|
<br /> "".. ~
<br /> f:, ii ~'\i !~1:!10'"
<br /> ~ 1 ,.
<br /> ,,(,J Q)
<br /> e
<br /> 10/26/59
<br /> , .- --*- ,_. ----- ----- .
<br /> .--.- ".--, ,- ..---~---c. ..-. --.- - _. --- - - -~ . _. -,-_. - - - -- - ---- ---- - -- ---- -----.-- --- --- .----> - -- - -~- - -- - -- -- --- - - .f
<br /> - ----..'-- - - -.-.-.......--- -~- -- .-- - -- -
<br /> I
<br /> ;
<br /> r
<br /> I i
<br /> I THAT A FLAT RATE DISCOUNT FOR IRRIGATION BE ALLOWED AND fOR EXrSTING AIR CON-
<br /> DITIONING UNITS, TO BE COMPUTED ON AN AREA BASIS FOR IRRIGATION AND ON A
<br /> i SWUARE FOOTAGE TO BE COOLED OR ACTUAL WATER USED fOR AIR CONDITIONING. ALL
<br /> fUTURE AIR CONDITIONING INSTALLATIONS TO PAY ON THE BASIS Of ACTUAL WATER
<br /> ~l USED WITH NO DISCOUNT. FURTHER, THAT THE EffECTIVE DATE FOR NE~ BILLIN~S ON
<br /> I THE ABOVE RATES BE NOVEMBER I, 1959 AND THAT THE ORDINANCE BE EffECTIVE AS !
<br /> 0(") 1\ OF THAT DATE. Moi'ON CARRIED WIT~ COUNCILMEN CHATT AND WILSON VOTING NAY."
<br /> C"1 I
<br /> ~"".... r IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAffEY THAT ITEM 8 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br /> C) r~ APPROVED. MOTION WITHDRAWN.
<br /> ~,,'" ~
<br /> ....,...
<br /> >~ ~! IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MCGAffEY SECO~DED BY MR. SHEARER THAT DEBATE BE LIMITED TO 15 MINUTES. I
<br /> ;1 MOTION DEfEATED 3-4.
<br /> ,1
<br /> , MR. DARLING, REPRESENTING THE MOTEL OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ASKED THE COUNC'IL fOR MORE TIME
<br /> I
<br /> e I 'BEfORE FINAL ACTION IS TAKEN ON ANY ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH WATER USERS CHARGES. HE fELT
<br /> I 'I
<br /> ~ THAT UNDER THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE THE MIDDLE USERS ARE BEING PENALIZED SINCE IT APPEARS
<br /> " THERE IS SOME DEGREE OF UNfAIRNESS BECAUSE RATES fOR HIGH USERS ARE DECREASED CON- I
<br /> ~
<br /> " SIDERABLY AND RATES FOR MIDDLE USERS REM41N APPROXIMATELY THE SAME. HE STATED THAT IN
<br /> ,
<br /> ~
<br /> f, HIS OPINION THERE ARE DANGEROUS LEGAL POINTS IN THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE THAT WOULD NOT
<br /> II STAND UP IN COURT. HE SUGGESTED A 4~ END RATE ON THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE TO REMOVE IN-
<br /> fl EQUITIES TO THE MIDDLE USERS CLASS.
<br /> I I!
<br /> 11 MR. SHEARER STATED THAT IT HAD BEEN 'T~E INTENT Of THE COUNCIL TO TREAT MOTELS, HOTELS
<br /> AND LIKE BUSINESSES WHERE HUMAN WASTE IS DISCHARGED INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM IN THE SAME
<br /> 11 MANNER AS RESIDENTIAL USERS.
<br /> ~ ,
<br /> II MAYOR CONE STATED THAT THE ENGINEERS EMPHASIZED THE POINT THAT HUMAN WASTE MUST BE I
<br /> 1\
<br /> ~. TREATED DUE TO BACTERIA COUNT WHEREAS LARGER INDUSTRIAL USERS WASTE IS NOT IN MOST
<br /> 11 CASES DANGEROUS WITHOUT TREATMENT.
<br /> i,\ !
<br /> \1 AfTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION ON VARIOUS RATES WHICH MIGHT TO SOME DEGREE RECTifY THE
<br /> ,I ALLEGED BURDEN ON THE MIDDLE CLASS USERS, IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY
<br /> tl MR. McGAffEY THAT ITEM e Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE AMENDED TO PROVIDE THAT THE LAST
<br /> I STEP, OR STEP 6, IN THE RATE SCHEDULE BE CHANGED fROM 3~ TO 4~ PER C CUBIC fEET fOR
<br /> ,(
<br /> H ALL OVER 50,000 CUBIC FEET. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEN MOLHOLM~ CHATT AND SWANSON
<br /> H
<br /> 'I VOTING NAY.
