|
<br /> 185 ~
<br /> e
<br /> - - ~ ~- ~ - - . - 9/28/59
<br /> - .=.--..:....::-- - ------ ~- --- -_: ~:_:-.::....:--:--:.....--..:.._--:-_~-:.- -~----=---_:~-------=---------=--- ----~~---
<br /> --~-~-----
<br /> I ~ - ~ r
<br /> ,
<br /> ~ I
<br /> I
<br /> I 2. DISCUSSION Or COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH CHANGE OF WATER SERVICE OF RESIDENTS ALONG
<br /> I', MONROE STREET BETWEEN 11TH AND 13TH AVENUES - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE WIDENING ,
<br /> I' ,
<br /> 11 Or MONROE STREET BETWEEN 11TH AND 13TH AVENUES NECESSITATES THE REPLACEMENT OR II
<br /> ,I RELOCATtON OF WATER SERVICE, LINES, BEING THE LINES FROM THE MAIN TO THE METER, Ii
<br /> ~I FOR SEVENTEEN CUSTOMERS SERVED BY THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD. EIGHT OF ,/
<br /> "I THESE SERVICES WERE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CUSTOMERS, AND UNDER THE EUGENE 'I
<br /> :1 I;
<br /> ~I WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD'S POLICY, THE CHANGE OR RELOCATION Or THE WATER SERVICE r
<br /> Q() WHERE SUCH SERVICE IS OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CUSTOMER IS A CHARGE AGAINST II
<br /> C\1 ~i THE CUSTOMER. A COMPLETE COST ANALYSIS fOR EACH Of THE EIGHT RESIDENCES WAS
<br /> 'I
<br /> ....l'" ~! GIVEN TO EACH MEMBER PRESENT, AND THIS ANALYSIS SHOWED A TOTAL COST Of $680.10 II
<br /> l.) I il
<br /> "'~ II fOR THE REPLACEMENT Of SUCH SERVICE Of WHICH THE WATER BOARD UNDER ITS POLICY Ii
<br /> ;..-. I
<br /> ,....T...~ :1 WOULD UNDERWRITE $358.46 LEAVING AN UNPAID BALANCE TO BE CHARGED TO THE OWNERS Ii
<br /> ....... II
<br /> OR TO BE PAID BY THE CITY OF $321.64. I'
<br /> ! II
<br /> d
<br /> 'I I,
<br /> :i IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT SINCE THE PEOPLE DID NOT ASK rOR THE WIDENING OF MONROE Ii
<br /> [I STREET BETWEEN I ITH AND 13TH AVENUES, PERHAPS THE CITY SHOULD PAY THE COST I'
<br /> e ,I WHICH WOULD NORMALLY BE BILLED TO THE PRIVATE OWNERS. SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS
<br /> I
<br /> '! SUB4ECT WAS HELD BY THE MEMBERS Of THE COUNCIL UNDER THE THEORY-THAT THIS MIGHT I
<br /> ~i ESTABLISH A PRECEDENT fOR FUTURE AND SIMILAR SITUATIONS. IT WAS INDICATED THAT
<br /> IN THE CITY RUNS BETWEEN 2000 AND I
<br /> \! THE BEST ESTIMATE Of SUCH PRIVATE SERVICES I
<br /> " 2500. FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS SUBJECT THE COUNCIL, ACTING AS A COM-
<br /> " I
<br /> "
<br /> ,
<br /> , MITTEE OF THE WHOLE, RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY PAY TO THE EUGENE WATER & ,
<br /> :1 ELECTRIC BOARD THE SUM OF $321.64 fOR THE REPLACEMENT Or SUCH WATER SERVICES I
<br /> I 'I ON MONROE STREET BETWEEN 11TH AND 13TH AVENUES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 'II
<br /> f! il
<br /> I
<br /> 2 ':, 3. DISCUSSION OF THE REPLACEMENT OF DOWNTOWN STREET LrGHTS - A SCHEDULE WHICH
<br /> " II
<br /> ;! SHOWS THE EXISTING NUMBER Of LIGHTS AND MONTHLY CHARGE fOR DOWNTOWN STREET
<br /> \1 II
<br /> f, LIGHTING IN THE AREA SERVED BY THE ORNAMENTAL POSTS AND A COMPARISON WITH SUCH
<br /> .,; NUMBER Of LIGHTS AND CHARGES WITH A MERCURY VAPOR LIGHT SYSTEM WHICH COULD BE
<br /> n:
<br /> 'I INSTALLED WAS PRESENTED TO THE GROUP. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THIS WAS PRE- 1
<br /> , I
<br /> i SENTED AT THIS TIME SINCE THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD IN THE PROCESS
<br /> ;1 IS
<br /> Of MAKING UP THEIR'BUDGET FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1960, AND If CHANGES ARE TO BE I
<br /> :1 ,I
<br /> " MADE IN THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM IT IS NECESSARY THEY KNOW WHAT THESE CHANGES
<br /> ,
<br /> , ,I
<br /> ~ i WILL BE SO THE CAPITAL COST CAN BE INCLUDED IN THEIR BUDGET., 'I
<br /> :1
<br /> !I II
<br /> I' Two PROPOSED MERCURY VAPOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS WERE PRESENTED TO THE GROUP, ONE
