Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~206 <br /> '" e <br /> " . I,,~/ 1~/59 . .. .. . . .. <br /> - -. - ," -. - ... -- ~ -- - - - - -- - - ~ <br /> ------=---~_.- -------- ~------- <br /> ---~---~-- ----~_._- - ~-_._--~_.~---.._- ._--~-~----~------~---------- -~ ------ <br /> -- -~. --. ---- -. - . -"- -------- ~-- <br /> - --- --- ---- - - - --. - .- . - - - - . - -, - ,- - -. - - _.- .. ." .. .. <br /> - --. - - r <br /> I COUNCILMAN SWANSON WELCOMED THE STUDENTS ATTENDING fROM CAL YOUNG, WOODROW WILSON AND JEffERSON II I <br /> JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS AND SAID ARRANGEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE fOR fEWER TO BE PRESENT AT ONE TIME. THE <br /> CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED THE TEACHERS REQUESTING PERMISSION fOR THE STUDENTS TO BE PRESENT HAD BEEN II <br /> ~DVISED Of THE PROBLEMS BUT THEIR ATTENDANCE CANNOT BE PROHIBITED. <br /> \) <br /> 2 WATER USER CHARGE - A LETTER fROM MR. RALPH RODERICK WAS REAO AS fOLLOWS: j <br /> 1I1N LINE WITH THE GENERAL DISCUSSION Of THE WATER USE CHARGES AT THE COUNCIL II <br /> !I <br /> COMMITTEE MEETING ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1959, WE HAVE, TOGETHER WITH MR. ALLEN <br /> Of THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, DEVELOPED A NEW RATE WHICH WE fEEL WILL REDUCE II <br /> MANY Of mHE OBJECTIONS TO THE EXISTING ORDINANCE. II <br /> THIS REVISEO RATE WOULD ELIMINATE THE LEGAL PROBLEM Of JUSTifYING CLASSlfl- II <br /> CATIONS AS IT PROVIDES fOR JUST ONE GRADUATED RATE. THE REVISED RATE COUDD PRO- II <br /> VIDE fOR A fLAT CHARGE Of $2.00 PER MONTH fOR ALL SINGLE fAMILY RESIDENCES OR IT e <br /> I <br /> COULD REMAIN AS A $2.00 MINIMUM WITH 1,000 CUBIC fEET PER MONTH ALLOWED fOR THE i <br /> MINIMUM BASED UPON A~ AVERAGE Of THE FOUR WINTER MONTHS. fOR ALL OTHER CUSTOMERS, Ii <br /> THIS REVISED RATE WOULD BE GRADUATED, THEREBY REDUCING THE UNIT COST FOR THE <br /> USERS Of LARGE VOLUMES Of WATER. II <br /> FIRST 1,000 CUBIC fEET 0.20 PER 100 $2...00 M I N IMUM II <br /> NEXT 4,000 CUBIC FEET 0.15 PER 100 :1 <br /> NEXT 5,000 CUBIC fEET 0.10 PER 100 <br /> I NEXT 15,000 CUBIC FEET 0.075" PER 100 <br /> NEXT 25,000 CUBIC fEET I <br /> 0.05 PER 100 I <br /> ALL OVER 50,000 AT 0.03 PER 100 <br /> Ttil S RATE IS A L[TTLE HIGHER THAN THE SUGGESTED RATE USING THE EUGENE WATER I <br /> AND ELECTRIC BOARD CLASSifiCATION fOR WATER USERS AND WILL INCREASE SOMEWHAT THE <br /> CHARGE TO THOSE WHO USE FROM 10,000 TO 40,000 CUBIC fEET PER MONTH AND ARE NOW I <br /> CLASSifiED AS COMMERCIAL USERS: IT DOES, HOWEVER, REDUCE CONSIDERABLY THE RATE <br /> TO THOSE NOW CLASSIfiED AS RESIDENTIAL USERS WHOSE MONTHLY WATER USE IS IN <br /> EXCESS Of 10,000 CUBIC FEET. t <br /> \ <br /> ! <br /> A TABLE HAS BEEN PREPA~ED TO PRESENT THE ESTIMATED MONTHLY CHARGE TO A <br /> LARGE GROUP Of USERS FOR THE VARIOUS RATES. IT CAN BE SEEN THAT THE CHARGE TO <br /> THE SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, fOR INSTANCE, HAS BEEN REDUCED fROM $334.60 PER <br /> MONTH, BASED UPON THEIR RELATIVE LARGE AVERAGE WATER CONSUMPTION PER MONTH, ! <br /> TO $7Q.30 PER MONTH.L A STUDY Of THESE CHARGES fOR THESE VARIOUS USERS WILL PRE- <br /> SENT THE EFFECT OF THE REVISED RATE ON THESE USERS. <br /> You WI LL ,..NOTE I'M SURE THAT THE i~COM~ FROM THIS REVISED RATE WILL BE. I <br /> MATERIALLY REDUCED. WHILE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH