03/23/1959 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ 476 3L23L59 e -. .- _ . _ _ u _.__._---~.._---~~~-- ~-.-----~.- ----~ --- -~-- -~- _._~~------ ---- ------ ------- -----~_.- --- --~ - - ----- - --~- ~ B. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW ADDITION TO RESIDENCE LOCA~ED AT 1192 HiGH STREET - IT WAS STATED THAT MR. ~. L. LONIGAN HAD REQUESTED A VARIANCE FROM THE 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF' AN ADDITION TO A~ tXISTING RESIDENCE AT 1192 HIGH STREET; THE EX I ST I NG RES I DENCE NOW HAS A S iDE YARD SETBACK OF 7' 1/2" AND THE CON-. TEMPLATED ADDITION WOULD CONFORM TO THIS EXISTING SETBACK. SOME COMMITTEE MEMBERS VIEWED THIS PROPOSED VARIANCE AND NOTED THAT THE EXISTING RESIDENCE IS AN OLDER HOME AND THAT THE REAR NORTHERLY PART OF THE BUILDING NOW PRO- JECTS CLOSER TO THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE THAN THAT WHICH IS ALLOWED BY ORDI~ NANCE. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT THE NEW PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE BUILT:TO THE FRONT OF THE EXISTING PART OF THE BUILDING THAT PROJECTS INTO ;'H~ S!D.~.~~~O.':'tHIS MATTE:~WAS-RECOMMENDED.FOR APPROVAL"BY THE BOARD OF ApPEALS AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD Of ApPEALS REPORT BE UPHELD." IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 14 A. AND B. OF .THE REPORT or THE COMMITTEE.BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. A REPORT or.THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MARCH 20, 1959 WAS SUBM.lTTED AND READ AS F"OlQOW5; "PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, McGAFFEY, CHATT AND MOYER; CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; CITY ENGINEER; CITY ATTORNEY; SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS &.RECREATION; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; MESSRS. DAVE VANFOSSEN, HERB PERSON, FRED BRENNE AND RICHARD CLARK; DAN WYANT AND DONN BONHAM, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; JACK CRAIG, KERG. , ,.. . .__ .... _ _ _ _4 _ I. BoARD OF ApPEALS REPORT -MARCH II, 1959: .' .. .. ..' . A. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM 25' SETBACK AT FORDS DRIVE. IN, 1769 FRANKLIN BoULEVARD, TO.BUILD COVERING OVER PARKING.AREA - MR. CLARK, ARCHITECT. rOR FORDS DRIVE'IN, APPEARED BEFORE THE.COMMITTEE AND REVIEWED THE CON- TEMPLATED PLANS NOW BEING CONsiDERED BY THE OWNER OF FORDS_DRI~E IN. MR. CLARK STATED THAT AT THIS TIME THE OWNER CONTEMPLATES REMOVING HIS , , PRESENT DRIVE IN STRUCTURE AND BUILDING COVERED PARKING AREAS TO rURTHER rACILITATE AND MODERNIZE HIS DRIVE IN SERVICE. A COVERED STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED TO PRO~ERtY~UTILIZE EQUIPMENT PROPOSED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH THE DRIVE IN SERVICE. IT WAS STATED THAT THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HAD RECOMMENDED THE REQUEST BE D~NIED ALTHOUGH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS WAS IN ATTENDANCE AND INDICATED THAT THE EXPLANATION GIVEN BY THE AR~1:f LTEc:T. WAS ABOYJ:. AND. BEYOND THAT GIVEN. TO THE ~OARD OF ApPEALS. COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES ALSO VIEWED THE AREA AND FOLLOWING A GENERAL D1SCUSSIONi IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE GRANTED, WAIVING THE 25' SETBACK AND ALLOWING THE BUILDING TO COME. WITHIN 5' OF THE PROPERTY LINE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AT THE PROPERTY OWNER'S EXPENSE AT ANY TIME THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE TO BE EXER- CISED BY THE CITY or EUGENE OR THE OREGON STATE~IGHWAY DEPARTMENT. B. REQUEST ON BEHALF' OF' JAMES AND EILEEN SUTLEY F"OR VARIANCE TO ALLOW CON- STRUCTION OF A HOME ON A LOT WITH A 55' F"RONTAGE LOCATED BETWEEN 1757 AND 1775 AUGUSTA STREET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT A REQUEST HAD BEEN RE- CEIVED F'ROM MR. HAROLD V. JOHNSON,. ATTORNEY FOR THE PROPERTY HOLDERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON AUGUSTA STREET, IN WHICH IT WAS REQUESTED THAT A VARIANCE BE ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENCE ON A LOT WITH ONLY 55' FRONTAGE BU.THAV)NG' AN.AREA .OF .8250. SQUARE f'.EET . IT WAS FURTHER EXPLA I NED THAT THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HAD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE, AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE VARIANCE REQUEST BE APPROVED. C. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM 20' MINIMUM REAR YARD REQUIREMENT AND 20' SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR. GARAGES AND CARPORTS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF HOME AND CARPORT WITH. A 12' AVERAGE REAR. YARD AND A 5' FRONT YARD SET~ BACK F"OR CARPORT MADE BY LOUIS F. BONSON ON BEHALF OF MR. JOHN HUMMER - IT WAS STATED THAT A REQUEST HAD BEEN RECEIVED BY THE BOARD OF ApPEALS, AND THE BOARD OF' ApPEALS HAD RECOMMENDED THE REQUEST BE GRANTED, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF" A RESIDENCE ON A LOT IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF 270 SUNSET DR I VE TO ALLOW READ AND FRONT YAR.D SETBACKS. AS I NO.1 CATED ABOVE. COMM I TTEE REPRESENTAr~VESDROVE;O THE AREA~ NOTED THAT tHE PROPOSED BUILDING SITE IS ON STEEP TERRAIN LOCATED ABOVE A~D TO THE EAST SIDE or SUNSET DRIVE, AND FURTHER NOTED THAT A NUMBER OF EQUIVALENT REiQUESTS HAD BEEN GRANTED IN THE SAME AREA. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE VARIANCE BE ALLOWED. ~\ D. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM 15' FRONT YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW A 10' SETBACK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO DWELLINGS ADJACENT TO AND SOUTH OF 1921 R,VERVIEW STREET - IT WAS STATED THAT THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HAD REVIEWED A REQUEST MADE ON BEHALF or MR. ORA LOVE THAT'HE BE ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT TWO DWELLINGS WITH A 10' SETBACK IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF" 1921 RtVERVIEW STREET. THE BOARD or ApPEALS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST BE APPROVED. COMM I T.TEE MEMBERS DROVE TO THE AREA AND NOTED .THAT THE LOTS ARE BELOW .THE GRADE OF R I VERV I EW STREET AND THE COMM I TTEE MEMBERS COUL.D SEE NO OBJECT ION TO THE GRANTING OF THE REQUEST. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE RE- QUESTED VARIANCE ALLOWING A 10' ~RONT YARD SETBACK BE APPROVED. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. McGAFFEY THAT ITEM I A., B., C. AND D. OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. ..uc..r. .... I e I I -- I -