<br /> I
<br /> I I
<br /> ,I A FIRST STAGE PROGRAM WHICH IS CAPABLE Of BEING EXPANDED INTO THE SECOND STAGE
<br /> r! PROGRAM WHICH IS THE ULTIMATE LIGHTING FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA. STAGE ONE, OR
<br /> ::1 THE LESSOR OF THE TWO PLANS PRESENTED, COVERS ONLY THE AREA NOW COVERED BY
<br /> :i THE ORNAMENTAL LIGHTING SYSTEM. BASICALLY, THIS AREA INCLUDES WILLAMETTE STREET I
<br /> fROM 6TH TO 12TH AVENUE, BROADWAY fROM CHARNEL TON TO OAK STREET, WITH SOME LESSOR
<br /> ,I TREATMENT fOR OTHER STREETS WITHIN THE AREA. THE PLAN PROPOSES fOUR 20,000 I
<br /> LUMEN MERCURY VAPOR LIGHTS AT EACH INTERSECTION AND THREE 35,000 LUMEN LIGHTS I
<br /> II
<br /> BETWEEN THE INTERSECTIONS. SUCH LIGHTS WOULD BE MOUNTED ON AN ALUMINUM STANDARD I,
<br /> 30 fEET HIGH AND WOULD BE QUITE COMPARABLE TO THE LIGHT CURRENTLY EXISTING IN I,
<br /> il fRONT Of THE CITY HALL BUT WITH A LONGER ARM. BASED ON THE PROPOSAL THE 250 II
<br /> :r ORNAMENTAL POSTS WOULD BE REMOVED AND THEY WOULD BE REPLACED WITH SIXTY-riVE I
<br /> i, Ii
<br /> I I Ii
<br /> 20,000 LUMEN MERCURY VAPOR LIGHTS ON ALUMINUM POSTS, TWO 20,000 MERCURY VAPOR II
<br /> ~I LIGHTS ON WOOD POSTS, AND fORTY 35,000 LUMEN MERCURY VAPOR LIGHTS IN MID-BLOCK. II
<br /> THE PRESENT COST fOR THE EXISTING ORNAMENTAL POSTS IS $737.50 AND THE PRO-
<br /> :i POSED COST Of THE MERCURY VAPOR INSTALLATION AS OUTLINED ABOVE ON A MONTHLY II
<br /> " BASIS WOULD BE $758.30.
<br /> d
<br /> '.I \1
<br /> i THESE CHARGES WOULD INCLUDE ALL COSTS Of INSTALLATION, AMORTIZATION, OPERA-
<br /> ,t
<br /> 'I TION, MAINTENANCE, ENERGY, AND OTHER rACTORS OVER A 20-YEAR LirE. I'
<br /> e , II
<br /> ;! COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT INDICATED THEY WOULD GIVE THIS MATTER STUDY IN THE
<br /> > I
<br /> :I ,~EAR fUTURE, AND THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTR I C BOARD REPRESENTATI VES INDICATED
<br /> I J
<br /> ;1 THEY' WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE ANSWER I N 30 DA Y S SO IT Cou. 0 BE INCLUDED IN THEIR
<br /> " BUDGET PRESENTATION IF SUCH ACTION IS TO BE TAKEN.
<br /> I
<br /> ;1 "
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM I Of THE REPORT BE RECEIVED Ii
<br /> " r
<br /> ;i AND PLACED ON FILE, AND THAT ITEM 3 BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND TO BE
<br /> :1 THE FIRST ITEM ON THAT AGENDA FOR FRIDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1959, WITHTHE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS II
<br /> ,I AND TRAFrlC ENGINEER TO DETERMINE POTENTIAL WIDENING AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF STREETS ON !
<br /> .1
<br /> " WHICH THE MERCURY VAPOR SYSTEM MIGHT BE INSTALLED. MOTION CARRIED. I
<br /> " I
<br /> d
<br /> I I
<br /> ~ i IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. lAURIS THAT ITEM 2 Of THE REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br /> .1 ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED. !
<br /> ,I ,
<br /> I
<br /> " IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. lAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ANOTHER JOINT MEETING WITH THE
<br /> I
<br /> I "
<br /> " EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD BE HELD IN THE MONTH Of DECEMBER 1959 TO DISCUSS MUTUAL I!
<br /> "
<br /> " MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ! PROBLEMS.
<br /> 'I
<br /> 3 " WITH REGARD TO THE JOINT MEETING TO BE HELD MONTHLY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION, IT WAS
<br /> "
<br /> ,i SUGGESTED SUCH MEETINGS BE HELD IN CONNECTION WITH THE REGULAR MONDAY NOON PLANNING COM-
<br /> i! MISSION MEETING AND THAT THE CITY M~NAGER ARRANGE SUCH MEETINGS., COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE IN
<br /> I' I
<br /> ,I CONCURRENCE IN THIS IDEA. II
<br /> -,
<br /> :1
<br /> "
<br /> 'i
<br /> - I
<br /> " I
<br /> i,: I
<br /> :1 I
<br /> I
<br /> .j Ii
<br /> " I
<br /> '~
<br /> ,i
<br />
|