Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r--2 8 <br /> <br />u5/ 1_1/5_9 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />j <br />I <br />II <br />i <br />I <br />i <br />II <br />11 <br />II <br />1\ <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />'I <br />!I <br />il <br />II <br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />THIS STRETCH Of ROAD IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE ANTICIPATED 19TH TO 29TH TO <br />BLOOMBERG fREEWAY AND RELIEf Of CONDITIONS ON IT SHOULD NOT BE RELATED TO fREE- <br />WAY COMPLETION. THE ONLY REAL SOLUTION IS THE PAVING AND WIDENING Of THIS <br />Of TH I S "STRETCH Of ROAD. UNT I L' TH I S CAN BE DONE WE URGE THE fOLLOW I NG TEMPORARY <br />MEASURES: <br /> <br />I. SOME KIND Of SIDEWALK fROM 30TH TO SUNSET HOME. <br />GRAVEL WALK WOULD BE A TREMENDOUS BOON. <br /> <br />EVEN A GRADED <br /> <br />2. SUBSTANTIAL REPAIRS TO THE EDGES Of THE ROAD TO RESTORE NORMAL <br />2 LANE WIDTH, ESPECIALLY BETWEEN 29TH AND 32ND NORTHBOUND, AND <br />34TH TO 35TH SOUTHBOUND." <br /> <br />ALSO PRESENTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS WAS A',lETTER ATTACHED TO THE ABOVE PETITION: <br /> <br />"ENCLOSED IS A PETITION RELATIVE TO A SIDEWALK EXTENSION ON HILYARD STREET <br />BETWEEN 30TH AND 35TH, WITH IMPROVEMENT Of THE STREET IN THE SAME STRETCH. THE <br />NUMBER Of SIGNATURES WAS LIMITED ONLY BY MY TIME fOR GETTING THEM. PEOPLE WERE <br />EAGER TO SIGN.' I.. SHOULD CONVEY THE DOMINANT EXPRESSIONS Of THE SIGNEES: <br /> <br />I. CONSTERNATION, EVEN DISBELIEf, AT THE NEWS THAT HILYARD IS NOT DESTINED <br />TO BE WIDENED AND PAVED AT ANY SPECIfiED TIME. ONE PROPERTY OWNER ON HILYARD <br />WAS OPPOSED TO PAVING BECAUSE Of THE COST;-- ANOTHER WOULD NOT BE HAPPY TO HAVE <br />A SIDEWALK EXTENDED TO 39TH If IT HAD TO CROSS HER PROPERTY AND CUT UP HER LAWN. <br />MANY HOMEOWNERS IN THE AREA WERE ASSURED THAT THIS PROJECT WAS ON THE CITY'S <br />TIMETABLE WHEN THEY BOUGHT OUT HERE. THE PRESENCE Of SURVEYING TEAMS LAST <br />WINTER CONfiRMED THEIR EXPECTATIONS. <br /> <br />2. A TREMENDOUS CONCERN OVER THE SUNSET HOME OCCUPANTS, UNPREDICTABLE <br />PEDESTRIANS AT BEST. <br /> <br />3. THE QUESTION - WHY SIDEWALKS ONLY TO 35TH? -- <br /> <br />ITEM I. PARTIALLY ANSWERS THE OBVIOUS QUESTION - WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE COM- <br />PLAINING? THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE GETTING INTO. THE REST OF THE ANSWER TO <br />THAT QUESTION LIES IN THE PHENOMENALLY RAPID DETERIORATION Of HILYARD OVER THE <br />PAST TWO WINTERS. <br /> <br />ONE fURTHER OBSERVATION! THE PETITION ASKS fOR A SIDEWALK fROM 30TH TO <br />35TH. SINCE WRITING THE PETITION I HAVE LEARNED THAT MCKAY'S IS PUTTING A <br />SIDEWALK ALONG HILYARD. fROM 30TH TO OMLID'S SERVICE STATION, WHICH IS NEARLY <br />AT 31ST. fROM THE SERVICE STATION TO W. AMAZON DRIVE THE PROPERTY IS NON- <br />RESIDENTIAL - THE STATION, A CHURCH, A TAVERN. CONTINUATION Of THE SIDEWALK <br />ON THE EAST,'.SIDE WOULD THEREfORE INVOLVE MINIMAL ADDITIONAL EffORT AND EXPENSE. <br />- <br />HOWEVER, ALL THESE BUSINESSES INVOLVE A GOOD DEAL Of VEHICLE TRAffIC IN AND <br />OUT OF PARKING AREAS, AND THEREFORE IT WOULD MAKE MUCH MORE SENSE, FROM THE <br />POINT Of VIEW Of SAfETY, TO EXTEND THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE fROM 29TH <br />TO 35TH. THIS IS MOSTLY CITY PARKLAND AND A WALK THERE-WOULD BE MORE PLEASANT, <br />AS WELL AS BEING SAfER. <br /> <br />I COMMEND THIS TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION Of THE COMMON COUNCIL AND ALSO <br />URGE THAT THE COUNCIL PRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECONSIDER ITS TIME- <br />TABLE fOR IMPROVING HILYARD." