|
<br />~422
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~~o-~~~_}_L2_~~?
<br />
<br />--- -~-_._-------_._- - --_._~ -~- - ---- -----
<br />. . -. .
<br />
<br />IT WAS ALSO INDICATED THAT THESE BONDS ARE NOT A LIEN UPON THE EWEB SYSTEM NOR ARE
<br />THEY IN ANY. WAY ~ LIEN UPON THE CITyq~ tUGENEa BUT.T~AT THEY AR~TQ BE .RE~~ID
<br />f'ROM THE EARN'JIIGS Of': THE ELECTRIC~L f'A~ILITIES Qf' E~e. ".
<br />
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />r
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />\'
<br />,I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT IN THE PROPOSED A~EN~MENr EWEe ~EQU~~rS.~UT~q~IIY.TOLEAS~
<br />CERTAIN f'A~I~ITIES BECAU~E IT IS NECE~SA~Y TO LEASE43_MIL~~.9F. eqNNEVI~~E P'qW~R
<br />TRANSM!SStON ~INES.
<br />
<br />I TWAS RECOMMEND;D THAT, THE RES()L UT IQN ,AS SUBM f.TTED_~E .APP'~OY~I;>.
<br />
<br />. ~. . '..'
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAffEY THAT ITEM I Of THE REPORT Of' THE COM-
<br />MITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. ROLLCALL:VOTE~ ALL COU~CILMEN PRESENT VOTING A~E,MOTION
<br />CARR I EO. " . " . ". "'.. . "..' . . .. ".
<br />
<br />, . .
<br />- - . -.. - .. - ..
<br />
<br />. . ,
<br />2. REQUEST Of GIUSTINA BROS. LUMBER-COMPANY fOR PERMISSION TO HAUL OVERWIDTH LOADS Of
<br />GREEN VENEER OVER A PORT ION Of GARfl ELD STREET -..1 TWAS .EXPLA I NED THAT GI UST I NA
<br />BROS. LUMBER COMPANY, HAD REQUESTED THEY-BE GRANTED PERMissioN' TO HAUL 'OVERWI[)Tti'
<br />LOADS Of GREE:NYENEER, BEING 8'?-1/2.~1', ~YE:R~A'~ECT'ON'.9~ ~ARf,IE':'!?'STRf:ETf'RQM~:Q~E
<br />LOCATION IN,THEIR PLANT..TO ANOTHER LOCATIQN. I~ THEJR.~L~NT A..D~ST~N~E qf. A~()UT_O~E
<br />BLOCK.: IN AN OPINION f'R9~ THE Cf.Ty.AHORNEY, .IT~~AS .I.NQICAIF;I?THAT T~~.COM~()~.
<br />COUNCIL HA~ AUTHORITY TO ,GRANT SU~H.~~RMI~SJON U~ TO A TOTAL .WIQTH Of ~~!/?I..
<br />BASED, ON THE RE~UEST AND THE CITY ATT9.RN~Y'S.OPI~19N,..lr WA~ .Rf:COMMf:~DE:Q THAt r~E
<br />REQUEST Of GIUSTINA'S BE: GRANTED.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />. .. - .~., . -" .-- -, . .
<br />IT WAS MOVED By.MR.. SHEARER S~CONQEI;>. BY..MR.:..CHATL:rHAT:.I:rE~ 2 ()~ 1HE~~~0~T Qf' THE CqMMITTEE
<br />Of THE WHOL~.,BE APPROVED. . M9T I ON CARR I ~Q. :
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />3. REQUE~T Of' VERNON D. SCOTT fOR. VARIANCE fROM. R-I RESTRICTIONS. TO ALLOW CONSTRUCT'ION
<br />Of' COURT APARTMENT AT. :1553 ORCHARD STREET..-"IT WAS INDICATEp THAT MR. ~CQTT.HAD. ~E-
<br />QUESTED THAT. A VARIANC~BE G~A~:rED TO A!-1-9W. HIM T9 COM'pLPE.A CO,llRT APA~TMENT: STRUC-
<br />TURE. I N AN R~ I ~ONE WH'I CH ABUTS ON AN R~4 ZQNE;... HE, ~f:QUESTED . AS E:X~Ep I T I OUS ~~T ,I QN
<br />AS POSSIBLE SINCE HE HAS AN OPTION ON THE PROPERTY fOR ONLY A 30-DAY PERIOD. THE
<br />COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST.BE TRANSMITTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
<br />.' . . . . .' . - '. . .,. '.." - - p - .. . - . . . -
<br />fOR ACTION AT THEIR NEXT MEETING, fEBRUARY ;3, 19~9. ..",."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVEP ~Y MR.. SHEARER SE~ONDED By.'MR. MC~AffEY THAT ITEM ~ Of' THE . REPORT Of TH.E ~o~-
<br />MITTEE Of THE-\JHOLE 'Bi:'APPROVEO.-'~Moil-ON ~CA~R:IEri~" d.".. -.- .,. - -.,.. - ...~ .--- . _..-,
<br />
<br />, . .
<br />4. DISPOSITION Of REPORT fROM PLANNING CONSULTANT WITH REfERElNCE TO TRAffiC fLOW ON.
