|
<br /> r 290 e
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> 9/8/58 -~ _____ __no. __~_____.. __~_ ----,
<br /> ------- ------ ---. --------- ---- - --- --- ~- ------ ---- ---- ---~--------- _..-. ---~---------- ~--- -_. -- -------- --- ---- ---- -- ----
<br /> - - - -- - . - ~ - ~ . _ U _ __ _ _ _ ,__ _ _. _ _ _ _.- T -- - -.. - ---
<br /> I - - - - . . . -- -- -
<br /> ELECTRIC, WHICH DID NOT MEtT SPECI~ICATIONS, AND SUBSTITUTING RADIOS BUILT BY I .-
<br /> MOTOROLA, WHICH DID:MEET SPEClrICATIONS, THE OVERALL BID.Or MOTOROLA BECAME THE t
<br /> i
<br /> LOW BID, AND THE POLICE CHIEf' RECOMMENDED THAT MOTOROLA EQUIPMENT BE PURCHASED. I
<br /> I
<br /> THE COMM I TTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BID Of' MOTOROLA COMPANY BE ACCEPTED.. I
<br /> I
<br /> I :
<br /> t
<br /> 5. REQUEST~fOR SEGREGATION Of' ASSESSMENT BY WESTWARD Ho,. INC. -. IT WAS EXPLAINED I
<br /> THAT WESTWARD Ho, INC. IS PURCHASING PROPERTY IN THE OWNERSHIP Of THE EUGENE I
<br /> FARMERS' COOP IN THE VIc'N'TY Of' 7TH AVENUE AND MCKINLEY STREET. THE PRoeeRTIES I
<br /> TO BE PURCHASED CONSIST Of THREE PARCELS AND IN ORDER F'OR THE.PURCHASE TO BE COM-
<br /> PLETED, IT IS REQUESTED THAT A SEGREGATION BE MADE.ON THE THREE PARCELS. THE
<br /> COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE REQUESTED.~EGREGATION AND RECOMMENDED THE SEGREGATION BE
<br /> I APPROVED." r
<br /> II
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN SECONDED.BY MR. SHISLER. THAT. ITEM I .OF' T.HE' REPORT OF' THE COMN I TTEE 1
<br /> Of THE WHOLE BE AP~ROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I
<br /> IT WAS MOVED.B.Y MR. HARTMAN SECONDED~ BY MR.'. J-.IN.DEEN.THA.T. ITE~S 2, 3. AND 4 OF" THE REPORT OF' THE i e
<br /> COMMITTEE OF' THE WHOLE BE APPROVED.' MOTION. CARRIED. . . I
<br /> - . -
<br /> - . . ~ . . . .
<br /> IT WAS MOVED.BY MR. HARTMAN SECONDED BY MR. SHISLER THAT ITEM.5 OF' THE REPORT OF' THE COMMITTEE
<br /> Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. ,
<br /> '. .
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN SECONDED BY MR. MCGAF'F'EY THAT tmEM 5 BE CORRECTED BY ADDING TO THE I
<br /> REPORT THE F'OLLOWING: "AND F'URTHER PROVIDED THAT THE COMMITTEE'S EXPRESSION OF' APPROVAL Of NON-
<br /> FRANCHISED OPERAT.IO.N BE. .1IM.I:rED TO. A .PER.lODOF' ~.S.DAYS.' F.ROM. ~.E'p.TE~!3ER I , 1958~TO F'ILE APPLICATION F'OR
<br /> FRANCHISE". MOTION CARRIED. -.
<br /> - - -- -. .
<br /> (I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. LINDEEN SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 5 .AS CORRECTED BE AMENDED BY ADD- I
<br /> ,
<br /> ING: "SUB~ECT TO EXTENSION IS SHOWN". MOTION CARRIED. ,
<br /> If NEED
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN SECONDED BY MR. SHISLER THAT ITEM 5 OF' THE REPORT OF' THE COMMITTEE
<br /> OF' THE WHOLE: AS CORRECTED AND AMENDED BEAPPROVED~ MOTION eARRIED. - .
<br /> I
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. SHISLER THAT ITEMS I AND 2 OF' THE REPORT OF' THE
<br /> PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. I
<br /> ~-
<br /> . . . -~ I
<br /> No ACTION WAS TAKEN ON ITEM~S' 3 A'ND '4 -O'F' THE' PUBL I C. WORKS "tOMM','TTE-E- 'REPORT: -AS' -CON'TR'A'C-r'S WERE I
<br /> AWARDED UNDER BID OPENING EARLIER IN THE MEETING. .
