<br />r--2 8
<br />
<br />u5/ 1_1/5_9
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />j
<br />I
<br />II
<br />i
<br />I
<br />i
<br />II
<br />11
<br />II
<br />1\
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />!I
<br />il
<br />II
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />THIS STRETCH Of ROAD IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE ANTICIPATED 19TH TO 29TH TO
<br />BLOOMBERG fREEWAY AND RELIEf Of CONDITIONS ON IT SHOULD NOT BE RELATED TO fREE-
<br />WAY COMPLETION. THE ONLY REAL SOLUTION IS THE PAVING AND WIDENING Of THIS
<br />Of TH I S "STRETCH Of ROAD. UNT I L' TH I S CAN BE DONE WE URGE THE fOLLOW I NG TEMPORARY
<br />MEASURES:
<br />
<br />I. SOME KIND Of SIDEWALK fROM 30TH TO SUNSET HOME.
<br />GRAVEL WALK WOULD BE A TREMENDOUS BOON.
<br />
<br />EVEN A GRADED
<br />
<br />2. SUBSTANTIAL REPAIRS TO THE EDGES Of THE ROAD TO RESTORE NORMAL
<br />2 LANE WIDTH, ESPECIALLY BETWEEN 29TH AND 32ND NORTHBOUND, AND
<br />34TH TO 35TH SOUTHBOUND."
<br />
<br />ALSO PRESENTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS WAS A',lETTER ATTACHED TO THE ABOVE PETITION:
<br />
<br />"ENCLOSED IS A PETITION RELATIVE TO A SIDEWALK EXTENSION ON HILYARD STREET
<br />BETWEEN 30TH AND 35TH, WITH IMPROVEMENT Of THE STREET IN THE SAME STRETCH. THE
<br />NUMBER Of SIGNATURES WAS LIMITED ONLY BY MY TIME fOR GETTING THEM. PEOPLE WERE
<br />EAGER TO SIGN.' I.. SHOULD CONVEY THE DOMINANT EXPRESSIONS Of THE SIGNEES:
<br />
<br />I. CONSTERNATION, EVEN DISBELIEf, AT THE NEWS THAT HILYARD IS NOT DESTINED
<br />TO BE WIDENED AND PAVED AT ANY SPECIfiED TIME. ONE PROPERTY OWNER ON HILYARD
<br />WAS OPPOSED TO PAVING BECAUSE Of THE COST;-- ANOTHER WOULD NOT BE HAPPY TO HAVE
<br />A SIDEWALK EXTENDED TO 39TH If IT HAD TO CROSS HER PROPERTY AND CUT UP HER LAWN.
<br />MANY HOMEOWNERS IN THE AREA WERE ASSURED THAT THIS PROJECT WAS ON THE CITY'S
<br />TIMETABLE WHEN THEY BOUGHT OUT HERE. THE PRESENCE Of SURVEYING TEAMS LAST
<br />WINTER CONfiRMED THEIR EXPECTATIONS.
<br />
<br />2. A TREMENDOUS CONCERN OVER THE SUNSET HOME OCCUPANTS, UNPREDICTABLE
<br />PEDESTRIANS AT BEST.
<br />
<br />3. THE QUESTION - WHY SIDEWALKS ONLY TO 35TH? --
<br />
<br />ITEM I. PARTIALLY ANSWERS THE OBVIOUS QUESTION - WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE COM-
<br />PLAINING? THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE GETTING INTO. THE REST OF THE ANSWER TO
<br />THAT QUESTION LIES IN THE PHENOMENALLY RAPID DETERIORATION Of HILYARD OVER THE
<br />PAST TWO WINTERS.
<br />
<br />ONE fURTHER OBSERVATION! THE PETITION ASKS fOR A SIDEWALK fROM 30TH TO
<br />35TH. SINCE WRITING THE PETITION I HAVE LEARNED THAT MCKAY'S IS PUTTING A
<br />SIDEWALK ALONG HILYARD. fROM 30TH TO OMLID'S SERVICE STATION, WHICH IS NEARLY
<br />AT 31ST. fROM THE SERVICE STATION TO W. AMAZON DRIVE THE PROPERTY IS NON-
<br />RESIDENTIAL - THE STATION, A CHURCH, A TAVERN. CONTINUATION Of THE SIDEWALK
<br />ON THE EAST,'.SIDE WOULD THEREfORE INVOLVE MINIMAL ADDITIONAL EffORT AND EXPENSE.
