Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~258 <br /> e <br /> 12j.'4/59 <br /> H <br /> " <br /> 'I <br /> I I <br /> A. 12TH AVENUE AND GARFIEL~,STREET I <br /> NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST ~ORNERS STOPPING EAST AND WEST ~OUND TRAFFIC ON !I <br /> 12TH AVENUE ENTERING GARfiELD STREET <br /> II <br /> " . <br /> I 13TH AVENUE AND HAYES AND GRANT STREETS /1 <br /> B. I: <br /> I NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS STOPPING NORTH.AND SOUTH BOUND TRAFFIC II <br /> I <br /> I ON HAYES AND GRANT STREETS ENTERING 13TH AVENUE II <br /> jl <br /> C. 13TH AVENUE AND GARFt ELD STREET I <br /> I (I) SOUTHEAST CORNER STOPPING NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC ON GARFIELD STREET ! <br /> i <br /> ENTERIN~ 13TH AVENUE 1\ <br /> I (2) SOUTHWEST CORNER STOPPING EASTBOUND TRAFFIC ON 13TH AVENUE ENTER- <br /> ING GARFIELD STREET <br /> I (3) NORTHWEST CORNER STOPPING SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC ON GARFIELD STREET Ii <br /> I ENTERING 13TH AVENUE, T~IS STOP SIGN TO BE ON A TEMPORAR~ BA~IS II <br /> UNTIL THE 11TH-13TH AVENUE ONE-WAY COUPLET IS IN EFFECT WHEN SOUTH- L <br /> I BOUND TRAFFIC ON GARfiELD STREET SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO fLOW FREE ONTO Ii e <br /> 13TH AVENUE. :1 <br /> 13TH AVENUE AND ARTHUR STREET <br /> D. Ij <br /> NORTHWEST CORNER STOPPING SOUTHBOUND TRAffiC ON ARTHUR STREET ENTERING II <br /> 13TH AVENUE, THIS TO PREVENT A BYPASS OF GARFIELD STREET AND ~HE USE df <br /> I <br /> AN UNIMPROVED STREET AS A THROUGH STREET 'I <br /> !I I <br /> I THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE STOP SIGNS BE II <br /> INSTALLED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE I' <br /> TRAFFIC ENGI~EER. MOTION CARRIED, MR. SWANSON VOTING NAY AFTER STATING HE I S IN II <br /> ,. . 13TH AVENUE AND ARTHUR <br /> FAVOR OF ALL THE STOP SIGN INSTALLATIONS EXCEPT THE ONE AT r1 <br /> STREET. II <br /> II <br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT [I <br /> ITEMS 3 AND 4 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT ! <br /> b <br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. il <br /> I :1 <br /> I I 5. REQUEST BY FIRE CHIEF TO PURCHASE FIRE TRUCK FROM CITY OF ROSEBURG - THE FIRE I, <br /> CHIEF EXPLAINED THAT HE AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT MECHANIC HAD EXAMINED 'A '1958 II <br /> 1000-GA~LON PUMPER WHICH HAD BEEN DAMAGED BY THE EXPLOSION AND FIRE IN ROSEBURG " <br /> 1/ <br /> AND WHICH COULD BE PURCHASED FOR $3000. IT WAS. HIS OPiNION THAT THIS PIECE OF II <br /> EQUIPMENT COULD BE RESTORED TO 'NEARLY NEWCQNDITION IN EUGENE'S FIRE DEPARTMENT I, <br /> SHOP AT VERY LITTLE EXPENSE AND WOULD RESULT IN THE 'C,TY'S OWNING A PIECE OF II <br /> Ii <br /> EQUIPMENT THAT WOULD BE WORTH APPROXIMATELY $20,000. HE STATED THAT THIS TRUCK I' <br /> WOULD REPLACE A 1941 TRUCK WHICH IS NOW IN USE AND WOULD CERTAINLY BE NECESSARY II <br /> I IN THE NEAR FUTURE, PARTICULARLY If PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS MATERIALIZE. IT WAS Ii <br /> EXPLAINED'THAT FUNDS COULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FROM. THE EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT II <br /> I BODGET FOR THE PURCHASE OF THIS PIECE OF EQUIPMENT SINCE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT Ii <br /> I <br /> I HAD A $2300 BUDGET ITEM fOR THE PURCHASE Of 'AUTOMOBILES AND A $2000 BUDGET ITEM Ii <br /> I It <br /> I FOR fiRE HOSE. IT WAS STATED THAT SINCE THE DEPARTMENT HAS RECENTLY ACQUIRED I: <br /> A PONTIAC WHICH HAD BEEN RETURNED TO THEM BY THE DIRECTOR Of CiVIL DEFENSE, II <br /> i THEIR TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM IS NOT CRITICAL ANO THE PURCHASE OF NEW F~RE HOSE :1 <br /> I <br /> I COULD BE DELAYED WITHOUT IMPAIRING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE DEPARTMENT. THE COM- I <br /> i II <br /> I MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO PURCHASE <br /> I II <br /> I THE FIRE TRUCK FROM ROSEBURG FOR $3000. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> I Ii <br /> :j <br /> I MR. SHEARER COMMENDED THE FJRECHIEf FOR HIS VIGILANCE AND RESOURCEfULNESS. <br /> , II <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 5 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br /> I APPROVED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTiON CARRIED. <br /> I 'I <br /> 2 I 6. PINBALL MACHINES - THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISION I, e <br /> 'I <br /> I WHICH LEGALIZED FREE PLAY PINBALL MACHINES. THE CITY ATTORNEY STATED THAT HE j; <br /> WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE C,TY NOT ISSUE ANY LICENSES FOR PINBALL MACHINES UN- II <br /> I TIL HE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO STUDY THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN ITS ENTIRETY. Ij <br /> I 'I <br /> I No ACTION WAS TAKEN." ji <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR.' CHATT THAT ITEM 6 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE II <br /> I :1 <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. Ii <br /> I q <br /> I MR. KENNETH POOLE, ATTORNEY FOR SIX PINBALL OPERATORS, STATED THESE OPERATORS DO NOT IN- i! <br /> TEND TO APPLY FOR LICENSES UNTIL AFTER JANUARY I~ 1960 AND WOULD BE GLAD TO MEET WITH THE II <br /> COUNCIL OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES TO DISCUSS THIS SUBJECT. I: <br /> !I <br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> I' <br /> 3 A REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD DECEMBER 9, 1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS Ii I <br /> FOLLOWS: Ii <br /> liTHE BOARD Of ApPEALS HELD A MEETING AT THE CITY HALL, DEC~BER 9, I' <br /> 1959. I <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT WERE MR. MORRIS, MR. HENDERSHOTT AND MR. :BALZHISER. <br /> I. MR. JACK W. GOSSARD, 2955 OAK STREET, REQUESTS A VARIANCE I <br /> IN LOT WIDTH I <br /> II <br /> TO BUICD A RESIDENCE ON A LOT 55'XI30' LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF II <br /> WEST 30TH AVENUE BETWEEN OLIVE AND CHARNELTON. - <br /> " <br /> I' <br /> i: <br /> /1 <br /> ~ .' <br />