<br /> ;Q;71~
<br /> e
<br /> 12/28/59
<br /> -- - - - - - ~ -~- - - --.- .. .
<br /> , . . --- --.- - -- f
<br /> :,
<br /> :1
<br /> I !l
<br /> II ,
<br /> [, I
<br /> I r! 3. REQUEST BY L. LOVELL FOR CURB SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE Of 32ND AVENUE BETWEEN I
<br /> "' UNIVERSITY AND ONYX STREETS - A REQUEST FROM MR. LOVELL TO ALLOW HIM TO :1
<br /> IN-
<br /> ~ I STALL CURB SIDEWALKS ON THE NORTH SIDE Of 32ND AVENUE BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND
<br /> I I,
<br /> ONYX STREETS WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COM- \!
<br /> MITTEE DROVE TO THt AREA TO INSPECT THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK. IN THE ;1
<br /> VIEWING IT WAS NOTED THAT OTHER SIDEWALKS IN THIS AREA HAVE BEEN BUILT WITH Ii
<br /> :: THE NORMAL SETBACK FROM THE CURB AND IT WAS FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT THE il
<br /> "
<br /> Q() ': COUNCILHAD REFUSED REQUESTS FOR CURB SIDEWALKS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 32ND AVE-
<br /> ,
<br /> N NUT BETWEEN KINCAID AND HARRIS STREETS AND ON HARRI S STREET fROM NOB COURT TO II
<br /> ~ 30TH AVENUE. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS II
<br /> , ITEM AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED II
<br /> U THAT THE SIDEWALK BE !
<br /> CO I INSTALLED AT THE NORMAL LOCATION AND THAT THE REQUEST II
<br /> c.:.'j BE DENIED. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEN MCGAFFEY AND CHATT VOTING NAY. \i
<br /> I
<br /> :1
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REPOR~ ,I
<br /> I
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEN MCGAffEY AND CHATT VOTING NAY.
<br /> : I
<br /> p
<br /> e 2 A. PETITION FOR CHANGE IN SIDEWALK LOCATION FROM STANDARD TO CURB ON WEST SIDE ,
<br /> OF JACKSON STREET FROM 18TH TO 19TH AVENUE - COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES VIEWED I
<br /> THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON WHICH A PETITION HAD BEEN RECEIVED FOR I
<br /> LOCATION ONLY SIGNED BY 100% OF THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY. IT WAS
<br /> I' NOTED THAT SIDEWALKS IN THIS AREA AND ON JACKSON STREET ARE A~L SET BACK AT I
<br /> I II
<br /> , THE NORMAL LOCATION, AND THAT FENCES AND BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN LOCATED WITH THE
<br /> "
<br /> NORMAL SIDEWALK LOCATION IN MIND. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST
<br /> I , BE DENIED AND THE STANDARD SIDEWALK LOCATION BE ADHERED TO. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> UNANIMOUSLY. I
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> 3 5. REQUEST BY RICHARD K. "GUSKE TO PURCHASE REMAINING PORTION Of LOT 9, BLOCK 3, I
<br /> PEARL ADDITION, BEING THAT PART WHICH LIES NORTH OF THE AMAZON AND WEST OF II
<br /> PEARL STREET AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 17TH AVENUE AND PEARL STREET - MR. I.