<br />-
<br />HOWEVER, ALL THESE BUSINESSES INVOLVE A GOOD DEAL Of VEHICLE TRAffIC IN AND
<br />OUT OF PARKING AREAS, AND THEREFORE IT WOULD MAKE MUCH MORE SENSE, FROM THE
<br />POINT Of VIEW Of SAfETY, TO EXTEND THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE fROM 29TH
<br />TO 35TH. THIS IS MOSTLY CITY PARKLAND AND A WALK THERE-WOULD BE MORE PLEASANT,
<br />AS WELL AS BEING SAfER.
<br />
<br />I COMMEND THIS TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION Of THE COMMON COUNCIL AND ALSO
<br />URGE THAT THE COUNCIL PRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECONSIDER ITS TIME-
<br />TABLE fOR IMPROVING HILYARD."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFfEY THAT THE PETITION TOGETHER WITH THE COM-
<br />MUNICATION, WHICH WAS SIGNED BY MRS. IVAN NIVEN, BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. MOTION
<br />CARRIED.
<br />
<br />I
<br />,
<br />i
<br />II
<br />\1
<br />I
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />i
<br />
<br />I
<br />II
<br />2 !
<br />
<br />COMMUNICATION DATED APRIL 23, 1959 fROM EUGENE ROTARY CLUB CONCERNING ADOPTION Of ROTARY
<br />"fOUR-WAY TEST", SUBMITTED AND READ ON APRIL 27,1959 AND HELD OVER, WAS BROUGHT ON FOR CONSIDERATION.
<br />
<br />MR. f. fORD NORTHROP, PRESIDENT OF THE EUGENE ROTARY CLUB, AND MR. WILLIAM BERG EXPLAINED THE
<br />ROTARY "FOUR-WAY TEST" AND THEIR DESIRE TO PROMOTE IT AMONG INDIVIDUAL BUSINESSES, SCHOOLS AND IN
<br />THE CITY, AND ASKED THE EUGENE COUNCIL TO ADOPT THE TEST AND HELP THE CITY PROMOTE IT.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. MCGAfFEY THAT THE CITY OF EUGENE ADOPT THE "fOUR-
<br />WAY TEST". MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />COMMUNICATION DATED APRIL 28, 1959 fROM OLAV AND GERD BERNTZEN,1871 GARF"lELD STREET, CONCERNING
<br />DOGS WAS PRESENTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />I
<br />~\
<br />
<br />"WE HAVE DOG PROBLEMS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. IT IS FROM WEST 18TH ST. AND
<br />UP HAYES ST., NAMELY HIMBER AT 1850 HAYES WITH 2 DOGS, MCCARTHY AT 1870 WITH
<br />AT LEAST 3 DOGS, AND 1880 HAYES (WE DO NOT KNOW THE NAME Of THE OCCUPANTS HERE)
<br />WITH ONE DOG.
<br />
<br />I TIS ESPEC I ALL Y BAD BETWEEN THE HOURS Of II AND 3 0' CL. AT NIGHT, AND
<br />AGAIN BEfORE 6 O'CL. IN THE MORNING. FOR A COUPLE Of WEEKS NOW, WE HAVE HARDLY
<br />HAD MORE THAN ABOUT 3 TO 4 HOURS SLEEP EACH NIGHT BECAUSE Of DOGS BARKING. WE
<br />HAVE TRIED TO TALK TO THE PEOPLE, BUT NO LUCK, CALLED THE POLICE SEVERAL TIMES
<br />BEfORE, WHO EVIDENTLY IS NOT ABLE TO DO A THING ABOUT IT, OR DO NOT CARE.
<br />
<br />Y,
<br />
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />i\
<br />,
<br />"
<br />
<br />!
<br />;1
<br />ii
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />,;
<br />I:
<br />'I
<br />
<br />il
<br />d
<br />p
<br />I!
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />:i
<br />h
<br />1.
<br />'j
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />~ ;
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />;'
<br />l'
<br />It
<br />
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />'I
<br />it
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />:I
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />"
<br />~ j
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />:,
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />!i
<br />
<br />,;
<br />I'
<br />i
<br />"
<br />i:
<br />
<br />ii
<br />
<br />I'
<br />i:
<br />. ~
<br />n
<br />1!
<br />i:
<br />II
<br />,
<br />II
<br />
<br />'I
<br />I:
<br />:1
<br />
<br />i!
<br />1!
<br />,
<br />"
<br />:I
<br />!I
<br />ii
<br />~ i
<br />I
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />I:
<br />I'
<br />i'
<br />
<br />ii
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />;:
<br />
<br />:1
<br />'1
<br />
<br />;:
<br />,.
<br />iI
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />ii
<br />"
<br />,
<br />
<br />i'
<br />"
<br />:1
<br />;f
<br />q
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />"
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|