Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />l <br />Ii <br />I <br />j <br />\ <br /> <br />I) <br />I <br />\ <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />J <br />! <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />j <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />If <br />I: <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />2 I <br />I <br />r <br />\1 <br />II <br /> <br />" <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />II <br />I' <br />Ii <br />I <br />Ii <br />II <br />I, <br />I' <br />I <br />j <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />I <br />11 <br /> <br />~Il <br /> <br />411 <br />11 <br />. 1'1 <br />I <br />5 './ <br />II <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-4a3~ <br /> <br />2/9/59 <br /> <br />-.- -. -------- - ~ ~ -.- - <br /> <br />- - --- - - ---- -- - ------- ---~----- --- <br />--- - -..-.-- ~--~-_.-- - <br /> <br />----- <br />--~-- ---- <br /> <br />--~-. --- --- - - - <br />--.--- -----.-- --'-- - ~-- -- -~-~ _._~------ <br /> <br />---- ---- - ----- <br />-- -- - ~.-- <br /> <br />--I- <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br /> <br />'r , <br /> <br />COUNC I L CHAMBER <br />~ELiGENE, OREGON ' <br />FEBRUARY 9, 1959 <br /> <br />THE REGULAR MEETING Of THE .CO~MON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE WAS HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, '1959 'AT <br />7:30 PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. THE MEETING -WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY HIS HONOR MAYOR E. E. CONE WITH <br />THE FOLLOWING COUNCILMEN PRESENT: MR. SHEARER, MRS. LAURIS, MR. LINDEEN~' MR. MOlHOLM, MR. MCGAFFEY, <br />MR.. CHATT AND MR. WILSON. MR.' MOYER WAS AB'$'ENT. <br /> <br />THE INVOCATION WAS GIVEN BY REV. GEORGE R. ASHWOOD, -JR. <br /> <br />THE MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED MEETING O~ JANUARY 26, 1959, AS MAILED TO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, <br />WERE APPROVED. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN WILSON BROUGHT UP THE:SUBJECT OF WIDENING STREETS, INDICATED THAT .AT A PREVIOUS <br />COUNCIL MEETING HE HAD STATED THAT CERTAIN STREETS IN THE 'C~TY OF SALEM HAD BEEN WiDtNED AND THAT <br />PARKING HAD BEEN RETAINED AFTER THE WIDENING HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED. He fURTHER 'STATE.D:THAT THE <br />CITY MANAGER HAD INDICATED THAT SOME STREETS HAD BEEN WIDENED IN THE CITY OF SALEM AND PARKING HAD- <br />BEEN REMOVED. IN THE COURSE Of THE CONVERSATION, IT APPEARED THAT THERE WAS SOME CONfUSION WITH <br />RESPECT TO WHICH STREETS WERE BEING DISCUSSED AND THAT COUNCILMAN WILSON WAS REfERRING TO STATE <br />STREET ON WHICH SOME PARKING HAD BEEN RETAINED WHILE THE CITY MANAGER HAD BEEN REFERRING TO 12TH <br />STREET ON WHICH NO PARKING IS ALLOWED.' IT FURTHER APPEAREti THAT IN THE CITY OF SALEM SOME Of THE <br />STREETS HAVE'99 FOOT RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN SOME SECTIONS Of THE CITY WHICH ALLOWS FOR WIDENING FOR <br />4-LANE TRAffic PLUS PARKING,'AND THAT DEPENDING UPON THE.WIDTH Of RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE PARKING DE- <br />SIRED, THE CTTY Of SALEM PAID PORTIONS Of THE COST Of WIDENING RANGING fROM ALL COSTS TO 25% Of- THE <br />COSTS. