Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4;78 <br /> <br />3/23/59 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />-- -- --~ <br /> <br />8. CONSIDERATION Of ACQUISITION OF 40 ACRES OF" TIMBERED LAND ADJACENT TO SPENCER <br />BUTTE PARK - A LETTER WAS READ FROM THE OBSIDIANS, INC. IN WHICH THE OBSIDIANS <br />COMMENDED THE COUNCIL F"OR THE NEGOTIATIONS IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PURCHASE OF <br />PRIVATE TIMBER ON THE WEST SIDE OF SPENCER BUTTE. THE LETTER FURTHER STATED <br />THAT HAVING THE WHOLE OF THE BUTTE IN PUBLIC OWNERSHIP IS A MARKED STEP FOR- <br />WARD IN PLANNING fOR THE F"UTURE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF' EUGENE'S CITIZENS. <br /> <br />THE P~RKS & RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT SHOWED A MAP OF' THE BUTTE AND ITS SUR- <br />ROUNDING AREA AND EXPLAINED THAT PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUTTE IN <br />THE OWNERSHIP OF A FAMILY BY THE NAME OF PRUITT CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 40 <br />ACRES IS AVA~LABLE. IT WAS FURTHER: STATED THAT THE TIMBER VALUE APPROXIMATES <br />$19,000 AND THAT THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE LAND. VALUE OF THE 40 ACRE TRACT. <br />IN THE DISCUSSION IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE PRUITTS DO NOT DESIRE TO SELL <br />ALL OF THE PROPpnX Bl!T PROBABL, '!. WOULD'W.' Sit .TO SEL,L 30' TO. 35 AC~ES. $O.~E 0 I S- <br />CUSSION WAS GIVEN TO THE POSSIBILITY OF ACQUIRING :rHE PROPERTY ~F'TER I,T HAD <br />BEEN LOGGED AND SECOND GROWTH, STANDS HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED. IT.WAS STATED <br />THAT THE ACQUISITION OF' SUCH PROPERTY IS NOT IN THE BUDGET F'OR 1959-60 AND <br />WOULD SEVERELY HAMPER EXISTING CAPITAL PROGRAMS IF IT WERE TO BE INCLUDED. <br />SOME QUESTIONS WERE ALSO RAISED.AS TO WHETHER IT IS PROPER TO' ACQUIRE TIMBER <br />LAND AT TODAY'S MARKET PRICES. <br /> <br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION BE, OBTAINED SO A MORE IN- <br />TELLIGENT APPRAISAL OF' THE PROBLEMS COULD BE MADE: (A) DETERMINE WHETHER THE <br />CENTURY FUN~ HAS ANY INTEREST IN THE ACQUIS~TION OF' PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY <br />OF PROPERTY IN CITY OWNERSHIP ON SPENCER BUTTE AND, 1F' SO, WOULD THEY BE <br />WILLING TO CARRY ON ANY NEGOTIATIONS FOR ~UCH ACQUISITION. (B) DETERMINE IF' <br />HOME S Il:E.SAREl:O BE EST~BLlSI:IE.D',E.~~EC.1 ~LL Y O~ .THEWESTE~N SIDE OF" THE BUTTE <br />SINCE I f THEY ARE TO BE ESTABLI SHED, PRESENT OWNERS WOULD BE I NTEREST,E.D IN <br />AESTHETIC VALUES CURRENTLY EXISTING. (C) IF' THE CENTURY FUND IS NOT INTERESTED <br />IN SUCH PRop'ERn' ACQUISITION, THE COUNCIL TO TALK.WITH'.THE PRUITTS TO DET.ERMINE <br />THEIR PLANS. AND WITH THIS SOME IDEA Of THE TIMBER VALUES BE DETERMINED, PRO- <br />PERTY VALUES BE DETERMINED AND THE POSSIBILITY OF SELECTIVE LOGGING BE DISCUSSED. <br /> <br />A~ A SEPARATE ITEM IT WAS ALSO RECOMMENDED THAT PROPERTY IN THE OWNERSHIP OF. <br />CHRISTENSEN BROTHERS ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF. THE BUTTE AND ADJACENT TO THE <br />CITY PROPERTY BE CONSIDERED AND THAT CHRISTENSEN BROTHERS BE CONTACTED TO <br />DETERMINE If THEY MIGHT DONATE SUCH PROPERTY OR IF IT COULD BE PURCHASED AT <br />A REASONABLE P~ICE. