<br />rB2
<br /> e
<br /> 6/22/59
<br /> ~ ~~ -- ~--~
<br /> ii
<br /> II I
<br /> REPORTS Of COMMITTEES II
<br /> I!
<br /> .. ,-,. "
<br /> I I:
<br /> A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JUNE I I, 1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: n
<br /> "
<br /> Ii
<br /> " . I
<br /> I PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MCGAFFEY, CHATT, MOYER AND SWANSON; j;
<br /> "
<br /> , CITY MANAGER; CITY ATTORNEY; DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS; ASSISTANT CITY RECORDER; \1
<br /> I MR. RODERICK OF CORNELL, HOWLAND, HAYES & MERRYFIELD; BYRON PRICE, EUGENE WATER I'
<br /> ,I
<br /> & ELECTRIC BOARD; FRED BRENNE, EUGENE CHAMBER Of COMMERCE;. DAN WYANT , EUGENE I,
<br /> ,.
<br /> I REGISTER-GUARD. II
<br /> ~ :
<br /> I. fiRST DRAfT~OF AN ORDINANCE TO INCREASE WATER USER CHARGE - THE CITY MANAGER READ II
<br />I I
<br /> THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND EXPLAINED THAT THIS ORDINANCE CONTAINS MANY THINGS l:
<br /> WHICH IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO EITHER ELIMINATE OR CHANGE, AND THIS MEETING PI
<br /> IS AN 'I
<br /> ATTEMPT TO MAKE A WORKABLE ORDINANCE. MR. RODERICK REPORTED TO THE COMMITTEE THAT I
<br /> )1
<br /> HE HAD COMPLETED A SURVEY IN WHICH IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL 1:
<br /> I'
<br /> CONSUMPTION Of WATER IS 1000 CUBIC FEET PER CUSTOMER PER MONTH. HE SUGGESTED THAT ; ~ e
<br /> ,
<br /> THE MONTHS Of DE~EMBER, JANUARY, fEBRUARY, AND MARCH BE USED TO ESTABLISH RATES Ii
<br /> Ii
<br /> SO AS TO NOT CURTAIL THE USE OF WATER FOR SPRINKLING PURPOSES DURING THE SUMMER. "
<br /> UNDER HIS PROPOSAL 85 TO 90% OF RESIDENTIAL USERS WOULD NOT PAY FOR EXTRA WATER ii
<br /> USED DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS. HE STATED THAT IN HIS OPINION IT WOULD BE NECES- 0- I,
<br /> 11
<br /> SARY fOR THE CITY TO HAVE SPECIAL RATES FOR MOTELS, HOSPITALS; SCHOOLS AND-LIKE " ~ .. I:
<br /> I'
<br /> INSTITUTIONS, AND AN ATTEMPT MUST-BE MADE TO MAKE RATES WHICH WILL BE fAIR AND II
<br /> EQUITABLE AS WELL AS TO SIMPLifY THEIR ADMINISTRATION AND COLLECTION. HE STATED Ii
<br /> II I
<br /> THAT THERE SHOULD BE A METERED MEANS Of DETERMINING WHICH WATER GOES ~NTO THE II
<br /> SEWER SYSTEM fOR EACH INDUSTRY OR INSTITUTION SO THAT WATER NOT ENTERING THE SEWER Ii
<br /> SYSTEM WOULD NOT INCREASE THE SEWER CHARGE. WINTER RATES WOU~D NOT APPLY TO IN- II
<br /> I
<br /> ,I
<br /> DUSTRY OR COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONS. SPECIAL SECTIONS WOULD HAVE TO BE INSERTED IN "
<br /> "
<br /> THE ORDINANCE TO COVER SPECifiC CASES WHERE UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE WATER USE I'
<br /> "
<br /> VARIED. HE STATED THAT THE UNIVERSITY Of OREGON HAS 43 METERS AND THEY WOULD :1
<br /> II
<br /> PROBABLY ANALYZE THE ORDINANCE AND, If fEASIBLE, WOULD PUT IN ONE MASTER METER. Ii
<br /> 'I
<br /> MR. PRICE STATED THAT IT WOULD BE MUCH EASIER fOR EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD 1/
<br /> I..
<br /> TO USE METERED RATES THAN fLAT RATES. HE fURTHER STATED THAT THE UNIVERSITY Of "
<br /> II
<br /> ,I OREGON MIGHT ISOLATE PART Of THEIR WATER SYSTEM AND USE THEIR OWN SYSTEM If THE ,\
<br /> IS TOO HIGH ON CITY WATER. HE ALSO STATED THAT II
<br /> RATE IN THE CASE Of OUTSIDE WATER II
<br /> DISTRICTS NOW PURCHASING WATER fROM EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD 17.6% Of THE I R I.
