Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> t)Ol ~ <br /> t&..4 <br /> e . <br /> -.. -- - - -- -- - --- - - - -. -. 10/12/59_ u~. .u. <br /> -- -- - - - .- . - - .. -. - - - - - - --- --- - ~----~ <br /> ~---~------~ ----_.~-- ---- <br /> ~---- -- , ---- ---- <br /> . . <br /> ~ : <br /> I <br /> J B. REQUEST BY DONALD R. fURTICK FOR REZONING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF WILLAMETTE <br /> I i:l , <br /> il STREET BETWEEN 29TH AND 31ST AVENUES FROM RA TO R-3 MULTIPLE fAMILY RESI- I <br /> ~.! DENTIAL - COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES VIEWED THE AREA, AND THE COMMITTEE ,I <br /> REVIEWED THE REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHICH RECOMMENDED THE CHANGE <br /> I FROM RA TO R-3 MULTIPLE fAMILY RESIOENTIAL. fOLLOWING SOME SHORT DISCUS- I <br /> I SION ON THIS, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT OF THE PLANNING I <br /> :1 <br /> 00 '1 COMMISSION BE UPHELD AND THE AREA BE REZONED FROM RA TO R-3 MULTIPLE I <br /> C\t :1 fAMILY RESIDENTIAL. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> ~~ I <br /> '., I <br /> C) 2 7. REQUEST BY TRIO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON RELIEF SANI- II <br /> CO <br /> CO TARY SEWER IN THE 24TH AND WILLAMETTE AREA - A REQUEST FROM TRIO CONSTRUCTION I, <br /> ASKING FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE COMPLETION DATE ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SEWER II <br /> FROM OCTOBER I, 1959 TO OCTOBER 10, 1959 WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. THE <br /> " II <br /> :1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INDICATED THE EXTENSION IS NOT A CRITICAL ITEM AND <br /> THEY WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE CONTRACT BE EX- <br /> " il <br /> e II MOTION CARRIED. <br /> ';1 TENDED AS REQUESTED. <br /> , <br /> ,: <br /> , B. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL ANNEXATION OF PORTION OF WILLAKENZIE AREA - MR. GLEN I <br /> 3 il <br /> '1 PORTER AND MR. RALPH COBB APPEARED ON BEHALF OF A COMMITTEE ON ANNEXATION FOR <br /> r. <br /> ~l A PORTION Of THE WILLAKENZIE AREA AND STATED THEY AND MEMBERS OF THEIR COM- <br /> I <br /> MITTEE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH VARIOUS PUBLIC AGENCIES ON A PROPOSED ANNEXA- <br /> , TION OF THE WILLAKENZIE AREA TO THE CITY OF EUGENE. THEY PRESENTED A MAP <br /> " il <br /> I :! SHOWING AREAS WHICH THEY SUGGESTED fOR ANNEXATION AND ASKED FOR AN EXPRESSION OF <br /> " OPINION FROM THE COUNCIL AS TO WHETHER SUCH AN ANNEXATION PROPOSAL WOULD :BE I, <br /> :; RECEIVED FAVORABLY OR NOT. VARIOUS MEMBERS Of THE COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR EX- ,I <br /> " PRESSED THEMSELVES fAVORABLY TOWARD SUCH AN ANNEXATION, DURING WHICH EXPRESSION J <br /> ~ I IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE ANNEXATION WOULD PRESENT PROBLEMS AND If' THE AREA <br /> 'I <br /> I' WERE ANNEXED IT WOULD TAKE TIME TO SOLVE THESE PROBLEMS, BUT THAT NOTHING CAN I <br /> ,I <br /> ;i BE DONE UNTIL ANNEXATION IS ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHED. No fORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN 'I <br /> ,if ON THIS SUBJECT. I <br /> 'I <br /> " I <br /> 4 9! DISCUSSION Of' WATER USER CHARGE - LETTERS WERE READ FROM THE IN-LAW BUILDING <br /> COMPANY LOCATED AT 260 EAST II TH AVENUE, FROM THE BUSINESS MANAGER OF THE I <br /> UNIVERSITY Of OREGON, AND fROM THE CENTRAL LANE COUNTY MOTOR COURT,AsSOCIA- II <br /> TION, ALL Of WHICH LETTERS REfERRED TO THE CHARGES MADE UNDER THE EXISTING