|
<br /> 325 ~
<br />e
<br />--- 10/13/58
<br />- - - -. - - -.- + _ _~_v ~_ -.- - - --_._~-- ---- ------ ,-- - ~ ---~ - -- - --
<br /> -, - +- -..-
<br />I TH~ PROPERTY LINE AND rHE~E I.S N.o EXCESS R,OOM I.N FRONT. AFTER
<br /> !.; SOME CO,N~ I DE~Ar I ON AND V I EW I N.G OF A SKETCH OF _THE PROPERT,X, THE II
<br /> II COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE ACTION OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS :1
<br /> DENYING THE REQU~STED ~ARIANCE BE UPHELD.
<br /> 11 - , >" "- Ii
<br /> ' , - .-.- - - - - - ~ . - - - ' - -' - . - - - . ---
<br /> I ' ' .q
<br /> (c) REQUEST OF CARTER OIL COMPANY FOR'VARIANCE: to ALLOW OVERSIZE SIGN AT II
<br /> \ PROPOSED SERVICE STATION TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF \1
<br /> ,I 19TH AVENUE AND AGATE STREET ~ IT WAS I NO I,CATER THAT THE CARTE_R O,I.L ,I
<br /> :1 11
<br /> !I COMPANY HAD REQUE~TED THEY BE ALLOWED TO INSTALL AN OVAL IDENTIFICA,:" I~
<br /> II TION SIGN .CONTAI~ING 29.5SQ~AR~ FEET AT THE ABOVE LOC~TIO~. THIS d
<br /> I
<br /> ARE~,IS ZONEp C-2, WHICH,,?ONE ALLOWS SUCH SIGNS TO CONTAIN ONLY 20 :1
<br /> SQUARE FEET,' , THE. BO_ARD ,Of, ApPEALS .MADE NO RECOMMENDAT ION ON TH IS. '\
<br /> I'i
<br /> P MATTER, AND THE COMMITTEE INDICATE~,THEY DI~ NOT WIS~TO ESTABLIS~
<br /> Ii (I
<br /> li'~ ANY PRECEDENT TOWARD OVERSIZE SIGNS. ON A MOTION THAT RECOMMENDATION ILl
<br /> " OF APPROVAL ~E GIVEN TH~S REQUEST, THE M~T~ON W~S D~FEATE~ BY A VOTE Ij
<br /> i'~ OF 3-2. :1
<br /> : I
<br /> I
<br />e. !; - . . II
<br /> B, PERMANENT REPORT Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION - OCTOBER 7, 1958: 1\
<br /> il
<br /> II (A) ZONING NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS AT 2736 lAURELWOOD LANE AND 29TH AVENUE AND il
<br /> L il
<br /> !t CITY V I EW STREET -. THE PLANN I NG COMM I SS I ON RECOMMENDED T:HAT THE NEWLY
<br /> I, A,NNEXED AREAS AT 2,736 lAURELWOOD :LAN.E AND 29TH AVEN.UEAND CITY V I EW
<br /> I: :1
<br /> I' STREET BE ZONED TO R-I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RA OUTER RESI- 1'1
<br /> /J DENTIAL RESPE,CrIVELY. AFTER ,CONSIDERATiON OF THE PLANNIN.G COMMISSION'S I'
<br /> Ii I
<br />I Ii REPORT, THE COMM I TTEE RECOM.MENDED THAT ACT ION OF THE PLANN I NG COMM I S- P
<br /> .\
<br /> 'I SION TO APPROVE THE ZONING Of THE ABOVE AREAS AS INDICATED BE UPHELD. /.
<br /> I. i'!
<br /> I
<br /> il ' ' II
<br /> I' (B) REQUESTED REZONING OF 1459 AND 1473 EAST 19TH AVENUE FROM R-4 RESIDEN- 'fj
<br /> I'
<br /> 'I TIAL TO C-2 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, GENE GIBSON AND JOHN WHETSELL - I
<br /> !; ,I
<br /> IT WAS INDICATED THAT PROPERTY HOLDER~ IN TH~S AREA HAD REQUESTED THEIR ,I
<br /> l::~
<br /> II PROPERTY BE REZONED FROM R-4 RESI DENT I A,L TO C-2 NE I GHBORHOOD COMM.ERC I AL II
<br /> H
<br /> !i SO THAT SUCH PROPERT I ES WOULD BE ZONED T,HESAME; AS OTHER PROPERTY RE- il
<br /> II
<br /> Ii CENTLY REZONED TO C-2 AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AVENUE AND AGATE II
<br /> l't STREET. THIS WOULD MAKE ALL PROPER~IES I N THE QUARTER BLOCK AR,EA IN 'I
<br /> I' ~\
<br /> AC-2 ZONE. THE'COMMITTEERECOMMENDED~THAT'THE A~TION OF THE PLANNING "
<br /> 11 :1
<br /> COMMI.?SION TO APPROVE'TH,E REQU,ESTED _REZONIt~GAS OUTLINE,D ABOVE, B,EfJPHELD. ;,\
<br /> tl
<br /> "
<br /> I: -
<br /> (C)REQUESTED REZONING OF PROPERTY AT 465 WEST 11TH AVENUE AND ADJACEN~ ;'l
<br /> ;t
<br /> I ~ PROPERTY FROM R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY TO C-3P COMMERCIAL, MEDICAL DENTAL :1
<br /> Ij BUILDING COMPANY - IT .WAS INDICATED THAT THE MEDICAL DENTAL BU,ILDING ~ l
<br /> h 'I
<br /> I' COMPANY HAD REQUE~TED THAT PROPERTY ON THENORT~ SIDE OF "TH AVENUE I'
<br /> " !!