<br /> ~ RICHARD GUSKE, WHO RECENTLY PURCHASED THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK II
<br /> I
<br /> 3, PEARL ADDITION, HAS NOW REQUESTED AND OFFERED TO PURCHASE THE NORTHERLY I
<br /> SECTION OF THE SAME LOT WHICH LIES NORTH OF THE AMAZON. FOR THIS ADDITIONAL
<br /> .' I
<br /> I AREA HE OFFERS THE SUM OF $575.00. COMMITTEE MEMBERS DROVE TO AND OBSERVED II
<br /> THE SITE ALTHOUGH IT APPEARS ON AN ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION THAT THE CITY
<br /> HAS MORE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE AMAZON THAN THAT WHICH MR. GUSKE
<br /> !I HAD OFFERED TO PURCHASE. FOR THIS REASON IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE ITEM BE I
<br /> I HELD OVER PENDING SUCH TIME AS ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS COULD BE HAD WITH ,
<br /> I
<br /> , THE GUSKES. MOTl ON CARR I ED. II
<br /> i
<br /> "
<br /> " II
<br /> 4 ,i 6. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS OPENED DECEMBER 22, 1959 ON PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS - THE II
<br /> , COMMITTEE GAVE CONSIDERATION TO THREE BIDS WHICH HAD BEEN OPENED DECEMBER 22, II
<br /> 1959 BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR~MENT. THE FIRST BID WAS FOR A SANITARY SEWER II
<br /> IN THE AREA BETWEEN AGATE AND COLUMBIA STREETS FROMBETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH AVE- "
<br /> Ii
<br /> NUES TO BETWEEN 27TH AND 28TH AVENUES ON WHICH MR. M. J. BUTTS WAS THE LOW
<br /> BIDDER AT A PRICE Of $2528.25. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS INDICATED THIS II
<br /> ,I IS A JaB WHICH HAD BEEN REBID AND IN HIS OPINION WAS THE LOWEST BID WHICH ii
<br /> , WOULD BE RECEIVED. THE COMMI~TEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE SANITARY SEWER IN THE I
<br /> , I,
<br /> I ABOVE DESCRIBED AREA BE AWARDED TO M. J. BUTTS AT A BID PRICE OF $2528.25. I'
<br /> Ii
<br /> MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCI~N MOLHOLM ABSTAINING. II
<br /> ,I
<br /> .I
<br /> II
<br /> , THE SECOND BID WAS ON A STORM SEWER ON 20TH AVENUE FROM POLK TO TAYLOR STREET r
<br /> I
<br /> il WHICH ALSO WAS BID BY M. J. BUTTS AS THE LOW BIDDER AT A CONTRACT COST OF II
<br /> .t
<br /> $2037.50. IT WAS NOTED THAT THIS WAS WITHIN THE AMOUNT BUDGETED AND IT WAS
<br /> RECOMMENDED THAT THE AWARD BE MADE TO M. J. BUTTS AT A PRICE Of $2037.50. :/
<br /> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I
<br /> I
<br /> e I
<br /> THE THIRD BID WAS ON A SIDEWALK IN THE WASHINGTON PARK AREA, ON THE EAST SIDE I,
<br /> OF WASHINGTON STREET FROM 19TH TO 21ST AVENUE; WEST SIDE OF LAWRENCE STREET J'
<br /> II
<br /> fROM 19TH TO 21ST AVENUE; SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH AVENUE fROM LAWRENCE TO WASHINGTON ;1
<br /> STRE[T; NORTH SIDE OF 21ST AVENUE fROM LAWRENCE TO WASHINGTON STREET; BID BY II
<br /> , K. A. WARDELL AS THE LOW BIDDER ATA PRICE OF $3159.75. IT WAS NOTED THAT !I
<br /> THIS ITEM WAS ~ITHIN THE AMOUNT BUDGETED AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE AWARD BE I,
<br /> MADE TO K.A.WARDELL ON THE BASIS-Of HIS BID Of $3159.75. MOTION CARRIED UNANI- \1
<br /> MOUSLY.
<br /> I'
<br /> .,
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 4, 5 AND 6 OF THE COMMITTEE 11
<br /> ; I:
<br /> :' REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTl ON CARRI ED.
<br /> 7. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES
<br /> 5 1,; IN AIR POLLUTION ORDINANCE AND fiRE PRE- I'
<br /> IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE EXISTING AIR POLLUTION ORDINANCE AND Ii
<br /> VENTION CODE - 'I
<br /> -, I,
<br /> I FIRE PREVENT10N CODE ARE IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES SOMEWHAT IN OPPOSITION AND
<br /> , II
<br /> I THAT AMENDMENTS'TO THE TWO SETS. OF REGULATIONS HAD BEEN PROPOSED WHICH WOULD' Ii
<br /> MAKE THEM COMPATIBLE. THESE AMENDMENTS WERE READ IN FULL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY II
<br /> AND BY THE AIR POLLUTION INSPECTOR AND DISCUSS10N ON THE AMENDMENTS WAS HAD BY II
<br /> REPRESENTATIVES Of THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, THE AIR POLLUTION INSPECTOR, THE CITY
<br /> ATTORNEY AND THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. FOLLOWING SUCH DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOM- II
<br /> I,
<br /> MENDED THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THESE ORDINANCES AND TO THE CITY CODE Ii
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br /> ,
<br /> "
<br /> '.1
<br /> e II
<br /> I,
<br /> 1\
<br /> ,I
<br /> !\~
<br />
|