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFfEY THAT THE PETITION TOGETHER WITH THE COM- <br />MUNICATION, WHICH WAS SIGNED BY MRS. IVAN NIVEN, BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. MOTION <br />CARRIED. <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />i <br />II <br />\1 <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />I <br />II <br />2 ! <br /> <br />COMMUNICATION DATED APRIL 23, 1959 fROM EUGENE ROTARY CLUB CONCERNING ADOPTION Of ROTARY <br />"fOUR-WAY TEST", SUBMITTED AND READ ON APRIL 27,1959 AND HELD OVER, WAS BROUGHT ON FOR CONSIDERATION. <br /> <br />MR. f. fORD NORTHROP, PRESIDENT OF THE EUGENE ROTARY CLUB, AND MR. WILLIAM BERG EXPLAINED THE <br />ROTARY "FOUR-WAY TEST" AND THEIR DESIRE TO PROMOTE IT AMONG INDIVIDUAL BUSINESSES, SCHOOLS AND IN <br />THE CITY, AND ASKED THE EUGENE COUNCIL TO ADOPT THE TEST AND HELP THE CITY PROMOTE IT. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. MCGAfFEY THAT THE CITY OF EUGENE ADOPT THE "fOUR- <br />WAY TEST". MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />COMMUNICATION DATED APRIL 28, 1959 fROM OLAV AND GERD BERNTZEN,1871 GARF"lELD STREET, CONCERNING <br />DOGS WAS PRESENTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />I: <br />I <br />~\ <br /> <br />"WE HAVE DOG PROBLEMS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. IT IS FROM WEST 18TH ST. AND <br />UP HAYES ST., NAMELY HIMBER AT 1850 HAYES WITH 2 DOGS, MCCARTHY AT 1870 WITH <br />AT LEAST 3 DOGS, AND 1880 HAYES (WE DO NOT KNOW THE NAME Of THE OCCUPANTS HERE) <br />WITH ONE DOG. <br /> <br />I TIS ESPEC I ALL Y BAD BETWEEN THE HOURS Of II AND 3 0' CL. AT NIGHT, AND <br />AGAIN BEfORE 6 O'CL. IN THE MORNING. FOR A COUPLE Of WEEKS NOW, WE HAVE HARDLY <br />HAD MORE THAN ABOUT 3 TO 4 HOURS SLEEP EACH NIGHT BECAUSE Of DOGS BARKING. WE <br />HAVE TRIED TO TALK TO THE PEOPLE, BUT NO LUCK, CALLED THE POLICE SEVERAL TIMES <br />BEfORE, WHO EVIDENTLY IS NOT ABLE TO DO A THING ABOUT IT, OR DO NOT CARE. <br /> <br />Y, <br /> <br />I <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />i\ <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />! <br />;1 <br />ii <br />Ii <br />I' <br />,; <br />I: <br />'I <br /> <br />il <br />d <br />p <br />I! <br /> <br />Ii <br />II <br />Ii <br />:i <br />h <br />1. <br />'j <br />Ii <br /> <br />~ ; <br />II <br />I, <br />;' <br />l' <br />It <br /> <br />" <br />'I <br />I' <br />,I <br />'I <br />it <br />,I <br />Ii <br />:I <br />I: <br />II <br />" <br />~ j <br />11 <br />Ii <br /> <br />:, <br />:1 <br />II <br />!i <br /> <br />,; <br />I' <br />i <br />" <br />i: <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />I' <br />i: <br />. ~ <br />n <br />1! <br />i: <br />II <br />, <br />II <br /> <br />'I <br />I: <br />:1 <br /> <br />i! <br />1! <br />, <br />" <br />:I <br />!I <br />ii <br />~ i <br />I <br />II <br />!I <br />I: <br />I' <br />i' <br /> <br />ii <br />I, <br />'I <br />;: <br /> <br />:1 <br />'1 <br /> <br />;: <br />,. <br />iI <br />'I <br />" <br />ii <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />i' <br />" <br />:1 <br />;f <br />q <br />Ii <br />I: <br />" <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br />