<br /> I: LOCATED AT 465 WEST 11TH AVENUE AND'ADJACENT P~OPERTX TO THE EAST BE ,I
<br /> r REZONED TO C-3P, COMI>1E~C I AL AND THAT T,HE PLANN ING COMM I SS I ON HAD AP- ~
<br /> PROVED TH I S REZON I:NG.. THE QOMM I 1.TE_E VI S I TE:D THE SITE or THE. PROPOSED
<br /> REZON I NG AND .AH~ER 0 I SCUSS I ON RECOMMENDED ,THE, ACT ION. OF THE P,LA_NN I NG "
<br /> i.; COMMISSION APPROVING T~E RE~UE~TBE :UPBELD. . :1
<br /> "
<br /> I q
<br /> Ii :.1
<br /> I: (D) REQUEST FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF 16TH AVENUE 1,
<br /> I: !l
<br />I j; AND OLIVE STREET, BEING 1596 OLIVE STREET AND 115 AND 125 WEST 16TH
<br /> I' ~l
<br /> .,,1 AVENUE, FROM R-2 RESIDENTIAL TO CR COMMERCIAL, BEULAH BARNES - THE
<br /> i' 'I
<br /> (I PROPERTY HOLDER AT T~IS LOCATION RE~UESTS REZONIN.G FROM R-2 RESIDEN- ,I
<br /> 11
<br /> I' TIAL TO CR COMMERCIAL, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT AT THIS TIME THE AREA IS
<br /> :"1: BE I NG USED AS A TH I P.LEX._ THE PLANN I NG CO,MM.I ~S I ON RECOMMENDED DEN I AL :1
<br /> I.. :l!
<br /> Of THIS REQUESTED REZONING; AND THE COMMITTEE AFTER DISCUSSION RECOM- ;'1
<br /> Il :r
<br /> I' MENDED ,THAT THE ACTION Of THE, ,PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING THE REQUESTED
<br /> I: ;1
<br /> I' REZONING ~E SUSTAINED. I,'
<br />e i,l
<br /> I: ,I
<br /> Ii (E) AREA REQUESTED FOR ANNEXATION IN VICINITY OF LORANE HIGHWAY AND WASH- 'I
<br /> INGTON STREET - IT WAS. EXPLAIN.ED THAT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION. HAD CON- !'j
<br /> 'I SIDERED A REQUESTER ANNEXATION WHICH ~OULO ENCO~P~SS THE ~REA SOUTH ::t
<br /> I', ~:~I
<br /> " Of KREArZ ROA~ AN~GENERALLY BETWEEN K~EATZ ROAD AND APPROXIMATELX ONE
<br /> I,: !,
<br /> Ii
<br /> I: HALF BLOCK SOUTH or 30TH AVENlIE, AND fROM LORANE HIGHWAY AND,MADISON ij
<br /> STREET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS, MORE SPECIFI- ~ I
<br /> i'
<br /> CALlY DE~CRIBED AS BEING IN AND ADJACENT TO THE REPLAT or LOTS H ,& J, ,I
<br /> Ii' II
<br /> I ~ SUNSET Row ADDITION. THE COMMITTEE DROVE TO AND GENERALLY'OBSERVED
<br /> I.: THE AREA AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE ACTION Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION I
<br /> APPROVING THE REQUESTED ANNEXATION B,E, UPHELD, AND THAT THE CITY PROCEED ~.l
<br /> 11 ,. .'. .. - . .. .. .. 'I
<br /> II WITH ANNEXATION AS REQUESTED, IT BEI/'{G UNDERSTOOD 1HAT AN ELECT,ION IN ;,1
<br /> I: TH I S AREA ,WOULD, BE NECE~SARY ,TO COMPLETE THE ANNEXAT ION PROCE,DURE. I
<br /> :J
<br /> 1: q
<br /> (F) DISCUSSION CONCERNING ACCEPTANCE OF 60' RIGHT-Of-WAYDEED.FROM MERTlE 'I
<br /> r I'
<br /> I!l CONGER rOR PROPERTY ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF HIGHWAY 99 SOUTH OF-THE q
<br />I I: OVERPASS OF THE COO.S BAY BRANCH OF THE SOUTHERN PAC I FlC COMPANY - IT :1
<br /> ,I
<br /> " WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY HAD RECEIVED A REQUEST THAT THEY ACCEPT A J
<br /> \
<br /> 1\ I,
<br /> RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED FOR A ROADWAY ADJACENT TO AND IMMEDIATELY WEST OF !
<br /> Ii HIGHWAY 99 IMMEDIATELY SQUrH Of THE OVERPAii'OF HIGHWA~'~9 AY'THE ' II
<br /> i,l
<br /> ,. WESTERLY CITY LIMITS. IT WAS INDiCATED THAT A ROADWAY CURRENTLY, .1
<br /> I'
<br /> .1
<br /> ! EXISTS OVER MOST OF THE PROPOSED RIGHT-Of-WAY, AND SINCE MRS. CONGER I'
<br /> .
<br /> I \,
<br /> I DES I RE;S TO S,ELL A PARCEL Of .PROP,ERTY. IT IS NECESSARY THAT A PUBL~C t
<br /> 'I
<br /> , ROADWAY BE DEDICATED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO ALL PROPERTIES IN THE AREA. 'I
<br /> Ii I
<br />e THIS MATTER HAD BEEN DISCUSSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HAD BEEN ~
<br /> Ii ,
<br /> ,
<br /> Ii II
<br /> ,:
<br /> I ~l
<br /> ~
<br />
|