My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/10/1959 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1959
>
08/10/1959 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 12:54:32 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 3:36:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/10/1959
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> rt46 I <br /> e <br /> " <br /> " <br /> 8/10/59 <br /> - -- <br /> I I, <br /> I .., I; <br /> " <br /> I 'I I <br /> I, <br /> IT WAS MOVED ~Y MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. McGArrEY THAT ITEM 5 or THE COMMITTEE REPORT II <br /> I 'I <br /> BE APPROVED.' MOTION CARRIED. I, <br /> II <br /> I I, <br /> I 6. CONSIDERATION OF MR. DEARDORFF'S COMPLAINT REGARDING COST TO BE ASSESSED TO " <br /> " <br /> " <br /> HIS PROPERTY rOR SEWER - THE DIRECTOR or PUBLIC WORKS PRESENTED MAPS TO THE " <br /> II <br /> I COMMITTEE SHOWING THE ENTIRE SEWER PROJECT WHICH IS BEING CONSTRUCTED IN THE " <br /> II <br /> I " <br /> VICINITY or 28TH AVENUE AND 29TH AVENUE BETWEEN KREATZ ROAD AND LORANE HIGHWAY; 11 <br /> I THIS ITEM HAD BEEN HELD UP AND RErERRED TO COMMITTEE rROM THE LAST COUNCIL " <br /> " <br /> 11 <br /> MEET I NG . ' THE DIRE.CTOR or PUBLIC WORKS GAVE A DETAILED DESCRIPTION or THE PRO- I' <br /> , BLEM AND POINTED OUT THAT MR. DEARDORrr's ASSESSMENT IS rAIR AND JUSTlrlED AND <br /> I THAT THE POLICY or ASSESSMENT CANNOT BE CHANGED AS THE SEWER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION <br /> IS TOO FAR ALONG. IT WAS ALSO POINTED OUT THAT PART OF THE PROMISE AT THE TIME <br /> I THIS AREA WAS ANNEXED WAS TO GIVE THE AREA SEWER SERVICE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. <br /> COMMITTEE'M~MBERS VOTED THAT THE SEWER PROJECT IN THE AREA BE CONTINUED AND <br /> I <br /> j THAT MR. DEARDORrr's. ASSESSMENT BE COMPUTED IN THE USUAL MANNER, MR. WILSON <br /> , ABSTAINING. ii <br /> I !i <br /> I e <br /> ; IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 6 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE I' <br /> I Ii <br /> APPROVED. MOT ION CARR I EO. i: <br /> I 1; <br /> :i <br /> 2 I 7. REQUEST FOR OVERLENGTH CURB CUT AT THE CORNER or 7TH AVENUE AND GRANT STREET - I, <br /> " <br /> IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT GRANT MOTORS HAD REQUESTED A CURB CUT AT THE CORNER or J~ <br /> I 7TH AVENUE kND .GRANT,STREET. - THE DIRECTOR or PUBLIC WORKS POINTED OUT THAT THE II <br /> , LOCATION or THE ALLEY IS IN QUES'TION AND THAT Ir NO ALLEY IS DEDICATED NOR. H I <br /> I EX I STS, THE' REQUEST WOULD NOT NEED SPEC IAL CONS I DERAT ION ; HOWEVER, Ir THE ALLEY il <br /> ! !I <br /> EXISTS THE ~EQutSTED ~URB CUT IS 5' OVERLENGTK AND MUS~ BE APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL. " <br /> , <br /> THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDED THAT TWO 35' CURB CUTS AS REQUESTED BE " <br /> I " <br /> II <br /> I ALLOWED. THE COMMJTTEEREC'OMMENDEDUNANIMOUSLY THAT THE REQUEST BE. GRANTED. I, <br /> i: <br /> I 1: <br /> I - <br /> IT WAS MOVED By'MR... SH,t'ARER SECONDED BY MR. McGArrEY THAT ITEM 7 or THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE ,: <br /> II <br /> r APPROVED. MOTIO'N CARR'IED. iI <br /> " <br /> - ., I! <br /> I 8. CONSIDERATION or 'RECOM'MENDATION BY SENIOR BUfLDING I NSPE'CTOR fOR REMOVAL Of j: <br /> 3 I i\ <br /> STRUCTURE LocATED. AT 2 I 13 K I NCAI 0 STREET - THE COMM I TTEE' RECOMMENDEDUNAN I MOUSL Y I <br /> i if <br /> I THAT THIS ITEM BE HELD OVtR UNTIL THE COMMITTEE CAN VIEW THE PROPERTY ON TOUR ,; <br /> Ii <br /> NEXT FRIDAy. II <br /> /. <br /> II Ii <br /> IT WAS MOV~D BY M~. