Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~26 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />5/ II/59 <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,1 <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />, <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />21 <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I' <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />31 <br />i <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />411 <br />I <br />j <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />'1 <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />, <br />; <br />, <br />I <br />,II <br />j <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />\ <br />~} <br /> <br />THE CITY Of" EUGENE, AND FROM THE fYR-fYTER COMPANY, WITH BOTH FIRMS BIDDING_ ON <br />ALL ITEMS EXCEPT THE TWO CIRCUIT CONTROL PANEL ITEM IN WHICH CASE ONLY THE <br />GAMEWELL COMPANY HAD BID. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE TOTAL ITEMS REQUIRED <br />AFTER THE 'GAMEWELL BID WOULD COST $8,519.95, AND THAT THE fYR-fYTER COMPANY BID ,.'- <br />WAS $443.29 LESS. LETTERS FROM fRESNO, CALIFORNIA AND DENVER, COLORADO CITING <br />EXPERIENCES WITH THE GAMEWELL SYSTEMS AND THE fYR-fYTER COMPANY BID SYSTEM WERE <br />READ, AND IN BOTH CASES THESE LETTERS RECOMMENDED THE PURCHASE Of" GAMEWELL EQUIP- <br />MENT BASED ON THEIR OWN EXPERIENCE. fOLLOWING THIS IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE <br />BID BE AWARDED TO THE GAMEWELL COMPANY IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT Of" $8,519.95. <br /> <br />d <br />I' <br />II <br /> <br />,[ <br />'I <br />1: <br />Ii <br />I: <br />I! <br />" <br />I' <br />Ii <br />I: <br />I; <br />I, <br />I' <br />I: <br />j' <br /> <br />I! <br />" <br />Ii <br />" <br />Ii <br />I: <br />i; <br />I' <br />II <br />Ii <br />!i <br />II <br />I' <br />Ii <br />n <br />Ii <br />,i <br />II <br />il <br />!I <br />I' <br />t! <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />J! <br />I <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />:; <br />Ii <br />11 <br />II <br />I, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ACTION ON AWARDI~G 6f" CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF FIRE ALARM EQUIPMENT WAS TAKEN UNDER "BIDS" <br />EARLIER IN THE MEETING. <br /> <br />3. PETITION FOR SANITARY SEWER IN AREA BETWEEN 23RD AND 24TH AVENUES BETWEEN . <br />VANBuREN AND ADAMS STREET - IT WAS STATED THAT THE COMMON COUNCIL HAD ASKED <br />THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DETERMINE IF THE CITY MUST ALLOW THE PROPERTY HOLDER AT <br />THIS AREA TO CONNECT TO THE SEWER WHEN THE MAJOR PORTION OF THE AREA HAD BEEN <br />ASSESSED FOR A SEWER. THE CITY ATTORNEY INDICATED THERE IS A CONTRACTUAL OBLIGA- <br />TION TO ALLOW SUCH A SEWER CONNECTION AND FURTHER STATED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER <br />HAD AGREED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SEPARATE LATERAL AT HIS OWN EXPENSE TO F~CILI- <br />TATE SUCH CONNECTION. IT WAS ALSO POINTED OUT THAT THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY THREE <br />LOTS WHICH HAD NOT BEEN ASSESSED TO THIS TIME WHICH WOULD ADD TO THE SEWER PROBLEM <br />ON TYLER STREET, BUT THAT SUCH ADDITIONS TO THE SEWER PROBLEM ON TYLER STREET COULD <br />NOT BE MEASURED. fOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM, AND A RECOMMENDATION FROM <br />THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THAT THIS ISOLATED AREA BE APPROVED FOR INSTALLATION <br />OF SEWER, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWER IN THIS AREA <br />AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE PROJECT BE PASSED. