My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/25/1959 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1959
>
05/25/1959 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:10:17 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 3:35:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/25/1959
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,.,.. 5 0 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />5/25/59 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br />2 II <br /> i <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> , <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> - , <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />3 I <br /> <br />7. PETITION rOR PAVING 27TH AVENUE rROM LINCOLN TO LAWRENCE STREET - A PETITION <br />SIGNED BY OWNERS OF 75% or THE PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE PAVING WAS <br />PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROJECT BE <br />APPROVED AND THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE PROJECT BE R~SSED. <br /> <br />Ii <br />I! <br />Ii <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />8. PETITION rOR SANITARY SEWER IN THE AREA BETWEEN 23RD AND 24TH AVENUES rROM GRANT <br />TO GARrlELD STREET - A MAP WAS GIVEN TO THE COMMITTEE ON WHICH THE REQUESTED <br />SANITARY SEWER WAS SHOWN. IT WAS ALSO EXPLAINED THAT THIS AREA DOES Naf HAVE A <br />NEW TRUNK SEWER PROPOSED TO SERVE IT AND FURTHER THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE ANY DIRECT <br />ErFECT ON THE SERVICE TO ADOITIONAL AREAS IN THE SOUTHWEST SECTION OF THE CITY <br />'AND WOULD ADD ONLY FOUR OR riVE LIVING UNITS AT THE PRESENT TIME. IT WAS FURTHER <br />EXPLAINED THAT IT DOES DRAIN TO 18TH AVENUE AND COULD POTENTIALLY ENHANCE THE <br />SEWER PROBLEM AT THIS AREA. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITION FOR THE <br />SEWER AS REQUESTED BE APPROVED AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE <br />PROJECT BE PASSED. MOTION CARRIED WITH MR. MOLHOLM VOTING NAY. <br /> <br />I' <br />il <br />II <br />I' <br />II <br /> <br />H <br />" <br />" <br />!I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 7 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br />BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />\ <br />\ <br />:\ <br />h <br />~:i <br />,\ <br />, <br /> <br />UP TO 12 YEARS, RESIDENT 30 SWIMS FOR $3.00 <br /> , - <br /> NON-RESIDENT 30 SWIMS rOR $4.50 <br />FROM 13 TO 18 YEARS, RESIDENT 25 SWIMS rOR $5.00 <br /> NON-RESIDENT 25 SWIMS FOR $6.25 <br />18 YEARS AND OVER, RESIDENT 20 SWIMS rOR $7.00 <br /> NON-RESIDENT 20 SWIMS FOR $10.00 <br /> <br /> I' e <br /> ~ I <br /> I' <br /> !I <br /> Ii <br /> 'I <br /> " <br /> I <br /> " <br /> 'I <br /> I! <br /> q I <br /> " <br /> , <br /> 'I <br /> I <br /> :1 <br /> 'I <br /> !I <br /> i: <br /> I <br /> II <br /> II <br /> ,. <br /> I <br /> ;! <br /> if <br /> ,I <br /> I: <br /> II <br /> " <br /> !i <br /> " <br /> I <br /> i' <br /> i ~ <br /> II <br /> " <br /> " <br /> ii <br /> I: <br /> l' <br /> Ii <br /> :1 <br /> I' I <br /> ;1 <br /> ~ : <br /> " <br /> Ij <br /> il <br /> I, <br /> II <br /> I: <br /> , <br /> L <br />!I <br /> II <br />11 <br /> II e <br /> ;1 <br />Ii <br /> I, <br />Ii <br />Ij <br />'I <br />I' <br />,I <br />I' <br />II <br />I! <br />I' <br />\! <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />,I <br />I! <br />:1 <br />II <br />:1 I <br />I' <br />;I <br />!I <br />:1 <br />I <br />I! <br />Ii <br />'I <br />I' <br />,I <br />:1 <br />i\ <br />" <br />I; - <br />" <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 8 or THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br />BE APPROVED. MOT I ON CARR I ED. : . <br /> <br />9. REPORT ON EXTENSION or LINING FOR AMAZON CHANNEL - THE CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED <br />THAT HE HAD BEEN WORKING WITH CONGRESSMAN CHARLES PORTER CONCERNING THE POSSI- <br />BILITY OF EXTENDING THE LINING ON THE AMAZON CREEK AND THAT-CONGRESSMAN PORTER <br />HAD IN TURN CORRESPONDED WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS ON THIS SUBJECT. AT THIS <br />TIME THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT THE IMPROVEMENT RE- <br />QUESTED SINCE IT IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE AUTHORIZED PROJECT AND EXTENSION WOULD <br />REQUIRE A STUDY TO DETERMINE THE rEASIBILITY OF EXTENDING THE CONCRETE CHANNEL <br />LINING AND NO AUTHORITY IS AVAILABLE TO MAKE SUCH A STUDY. