Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ;Q;71~ <br /> e <br /> 12/28/59 <br /> -- - - - - - ~ -~- - - --.- .. . <br /> , . . --- --.- - -- f <br /> :, <br /> :1 <br /> I !l <br /> II , <br /> [, I <br /> I r! 3. REQUEST BY L. LOVELL FOR CURB SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE Of 32ND AVENUE BETWEEN I <br /> "' UNIVERSITY AND ONYX STREETS - A REQUEST FROM MR. LOVELL TO ALLOW HIM TO :1 <br /> IN- <br /> ~ I STALL CURB SIDEWALKS ON THE NORTH SIDE Of 32ND AVENUE BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND <br /> I I, <br /> ONYX STREETS WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COM- \! <br /> MITTEE DROVE TO THt AREA TO INSPECT THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK. IN THE ;1 <br /> VIEWING IT WAS NOTED THAT OTHER SIDEWALKS IN THIS AREA HAVE BEEN BUILT WITH Ii <br /> :: THE NORMAL SETBACK FROM THE CURB AND IT WAS FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT THE il <br /> " <br /> Q() ': COUNCILHAD REFUSED REQUESTS FOR CURB SIDEWALKS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 32ND AVE- <br /> , <br /> N NUT BETWEEN KINCAID AND HARRIS STREETS AND ON HARRI S STREET fROM NOB COURT TO II <br /> ~ 30TH AVENUE. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS II <br /> , ITEM AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED II <br /> U THAT THE SIDEWALK BE ! <br /> CO I INSTALLED AT THE NORMAL LOCATION AND THAT THE REQUEST II <br /> c.:.'j BE DENIED. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEN MCGAFFEY AND CHATT VOTING NAY. \i <br /> I <br /> :1 <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REPOR~ ,I <br /> I <br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEN MCGAffEY AND CHATT VOTING NAY. <br /> : I <br /> p <br /> e 2 A. PETITION FOR CHANGE IN SIDEWALK LOCATION FROM STANDARD TO CURB ON WEST SIDE , <br /> OF JACKSON STREET FROM 18TH TO 19TH AVENUE - COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES VIEWED I <br /> THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON WHICH A PETITION HAD BEEN RECEIVED FOR I <br /> LOCATION ONLY SIGNED BY 100% OF THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY. IT WAS <br /> I' NOTED THAT SIDEWALKS IN THIS AREA AND ON JACKSON STREET ARE A~L SET BACK AT I <br /> I II <br /> , THE NORMAL LOCATION, AND THAT FENCES AND BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN LOCATED WITH THE <br /> " <br /> NORMAL SIDEWALK LOCATION IN MIND. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST <br /> I , BE DENIED AND THE STANDARD SIDEWALK LOCATION BE ADHERED TO. MOTION CARRIED. II <br /> UNANIMOUSLY. I <br /> I <br /> , <br /> 3 5. REQUEST BY RICHARD K. "GUSKE TO PURCHASE REMAINING PORTION Of LOT 9, BLOCK 3, I <br /> PEARL ADDITION, BEING THAT PART WHICH LIES NORTH OF THE AMAZON AND WEST OF II <br /> PEARL STREET AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 17TH AVENUE AND PEARL STREET - MR. I. <br /> ~ RICHARD GUSKE, WHO RECENTLY PURCHASED THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK II <br /> I <br /> 3, PEARL ADDITION, HAS NOW REQUESTED AND OFFERED TO PURCHASE THE NORTHERLY I <br /> SECTION OF THE SAME LOT WHICH LIES NORTH OF THE AMAZON. FOR THIS ADDITIONAL <br /> .' I <br /> I AREA HE OFFERS THE SUM OF $575.00. COMMITTEE MEMBERS DROVE TO AND OBSERVED II <br /> THE SITE ALTHOUGH IT APPEARS ON AN ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION THAT THE CITY <br /> HAS MORE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE AMAZON THAN THAT WHICH MR. GUSKE <br /> !I HAD OFFERED TO PURCHASE. FOR THIS REASON IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE ITEM BE I <br /> I HELD OVER PENDING SUCH TIME AS ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS COULD BE HAD WITH , <br /> I <br /> , THE GUSKES. MOTl ON CARR I ED. II <br /> i <br /> " <br /> " II <br /> 4 ,i 6. