<br /> t)Ol ~
<br /> t&..4
<br /> e .
<br /> -.. -- - - -- -- - --- - - - -. -. 10/12/59_ u~. .u.
<br /> -- -- - - - .- . - - .. -. - - - - - - --- --- - ~----~
<br /> ~---~------~ ----_.~-- ----
<br /> ~---- -- , ---- ----
<br /> . .
<br /> ~ :
<br /> I
<br /> J B. REQUEST BY DONALD R. fURTICK FOR REZONING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF WILLAMETTE
<br /> I i:l ,
<br /> il STREET BETWEEN 29TH AND 31ST AVENUES FROM RA TO R-3 MULTIPLE fAMILY RESI- I
<br /> ~.! DENTIAL - COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES VIEWED THE AREA, AND THE COMMITTEE ,I
<br /> REVIEWED THE REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHICH RECOMMENDED THE CHANGE
<br /> I FROM RA TO R-3 MULTIPLE fAMILY RESIOENTIAL. fOLLOWING SOME SHORT DISCUS- I
<br /> I SION ON THIS, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT OF THE PLANNING I
<br /> :1
<br /> 00 '1 COMMISSION BE UPHELD AND THE AREA BE REZONED FROM RA TO R-3 MULTIPLE I
<br /> C\t :1 fAMILY RESIDENTIAL. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ~~ I
<br /> '., I
<br /> C) 2 7. REQUEST BY TRIO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON RELIEF SANI- II
<br /> CO
<br /> CO TARY SEWER IN THE 24TH AND WILLAMETTE AREA - A REQUEST FROM TRIO CONSTRUCTION I,
<br /> ASKING FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE COMPLETION DATE ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SEWER II
<br /> FROM OCTOBER I, 1959 TO OCTOBER 10, 1959 WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. THE
<br /> " II
<br /> :1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INDICATED THE EXTENSION IS NOT A CRITICAL ITEM AND
<br /> THEY WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE CONTRACT BE EX-
<br /> " il
<br /> e II MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ';1 TENDED AS REQUESTED.
<br /> ,
<br /> ,:
<br /> , B. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL ANNEXATION OF PORTION OF WILLAKENZIE AREA - MR. GLEN I
<br /> 3 il
<br /> '1 PORTER AND MR. RALPH COBB APPEARED ON BEHALF OF A COMMITTEE ON ANNEXATION FOR
<br /> r.
<br /> ~l A PORTION Of THE WILLAKENZIE AREA AND STATED THEY AND MEMBERS OF THEIR COM-
<br /> I
<br /> MITTEE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH VARIOUS PUBLIC AGENCIES ON A PROPOSED ANNEXA-
<br /> , TION OF THE WILLAKENZIE AREA TO THE CITY OF EUGENE. THEY PRESENTED A MAP
<br /> " il
<br /> I :! SHOWING AREAS WHICH THEY SUGGESTED fOR ANNEXATION AND ASKED FOR AN EXPRESSION OF
<br /> " OPINION FROM THE COUNCIL AS TO WHETHER SUCH AN ANNEXATION PROPOSAL WOULD :BE I,
<br /> :; RECEIVED FAVORABLY OR NOT. VARIOUS MEMBERS Of THE COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR EX- ,I
<br /> " PRESSED THEMSELVES fAVORABLY TOWARD SUCH AN ANNEXATION, DURING WHICH EXPRESSION J
<br /> ~ I IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE ANNEXATION WOULD PRESENT PROBLEMS AND If' THE AREA
<br /> 'I
<br /> I' WERE ANNEXED IT WOULD TAKE TIME TO SOLVE THESE PROBLEMS, BUT THAT NOTHING CAN I
<br /> ,I
<br /> ;i BE DONE UNTIL ANNEXATION IS ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHED. No fORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN 'I
<br /> ,if ON THIS SUBJECT. I
<br /> 'I
<br /> " I
<br /> 4 9! DISCUSSION Of' WATER USER CHARGE - LETTERS WERE READ FROM THE IN-LAW BUILDING
<br /> COMPANY LOCATED AT 260 EAST II TH AVENUE, FROM THE BUSINESS MANAGER OF THE I
<br /> UNIVERSITY Of OREGON, AND fROM THE CENTRAL LANE COUNTY MOTOR COURT,AsSOCIA- II
<br /> TION, ALL Of WHICH LETTERS REfERRED TO THE CHARGES MADE UNDER THE EXISTING II
<br /> ORDINANCE fOR WATER USERS. MAYOR CONE THEN STATED THAT THE COUNCIL HAD BEEN Ii
<br /> STUDYING THE WATER USER CHARGE FOR A PERIOD OF SOME TIME AND THAT TWO WEEKS Ii
<br /> BEfORE THIS MEETING HE HAD BROKEN A TIE VOTE IN fAVOR OF LEAVING THE RATES Ii
<br /> "
<br /> AS THEY ARE AT THE PRESENT TIME fOR A PERIOD Of ONE YEAR. HE FURTHER STATED "
<br /> I
<br /> THAT SINCE THAT VOTE HE HAD DONE MORE INVESTIGATING AND IS NOW Of THE OPINION 'I
<br /> !