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMAN WILSON THAT THE COUNCIL TERMINATE THE SERVICES Of MR. ROBERT FiNLAYSON <br />AS,CITY MANAGER Of THE CITY Of EUGENE AS OF THIS'DATE. THis MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN LINDEEN. <br /> <br />FOLLOWING THE MOTION COUNCILMAN LINDEEN STATED THAT-A NUMBER OF H~;S CONSTITUENTS HAVE TALKED <br />WITH HIM ABOUT WHAT HE TERMED "BUCK PASSING", THAT IN A NUMBER Of INSTANCES PETITIONS HAVE BEEN <br />CIRCULATED WHICH HAVE MADE THE NEIGHBORHOOD MAD OVER ISSUES WHICH HE INDICATED SHOULD HAVE BEEN <br />TAKEN UP WILLINGLY BY THE CITY MANAGER..HE~URTHER INblEATED THAT IN SOME INSTANCES HE BELIEVED <br />T~E C~UNCIL WAS NOT KEP T INfORMED.AS TO CITY. PROBLEMS. WITH REfERENCE TO ANNEXATIONS, HE STATED <br />THAT PROMISES ON SEWERS AND OTHER ITEMS'AREMADE' AND THAT THE CITY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO TAKE CARE.OF, <br />ITS OWN PROBLEMS, THAT THESE' PROBLEMS DEfEAT,ANNEXATION, AND If THIS IS THE BEST THAT THE CITY <br />MANAGER PLAN CAN OffER, THEN THE ClfY SHOULD GET. ANOTHER' fORM Of GOVERNMENT. OTHER ITEMS Of SPECifiC <br />NATURE WERE ADVANCED INCLUDING THE INCIDENT Of- PROPERTY CLEANUP ON PROPERTY OWNED BY,MR. CROWE AT <br />18TH AVENUE AND GARfiELD STREET IN WHICH IT, WAS. ALLEGED THAT A PETITION CAME' fROM THE CITY MANAGER'S <br />OffiCE WHICH WAS POORLY,WORDED AND MADE ~HE PETITION PASSER LOOK SILLY, AND OTHER coMPARABLE ITEMS. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN SHEARER THEN stATED THAT HE HAD BEEN ON THE COUNCIL fOR fOUR~'YEARS' AND THAT THERE <br />HAD BEEN MORE WRANGLING PER MONTH IN THE, LAS~TWO YEARS THAN THERE HAD BEEN IN THE TWO PREV10US <br />YEARS COMBINED, THAT THERE WERE MATTERS BEING, DISCUSSED HERE:;BY NEW COUNCILMEN WHO HAVE NOT THE <br />MOST RUDIMENTARY KNOWLEDGE Of COUNCIL PROCEDURE, AND If THE COUNCIL WILL GET ITSELf ORGANIZED AND <br />OPERATING, THE CITY MANAGER WILL TAKE CARE. OF HIS PROBLEMS~ <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />Ii <br />I' <br />! <br /> <br />ON A SECRET BALLOT TAKEN ON THE ORIG,INAL' MOTION THAT THE COUNCIL TERMINATE; THE SERVICE OF THE <br />CITY MANAGER AS OF THIS DATE~' 1'HE MOT.ION WAS DEFEATED 5-2. <br /> <br />COUNCILWOMAN LAURIS INDICATED THEREJIS AN ARTICLE IN THE FEBRUARY-MARCH 1959 ISSUE Of OLD OREGON <br />BY' L~wIS P. CRUTCHER, ASSISTA~T PROFESSOR-OF ARCHITECTURE AT THE UNIVERSITY-Of OREG~,' ON COMMUNITY <br />PLANNING. COPIES OF THIS EDITION Of OLD OREGON WERE DISTRIBUTED TO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, AND IT <br />WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE COUNCIL PLAN A MEETING WITH MR. CRUTCHER <br />IN. ABOUT SIX WEEKS AT MR. CRUTCHER'S CONVENIENCE TO DISCUSS COMMUNITY PLANNING. MOTION tARRIED. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN MOLHOLM INDICATED THAT MR. MOYER WAS ABSENT fROM THIS COUNCIL MEETING BECAUSE OF THE <br />DEATH OF HIS MOTHER, AND COU~CILMAN MOLHOLM BELIEVED THE. RECORD SHOULD IND~CATE THIS. <br /> <br />BILLS AGAINST VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 1959: WERE SUBMITTED AND READ <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />1 <br />II <br />,I <br />I' <br />Ii <br />I] <br />I; <br /> <br /> GENERAL FUND . . - ' " <br />PUBLI C EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM $ I , 3 I 8..46 - EUGENE HOSPITAL & CLINIC $ - - 2,8.00 <br />PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 5,056.48 DANIEL O. POTTER, TREAS. 52'3.72 r <br />PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ' , . 818.18, DANIEL O. POTTER, TREAS. ,28 I .00 I <br /> I <br />UN'I TED STATES NATIONAL BANK - 10, 383 .7 L.' . DANIEL O. POTTER, TREAS. '168.25 II <br />UN-ITED STATES NAT 10NAL BANK 281 .25 EUGENE FIRE FIGHTERS. ASSN.' ' ~90. 00 <br />STATE TAX COMMI SSION - . 1,938.70, BLUE CROSS PLAN ' 29.50 I <br />AE:rNA LIFE INSURANCE Co. 1,639.:6a UNITED ApPEAL - LANE COUNr.V 65.65 f <br />PACIFIC HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 1,676. 15 LANE HUMANE SOC I ErY 750.00 ~ <br /> <br />'\ <br /> <br />~ <br />