ~OMPANY, HAD BEEN TERMINATED BY THE COMPANY WITHOUT 'THE6Rr~ERS' 1'1
<br />KNOWLEDGE AND WAS A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE coNTRACT. .
<br />. 'I
<br />I I
<br />1 AT THIS POIN,T A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION WAS AGAIN HELD ON THE VAR'IOUS It
<br />I ASPECTS OF THE PROBLEM. COUNCILMAN LINDEEN INDICATED HE WISHED THE MATTER LEFT I
<br />j OPEN UN~IL SOMETHING DEFINITE CAME BEFORE ~HE COMM~TTEE, AND FOLLOWING SOME DIS~ I
<br />I ~
<br />I CUSSION IT WAS MOVED BY. MR. LINDEEN SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT NO ACTION BE ~
<br />I} TAKEN AT THIS TIME WITH REGARD TO THE' LEGALITY OF THE PRESENT FRANCHISE: OR OPERA- \1
<br />Ii TION OF THE BUS LINES. MOTION CARRIED, WITH COUNCILMA,N MCGAFFEY VOTING NA~." I
<br />
<br />II I T WAS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN ~SECONDED BY MR.- SH I SLER THAT' THE COMM I TTEE REPORT OF"' AUGUST 29, 1958 I
<br />11 BE APPROVED. MOT I ON CARR I ED. d
<br />
<br />Ii . ' ~ I
<br />
<br />I A RepORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1958 - RE: COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - Dlscus- I
<br />; SION REGARDING, SA,NITARY SE~ER ON EA,ST SI,DE OF EMERALD STRE.ET FROM 26TH TO 28TH AVENUE; COMMUNICATION I e
<br />1 REGARDING PURCHASE OF PROPERTIES IN PARK-A IRE SUBDIVISION; COMMUNICATION FROM UNITED AIRLINES REGARD-
<br />I ~ ,,~ " .
<br />liNG TERMINAL FACILITIES; CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF PROPERTY WEST OF CITY JAIL; BUSSES; PUBLIC WORKS
<br />I COMMITTEE - REQUEST FOR DEFERRMENT OF INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK O~ POTTER SiREET BETW~EN 22ND AND 23RD
<br />I AVENUES; REQUEST FOR DEFERRMENT OF INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK .ON COLUMBIA STREET BETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH
<br />I AVENUES; CONSIDERATION OF BIDS ON' VARIOUS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OPENED SEPTEMBER 4" 1958; CONSIDERATION
<br />1 OF B I OS ON RADIO EQUIPMENT FOR POL I_CE AND fl RE DE,PARTMEN~TS; REQUEST FOR SEGREGAT ION OF ASSESSMENT BY 1-
<br />WESTWARD Ho, INC.; WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: > ,
<br />" .', ~ I
<br />PRESENT: COUNCILMEN SHEARER, SHISLER, EDMUNDS,LAURIS, LINDEEN, MOLHOLM AND MCGAF"FEYj
<br />I CITY MANAGER; CITY ATTORNEY; CITY RECORDER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; ADMINI-
<br />STRATIVE ASSISTANT; fiRE CHIEf; CHIEF OF POLICE; ASSISTANT PURCHASI'NG AGENT;
<br />MESSRS. KEEFE"HALE THOMPSON, ELKINS, 'RAY SIEGENTHA'LERj MR. BEEBE, MOTO'ROiA
<br />" COMPANY; ME~SSRS. EVERETTE MEADOR', COUNC I L NOM I-NEE F"~OM' WARD 4; J. HOBA'RT, . I
<br />I WI LSON, COUNC I~L NOM I NEE. F"ROMWARD 2'; JOH.N CHATT~, ,COU,NC IL, NOM I NEE FROM ~ARD I j
<br />DoNN BONHAM AND DEAN REA, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; WENDY RAY, KUGN; DOLPH
<br />I ,'~ ., ~ . " '
<br />, JANES, KOREj JACK CRAIG, KERG.
<br />1 .. ~
<br />II COOl TTEE Of, THE WHOLE ~
<br />II I. DISCUSSION REGARDING SANITARY SEWER ON EAS'T SIDE OF EMERALD STREE'T FROM 26TH TO 28TH I
<br />'I AVENUE - THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AGAIN EXPLAINE~D THE ROUTES OF THE PROPOSED: SEWER I
<br />LINE AS WELL AS AN ALTERNATE ROUTE. IT WAS LIKEWISE EXPLAINED THAT IF THE NATURAL
<br />j DRA I NAGE AREA. WERE USED. 'I~TWOULD SERVE. FOR BOTH A SA~N liAR": 'SEWER AND A STORM SEWER, ,
<br />! BUT IF THE ALTERNATE ROUTE WERE USED IT WOULD SERVE ONLY FOR A SANITARY SEWER. IT !