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT <br />CITY REPRESENTATIVES TALK WITH THE DISTRICT ENGINEER AT PORTLAND AND SUCH TALKS <br />HAVE BEEN HELD AND THE DISTRICT ENGINEER IS FAVORABLE TOWARD OPENING UP DISCUSSION <br />ON THIS SUBJECT SINCE THE CITY LIMITS HAVE EXTENDED BEYOND THAT FOUND WHEN THE <br />ORIGINAL PROJECT WAS STARTED. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WILSON SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM <br />THAT CONGRESSMAN PORTER BE.URGED TO INTRODUCE A RESOLUTION BErORE THE PUBLIC WORKS <br />COMMITTEE OF THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO AUTHORIZE A RESTUDY OF THE PRO- <br />JECT WITH A VIEW TOWARD POSSIBLE EXTENSION. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 9 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br />BE APPROVED. MOTJON CARRIED. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />10. REQUEST BY EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD ON CERTAIN ITEMS: (A) REQUEST rOR <br />APPROVAL TO ASSUME ASSETS AND LIABILITIES or ANNEXED PORTION OF COLLEGE CREST <br />WATER DISTRICT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1958, (B) REQUEST FOR EXCHANGE OF EASEMENTS <br />IN ORDER TO CORRECT AN EASEMENT DESCRIPTION (NEW EASEMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, <br />OLD EASEMENT REQUIRED TO BE RELEASED), AND (C) ,REQUEST rOR SALE OF .21 ACRES <br />or SURPLUS PROPERTY ALONG WALTERVILLE CANAL. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT <br />THE ABOVE THREE REQUESTS FROM THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD BE APPROVED. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 10 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br />BE APPROVED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MR. SWANSON ABSTAINING, <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />5 I I . <br /> I <br /> I' <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />1 <br />!I <br />II <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />REQUEST BY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT rOR REVISION OF SWIMMING POOL PASS <br />FEES AND INCLUSION OF A FAMILY SWIM PASS - THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS & <br />RECREATION PRESENTED A REPORT AND A STUDY CONCERNING THE USE OF SWIM POOL <br />PASSES AS REQUESTED BY THE SPECIAL FEES AND CHARGES COMMITTEE OF THE CITY <br />COUNCIL. THE REPORT EXPLAINS THAT INQUIRY WAS MADE or A NUMBER OF CITIES or <br />THE NORTHWEST AND THAT IT WAS FOUND THAT THE CURRENT PASS rEES ARE REASONABLE <br />AND THAT AN ADDITIONAL AREA OF A FAMILY PASS COULD ALSO BE INSTITUTED. IT WAS <br />EXPLAINED THAT A SEASON PASS PRESENTS SOME PROBLEMS OF ADMINISTRATION AND or <br />CONTROL AND TWO RECOMMENDATIONS WERE MADE - (I) THAT A STANDARD SEASONAL SWIM <br />PASS BE ISSUED AND (2) THAT SPECIAL SWIM PASSES LIMITED TO A CERTAIN NUMBER <br />OF SWIMS BE ISSUED TO INCLUDE A FAMILY PASS. THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THE <br />ITEMS AS PRESENTED AND RECOMMENDED THAT A SPECIAL SWIM PASS LIMITED TO A <br />CERTAIN NUMBER or SWIMS AS INDICATED BELOW BE ADOPTED AS CITY POLICY. THE <br />RECOMMENDED FEES FOR SUCH PASSES ARE AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />IT WAS ALSO RECOMMENDED THAT A rAMILY PASS or 100 SWIMS FOR $15.00 ON A PUNCH <br />SYSTEM BE INSTITUTED WITH UP TO TWO ADMISSIONS BEING ALLOWED rOR ONE PUNCH, <br />THREE ADMISSIONS FOR TWO PUNCHES AND AN ENTIRE FAMILY FOR THREE PUNCHES WITH <br />NO AGE LIMIT. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.