THE AMOUNT Of THE <br /> INCOME TO BE PRODUCEO BY THIS CHARGE WITHOUT A COMPLETE REVIEW Of CHARGES TO I <br /> ALL USERS, IT WOULD APPEAR fROM THE RECORD OF ANNUAL WATER USAGE THAT IT WOULD <br /> 1 PRODUCE BETWEEN $400,000 AND $500,000 ANNUALLY. THIS WOULD BE SOMEWHERE IN I I <br /> I <br /> THE VICINITY Of 75 PERCENT OF THE PRESENT INCOME. I <br /> I <br /> ! IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE, Of COURSE, TO INCREASE OR DECREASE THE AMOUNT Of <br /> INCOME BY ADJUSTING THE REVISEO GRADUATED RATE. THIS SUGGESTED RATE WE BELIEVE <br /> I APPROACHES THE CHARGES SUGGESTED AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING." <br /> TABUL~TIONS WERE PRESENTED TO COUNCIL'MEMBERS AND INTERESTED CITIZENS, AND THESE TABULATIONS <br /> WERE EXPLAINED BY THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS VERBALLY AND BY GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION ON THE VARIOUS e <br /> SUGGESTED RATES, THE PRESENT RATE AND THE RATE IN EXISTENCE PRIOR TO JULY I, 1959. SOME DISCUSSION <br /> WAS HAD ON THESE RATES, AND .DURING THE COURSE Of THE DISCUSSI~N MR. BYRON PRICE, SUPERINTENDENT- <br /> SECRETARY Of THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD, GAVE HIS CONSIDERATION OF THE VARIOUS ,RATES BEFORE <br /> THE COUNCIL.. MR. PRICE STATED THAT A fLAT RATE STRUCTURE FOR SINGLE fAMILY RESIDENCES WOULD EASE I <br /> THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS CONSIDERABLY. HE OBJECTED TO A RATE PROPOSAL CONTM NING SIX STEPS AND <br /> I INDICATED THAT IT IS DiffiCULT fOR BILLING MACHINE OPERATORS ,TO FOLLOW A RATE STRUCTURE CONT~NING <br /> THIS NUMBER Of RATE CLASSIFICATIONS. HE STATED THAT A FOUR STEP RATE WOULD EASE THIS CONSIDERABLY I' <br /> AND IT APPEARED WOULD NOT MATERIALLY CHANGE THE REVENUES PRODUCED. 11 <br /> MR. PRICE ALSO STATED THAT THE $2.00 APPEARS EXCESSIVE fOR SOME PENSIONERS WHO HAVE LIMITED II <br /> INCOMES, AND HE ALSO STATED THE CITY SHOULD ENCOURAGE USE OF WATER FOR IRRIGATION ANO fOR AIR CON- <br /> DITIONING ALTHOUGH IT WAS HIS WISH THAT SEPARATE METERING BE AVOIDED fOR IRRIGATION AND AIR CONDI- <br /> TIONING PURPOSES. SOME CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS THEN HAD ON THREE PROPOSED RATES, TWO Of WHICH <br /> l ENVISIONED A RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL RATE S.TRUCTURE AND ONE Of WHIC'H WOULD BE A UNifORM RATE <br /> STRUCTURE fOR RESIDENCES AND COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS. <br /> CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON THESE VARIOUS RATE STRUCTURES AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT I <br /> ONE SUCH STRUCTURE, BEING KNOWN AS ITEM 4 REVISED RATES DEVELOPED BY THE CITY STAfF IN COOPERATION I <br /> WITH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ATTEMPT~D TO iAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE TREATMENT PLANT LOAD AND THE <br /> TYPE Of WASTE BEING DEPOSITED AT THE TREATMENT PLANT AND CHARGED ACCORDINGLY. ON THIS BASIS LARGE <br /> MULTIPLE FAMILY UNITS WOULD PAY IN PROPORTION TO THE AMOUNT OF WASTE DEPOSITED IN THE SEWER SYSTEM <br /> AND REQUIRING TREATMENT IN THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT WHILE THE RATES WOULD BE SCALED DOWN FOR <br /> VOLUME USERS IN DEPOSITING AS MUCH PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN THE TREATMENT PLANT. <br /> I -- <br /> \ II <br /> ~\, :i <br />