<br />6TH AND 7TH AVENUES AND fERRY STREET BRIDGE IN CONNECTION WITH NEW ENTRANCE TO CITY
<br />BY: REASON. Of THE NEWPACIF"IC HIGHWAY 99 -- THIS MATTER WAS AGA-IN BROUGHT TO THE COM-
<br />MITTEE fOR SUCH ACTION AS THEY WISHED: TO. TAKE'.. THE. CPt:'lMI~TE'E~ RE~~t:'It:'IE'N:DE_Q TH~T. TH_~"
<br />REPORT AS CONTAINED IN A LETTER FROM THE PLANNING CONSULTANT TO MR. W. C. WILLIAMS,
<br />STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER, BE ACCEPTED AND PLACED ON fiLE SINCE THE OREGO!'4'STATE HIGH-
<br />WAY DEPARTMENT HI'S IND.ICATED A RAMP f9R. T.HE FERRY STREET OVERPASS IS 'fNTtfE DESIGN";
<br />- - - . ~ -. . . . - . - ~ - - . . - .
<br />ING STAGE AT THIS TIME.
<br />
<br />I TWAS .,.OVED BY MR:. S,HEARER SECpNDED BY M_R. ~CGAffEY THAT, I TOt, 4 Of THE REPORT Of. THE C.OM-
<br />M I TTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOT ION CARRI E.D..
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />5. DISPOSITION Of SALARY COMMITTEE REPORT - THIS MATTER WAS AGAIN BROUGHT TO THE COM-
<br />MITTEE, AND: IT WAS .EXPLAINED ,THAT A MINOR,IT.Y ~EPORT_ f'ROMC,O;~NCJ!-~~t:'IA.N :LA.~RIS. HAD .
<br />NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION AS TO WHAT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN,
<br />AND I T WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT BE RECE I.VED. AND B.E.F'E~RREo. TO THE BU.o.GET: COM-
<br />MITTEE, MR. MOLHOLM VOTING ",AY.
<br />
<br />. . ..-
<br />I T WAS MOVED :BY MR .SHEAR.ER. SECONDED BY MR.. MCGAFfE:Y. TI:tAT '.TEM 5 Of :THE RE.~ORT. Of THE COM-
<br />MITTEE Of' THE .WHOLE BE APP~OVED. MO:TION CAR.R,ED..
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />6. ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE WITH REfERENCE TO TRUNK LINE SEWER ASSESSMENTS -A PRO-
<br />POSED AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CODE WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE., AND-IT 'WASEXPLAI.NE'D'
<br />THAT' THE: CiTY' CODE AS' IT 'C~R,~E;NTL.~ "[-,( i:~:is -tiASA tot I'NO~' AMEdGU 11.( ':WH I CH :T.HE', F;~~~OSED '
<br />AMENDMENT'WOUL,D _REMOVE.. THE AMENDME:NT :WOULD MAKE- IT PO.SSIBLE fOR f'UNDS 'COLL,ECTED
<br />fROM THE. TRUNK LINE SEWER ASSESSME~TS ro :BE. DEPO~ITED.I N :T.HE ~EWAGE AND. DRA 1t,!~GE
<br />fUND, AND .TH IS DEPOS I T ,I N ITSE:L f WOULD BE EV I DENCE THA,T ..MO.N I.ES A.SSESSED fo.R TRU.NK
<br />LINE SEWERS ARE USED FOR THE CONSTRUC,TION Of TRUNK _LINE ,SEWE~S AND WOULD.. NOT .RE-
<br />QUIRE PROOf THAT THE TRUNK LINE SEWER ASSESSMENT IS SPECifiCALLY TIED TO A SPECIf'IC
<br />LOT.. I,T WAS RECOMMENDE.o THAT THE ORDINANC.~ BE. ENAC:T~D.
<br />
<br />I TWAS MOV.ED BY MR. SHEARER :SECONDED BY MR.,' MoLHOLM THAT ITEM.6 .Of THE REPORT Of THE COM-
<br />MITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />7. STREET L1GHTING SYSTEM ~ COUNCILMAN~CGAfF"EY REQUESTED THAT THE C~U~CiL'RE~~N~IDER
<br />THE ACT I ON ON ST~EET L I.GHT I NG IN :THE DO~NTOWN _AREA :.. 'HE. i,TAT,E'D,: HE BEL'I.E.vEs '1 T 'W~ULD
<br />BE MORE EQU I TABLE TO ASS[:SS DOWNTq\rfN P~OPE.RTY OWNERS. :f'~~THE ,CAP I TAL COST. or S~CH.
<br />STREET 'LIGHTING AND fOR THE GENERAL TAXPAYER ,TO ASSUME THE MAINTENANCE AND POWER
<br />- .. - . ..., - . . . . - .. ... -"
<br />COSTS Of' SUCH LIGHT I NG. Tt!ERE WAS ~ 1M i T~D 0.1 S,CUSS I:ON ON TH I~. I ~~M. AND. o.N ~OTE THE
<br />MOTION WAS DEfEATED.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 7 Of' .rHE REPORT Of' THE COM-
<br />MITTEE Of THE 'WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, 5-3.
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />~!
<br />
<br />:1
<br />!
<br />
|