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY'MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />4. CONSIDERATION OF SIDEWALK ON ADAMS AND JACKSON STREETS FROM 18TH TO 22ND AVENUE - <br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS PARTICULAR SIDEWALK AS WELL AS THE NECESSITY <br />FOR A SIDEWALK PROGRAM IN ALL AREAS OF THE CITY THAT ARE USED BY SCHOOL CHILDREN <br />GOING TO AND FROM SCHOOL. fOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT A <br />REPORT ON THE SIDEWALKS NECESSARY IN THE AREAS AROUND SCHOOLS AND NECESSARY FOR <br />SCHOOL CHILDREN TO TRAVERSE GOING T~ AND FROM SCHOOL BE PREPARED, AND THAT A <br />REPORT BE MADE TO THE COMMITTEE ON THIS SUBJECT. IT WAS ALSO RECOMMENDED THAT <br />SIDEWALKS BE CONSTRUCTED ON BOTH SIDES OF JACKSON STREET FROM 18TH TO 22ND AVE- <br />NUE AND BOTH SIDES OF ADAMS STREET FROM 19TH TO 22ND AVENUE AND THAT THE NECES- <br />SARY ORDINANCE INITIATING THE PROJECT BE PASSED. <br /> <br />h <br />ii <br />II <br />Ii <br />I: <br />,I <br />Ii <br />'1 <br />I, <br />Ii <br />I <br />Ii <br />'I <br />Ii <br />.1 <br />1\ <br />" <br />I' <br />Ij <br />I; <br />" <br />j1 <br />:f <br />It <br />,! <br />II <br />II <br />d <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />fT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 4 6F THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />5. REQUEST BY TRYGVE VIK, VIK CONSTRUCTION CO., TO CONSTRUCT T-HANGER AT MAHLON- <br />SWEET AIRPORT - A REQUEST AND PLAN FOR A T-HANGER TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT MAHLON- <br />SWEET AIRPORT TO HOUSE THREE AIRCRAFT AS REQUESTED BY MR. TRYGVE VIK OF VIK <br />CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WERE PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED <br />THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS BE INSTRUCTED TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT FOR THE <br />LEASE OF GROUND FOR SUCH HANGER BUILDING. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR~ SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 5 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />6. REQUEST FOR VARIANCE BY MCKAY'S MARKETS TO INSTALL 71 CURB SIDEWALK IN 21' AREA <br />AT 30TH AVENUE AND HILYARD STREET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT A REQUEST HAD BEEN <br />RECEIVED FROM MCKAY'S MARKETS THAT THEY BE ALLOWED TO- INSTALL A 7' SlbEWALK <br />ADJACENT TO THE CURB IN AN AREA WHERE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CURB AND THE <br />PROPERTY LINE IS 21 '. THE CITY ATTORNEY EXPLAINED THAT AS THIS AREA IS ZONED <br />IT REQUIRES THAT A FULL SIDEWALK BE CONSTRUCTED' FROM THE CURB TO THE PROPERTY <br />. . <br />LINE, AND UNLESS AN AMENDMENT IS MADE TO THE EXISTING ORDINANCE, PERMISSION <br />CANNOT BE GIVEN TO DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF SIDEWALK IN THIS AREA. fOLLOWING <br />SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS SUBJECT, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST BE DENIED <br />BECAUSE OF THE ORDINANCE QUALIFICATIONS. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />ii <br />II <br />J; <br />p <br />II <br />It <br />'I <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />I' <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />:1 <br />Ii <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 6 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE, AND THE CITY ATTORNEY BE INSTRUCTED TO WORK OUT A SO~UTION TO <br />THE PROBLEM. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />7. REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY ON THE PAUL W. CAMPBELL CONDEMNATION SUIT FOR AMAZON <br />EASEMENT - THE CITY ATTORNEY SHOWED A MAP OF THE AREA OVER WHICH THE CITY OF <br />EUGENE HAD CONDEMNED FOR AMAZON PURPOSES, EXPLAINED THE BACKGROUND OF THE CON- <br />DEMNATION SUIT, THE DIFFERENCES IN APPRAISALS BY EXPERT WITNESSES, AND THE FACT <br />THAT THE: COURT HAD FOUND IN FAVOR OF MR. CAMPBELL AND -HAD RENDERED A JUDGMENT <br />AGAINST THE CITY IN FAVOR OF MR. CAMPBELL IN THE SUM OF $24,000.00 PLUS INTEREST <br />AT 6~ FROM APRIL 15, 1958, PLUS COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES. THESE TOTAL COSTS ARE <br />NOW ESTIMATED TO BE $27,048.48. THE CITY ATTORNEY INDICATED THERE ARE SOME <br /> <br />II <br />11 <br />:1 <br />I' <br />,I <br />ti <br />" <br />I' <br />~ I <br /> <br />'I <br />/, <br /> <br />e <br />