<br /> ii SALES ARE TO OUTSIDE DISTRICTS. THEY ARE VALUABLE CUSTOMERS AND ANY PROGRAM MUST II
<br /> BE PROPERLY SOLD TOPEOPLE-OUTStDE THE CITY TO AVOID WHOLESALE COMPLAINTS. d
<br /> :1
<br /> I:
<br /> " il
<br /> II THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION REGARDING CHARGES THAT MIGHT BE MADE TO HOSPI- \,
<br /> TALS IN THE AREA AND AS TO WHETHER THESE CHARGES SHOULD BE ON A METERED RATE OR :1
<br /> II "
<br /> PER BED CHARGE. THE COMMITTEE INSTRUCTED MR. RODERICK TO PROCEED ON THE BASIS "
<br />',I.. Ii
<br /> I Of THE AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION Of EACH HOSPITAL AND TO DIVIDE THIS NUMBER BY II
<br /> , THE COM-
<br /> I 3.7 TO DETERMINE THE AVERAGE RATE PER BED fOR HOSPITALS AND REST HOMES. I
<br /> I 'I
<br /> MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT IN THE CASE Of THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON THE COUNCIL ADVISE II
<br /> I . ' I'
<br /> I THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON BY LETTER THAT ANY ATTEMPT-TO CIRCUMVENT SEWAGE CHARGES "
<br /> AS fiNALLY DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL MAY RESULT IN A CHANGE IN THE ORDINANCE TO ii I
<br /> "
<br /> i BRING CONFORMITY AS FAR AS THEIR USAGE IS CONCERNED. ,:
<br /> II
<br /> I il
<br /> I'
<br /> I THE COMMITTEE THEN DISCUSSED OUTSIDE WATER DISTRICTS AND THE EffECT THE NEW SEWER 11
<br /> CHARGE MIGHT HAVE ON THEM. THE MAYOR STATED THAT AT A MEETING WITH THE OUTSIDE
<br /> ! WATER DISTRICTS, THEY HAD BEEN ON THE WHOLE VERY COOPERATIVE AND SEEMED TO BE
<br /> INTERESTED IN THE METROPOLITAN CONCEPT, BUT SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNCIL PROCEED II
<br /> I[
<br /> WITH CAUTION SINCE MANY WATER DISTRICTS MAY DISCONTINUE BUYING WATER fROM THE L
<br /> EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD .,
<br /> If IT BECOMES ECONOMICALLY fEASIBLE fOR THEM TO It
<br /> DRILL THEIR OWN WELLS SINCE WATER IS READILY ACCESSIBLE IN MOST DISTRICTS~ HE II e
<br /> 1 "
<br /> fURTHER STATED THAT IT !S DiffiCULT TO EXPLAIN TO PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS II
<br /> I II
<br /> ! WHY THEY SHOULD PAY ADDITIONAL SEWAGE CHARGES WHEN THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO USE THE II
<br /> SEWERS AT THIS TIME. SOME MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE fELT THAT WHILE A REASONABLE 11
<br /> I'
<br /> , INCREASE IS JUSTifiED SINCE THE OUTSIDE WATER DISTRICTS WILL EVENTUALLY NEED SEWERS, :1
<br /> 1
<br /> , IS A VERY DifFICULT SITUATION TO EXPLAIN TO THEM IN A MANNER WHICH THEY WILL "
<br /> IT "
<br /> , Ii
<br /> I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND. I T WAS fURTHER BROUGHT OUT THAT THE WATER 0 I STR-I CTS' BUD-
<br /> tl
<br /> GETS fOR THE COMING YEAR ARE ALREADY MADE UP AND IT WOULD BE DiffiCULT fOR THEM I,
<br /> TO CHANGE. THEIR BUDGETS IN ORDER TO RAISE ADDITIONAL MONEY TO PAY THE SEWER !\
<br /> CHARGE. SOME COMMITTEE MEMBERS fELT THERE IS GOOD POSSIBILITY fOR ANNEXATION Of II
<br /> SOME Of THESE DISTRICTS IN THE NEAR fUTURE AND ANY ANTAGONISM WHICH MIGHT RESULT Ii
<br /> Ii
<br /> fROM PLACING AN.EXTRA SEWER CHARGE ON THEM ~T THE PRESENT TIME MIGHT RESULT IN jl
<br />I THE ANNEXATION NOT CARRYING. 'I
<br /> I:
<br />I THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE SEWER CHARGES INSOFAR AS OUTSJDE WATER DIS- Ii
<br /> ,i
<br /> TRICTS ARE CONCERNED BE LEFT STATUS QUO AND THAT MORE DISCUSSIONS BE HELD WITH l;
<br />i 'I I
<br />I THEM PRIOR TO THEIR MAKING UP THEIR 1960-61 BUDGETS ON-THE POSSIBILITY OF IIC REAS- I!
<br />I PROBLEMS OF PLYWOOD AND LUMBER MILLS, OTHER
<br />I ING THEIR SEWER CHARGES. INDUSTRIES ,I
<br />! ~ITH COMPLICATED WASTE PROBLEMS, AND WHETHER OR NOT AN EXTRA CHARGE SHOULD BE MADE \,
<br /> I
<br /> TO HOMES WITH GARBAGE DISPOSAL UNITS WERE DISCUSSED BY THE COMMITTEE BUT N~ ACTION I'
<br /> II
<br /> WAS TAKEN. THE COMMITTEE AGREED TO MEET AGAIN THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 1959, fOR FUR- P
<br /> THER 0 I SC US'S I ON. " d
<br /> Ii
<br /> I
<br /> ;1
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT THE COMMITTEE R~PORT BE RECEIVED AND I)
<br /> ~I;..ACED ON F' I LE. MOTION CARRIED. J, e
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br />..... :"
<br />
|