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 8 OF' THE REPORT OF' THE COM- <br />M I TTEE BE APP~OVED.. Mcn '<?N CARR I ED. . _ .... <br /> <br />: 'I' . <br />9. CONS I DERAT ION REGARD ING 'PAYMENT 'or 'cosT ~OF" 'NooN -LuNcHEoNs -FoR. 'couNc I'LMEN <br />WHILE ATTENDING COMMITTEE MEETINGS - THE SUBJECT OF THE CITY'S PAYING fOR <br />LUNCHEONS FOR COUNCIL- PERSONNEL ATTENDING NOON MEETINGS OK CITY BUSINESS <br />WAS BROUGHT UP. THE MATTER WAS DISCUSSED AMONG THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE <br />PRESENT, AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT PAYMENT BE MADE BY THE CITY FOR MEALS <br />FOR COUNCIL PERSONNEL THAT WERE TAKEN WHILE THEY ARE IN ATTENDANCE AT MEET- <br />INGS ON CITY BUSINESS. SUCH PAYMENTS WOULD NOT EXCEED $1.50 AND WOULD NOT <br />INCLUDE GRATUITY. MOTION CARRIED WITH MR. CHATT VOTING NAY. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. McGAFfEY THAT ITEM 9 OF THE REPORT OF" THE COM- <br />MITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />. , <br /> <br />10. THE CITY MAN'AGER ANNOUNCED THAT HE AND THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER WOULD BE <br />ABSENT fROM THE ~ITY AND IN ATTENDANCE AT A MEETING TO BE HELD IN TACOMA <br />ON APRIL 9, 10 AND I I, 1950. THIS ABSENCE MIGHT NECESSITATE THE MOVING <br />Of ONE 'COMMITTEE MEETING TOA .DATE OTHER THAN FRIDAY, OR IT MIGHT BE-POSSI- <br />BLE SINCE THREE FR I DAY MEETI NGS WI LL I NTERVENEBETWEEN THE MARCH :23, CO,UNC I L <br />MEETING AND THE APRIL 13 MEETING, ~O DISPENSE WITH ONE COMMI~TEE SESSION IN <br />THIS PERIOD. ..No FORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN ON THIS MATTER. <br /> <br />IT WAS M~ED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFfEY THAT :ITEM 10 OF THE REPORT OF THE COM- <br />MITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />II. CONSIDERATION OF" REQUEST fOR SHORT TIME PARKING METER ON SOUTH SIDE ~f 11TH <br />AVENUE AND WEST OF" ALDER STREET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT ~HE OWNER OF THE <br />BUILDING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF" 11TH AVENUE AND THE WEST, SIDE. OF ALDER <br />STREET HAD REQUESTED A SHORT TIME METER BE INSTALLED AT THE ONE PARKI:NG SPACE <br />BETWEEN THE ENTRANCE TO THE MAYF"LOWER THEATRE AND ALDER STREET. THE REQUEST <br />WAS fOR A 12-MINUTEMETER SO MAXIMUM. TURNOVER OF PARKING COULD BE HAD., SOME <br />COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE,S VIEWED THE LOCATION, AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED <br />THAT THE SHORT TIME METER BE INSTALLED AT THE LOCATION INDICATED ABOVE AS <br />REQUESTED. " <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. McGAfFEY THAT ITEM I I Of THE REPORT OF THE COM- <br />MITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />~ <br />\ <br />~i <br /> <br />. - - . - -;r' <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />II <br />ii <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />II <br />,( <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Ii <br />,! <br />,I <br />I, <br />il <br />:1 <br />\! <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />I' <br />, <br /> <br />j! <br /> <br />Ii <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e... <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br />