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. McGArfEY THAT ITEM' 80r THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE Ii, <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. li <br /> 41 " <br /> :i <br /> I, <br /> 9. CONSIDERATION or RECOMMENDATION BY SENIOR BUILDING INSP~CTOR AND FIRE MARSHAL Ii <br /> I i' <br /> fOR REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 2633 PORTLAND STREET - THE COMMITTEE RECOM- 'f <br /> II <br /> I ii <br /> I MENDED UNANIMOUSLY THAT THIS ITEM BE HELD OVER UNTIL THE COMMITTEE MEETING NEXT Ii <br /> FRIDAY WHEN THEY CAN VIEW THE PROPERTY ON TOUR. . I' <br /> Ii <br /> i iI <br /> , - :1 <br /> II IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. McGAHEY THAT ITEM 9 or THE COMMI.TTEE.REPORT BE " <br /> II <br /> APPROVED. MOT 10.N 'C'ARR I EO. " <br /> " <br /> " <br /> II II I <br /> I, <br /> 51 10. PROPOSAL TO GRANT EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO A PROPOSED ORGANIZATION rOR THE COL- d <br /> LECT ION OF GARBAGE'- THE CITY RECORDER' :RE'ADA PROPOS'AL F"ROM S. A. SORENSON 'CON- " <br /> I ~ <br /> CERNING AN tXCLUSIVE fRANCHISE fOR ~HE EUGENE GARBAG~ COLLECTORS ASSOCIATION. (I <br /> THEIR PROPOSAL WOULD ESTABLISH AN EXCLUSIVE fRANCHISE FOR HAULING AND DISPOSING :1 <br /> I <br /> I OF GARBAGE rRO~ WITHIN THE CITYLIMITS or EUGENE. THE CITY RECORDER POINTED OUT il <br /> ~ \ <br /> THA T .A 1929 CHARTER .AMENDMENT DOES NOT PERM IT THE COUNC I L TO' fSSUE. EXCLUS I VE ' ' j! <br /> I FRANCHISES FOR 'THE COLLEC~ION Of GARBAGE. ADVANTAGES of THE PRESENT SYSTEM ~ERE II <br /> I POINTtD OUT WHERE COMPETITION IS KEEN; SERVICE SHARP AND AT ATTRACTIVE. RATES~ Ii - <br /> 1 THE COMMITTEE R'ECO'MMENDED UNANIMOUSLY THAT THIS MATTER BE PLACED.ONfILE AND ji <br /> II THAT .~ LETTER ~E ~RITrEN TO THE ASSOCIATION EXPLAINING THE CHARTER PROVISIONS. : <br /> Ii " <br /> !l <br /> Ii <br /> IT WAS MOVED B~ MR~ SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 10 or THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE I, <br /> " <br /> " <br /> APPROVED. " <br /> :1 <br /> I :i <br /> I <br /> , i.! <br /> I MR. MOLHOLM POINTED OUT THAT MANY CITIES HAVE SUCH ASSOCfATI.ONS fOR GARBAGE HAULE~S, AND !1 <br /> I HE fEELS THAT Ir RESOURCES ARE POOLED BY THE AsSocfATION BETTER SERVICE WILL RESULT; rUR- 'I <br /> , h <br /> I THER, IT I~ POSSIB(E TO tHANGE THE CHARtER THROUGH A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE AND POSSIBLY THE !I <br /> I " <br /> I PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE THIS OPPORtUNITY. MR. SHEARER INDICATED 'HE fEELS THE ASSOCIATION AND I' <br /> tl <br /> I NOT THE COUNCIL SHOULD INitiATE TAKING .tHE ISSUE TO THE PEOPLE. 11 <br /> " <br /> iI <br /> , ON VOTE, THE MOTION io ~PPROV~ THE COMMITTEE REPORT CARRIED. i! <br /> I i' <br /> II <br /> 61 I I. CONSIDERATION or STREET TREE PROGRAM - THE MAYOR DIRECTED A QUESTION TO THE 'CITY 1, <br /> 'I <br /> .ATTORNEY IN WHICH HE ASKED THE CITY'S LIABILITY rOR TREES PLANTED IN STREET ! ~ I <br /> 1: <br /> RIGHTS-Or-WAY. THE CITY ATTORNEY POINTED OUT THAT fN HIS OPINION THE TREES LO- ,I <br /> I ;1 <br /> CATED IN THE STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE PLANTED BY rNDIVIDUAL' " <br /> I CITIZENS, BELONG TO THE.~ITY AND SHOULD BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY. .THE SUPER- :, <br /> I' <br /> I INTENDENT Of PARKS & RECREATION POINTED OUT THAT TREES ON STREET RIGHTS-Or-WAY I: <br /> " <br /> ,i <br /> CREATE'SEVERAL PROBLEMS SUCH AS LOW LIMBS BEING IN THE WAY or HIGH MOTOR VEHI- " <br /> I :i <br /> CLES'SUCH AS TRUCKS, MANY DEAD LIMBS PREVALENT IN THE TREES~ TREE LIMBS OBSTRUCT- Ii <br /> ING ~RAfF"IC SIGNALS AND UTILITY LINES, AND ROOTS Of TREES DISTURBING SIDEWALKS. " <br /> II <br /> " <br /> Ii e <br /> 'I <br /> I) <br /> ~ , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.