<br /> IT WAS THEN MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR.' MOLHOLM THAT THE COMMITTEE REPORT
<br /> 'I BE fURTHER AMENDED TO PROVIDE THAT CREDITS AND ADJUSTMENTS BE ALLOWED BY THE EUGENE
<br /> I
<br /> -I WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD ON fUTURE BILLINGS TO ALL WATER USERS WHO HAVE PAID WATER
<br /> ~I
<br /> ,I USER CHARGES DURING THE PERIOD AUGUST I, 1959 TO NOVEMBER I, 1959 IN EXCESS OF THE
<br /> ~I AMOUNT WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED HAD THE RATE SCHEDULE ADOPTED ABOVE BEEN IN
<br /> n EfFECT, BUT THAT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE BE MADE TO ANY WATER USER WHO HAS PAID LE~S
<br /> iii
<br /> ~ THAN THE AMOUNT THE ABOVE RATE SCHEDULE WOULD HAVE REQUIRED. MOTION CARRIED,
<br /> ,I
<br /> tI MR. MCGAfFEY ABSTAINING.
<br /> I II
<br /> f' REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
<br /> I
<br /> I'
<br /> ~I !
<br /> tl A REPORT OF THE BOARD Of ApPEALS MEETING HELD OCTOBER 14, 1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READkS FOLLOWS:
<br /> I [I "THE BOARD Of ApPEALS HELD A MEETING AT THE CITY HALL, OCTOBER 14, 1959.
<br /> [I MEMBERS PRESENT WERE MR. MoRRIS, MR. PERKINS, MR. BALZHISER AND MR. HENDERSHOTT.
<br /> . - - .
<br /> e 'I I. MR. O. O. YOUNG, 820 WEST 23RD AVENUE, REQUESTS A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT
<br /> II
<br /> II 'A NEW RESIDENCE ON A LOT 60fxI50", 9000 SQUARE FEET. IT 'WAS POINTED
<br /> I'
<br /> II OUT TO MEMBERS Of THE BoARD THAT A DUPCEX WOULD BE PERMITTED ON A CORNER
<br /> f
<br /> ~I LOT IN THAT AREA. IT WAS ALSO MENTIONED THAT THERE WAS A RESIDENCE AL-
<br /> 'I
<br /> ;j READY ON THE PROPOSED BUILDING SITE.
<br /> ~!
<br /> II MEMBERS OF THE BOARD WERE DRIVEN TO THE LOCATION AND AFTER DISCUSSING
<br /> "
<br /> II THE MATTER IT WAS THE OPINION OF MR. BALZHISER THAT DIVIDING THE LOT I
<br /> :1
<br /> l! I-NTO TWO LOTS, EACH LOT WOULD HAVE AN AREA Of ONLY 4500 SQUARE FEET. I
<br /> I, DUE TO THESE~ fACTS, MR. MORRIS MADE A MOTION AND MR. B~LZHISER SECONDED :
<br /> ! THAT THE REQUEST FOR THE VARIANCE BE DENIED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ~
<br /> .'
<br /> 2 II 2. ELLEN SCHOONOVER, 1785 WEST 1.4TH--AvENUE, REQUESTS A VARIANCE IN SETBACK
<br /> Ii TO CONSTRUCT A CARPORT AT r3271r::GR~NTCSTF.!EEll~TTltN E'ElElll'd .1.00 F7~QM "He
<br /> II F.'RONiI!C;p~OeItRl:1tCEJNEi':f:;,f: ',,<:',... ~,:: '. :'" .~. L ~~ ": C:.o' ':
<br /> I
<br /> I fl AFTER VIEWING THE PLOT PLAN, IT WAS AGREED UPON BY ALL MEMBERS THAT BY
<br /> REMOVING A SECTION OF FENCE, WHICH IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH OUR ZONING I
<br /> ~I ORDINANCE, THERE WOULD BE AMPLE ROOM TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED CARPORT
<br /> ;1
<br /> :1 AND COMPLY WITH ALL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. MR. BALZHISER MADE A MOTION
<br /> AND IT WAS SECONDED BY MR. HENDERSHOTT THAT THE REQUEST fOR VARIANCE
<br /> ~I BE DENIED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> e I
<br /> tl
<br /> :.I
<br /> /' !~
<br /> .1
<br />
|