II <br /> ORDINANCE fOR WATER USERS. MAYOR CONE THEN STATED THAT THE COUNCIL HAD BEEN Ii <br /> STUDYING THE WATER USER CHARGE FOR A PERIOD OF SOME TIME AND THAT TWO WEEKS Ii <br /> BEfORE THIS MEETING HE HAD BROKEN A TIE VOTE IN fAVOR OF LEAVING THE RATES Ii <br /> " <br /> AS THEY ARE AT THE PRESENT TIME fOR A PERIOD Of ONE YEAR. HE FURTHER STATED " <br /> I <br /> THAT SINCE THAT VOTE HE HAD DONE MORE INVESTIGATING AND IS NOW Of THE OPINION 'I <br /> ! <br /> THE COMMERCIAL RATES ARE TOO HIGH. HE STATED HE HAD VISITED THE OfFICE OF , <br /> THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD AND HAD REQUESTED INfORMATION fROM THEM I <br /> AND HAD RECEIVED SUGGESTIONS fROM THE WATER BOARD STAff AS TO POSSIBLE RATES. <br /> HE SUGGESTED THERE ARE TWO POSSIBLE AREAS WHERE CHANGES ARE NECESSARY, ONE I <br /> i, BEING THE LARGE COMMERCIAL USERS WHO WHEN CHARGEDLON THE PRESENT fORMULA I <br /> tI RECEIVED BILLINGS OUT Of PROPORTION, AND THE SECOND, THE LIVING ORGANIZA- I, <br /> I " TIONS, APARTMENTS, HOTELS, MOTELS, HOSPITALS, REST HOMES, WHO HE BELIEVED <br /> I <br /> I: <br /> SHOULD HAVE SOME REDUCTION IN fEE fROM THAT CURRENTLY EXISTING. IN THE :1 <br /> CONVERSATION WHICH fOLLOWED IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT PRIOT TO THE ADOPTION II <br /> Of THE NEW ORDINANCE SOME SEWER USERS HAD PAID AN EXTREMELY LOW fEE AND 'I <br /> THERE WAS NEED fOR A fORMULA fOR A fAIR SHARE TO BE BORNE BY ALL. I; <br /> II <br /> " Ii <br /> , As A SUGGESTION WITH REFERENCE TO MOTELS, HOSPITALS, HOTELS AND OTHER EQUIVA- <br /> LENT ORGANIZATIONS, THE COMMERCIAL RATE MIGHT BE APPLIED PLUS A fEE Of 50~ <br /> e PER ROOM WHiCH MIGHT PRODUCE SOMETHING BETWEEN THE fORMER RATE AND THE <br /> EXISTING RATE. <br /> SOME DISCUSSION WAS ALSO HAD AS TO THE ADVISABILITY OF USING THE SAME RATE <br /> CLASSIfiCATION fOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AS USED BY THE EUGENE WATER <br /> & ELECTRIC BOARD, AND SOME CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HAD AS TO T HE LEGAL <br /> REQUIREMENTS SO THE RATES COULO BE KEPT EQUITABLE FOR THE VARIO~S CLASSlfl- I <br /> CATIONS. DURING THIS DISCUSSION IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE CLASSifICATIONS :1 <br /> AS NOW EXISTING fOR RESIOENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ARE EQUITABLE BUT POSSIBLY <br /> THE RATES WITHIN THE CLASSIfiCATION SHOULD BE ADJUSTED. I, <br /> ,I I <br /> ..! <br /> THERE WAS FURTHER SUGGESTION THAT SOME MEANS MIGHT BE fOUND WHERE THE ESCAPE I <br /> ,I I <br /> " CLAUSE COULD BE REMOVED SO THAT ALL PEOPLE WOULD PAY ONTHE VOLUME Of WATER I <br /> '/ <br /> :1 WHICH IS USED WITH THE IDEA IN MIND THAT If THE SEWER PROGRAM WERE fiNANCED I <br /> iI <br /> 'I BY A BOND I S S UE, SUCH PEOPLE WOULD BE PAYING fOR SUCH A PROGRAM ON THE BASIS II <br /> ~, i <br /> OF VALUATION AND THAT IT APPEARS THAT THE RATE STRUCTURE AND THE VALUATION II <br /> I , <br /> I AND THE AMOUNTS RECEIVED FROM THE RATE STRUCTURE ARE QUITE SYNONYMOUS. Ii <br /> ,I <br /> fl 1 <br /> SOME DISCUSSION WAS ALSO GIVEN AS TO THE ADVISABILITY Of fLAT RATING THE I <br /> " RESIDENTIAL AREA SINCE, ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED, SOME 9700 METERS ARE <br /> :i <br /> II INVOLVED AND THAT BY APPLICATION Of THE fORMULA AS IT NOW EXISTS ONLY I <br /> APPROXIMATELY $400.00 PER MONTH ADDITIONAL REVENUE IS RECEIVED OVER THAT <br /> WHICH WOULD BE RECEIVED If A fLAT RATE WERE IN EXISTENCE. MR. MERV VATER, <br /> ~ ~ <br /> -- :! <br /> " , <br /> I jl <br /> ,; <br /> , <br /> ,i ,I <br /> \~ <br /> I; <br />