<br /> . - .
<br /> IT WkS MOVED BY MR. HARTMAN SECONDED BY. MR. SHISLER THAT ITEM 5 OF' THE REPORT Of THE PUBLIC WORKS
<br /> COMMITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION. CARRIED.
<br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
<br /> .,.-
<br /> I A PERMANENT: REPORT or THE PLANNING~COMMISSION. MEETING OF' SEPTEMBER 2,: 1958 - RE: STREET LIGHT-
<br /> ING PROGRAM, ANNEXATION Fox HOLLOW- AREA, STREET VACATION WAS SUBMITTED AND READ ASF'OLLOWS:
<br /> "AT THE REGULAR:MEETING or THE EUGENE CIT.Y PLANNINGCOMMIS.S:ION,. I
<br /> SEPTEMBER 2, 1958, THE PLANNING COMMIS.SION BEGS TO'.MAKE 'THE F'OLLOWING RECOM.-
<br /> MENDAT.IONS TO' THE COUNC-I L :'.
<br /> .
<br /> STREET LIGHTING
<br /> THE PLANN I NG COMM I SS I ON.~ RECOMMENDS THAT THE 'REPORT ~Of THE STREET LIGHT I.NG COM-
<br /> MITTEE, COPIED BELOW, WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT.THEIR
<br /> SEPTEMBER 2,: 1.95~MEE.-': ~~G~ _BEADOPTE~ . AND T.HE NEC~SSARY. S",:EPS~ BE TAKEN TO PLACE ->
<br /> THE PLAN I NT'O EXECUT rON,. ,. - .
<br /> . , ~ ,
<br /> REPORT or STREET LIGHTING COMMI~TEE
<br /> MODERN STREET LIGHTING F'OR THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, EUGENE, OREGON
<br /> AUGUST 25, :,958 P'.. .
<br /> I FOLLOWING A REPOR'f..~Of THE. EUGENE CITY PLANN.ING COMMISSION IN AUGUST 1950,
<br /> THE CITY COUNC I L, WORK I NG THROUGH THE EUGENE WATER &-. ELECTR I C :BOARD, ORDERED.
<br /> NEW LIGHTING ON FRANKLIN BOULEVARD fROM THE.EAST~CIT.Y LIMITS T.O HIGH STREET
<br /> ON. 6TH AND 7TH ,AND, F'ROM THE NORTHWEST C!TV LI M I TS TO. LINCOLN .STREE:T ON .(IT.H .
<br /> AND 7-TH. SIX BLOCKS ~N 6TH AND 7TK BETWEEN LINCOLN ~ND HI~H STREETS REMAIN
<br /> I DARK OR INADEQUATELY L.IGHTED SINCE A .DETERMINATION COULD NO.T, BE MAD~E AT :THAT
<br /> TIME AS TO THE T-VPEor 'STANDARD TO BE :USED THROUGH THE CENT.RAL B;US INES~D 1.5,-
<br /> I TRleT OR AS TO THE rlNANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CITY VS BENEfiTTED PRO~ERT.IES).
<br /> . TEN YEARS HAVE ~ASSEDAND THESE .tSSUES REMAIN. UNSO~VED. .THE 0.1 LEMMA ~AR I SES
<br /> F'ROM :THE -F'ACT THAT. THE NOW OBSOLETE .STREET LIGHTING I~ THE CENTRAL BU~INES~ I I
<br /> DISTRICT WAS ORIGI.NALLY, FINANCED .THROUGH ,/Ii BENEFIT ASSESSMENT., ALL OTHER .
<br /> STREET LIGHTING I N THE -C I TY INCLUDI NG .THE MODERN LIGHT I NG ON~ '6TH,.7.TH, BROAD.-
<br /> I WAY AND FRANKL I N BOULEVARD, HOWEVER, .WAS PA I D OUT .Of GENERAL :F'UNDS. AND .A
<br /> ONE-M I LL CO NT '~NU I NG LEVY fOR STREET LIGHT I NG. FOR.THIS REASON AND .THE .OUT- I
<br /> II STANDING ADVANTAGES :REAlIZED BY THE COMMUNITY'.AS, A WHOLE fROM MOD.ERN STREE.T
<br /> LCGHTrNG SUCH AS:
<br /> .' .
<br /> II e
<br /> ~ "
<br /> II
<br /> I,
<br /> "
<br /> Ii
<br />
|