<br />i WAS LIKEWISE EXPLAINED THAT IF THE NATURAL D'RAINAGE AREA WERE USED, CONDEMNATION OF I
<br />I PROPERTY WOULD BE NECESSARY TO SECURE THE NECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR I NSTALLAT I'ON OF
<br />. THE SEWER LINES. AFTER SOME 'DISCUSSION THE t~MMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT B~TH 'STORM I
<br />AND SANITARY SEWER ~ECONSTRUCTED ALONG ~HE NATURAL DRAINAGE AREA ON THE EAST. sf DE
<br />OF EMERALD STREET BETWEEN "26TH AND2,STH AVEN'UES,. TH IS' ..TO ;BE 'o~' THE 'BAS I S OF 'THE .
<br />I OR~GINAL RECOMMENDATION AND WITH THE UN~ERSTANDING THAT CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY I
<br />1 WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY BE REQUIRED.. -
<br />
<br />· 2. CONMUNICATION REGARDING PURCHASE or PROPERTIES IN PARK-A'RE .SUBDIVISION -.A LETTER 1
<br />FROM MESSRS.COUGILL, HANSEN AND GLASS WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE. THIS LETTER PRO-
<br />POS~D THE :P~RCHASEOF" 77 LOTS IN THE PARK-A'IRE SUBDIVISION ON A TIME TABLE EXTENDING
<br />FROM THE PRESENT TIME TO JULY I, 196~, AND FURTHER STIPU~ATED THE BASIS OF A POTEN-
<br />TIAL CONTRACT AND OTHER ITEMS WITH REFERENC~ TO THE PURCHASE OF SUiH PRO~ERT~. . THE
<br />I . . ",~' "
<br />J COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE~TTER BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE.
<br />
<br />I I
<br />' 3. COMMUNICATION FROM UNITED AIRLINES REGARDING TERMINAL .FACILITIES - A LETTER FROM
<br />UN I TED A I RLI NES CONCERN.I ~G THE TE~M I NAL. FAC I L1,T I ES .E I T~E~ AT UN I TE'D"S PRESEN": LEASE I e
<br />PROPERTY OR AT A NEW TERMINAL BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE CITY AT MANLON-SWEET
<br />'I AIRPORT WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE: THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THis MATTER BE I
<br />REFERRED TO THE AIRPORT COMMITTEE FOR FURTHER STUDY.
<br />
<br />I 4. CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE~OF PROPERTY WEST OF THE CIT~' JAIL - IT WAS INDICATED I
<br />'I THAT THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE HAD BEEN REQUESTED TO DETERMINE THE COST OF PROPER-
<br />TIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 5TH AVENUE IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE JAIL BUILDING. IT WAS
<br />I INDICATED THAT, THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE JAIL 'IS 'PRICED AT $19,800, AND
<br />THE SECOND PROPERTY WEST OF" THE JAIL AND'EAST OF'THE NORTH/SOUTH ALLEV IS PRICED
<br />AT $25,000. THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE FIGURES WHICH HAD BEEN OBTAINED AND INDI-
<br />CATED THEY THOUGHT IT DESIRABLE TO PURCHASE THESE PROPERTIES AND TO ESTABL~SH A
<br />I JAIL AND POLICE DEPARTM~N~.SEPARATELY FROM T~E CI~Y H~L~. :IT WAS A~SO 'INDICATED
<br />THAT IT WAS FELT THAT THE POLICE AND JAIL F"ACILITIES SEPARATE FROM OTHER ADMINI-
<br />STRATIVE F"ACILlTIES <?F THE eIT,YIS THE, TREND IN ORGANIZA~I.ONAL PROCEDU~ES AT THIS .1 I"
<br />TIME. IT '1AS RECOMMENDED THAT THE:CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE DETER~INE THE-ASSESSED ,.
<br />VALUATIONS OF THESE PROPERTIES SO THAT A VALUE OF THE PROPERTIES MIGHT'BE MORE I
<br />READILY HAD. I
<br />
<br />j 5. BUSSES - MR. HALE THOMPSON, ,ATTORNEY FOR A PROPOSED NEW BUS SERVICE TO,SERVE fHE l
<br />CITY OF EUGENE, APPEAR~,D:BEFORE THE COM~ITTEE TO ~TAiE THE LATEST DEVELOP~ENTS'~N I'
<br />THE BUS SITUATION IN THE CITY.. HE INDIC~TED ~HAT CITY TRAN~IT-LINES APeEARSTO. I
<br />HAVE MOVED OUT AND THAT HIS PROPoSED NEW COM~ANY, EMERALD TRANSIT LINES, WILL FILE I
<br />ARTICLES OF" INCORPORATION IN THE NEAR F"UTURE. HE'ALSO INDICATED THAT THE F"'NANCES I ~
<br />
<br />\ I
<br />~ 'i
<br />'I
<br />II l'
<br />I, ,I
<br />I' I,
<br />
|