<br /> THE COMMERCIAL RATES ARE TOO HIGH. HE STATED HE HAD VISITED THE OfFICE OF ,
<br /> THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD AND HAD REQUESTED INfORMATION fROM THEM I
<br /> AND HAD RECEIVED SUGGESTIONS fROM THE WATER BOARD STAff AS TO POSSIBLE RATES.
<br /> HE SUGGESTED THERE ARE TWO POSSIBLE AREAS WHERE CHANGES ARE NECESSARY, ONE I
<br /> i, BEING THE LARGE COMMERCIAL USERS WHO WHEN CHARGEDLON THE PRESENT fORMULA I
<br /> tI RECEIVED BILLINGS OUT Of PROPORTION, AND THE SECOND, THE LIVING ORGANIZA- I,
<br /> I " TIONS, APARTMENTS, HOTELS, MOTELS, HOSPITALS, REST HOMES, WHO HE BELIEVED
<br /> I
<br /> I:
<br /> SHOULD HAVE SOME REDUCTION IN fEE fROM THAT CURRENTLY EXISTING. IN THE :1
<br /> CONVERSATION WHICH fOLLOWED IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT PRIOT TO THE ADOPTION II
<br /> Of THE NEW ORDINANCE SOME SEWER USERS HAD PAID AN EXTREMELY LOW fEE AND 'I
<br /> THERE WAS NEED fOR A fORMULA fOR A fAIR SHARE TO BE BORNE BY ALL. I;
<br /> II
<br /> " Ii
<br /> , As A SUGGESTION WITH REFERENCE TO MOTELS, HOSPITALS, HOTELS AND OTHER EQUIVA-
<br /> LENT ORGANIZATIONS, THE COMMERCIAL RATE MIGHT BE APPLIED PLUS A fEE Of 50~
<br /> e PER ROOM WHiCH MIGHT PRODUCE SOMETHING BETWEEN THE fORMER RATE AND THE
<br /> EXISTING RATE.
<br /> SOME DISCUSSION WAS ALSO HAD AS TO THE ADVISABILITY OF USING THE SAME RATE
<br /> CLASSIfiCATION fOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AS USED BY THE EUGENE WATER
<br /> & ELECTRIC BOARD, AND SOME CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HAD AS TO T HE LEGAL
<br /> REQUIREMENTS SO THE RATES COULO BE KEPT EQUITABLE FOR THE VARIO~S CLASSlfl- I
<br /> CATIONS. DURING THIS DISCUSSION IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE CLASSifICATIONS :1
<br /> AS NOW EXISTING fOR RESIOENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ARE EQUITABLE BUT POSSIBLY
<br /> THE RATES WITHIN THE CLASSIfiCATION SHOULD BE ADJUSTED. I,
<br /> ,I I
<br /> ..!
<br /> THERE WAS FURTHER SUGGESTION THAT SOME MEANS MIGHT BE fOUND WHERE THE ESCAPE I
<br /> ,I I
<br /> " CLAUSE COULD BE REMOVED SO THAT ALL PEOPLE WOULD PAY ONTHE VOLUME Of WATER I
<br /> '/
<br /> :1 WHICH IS USED WITH THE IDEA IN MIND THAT If THE SEWER PROGRAM WERE fiNANCED I
<br /> iI
<br /> 'I BY A BOND I S S UE, SUCH PEOPLE WOULD BE PAYING fOR SUCH A PROGRAM ON THE BASIS II
<br /> ~, i
<br /> OF VALUATION AND THAT IT APPEARS THAT THE RATE STRUCTURE AND THE VALUATION II
<br /> I ,
<br /> I AND THE AMOUNTS RECEIVED FROM THE RATE STRUCTURE ARE QUITE SYNONYMOUS. Ii
<br /> ,I
<br /> fl 1
<br /> SOME DISCUSSION WAS ALSO GIVEN AS TO THE ADVISABILITY Of fLAT RATING THE I
<br /> " RESIDENTIAL AREA SINCE, ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED, SOME 9700 METERS ARE
<br /> :i
<br /> II INVOLVED AND THAT BY APPLICATION Of THE fORMULA AS IT NOW EXISTS ONLY I
<br /> APPROXIMATELY $400.00 PER MONTH ADDITIONAL REVENUE IS RECEIVED OVER THAT
<br /> WHICH WOULD BE RECEIVED If A fLAT RATE WERE IN EXISTENCE. MR. MERV VATER,
<br /> ~ ~
<br /> -- :!
<br /> " ,
<br /> I jl
<br /> ,;
<br /> ,
<br /> ,i ,I
<br /> \~
<br /> I;
<br />
|