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS OPENED DECEMBER 22, 1959 ON PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS - THE II <br /> , COMMITTEE GAVE CONSIDERATION TO THREE BIDS WHICH HAD BEEN OPENED DECEMBER 22, II <br /> 1959 BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR~MENT. THE FIRST BID WAS FOR A SANITARY SEWER II <br /> IN THE AREA BETWEEN AGATE AND COLUMBIA STREETS FROMBETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH AVE- " <br /> Ii <br /> NUES TO BETWEEN 27TH AND 28TH AVENUES ON WHICH MR. M. J. BUTTS WAS THE LOW <br /> BIDDER AT A PRICE Of $2528.25. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS INDICATED THIS II <br /> ,I IS A JaB WHICH HAD BEEN REBID AND IN HIS OPINION WAS THE LOWEST BID WHICH ii <br /> , WOULD BE RECEIVED. THE COMMI~TEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE SANITARY SEWER IN THE I <br /> , I, <br /> I ABOVE DESCRIBED AREA BE AWARDED TO M. J. BUTTS AT A BID PRICE OF $2528.25. I' <br /> Ii <br /> MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCI~N MOLHOLM ABSTAINING. II <br /> ,I <br /> .I <br /> II <br /> , THE SECOND BID WAS ON A STORM SEWER ON 20TH AVENUE FROM POLK TO TAYLOR STREET r <br /> I <br /> il WHICH ALSO WAS BID BY M. J. BUTTS AS THE LOW BIDDER AT A CONTRACT COST OF II <br /> .t <br /> $2037.50. IT WAS NOTED THAT THIS WAS WITHIN THE AMOUNT BUDGETED AND IT WAS <br /> RECOMMENDED THAT THE AWARD BE MADE TO M. J. BUTTS AT A PRICE Of $2037.50. :/ <br /> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I <br /> I <br /> e I <br /> THE THIRD BID WAS ON A SIDEWALK IN THE WASHINGTON PARK AREA, ON THE EAST SIDE I, <br /> OF WASHINGTON STREET FROM 19TH TO 21ST AVENUE; WEST SIDE OF LAWRENCE STREET J' <br /> II <br /> fROM 19TH TO 21ST AVENUE; SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH AVENUE fROM LAWRENCE TO WASHINGTON ;1 <br /> STRE[T; NORTH SIDE OF 21ST AVENUE fROM LAWRENCE TO WASHINGTON STREET; BID BY II <br /> , K. A. WARDELL AS THE LOW BIDDER ATA PRICE OF $3159.75. IT WAS NOTED THAT !I <br /> THIS ITEM WAS ~ITHIN THE AMOUNT BUDGETED AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE AWARD BE I, <br /> MADE TO K.A.WARDELL ON THE BASIS-Of HIS BID Of $3159.75. MOTION CARRIED UNANI- \1 <br /> MOUSLY. <br /> I' <br /> ., <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 4, 5 AND 6 OF THE COMMITTEE 11 <br /> ; I: <br /> :' REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTl ON CARRI ED. <br /> 7. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES <br /> 5 1,; IN AIR POLLUTION ORDINANCE AND fiRE PRE- I' <br /> IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE EXISTING AIR POLLUTION ORDINANCE AND Ii <br /> VENTION CODE - 'I <br /> -, I, <br /> I FIRE PREVENT10N CODE ARE IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES SOMEWHAT IN OPPOSITION AND <br /> , II <br /> I THAT AMENDMENTS'TO THE TWO SETS. OF REGULATIONS HAD BEEN PROPOSED WHICH WOULD' Ii <br /> MAKE THEM COMPATIBLE. THESE AMENDMENTS WERE READ IN FULL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY II <br /> AND BY THE AIR POLLUTION INSPECTOR AND DISCUSS10N ON THE AMENDMENTS WAS HAD BY II <br /> REPRESENTATIVES Of THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, THE AIR POLLUTION INSPECTOR, THE CITY <br /> ATTORNEY AND THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. FOLLOWING SUCH DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOM- II <br /> I, <br /> MENDED THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THESE ORDINANCES AND TO THE CITY CODE Ii <br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> , <br /> " <br /> '.1 <br /> e II <br /> I, <br /> 1\ <br /> ,I <br /> !\~ <br />